January 1930 - Philippine Supreme Court Decisions/Resolutions
Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence
Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 1930 > January 1930 Decisions >
G.R. No. 32622 January 16, 1930 - PROVINCE OF SURIGAO v. GERVASIO DIAZ
054 Phil 249:
054 Phil 249:
EN BANC
[G.R. No. 32622. January 16, 1930.]
THE PROVINCE OF SURIGAO, Petitioner, v. HONORABLE GERVASIO DIAZ, Judge of the Court of First Instance of Surigao, Respondent.
Provincial Fiscal Ceniza, for Petitioner.
The respondent Judge in his own behalf.
SYLLABUS
1. COURTS, JURISDICTION; POWER OF COURTS TO ORDER A PROVINCIAL PRISONER CONFINED IN BILIBID PRISON. — A court is without authority to order one convicted of a violation of the Opium Law, and properly a provincial prisoner, confined in Bilibid Prison.
2. ID.; ID.; ID.; ID. — The power conferred by section 1750 of the Administrative Code on the Governor-General to order prisoners transferred from provincial or municipal jails to an insular prison does not confer power on a Judge of First Instance to do so.
2. ID.; ID.; ID.; ID. — The power conferred by section 1750 of the Administrative Code on the Governor-General to order prisoners transferred from provincial or municipal jails to an insular prison does not confer power on a Judge of First Instance to do so.
D E C I S I O N
MALCOLM, J.:
These are certiorari proceedings begun by the Provincial Fiscal of Surigao to determine if the Judge of First Instance of Surigao acted without jurisdiction in ordering one convicted of a violation of the Opium Law, and properly a provincial prisoner, confined in Bilibid Prison.
In the Court of First Instance of Surigao, Pedro Ceda pleaded guilty to an information charging him with the smoking of opium. The judgment of the trial court sentenced the accused to three months’ imprisonment, and to pay a fine of P300, with subsidiary imprisonment in case of insolvency. "Taking into account that the accused is a Filipino and is addicted to the vice of smoking opium," said the judge, "it is ordered that the accused extinguish the penalty in Bilibid Prison, Manila, so that in said institution he may be cured of the opium habit."cralaw virtua1aw library
The law in force in the Philippines since July 1st, 1914, restricting the use, possession, and importation of opium and its derivatives is Act No. 2381. Turning to this law, it is found to name specific penalties of imprisonment, fine, and deportation, without, however, granting any authority to the courts to depart from general provisions of law determining what persons shall be deemed to be municipal, provincial, or insular prisoners. Nor does any other law confer such power on the courts. On the contrary, the accused in the case under review could be considered a provincial prisoner to be detained in a provincial jail (Administrative Code, secs. 1739, 1740, 1741).
The trial judge relied for authority on another legal provision and two administrative circulars. The legal provision is section 1750 of the Administrative Code reading: "When, in the discretion of the Governor-General, the insanitary or insecure condition of any provincial or municipal jail makes it advisable, or when the public interests require, he may transfer to any Insular prison or penal institution all or any of the prisoners committed to such jail, and may also direct the return of said prisoners to provincial or municipal jails when deemed expedient. . . ." The first administrative circular which is cited in support of the action taken in one under the action taken is one under the hand of the Executive Secretary addressed to provincial governors and dated January 18, 1913. It is therein provided:jgc:chanrobles.com.ph
"It appearing that it will be in the interest of the public to have confined in Bilibid Prison all persons convicted of using opium in violation of Act No. 1761, as amended, and sentenced to imprisonment, in order that said persons may receive proper medical treatment and be cured of the opium habit, provincial governors are hereby requested by direction of the Governor-General to send thereto by first available transportation and under proper guard, all such persons whose term of imprisonment shall not expire within sixty days after the receipt hereof.
"All persons subsequently sentenced to imprisonment for using opium in violation of Act No. 1761 shall be immediately transferred to Bilibid Prison.
