Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence


Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 1931 > September 1931 Decisions > G.R. No. 34497 September 12, 1931 - LA YEBANA COMPANY v. ALHAMBRA CIGAR & CIGARETTE MANUFACTURING CO., ET AL.

056 Phil 106:




PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

EN BANC

[G.R. No. 34497. September 12, 1931.]

LA YEBANA COMPANY, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ALHAMBRA CIGAR & CIGARETTE MANUFACTURING CO., ET AL., Defendants-Appellees.

Alfredo Chicote and Jose Arnaiz, for Appellant.

Benjamin S. Ohnick, for appellee Alhambra Cigar and Cigarette Manufacturing Co.

Attorney-General Jaranilla, for appellee Francisco Segado.

SYLLABUS


1. TRADED-MARKS AND TRADE-NAMES; INFRINGEMENT; USE OF THE WORD "CHORRITOS" FOR CIGARETTES. — Where on October 6, 1904, A. Co. registered a trade-mark containing the words "Alhambra 25 Chorritos," and on August 21, 1928, perfected the trade-mark using the words "Alhambra Chorritos" ; where on February 23, 1922, E. registered a trade-mark for cigarettes containing the words "20 Chorritos de Gamu" ; where on March 3, 1925, Y. Co. registered a trade-mark for cigarettes containing the words "La Yebana Chorritos," and where it is evident that the word "Chorritos" has come to be a local name given to a special kind of cigarettes the tobaccos of which is rolled in sweetened black paper, it is held that Y. Co., by the registration of its trade-mark for cigarette wrappers, has not acquired the exclusive right to sue the word "Chorritos" as a trade-mark as against all competitors.


D E C I S I O N


MALCOLM, J.:


La Yebana Company, Inc., seeks to reverse a judgment of the Court of First Instance of Manila which sustained an order of the Director of the Bureau of Commerce and Industry, approving the application of the Alhambra Cigar and Cigarette Mfg. Company for the registration of a trade-mark and denying La Yebana Company’s opposition to the application, and which further awarded the Alhambra Cigar and Cigarette Company, upon its cross-complaint, the sum of P1,176.10 by way of indemnity for damages sustained as a result of the preliminary injunction issued at the commencement of the action. The thesis of La Yebana Company, Inc. as appellant, and so the pivotal point in the case, is whether the appellant, by the registration of a trade-mark for cigarette wrappers, acquired the exclusive right to use the word "Chorritos" as a trade-mark as against all competitors.

The facts are practically undisputed, and may be stated briefly as follows: On October 6, 1904, a label forming the wrapper for cigarette packages and containing the words "Alhambra 25 Chorritos" was registered with the Government by the Alhambra Fabrica de Tabacos, Cigarrillos y Picadura of Manila, P. I. On February 23, 1922, another label forming the wrapper for cigarette packages and containing the words "20 Chorritos de Gamu" was registered by Enrique Ga. Caruana. On March 3, 1925, La Yebana Company, Inc. secured the registration of a trade-mark which , as more particularly described in the application, was: "La caracteristica esencial de esta etiqueta es la palabra "La Yebana Chorritos’ como nominación o nombre de la clase especial de cigarrillos elaborados por la fabrica." On August 21, 1928, the Alhambra Cigar and Cigarette Mfg. Company, the successor of the Alhambra Fabrica de Tabacos, Cigarrillos y Picadura, presented to the Bureau of Commerce and Industry an application to register a trade- mark consisting of the words "Alhambra Chorritos" with a design for cigarettes. La Yebana Company filed an opposition to this application. Thereupon, the chief of the Bureau of Commerce and Industry decided to accept the application of the Alhambra Cigar and Cigarettte Mfg. Company and to overrule the opposition thereto. The present action is the outcome.

We experience no difficulty in reaching the definite conclusion that the registration of the trade-mark of the appellee does not constitute an infringement of appellant’s trade-mark. The word "Chorritos" as we understand it, had come to be a local name given to a special kind of cigarettes the tobacco of which is roled in sweetened black paper. Like the words "Corona," "Especiales," "Perfectos," etc. which are used in common by local cigar manufacturers to designate the different shapes or forms of cigar manufactured by them, for cigarettes there could be "La Yebana Chorritos," "Alhambra Chorritos," "Chorritos de Gamu," etc. This is particularly true in so far as the appellant is concerned, since the appellant was one of the last to make use of the word "Chorritos" as a trade-mark, and since all that the appellee has been endeavoring to do has consisted to perfecting a trade-mark originally registered many years ago. On such facts, the appellee, rather than the appellant, could more logically contend that it has acquired the exclusive right to use the word "Chorritos" as a trade-mark for cigarettes. In addition, it need only be remarked that a superficial examination is sufficient to show an entire back of deceitful similarity between the trade-mark of the appellant and the trade-mark of the appellee. (See as corroborative authorities the cases of Baxter and G. Baxter & Co. v. Zuazua [1905], 5 Phil., 160; and Alhambra Cigar and Cigarette Mfg. Co. v. Compañia Gral. de Tabacos [1916], 35 Phil., 62.)

