Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence


Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 1958 > December 1958 Decisions > G.R. No. L-11061 December 29, 1958 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. CIPRIANO REVIL Y. CUAYSON

104 Phil 1043:




PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

EN BANC

[G.R. No. L-11061. December 29, 1958.]

THE PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CIPRIANO REVIL Y. CUAYSON, Defendant-Appellee.

Solicitor General Ambrosio Padilla and Solicitor Frine’ C. Zaballero for Appellant.

Guevara & Castro for Appellee.


SYLLABUS


1. CRIMINAL LAW AND PROCEDURE; APPEAL AND ERROR; DOUBLE JEOPARDY. — CR y C was charged with violation of Section 4 (a) and 8 of Circular No. 20 of the Central Bank, in connection with Section 34, Republic Act No. 265, for failure to sell foreign exchange, consisting of United States dollar checks, money orders and bills to authorized agents of checks, money orders and bills to authorized agents of the Central bank within one business day following the receipt or acquisition thereof. He pleaded guilty to the receipt or acquisition thereof. He pleaded guilty to the charge. The Court sentenced him to suffer the penalty of one month imprisonment, to pay a fine of P3,000 with subsidiary imprisonment in case of insolvency, and to pay the costs. Subsequently, the Court ordered that the dollar bills and checks confiscated by exchanged with Philippine money and the value thereof delivered to the accused. From that order the prosecution appealed, insisting that the court should have ordered the forfeiture of the United States dollar checks, money orders and bills. The court gave due course to the appeal over the objection of the appellee. It appearing that on 23 June 1956 the appellee commenced to serve sentence that on 9 July 1956 the court entered the order appealed from; that on 17 July 1956, he paid the fine of P3,000 and the costs of P16 and that on20 July 1956 the prosecution filed its notice of appeal from the order. held: That to uphold the appeal and order the forfeiture of the U.S. dollar checks, money orders and bills in favor of the State, after the entry of the order that an equivalent amount of Philippine currency be exchanged for them, would place the defendant in double jeopardy, for such forfeiture would increase the penalty already imposed upon him. Such is the ruling in People v. Paet y Velasco, 53 Off. Gaz., 668. Hence, the instant appeal is legally untenable.


D E C I S I O N


PADILLA, J.:


In the Court of First Instance of Manila Cipriano Revil y Cuayson was charged with a violation of sections 4 (a) and 8 of Circular No. 20 of the Central Bank, in connection with section 34, Republic Act No. 265, for his failure to sell foreign exchange, consisting of United States dollar checks, money orders and bills in the total sum of $23,197.77, to authorized agents of the Central Bank within one business day following the receipt or acquisition thereof (criminal case No. 35766). Upon arraignment on 20 June 1956, with the advice of Counsel, he entered a plea of guilty. On 23 June 1956 the Court rendered judgment convicting and sentencing him to suffer the penalty of one months imprisonment, to pay a fine of P3,000, with subsidiary imprisonment in case of insolvency, and to pay the costs. It reserved however, its judgment on the defendant’s petition that the seized suitcase, clothing and other personal effects and the dollar checks, money orders and bills be returned to him. After the defendant had filed a memorandum in support of his contention and the Court had heard the parties, on 9 July 1956 it ordered that the suitcase, clothing and other personal effects be returned to him and —

. . . that the dollar bills and checks taken from the accused, and enumerated in the inventory made by an agent of the National Bureau of Investigation on May 7, 1956, be exchanged with Philippine money in the Central Bank of the Philippines and the value thereof delivered to the accused, Cipriano Revil y Cuayson.

In the sentence meted out to the aforesaid accused, a fine of Three Thousand Pesos (P3,000) was imposed upon him. If the amount has not so far been paid, let a writ of execution to cover the amount in question be issued and served upon the Central Bank of the Philippines.

The prosecution has appealed insisting that the Court should have ordered the forfeiture of the United States dollar checks, money orders and bills which the defendant failed to sell to authorized agents of the Central Bank in violation of Circular No. 20 of the Central Bank in connection with section 34 of Republic Act No 265, charged in the information. The Court gave due course to the appeal over the objection of the appellee, who reiterated and urged upon this Court to dismiss the appeal. The appellant and the appellee filed their respective briefs.

It appears that on 23 June 1956 the appellee commenced to serve sentence; that on 9 July 1956 the Court entered the order appealed from; that on 17 July 1956 he paid the fine of P3,000 and the costs of P16; and that on 20 July 1956 the prosecution filed its notice of appeal from the order.

