Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence


Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 1958 > January 1958 Decisions > G.R. No. L-10806 January 27, 1958 - DAVID AZNAR v. ASUNCION SUCILLA

102 Phil 902:




PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

EN BANC

[G.R. No. L-10806. January 27, 1958.]

DAVID AZNAR, ET AL., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. ASUNCION SUCILLA, Defendant-Appellee.

Moises O. Bontoc for Appellants.

Pedro Yusua for Appellee.


SYLLABUS


HUSBAND AND WIFE; DONATION BETWEEN SPOUSES DURING MARRIAGE; VALIDITY. —Donations between spouses made in 1948, during the marriage are patently null and void since they fall under Article 1334 of the old Civil Code which provides that "all donations between spouses, made during the marriage shall be void."


D E C I S I O N


ENDENCIA, J.:


The only question involved in the present appeal is whether the deed of donation executed by Inocente Aznar on March 15, 1948, in favor of his wife Asuncion Sucilla, herein appellee, has validly transferred ownership of the property so donated, consisting of a parcel of land with an area of 4.8007 hectares and described in Transfer Certificate of Title No. 15195 of the land records of Quezon province. Plaintiffs-appellants are the nephews and nieces of Inocente Aznar who died on March 22, 1948. They filed a complaint against Asuncion Sucilla on December 15, 1952, in Civil Case No. 327 of the court of first instance of Quezon, wherein they allege that they are the nephews and nieces of the late Inocente Aznar; that the latter left the aforementioned land which was the conjugal property of the deceased and his wife Asuncion Sucilla who, despite demand, refused to divide it between her and the plaintiffs as the heirs and successors in interest of the deceased; and prayed that the property be divided among themselves and defendant Asuncion Sucilla in accordance with law, and that said defendant be required to render an accounting of the moneys and other returns from the said property since the time of the death of Inocente Aznar. In answering the complaint, defendant admitted that the property was conjugal and that the plaintiffs were the nephews and nieces of her late husband, but maintained that they had no more right to claim by succession, any share in the property, as the same had already been donated to her in a document reading as follows:chanrob1es virtual 1aw library

KASULATAN NG PAGKAKALOOB

DAPAT MALAMAN NG SINOMANG MAKABASA NITO:chanrob1es virtual 1aw library

Na ako, INOCENTES AZNAR, may sapat na gulang, filipino, asawa ni Asuncion Sucilla, tubo’t naninirahan rito sa municipio ng Polillo, lalawigan ng Quezon, Kapuluang Filipinas, nasa sa mabuting kalagayan ang pagi-isip, bukal sa sariling pag-kukuro, na wala sinomang nag udyok sa akin, ay minarapat ko, dahil sa tinataglay kung sakit o karamdaman na di tawag-delengin, at sa malao’t madali’y maaaring bawiin ko ng hiram na buhay sa sinapupunan ng Maykapal, kaya’t ngayon, ang aking isang palagay na lupang niogan na natatayo sa nayon ng Libjo, Polillo, Quezon, na sa lalong maliwanag, ay nasasaad tulad ng sumusunod:chanrob1es virtual 1aw library

ISANG PALAGAY NA LUPANG NIOGAN, may lawak na 4 hectareas, 87 areas at 77 centareas, may tanim na siyam na daang (900) kapunong niog na pawang bungahan, humigit-kumulang may Certifico Original No. 348, na hahanga sa Norte, Miguela Quinto & Public Land; sa Este, Sapa ng Pandan; sa Sur, Antonio Ayapana; at sa SW. Zacarias Abcede & Masisi Creek. Natatala sa ilalim ng Tax No. 8034, valor amillarado - P1,350. Na ang lupang na

sasabi sa itaas, ay pinagsamahan namin at sariling bugta (ni Asuncion), pinagugulan ng sariling pagod at salapi, at sapagka’t hangang sa mga sandaling ito’y hindi kami pinagkalooban ng bunga o anak ang lupang ito’y aming sama o pagaari ng pantay o patas; ay kusang loob kong ipinagkakaloob, ibinibigay at isinulit ang lahat at boong kabahagui ko sa lupang nasabi sa itaas; (lupa at lahat ng mejoras na natatanim roon) bilang Donation Mortiz Causa, sa aking pinakamamahal na asawa, Asuncion Sucilla, may sapat ding gulang, filipina at naninirahan din rito sa Polillo, Quezon upang sakali’t ako’y mamatay na ay ng siya may pagkunan ng kanyang ikabubuhay;

Dapat din naman alamin, na dahil sa mabuti naming pagsasama buhat ng kami’y makasal at dahil sa pagiging masunurin niya sa mabubuti kong pasiya at sa walang katulad na pagaandukha o pagaalaga sa aking buhat ng akoy magkasakit hanggang sa mga sandaling ito, kaya nga’t pinagtitibay at ipinasiya ng aking sarili na kahit hindi nagka bunga ang aming mabuting pagsasama, na ipagkakaloob ko sa aking asawa, Asuncion Sucilla na nabanggit na lupa sa itaas ng pagkakaloob ng "Walang Pasubali."cralaw virtua1aw library

Pinatutunayan at pinatitibay ko rin, na wala sinomang makapaghahabol sa ginawa kong itong pagbibigay sa minamahal kong asawa, dahil sa itoy siya kong kalooban at ang kasulatan itoy siya kung katibayan ng aking niloloob, sapagkat ako ang siyang makapangyarihan sa aking ari-arian, kayat ang lahat ng paghahabol ng sino man sa mahuhuli, ay pinawawalang kabuluhang ng kasulatang ito sapagkat ito’y siya kong huling pasiya, kayat ito’y dapat igalang.

