Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence


Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 1918 > January 1918 Decisions > G.R. No. L-12926 January 21, 1918 - UNITED STATES v. TOMAS DOMINGO 1st ET AL.

037 Phil 446:




PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

FIRST DIVISION

[G.R. No. L-12926. January 21, 1918. ]

THE UNITED STATES, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. TOMAS DOMINGO 1st ET AL., Defendants-Appellants.

Iñigo Bitanga for Appellants.

Acting Attorney-General Paredes for Appellee.

SYLLABUS


1. CRIMINAL LAW; HOMICIDE. — In a dispute over the possession of land, V was assaulted and killed by the seventeen defendants. Four of them (one other having died during the appeal) who struck V held guilty as principals and the twelve others, who stood around brandishing their clubs to keep V and his companions from escaping, held guilty as accomplices.


D E C I S I O N


MALCOLM, J. :


This is an appeal by the seventeen defendants from a judgment rendered by the Honorable Francisco Santamaria, judge of the Third Judicial District, finding Tomas Domingo the First, Tomas Domingo the Second, Catalino Domingo, Isidro Domingo, and Teodoro Domingo guilty as principals of the crime of homicide and sentencing each of them to imprisonment for a period of twelve years and one day of reclusion temporal, with the accessory penalties provided by law, and finding Luciano Tolentino, Policarpio Domingo, Donato Pascua, Rosendo Quelnat, Servando Viernes, Anacleto Pascua, Cesareo Domingo, Geronimo Viernes, Eugenio Julian, Marciano Mateo, Bruno Mateo, and Fortunato Mateo guilty as accomplices of the crime of homicide, and sentencing each of them to imprisonment for a period of six years and one day of prison mayor, with the accessory penalties provided by law. The five principals were further condemned jointly to indemnify the heirs of the deceased Pio Victoriano in the amount of P1,000. Finally, each of the defendants was sentenced to pay one seventeenth part of the costs. During the pendency of the appeal, Teodorico Domingo died, and the appeal as to him has been dismissed with one seventeenth part of the costs de officio.

We find the facts to be as follows: A certain piece of land in the municipality of Piddig, Ilocos Norte, had been sought as a homestead by two factions. In November, 1916, the property apparently was held in the name of Caridad Bolibol, widow of Lorenzo Andres. Rice had been planted on the property by the servants of the widow. Members of the opposing party, including Pio Victoriano, coming upon the land on November 11, 1916, proceeded to harvest the rice. The retainers of Caridad Bolibol offered objection but no serious trouble ensued. That same night it is probable that the adherents of Caridad Bolibol gathered at the house of Tomas Domingo the First, the lieutenant of the barrio, and received instructions from him to meet early on the following morning so as to kill their enemies from Laoag. At any rate, on the following day, November 12, 1916, the seventeen defendants proceeded to the field in question. Meeting Pio Victoriano and his companions, Tomas Domingo the First exclaimed in a loud voice, "Here are the people of Laoag; take your clubs and we will kill them all." Thereupon, Tomas Domingo the First and those with him attacked Pio Victoriano and his companions and so seriously assaulted Victoriano as to cause his death soon after. Tomas Domingo the First Tomas Domingo the Second, Catalino Domingo, Isidro Domingo, and Teodoro Domingo were those who struck Victoriano on the head and hit him after he was down. The other twelve stood around, brandishing their clubs to keep their victim from escaping.

The defendants tried to convince the lower court that four of their number were attacked by four of the men of Laoag, that those four defendants in self-defense each struck one of their adversaries, and that immediately each of those four defendants was seized and held by two other defendants to prevent further fighting. This story, however, is unreasonable, and is inconsistent with the facts substantiated by numerous witnesses for the prosecution, and corroborated by the statements of the defendants directly after the affray and the presence of fourteen clubs picked upon the police in this field after the fight. While there may be some questions as to the exact cause and details of the homicide, there is certainly none as to the criminal responsibility of the defendants.