To uphold the appeal and to order the forfeiture of the U.S. dollar checks, money orders and bills in favor of the State, after the entry of the order that an equivalent amount of Philippine currency be exchanged for them, would place the defendant in double jeopardy, for such forfeiture would increase the penalty already imposed upon him. Such is the ruling in People v. Paet y Velasco 53 Off. Gaz. 668. Hence the instant appeal is legally untenable.

The appeal taken by the prosecution in this case is dismissed, without pronouncement as to costs.

Paras, C.J., Bengzon, Montemayor, Bautista Angelo, Labrador, Concepcion, Reyes, J.B.L. and Endencia, JJ., concur.




Back to Home | Back to Main




















chanrobles.com





ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com






December-1958 Jurisprudence                 

  • G.R. No. L-11162 December 4, 1958 - FIRESTONE TIRE & RUBBER CO. v. MARIO DELGADO, ET AL.

    104 Phil 920

  • G.R. No. L-10394 December 13, 1958 - CLAUDINA VDA. DE VILLARUEL, ET AL. v. MANILA MOTOR CO., INC.

    104 Phil 926

  • G.R. No. L-9417 December 22, 1958 - ISABELO DOCE v. WORKMEN’S COMPENSATION COMMISSION, ET AL.

    104 Phil 946

  • G.R. No. L-10009 December 22, 1958 - TIU CHUN HAI, ET AL. v. COMMISSIONER OF IMMIGRATION, ET AL.

    104 Phil 949

  • G.R. No. L-11172 December 22, 1958 - IN RE: NG BUI KUI v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

    104 Phil 957

  • G.R. No. L-11594 December 22, 1958 - SERGIO F. NAGUIAT v. J. ANTONIO ARANETA

    104 Phil 11594

  • G.R. No. L-11988 December 22, 1958 - NG SAM BOK v. DIRECTOR OF LANDS

    104 Phil 965

  • G.R. No. L-12132 December 22, 1958 - ELENA COTIA v. MARIA JIMENEZ, ET AL.

    104 Phil 966

  • G.R. No. L-9228 December 26, 1958 - LEONARDO DIAZ v. FELIX P. AMANTE

    104 Phil 968

  • G.R. No. L-11056 December 26, 1958 - JOSE D. VILLEGAS, ET AL. v. NAPOLEON ZAPANTA, ET AL.

    104 Phil 973

  • G.R. No. L-11384 December 26, 1958 - IN RE:JOSE GO v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

    104 Phil 977

  • G.R. No. L-11433 December 26, 1958 - CEBU PORTLAND CEMENT COMPANY v. COURT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS, ET AL.

    104 Phil 979

  • G.R. No. L-13054 December 26, 1958 - UNIVERSITY OF THE PHILIPPINES, ET AL. v. COURT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS, ET AL.

    104 Phil 986

  • G.R. No. L-9185 December 27, 1958 - BATANGAS TRANSPORTATION COMPANY, ET AL. v. LAGUNA TRANSPORTATION COMPANY

    104 Phil 992

  • G.R. No. L-11418 December 27, 1958 - ROBERTO LAPERAL, JR., ET AL. v. RAMON L. KATIGBAK, ET AL.

    104 Phil 999

  • G.R. No. L-11651 December 27, 1958 - TOMAS ROCO, ET AL. v. JUAN GIMEDA

    104 Phil 1011

  • G.R. No. L-9793 December 29, 1958 - SY CHUAN, ET AL. v. EMILIO GALANG, ET AL.

    104 Phil 1014

  • G.R. No. L-10020 December 29, 1958 - ANTONIO ALACAR v. CITY MAYOR OF BAGUIO

    104 Phil 1018

  • G.R. No. L-10275 December 29, 1958 - MELCHOR MANIEGO v. DOMINADOR B. MANALO

    104 Phil 1023

  • G.R. No. L-10484 December 29, 1958 - MUNICIPAL GOVERNMENT OF SAGAY v. JANUARIO L. JISON, ET AL.

    104 Phil 1026

  • G.R. No. L-10772 December 29, 1958 - AGUSTIN C. BAGASAO, ET AL. v. BENJAMIN TUMANGAN

    104 Phil 1033

  • G.R. No. L-10920 December 29, 1958 - EUGENIO ESTAYO v. JOSE L. DE GUZMAN

    104 Phil 1038

  • G.R. No. L-11061 December 29, 1958 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. CIPRIANO REVIL Y. CUAYSON

    104 Phil 1043