September 1936 - Philippine Supreme Court Decisions/Resolutions
Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence
Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 1936 > September 1936 Decisions >
G.R. No. 45129 September 24, 1936 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ANACLETO FOLLANTES, ET AL.
063 Phil 474:
063 Phil 474:
EN BANC
[G.R. No. 45129. September 24, 1936.]
THE PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINE ISLANDS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ANACLETO FOLLANTES and EUGENIO JACINTO, Defendants. ANACLETO FOLLANTES, Appellant.
Alejo Mabanag for Appellant.
Undersecretary of Justice Melencio for Appellee.
SYLLABUS
1. CRIMINAL LAW; UNDER THE CONSTITUTION OF THE PHILIPPINES, PERSONS CONVICTED OF CRIMES PUNISHED BY DEATH HAVE NO RIGHT TO BAIL. — Persons convicted of a crime punishable by death, as murder, are not bailable, as the law recognizes such right in a person accused of said crime, before conviction, only when the evidence of his guilt is not strong (Art. III, sec. 1, No. 16, of the Constitution of the Philippines).
2. ID.; ID.; PERSONS CONVICTED OF NON-CAPITAL CRIMES ARE NOT BAILABLE, AS OF ABSOLUTE RIGHT. — Under the law, persons convicted of non-capital crimes, who appeal from a judgment sentencing them to penalties other than death, have no absolute right to bail, except when said penalties are imposed upon them by the justice of the peace courts, as the right to bail after conviction is not authorized by the Constitution and is, as a general rule, not recognized (3 R.C.L., par. 14, p. 15; sec. 64, General Orders, No. 58, as amended by Act No. 4178).
2. ID.; ID.; PERSONS CONVICTED OF NON-CAPITAL CRIMES ARE NOT BAILABLE, AS OF ABSOLUTE RIGHT. — Under the law, persons convicted of non-capital crimes, who appeal from a judgment sentencing them to penalties other than death, have no absolute right to bail, except when said penalties are imposed upon them by the justice of the peace courts, as the right to bail after conviction is not authorized by the Constitution and is, as a general rule, not recognized (3 R.C.L., par. 14, p. 15; sec. 64, General Orders, No. 58, as amended by Act No. 4178).
D E C I S I O N
DIAZ, J.:
It appears that after the lower court had rendered judgment sentencing the appellant Anacleto Follantes to the penalty of reclusion perpetua, for murder, said appellant asked that, pending final determination of his appeal, he be permitted to perfect the bail of P15,000 which said court had authorized him to give for his provisional liberty in the municipality of Jones of the Province of Isabela.
The crime of murder is punishable by reclusion temporal in its maximum period of death (art. 248, Revised Penal Code).
Persons convicted of a crime punishable by death, as murder, are not bailable, as the law recognizes such right in a person accused of said crime, before conviction, only when the evidence of his guilt is not strong (Art. III, sec. 1, No. 16, of the Constitution of the Philippines).
Under the law, persons convicted of non-capital crimes, who appeal from a judgment sentencing them to penalties other than death, have no absolute right to bail, except when said penalties are imposed upon them by the justice of the peace courts, as the right to bail after conviction is not authorized by the Constitution and is, as a general rule, not recognized (3 Ruling Case Law, par. 14, p. 15), it being clearly stated in section 64 of General Orders, No. 58, as amended by section 2 of Act No. 4178, that:jgc:chanrobles.com.ph
"After judgment by a justice of the peace, the defendant shall be admitted to bail as of right, and, in all non-capital cases after judgment by any other court, as a matter of judicial discretion. . . ."cralaw virtua1aw library
Wherefore, this court being of the opinion that the appellant should not be admitted to bail, pending his appeal, his petition is hereby denied. So ordered.
Avanceña, C.J., Villa-Real, Imperial, Recto and Laurel, JJ., concur.
Abad Santos, J., concur in the result.
The crime of murder is punishable by reclusion temporal in its maximum period of death (art. 248, Revised Penal Code).
Persons convicted of a crime punishable by death, as murder, are not bailable, as the law recognizes such right in a person accused of said crime, before conviction, only when the evidence of his guilt is not strong (Art. III, sec. 1, No. 16, of the Constitution of the Philippines).
Under the law, persons convicted of non-capital crimes, who appeal from a judgment sentencing them to penalties other than death, have no absolute right to bail, except when said penalties are imposed upon them by the justice of the peace courts, as the right to bail after conviction is not authorized by the Constitution and is, as a general rule, not recognized (3 Ruling Case Law, par. 14, p. 15), it being clearly stated in section 64 of General Orders, No. 58, as amended by section 2 of Act No. 4178, that:jgc:chanrobles.com.ph
"After judgment by a justice of the peace, the defendant shall be admitted to bail as of right, and, in all non-capital cases after judgment by any other court, as a matter of judicial discretion. . . ."cralaw virtua1aw library
Wherefore, this court being of the opinion that the appellant should not be admitted to bail, pending his appeal, his petition is hereby denied. So ordered.
Avanceña, C.J., Villa-Real, Imperial, Recto and Laurel, JJ., concur.
Abad Santos, J., concur in the result.
