October 1948 - Philippine Supreme Court Decisions/Resolutions
Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence
Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 1948 > October 1948 Decisions >
G.R. No. L-1995 October 7, 1948 - PIO L. PESTAÑO v. P. G. CORNISTA, ET AL.
081 Phil 573:
081 Phil 573:
FIRST DIVISION
[G.R. No. L-1995. October 7, 1948.]
PIO L. PESTAÑO, Petitioner, v. P. G. CORNISTA, Justice of the Peace of Santa Cruz, Laguna, and THE CHIEF OF POLICE, Pasig, Rizal, Respondents.
Gualberto Cruz and Pio L. Pestaño for Petitioner.
P. A. Revilla for respondent chief of police.
SYLLABUS
HABEAS CORPUS; MOOT CASE; RELEASE OF PETITIONER. — Where the petitioner has been released from the confinement complained of, the petition for habeas corpus should be dismissed for being academic.
D E C I S I O N
PARAS, J.:
In this habeas corpus case, the petitioner is alleged to have been placed under confinement by the chief of police of Pasig, Rizal, in virtue of a warrant of arrest issued by the respondent justice of the peace of Santa Cruz, Laguna, as a result of petitioner’s failure to appear at the preliminary investigation in connection with a complaint for theft of coconuts against the petitioner. The latter contends that his presence in the preliminary investigation was a personal right and, therefore, waivable by him, and such waiver could not legally give rise to his arrest and detention.
In his answer, the respondent justice of the peace simply averred that the petitioner had already been released upon the former’s directive. This averment has not been denied by the petitioner.
Without passing upon the supposed illegality of the warrant of arrest issued by the respondent justice of the peace, we have to rule that the petition is now academic.
Petitioner’s other allegations that have reference to the sufficiency of the facts stated in the criminal complaint against him, to the right of the respondent justice of the peace to proceed with the criminal proceeding, or to the cancellation of petitioner’s bond, are obviously not proper subjects of inquiry herein. Moreover, the petitioner failed to substantiate his attempt to hold the respondent chief of police of Pasig guilty of contempt of this Court.
The petition is denied, without costs. So ordered.
Moran, C.J., Ozaeta, Pablo, Perfecto, Bengzon, Briones, Tuason and Montemayor, JJ., concur.
In his answer, the respondent justice of the peace simply averred that the petitioner had already been released upon the former’s directive. This averment has not been denied by the petitioner.
Without passing upon the supposed illegality of the warrant of arrest issued by the respondent justice of the peace, we have to rule that the petition is now academic.
Petitioner’s other allegations that have reference to the sufficiency of the facts stated in the criminal complaint against him, to the right of the respondent justice of the peace to proceed with the criminal proceeding, or to the cancellation of petitioner’s bond, are obviously not proper subjects of inquiry herein. Moreover, the petitioner failed to substantiate his attempt to hold the respondent chief of police of Pasig guilty of contempt of this Court.
The petition is denied, without costs. So ordered.
Moran, C.J., Ozaeta, Pablo, Perfecto, Bengzon, Briones, Tuason and Montemayor, JJ., concur.