On March 5, 1923, the Chief of the Executive Bureau, with the approval of the Secretary of the Interior, amended the second paragraph of the circular above quoted to read as follows:jgc:chanrobles.com.ph
"All persons subsequently sentenced to imprisonment for using opium in violation of Act No. 1761, whose term of imprisonment will not expire within sixty (60) days after the rendition of the sentence, shall be immediately transferred to Bilibid Prison, provided that proper medical treatment for the cure of contracted opium or morphine habit cannot be administered in the province where they are convicted."cralaw virtua1aw library
The law and the circulars above quoted furnish a very insecure basis for the judicial action in this case. The circular of 1923 mentions Act No. 1761, which not only is not now in force, but had not been in force nine years prior thereto. This circular was promulgated by the Chief of the Executive Bureau with the approval of the Secretary of the Interior who were entirely without authority in the premises. As to section 1750 of the Administrative Code, it relates exclusively to the prerogative of the Governor-General. The power conferred by law on the Chief Executive to order prisoners transferred from provincial or municipal jails to an insular prison does not confer power on a Judge of First Instance to do so. Of course, after the Judge of First Instance has pronounced sentence, it lies in the discretion of the Governor-General to have provincial prisoners sent to Bilibid Prison for medical attention, including the cure of the opium habit. The good intentions of a Judge of First Instance will not supply the lack of express judicial power.
Writ granted without costs.
Johnson, Street, Villamor, Ostrand, Johns, Romualdez and Villa-Real, JJ., concur.
In the Court of First Instance of Surigao, Pedro Ceda pleaded guilty to an information charging him with the smoking of opium. The judgment of the trial court sentenced the accused to three months’ imprisonment, and to pay a fine of P300, with subsidiary imprisonment in case of insolvency. "Taking into account that the accused is a Filipino and is addicted to the vice of smoking opium," said the judge, "it is ordered that the accused extinguish the penalty in Bilibid Prison, Manila, so that in said institution he may be cured of the opium habit."cralaw virtua1aw library
The law in force in the Philippines since July 1st, 1914, restricting the use, possession, and importation of opium and its derivatives is Act No. 2381. Turning to this law, it is found to name specific penalties of imprisonment, fine, and deportation, without, however, granting any authority to the courts to depart from general provisions of law determining what persons shall be deemed to be municipal, provincial, or insular prisoners. Nor does any other law confer such power on the courts. On the contrary, the accused in the case under review could be considered a provincial prisoner to be detained in a provincial jail (Administrative Code, secs. 1739, 1740, 1741).
The trial judge relied for authority on another legal provision and two administrative circulars. The legal provision is section 1750 of the Administrative Code reading: "When, in the discretion of the Governor-General, the insanitary or insecure condition of any provincial or municipal jail makes it advisable, or when the public interests require, he may transfer to any Insular prison or penal institution all or any of the prisoners committed to such jail, and may also direct the return of said prisoners to provincial or municipal jails when deemed expedient. . . ." The first administrative circular which is cited in support of the action taken in one under the action taken is one under the hand of the Executive Secretary addressed to provincial governors and dated January 18, 1913. It is therein provided:jgc:chanrobles.com.ph
"It appearing that it will be in the interest of the public to have confined in Bilibid Prison all persons convicted of using opium in violation of Act No. 1761, as amended, and sentenced to imprisonment, in order that said persons may receive proper medical treatment and be cured of the opium habit, provincial governors are hereby requested by direction of the Governor-General to send thereto by first available transportation and under proper guard, all such persons whose term of imprisonment shall not expire within sixty days after the receipt hereof.
"All persons subsequently sentenced to imprisonment for using opium in violation of Act No. 1761 shall be immediately transferred to Bilibid Prison.
x x x
On March 5, 1923, the Chief of the Executive Bureau, with the approval of the Secretary of the Interior, amended the second paragraph of the circular above quoted to read as follows:jgc:chanrobles.com.ph
"All persons subsequently sentenced to imprisonment for using opium in violation of Act No. 1761, whose term of imprisonment will not expire within sixty (60) days after the rendition of the sentence, shall be immediately transferred to Bilibid Prison, provided that proper medical treatment for the cure of contracted opium or morphine habit cannot be administered in the province where they are convicted."cralaw virtua1aw library
The law and the circulars above quoted furnish a very insecure basis for the judicial action in this case. The circular of 1923 mentions Act No. 1761, which not only is not now in force, but had not been in force nine years prior thereto. This circular was promulgated by the Chief of the Executive Bureau with the approval of the Secretary of the Interior who were entirely without authority in the premises. As to section 1750 of the Administrative Code, it relates exclusively to the prerogative of the Governor-General. The power conferred by law on the Chief Executive to order prisoners transferred from provincial or municipal jails to an insular prison does not confer power on a Judge of First Instance to do so. Of course, after the Judge of First Instance has pronounced sentence, it lies in the discretion of the Governor-General to have provincial prisoners sent to Bilibid Prison for medical attention, including the cure of the opium habit. The good intentions of a Judge of First Instance will not supply the lack of express judicial power.
Writ granted without costs.
Johnson, Street, Villamor, Ostrand, Johns, Romualdez and Villa-Real, JJ., concur.