The Trial court awarded the appellee the sum of P1,176.10 ad damages resulting from the issuance of the preliminary injunction, and the amount of damages is sufficiently established by the testimony. Counsel for the appellant has further elaborated on other points mostly of a minor character which merit no particular consideration. For instance, there is nothing to be found in Act No. 3202, relating to the obligatory registration of trade-marks and trade-names for cigars and cigarettes, which effects the disposition of this case one way or the other. Fundamentally the decisions of the Director of the Bureau of Commerce and Industry and of Judge Concepcion, sitting in First Instance, are sound and should be maintained.

Judgment will be affirmed, with the costs of this instance against the Appellant.

Avanceña, C.J., Johnson, Street, Villamor, Ostrand, Romualdez, Villa-Real and Imperial, JJ., concur.




Back to Home | Back to Main




















chanrobles.com





ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com






September-1931 Jurisprudence                 

  • G.R. No. 35937 September 2, 1931 - DIEGO CUEVAS v. JUAN G. LESACA

    056 Phil25cralaw:red

  • G.R. No. 34331 September 3, 1931 - ILOILO COMMERCIAL AND ICE COMPANY v. PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION

    056 Phil 28

  • G.R. No. 33224 September 4, 1931 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. BERNABE VILLAPANDO

    056 Phil 31

  • G.R. No. 33795 September 4, 1931 - ALEIDA SAAVEDRA v. CEFERINO YBAÑEZ ESTRADA

    056 Phil 33

  • G.R. No. 34187 September 7, 1931 - JOAQUIN A. ELEAZAR v. GONZALO ABAYA, ET AL.

    056 Phil 39

  • G.R. No. 34917 September 7, 1931 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. LUA CHU, ET AL.

    056 Phil 44

  • G.R. No. 35066 September 7, 1931 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. PURIFICACION ALMONTE

    056 Phil 54

  • G.R. No. 32894 September 8, 1931 - LEOCADIA ANGELO v. CIPRIANO PACHECO

    056 Phil 70

  • G.R. No. 33598 September 8, 1931 - GOVERNMENT OF THE PHIL. v. FAUSTINO ABAD, ET AL.

    056 Phil 75

  • G.R. No. 34638 September 9, 1931 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ESTEBAN CABAJAR

    056 Phil 83

  • G.R. No. 35235 September 10, 1931 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. EUGENIO MOMO

    056 Phil 86

  • G.R. No. 35346 September 10, 1931 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. PEDRO S. SORIANO

    056 Phil 95

  • G.R. No. 34283 September 11, 1931 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. TELESFORO ALVIAR

    056 Phil 98

  • G.R. No. 34004 September 12, 1931 - APOLONIA CALMA v. EULALIO CALMA

    056 Phil 102

  • G.R. No. 34497 September 12, 1931 - LA YEBANA COMPANY v. ALHAMBRA CIGAR & CIGARETTE MANUFACTURING CO., ET AL.

    056 Phil 106

  • G.R. No. 33413 September 16, 1931 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. VICTORINO CARIÑO

    056 Phil 109

  • G.R. No. 34780 September 16, 1931 - RURAL TRANSIT COMPANY v. PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION

    056 Phil 115

  • G.R. No. 35223 September 17, 1931 - BACHRACH MOTOR CO. v. TALISAY- SILAY MILLING CO., ET AL.

    056 Phil 117

  • G.R. No. 34163 September 18, 1931 - GREGORIO PEDRO v. PROVINCIAL BOARD OF RIZAL, ET AL.

    056 Phil 123

  • G.R. No. 34574 September 19, 1931 - CIRILO ABELLA v. MARIANO GONZAGA

    056 Phil 132

  • G.R. No. 34385 September 21, 1931 - ALEJANDRA TORRES, ET AL. v. FRANCISCO LIMJAP

    056 Phil 141

  • G.R. No. 34774 September 21, 1931 - EL ORIENTE, FABRICA DE TABACOS, INC. v. JUAN POSADAS

    056 Phil 147

  • G.R. No. 30756 September 22, 1931 - ENRIQUE BRIAS DE COYA v. TAN LUA, ET AL.

    056 Phil 153

  • G.R. No. 34962 September 22, 1931 - GOVERNMENT OF THE PHIL. v. BANK OF THE PHILIPPINE ISLANDS

    056 Phil 165

  • G.R. No. 35246 September 22, 1931 - CENTRAL AZUCARERA DE TARLAR v. RICARDO DE LEON, ET AL.

    056 Phil 169

  • G.R. No. 34906 September 23, 1931 - FERNANDEZ HERMANOS v. DIRECTOR OF LANDS, ET AL.

    057 Phil 929

  • G.R. No. 34840 September 23, 1931 - NARCISO GUTIERREZ v. BONIFACIO GUTIERREZ

    056 Phil 177

  • G.R. No. 34401 September 24, 1931 - DEE HAO KIM v. LEON BUSIANG, ET AL.

    056 Phil 181

  • G.R. No. 34642 September 24, 1931 - FABIOLA SEVERINO v. GUILLERMO SEVERINO, ET AL.

    056 Phil 185

  • G.R. No. 34960 September 25, 1931 - LA COMPAÑIA GENERAL DE TABACOS DE FILIPINAS v. MABALACAT SUGAR CO.

    057 Phil 937

  • G.R. No. 34564 September 29, 1931 - BASILIO CARIÑO v. ARSENIO JAMORALNE

    056 Phil 188