The lower court convicted the defendants of homicide qualified by no aggravating circumstance and mitigated by the circumstance of lack of education. It would be possible, in accordance with the proof, to find the defendants guilty of murder because of the presence of premeditation. It might be possible also to make use of the aggravating circumstance of advantage being taken of superior strength. But there existing in the minds of a majority of the court some doubt as to the concurrence of premeditation and of any aggravating circumstance, such doubt must be resolved in favor of the accused. It results, therefore, that the penalty imposed by the lower court on the four principals and the twelve accomplices is in accordance with law. One exception to this statement is regarding the order of the court that the principals pay jointly an indemnity of P1,000 to the heirs of the deceased Pio Victoriano. Article 125 of the Penal Code makes no such distinction between the civil liability of principals and accomplices. Accordingly, this order of the lower court must be modified so as to make the defendants and appellants liable in solidum in the order established in said article 125 to pay an indemnity of P1,000 to the heirs of the deceased Pio Victoriano. Each defendant and appellant shall pay one-seventeenth part of the costs of this instance with one-seventeenth part of the costs declared de officio. So ordered.

Arellano, C.J., Torres, Johnson, Araullo, Street, and Avanceña, JJ., concur.




Back to Home | Back to Main




















chanrobles.com





ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com






January-1918 Jurisprudence                 

  • G.R. No. L-11109 January 7, 1918 - AMADEO MATUTE v. CHEONG BOO

    037 Phil 372

  • G.R. No. 12936 January 10, 1918 - UNITED STATES v. MARIANO BATUNGBACAL

    037 Phil 382

  • G.R. No. L-11732 January 12, 1918 - FLORENCIO GONZALEZ DIEZ v. VICENTE DELGADO, ET AL.

    037 Phil 389

  • G.R. No. 13398 January 14, 1918 - DIRECTOR OF LANDS v. LEOCADIA MAURERA

    037 Phil 410

  • G.R. No. L-11328 January 15, 1918 - RUFINA CAUSING v. ALFONSO BENCER

    037 Phil 417

  • G.R. No. L-11519 January 17, 1918 - CITY OF MANILA v. J.C. RUYMANN

    037 Phil 421

  • G.R. No. L-11354 January 19, 1918 - BEHN v. IRA L. DAVIS, ET AL.

    037 Phil 431

  • G.R. No. L-12151 January 19, 1918 - ADRIANO BUENAVENTURA Y DEZOLLIER v. ANTONIO DAVID y ABELIDO

    037 Phil 435

  • G.R. No. L-11624 January 21, 1918 - E. M. BACHRACH v. "LA PROTECTORA" ET AL.

    037 Phil 441

  • G.R. No. L-12926 January 21, 1918 - UNITED STATES v. TOMAS DOMINGO 1st ET AL.

    037 Phil 446

  • G.R. No. L-12990 January 21, 1918 - UNITED STATES v. LAZARO JAVIER ET AL.

    037 Phil 449

  • G.R. No. 13217 January 21, 1918 - UNITED STATES v. TIMOTEO SANTOS

    037 Phil 453

  • G.R. No. L-12858 January 22, 1918 - UNITED STATES v. SANTIAGO PINEDA

    037 Phil 456

  • G.R. No. L-13082 January 22, 1918 - UNITED STATES v. WENCESLAO DUMAUA ET AL.

    037 Phil 466

  • G.R. No. L-13283 January 23, 1918 - CASIMIRO BAYANI v. INSULAR COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS

    037 Phil 468

  • G.R. No. L-11362 January 24, 1918 - H.L. KRIEDT v. E.C. McCULLOUGH & CO.

    037 Phil 474

  • G.R. No. L-12988 January 24, 1918 - UNITED STATES v. SARIKALA

    037 Phil 486

  • G.R. No. L-11102 January 28, 1918 - H. C. BEST v. LIZARRAGA HERMANOS

    037 Phil 491

  • G.R. No. L-11887 January 28, 1918 - CEFERINO ESTIVA Y ANISTA v. MARTIN ALVERO

    037 Phil 497

  • G.R. No. L-12979 January 28, 1918 - UNITED STATES v. SITO BALMES

    037 Phil 504

  • G.R. No. L-11310 January 31, 1918 - CARLOS PALANCA v. FRED WILSON & CO.

    037 Phil 506

  • G.R. No. L-12954 January 31, 1918 - UNITED STATES v. CHU LOY, ET AL.

    037 Phil 510

  • G.R. No. 12252 January 8, 1918 - SEGUNDA DE LOS SANTOS, ET AL. v. FERNANDO SANTA TERESA

    044 Phil 811

  • G.R. No. 11889 January 10, 1918 - GOVERNMENT OF THE PHIL. ISLANDS v. CARMEN MARTINEZ,ET AL.

    044 Phil 817