Sa KATUNAYAN NG LAHAT NG ITO, ay inilagda ko ang aking pangalan o idinait rito ang aking kanang hinlalaki, rito sa Polillo, Quezon, ngayon ika-15 ng Marzo, 1948, A.D.

His right hand

INOCENTE AZNAR

thumb mark

(Nagkaloob)

Na ako, ASUNCION SUCILLA, pinatutunayan ko na tinatanggap ko ng boong puso ang guinawang pagkakaloob sa aking ng isang palagay na lupang niogan (bahagui) ng aking asawa, at pinasasalamatan ko ng taos pusong pasasalamatang ala-alang ito sa akin ng aking asawa.

Her right hand

ASUNCION SUCILLA

thumb mark

NILAGDAAN SA HAPAP NG MGA SAKSI:chanrob1es virtual 1aw library

(Fda. Ramona Tina

(Fda. Margarita E. Combaleser

REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES

PROVINCE OF QUEZON S. S.

MUNICIPALITY OF POLILLO

In the municipality of Polillo, Province of Quezon, Philippines, this 15th day of March, 1948, before me, personally appeared, Inocente Aznar (Donor) who exhibited to me his Res. Cert. No. A2891358, issued at Polillo, Quezon, on February 28, 1948; and Asuncion Sucilla, (Donee) who exhibited to me her Res. Cert. No. A2891411, issued at Polillo, Quezon, on March 8, 1948, who are personally known to me and to me known to be the same person who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that the same is their free will and deed for the purpose therein expressed.

Affiants and their witnesses have signed on each and every page of this instrument composing of two pages including the acknowledgment page and deals with a deed of Donation Mortis Causa executed by the Donor Inocente Aznar, in favor of the Donee, Azuncion Sucilla, over a parcel (part) of coconut land.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my Notarial Seal at the place and date above-designated.

(Sgd.) MARCIANO MOPERA

Notary Public

My Commission expires

December 31, 1948

Doc. No. 132

Page 96

Book No. III

Series of 1948

At the hearing of the case, the parties submitted the same for decision under the following agreement:chanrob1es virtual 1aw library

CONVENIO

Las partes convienen en someter como por la presente someten la escritura de DONACION extendida por Inocente Aznar de fecha 15 de Marzo de 1948 a favor de Asuncion Sucilla, cuya escritura de Donacion ha sido ratificada ante el Notario Publico Marciano Mopera, al objeto de que este Hon. Juzgado determine si dicha escritura de Donacion es con caracter intervivos o Mortis Causa.

Para el caso de que la determinacion por este Hon. Juzgado sea que dicha escritura de Donacion es con inter vivos o Mortis Causa que la Ley sea aplicada.

Las partes convienen en que la posesion de la demandada Asuncion Sucilla sobre el terreno en cuestion ha sido y es de buena fe. Sin costas.

In view thereof, the trial court rendered judgment in favor of the defendant, on the ground that the above-quoted document is a donation inter vivos.

"governed by the provisions on donations and also by the general provisions on contracts and obligations. So that the prima facie donation inter vivos and its acceptance by the defendant donee here, having been proved by means of a public instrument, and the donor having been duly notified of said acceptance, the contract is perfect and obligatory and it transfers ownership of the property mentioned therein. If the property in question has already been disposed of, by the late Inocentes Aznar, and it is not in contravention with any law on the subject, the plaintiffs herein have no more right to claim by succession, the one-half 1/2 share corresponding to him of the conjugal property in litigation."cralaw virtua1aw library

Thereupon plaintiffs filed a motion for reconsideration which was denied, hence the present appeal predicated upon the propositions that the lower court erred:jgc:chanrobles.com.ph

"1. in not declaring that the deed of donation dated March 15,

1948, executed by the deceased Inocente Aznar in favor of

his wife Asuncion Sucilla during their marriage, is null

and void; and

2. in absolving the defendant Asuncion Sucilla from the

complaint, instead of ordering the partition among the heirs,

of the estate of the deceased Inocente Aznar."cralaw virtua1aw library

As could readily be seen, the controversy between the parties is whether the aforequoted document is valid and has legally transmitted the ownership in question in favor of the defendant Asuncion Sucilla. For the purpose of this decision, it is immaterial whether the document is a deed of donation mortis causa or inter vivos, for if it should be considered as donation mortis causa, it would certainly not be valid because it does not comply with the requirement of the law regarding attestation clause which, like a will, it must contain for its validity. On the other hand, if the said document should be considered as donation inter vivos, it would certainly fall under the clear provision of Art. 1334 of the old Civil Code which provides that "all donations between spouses made during the marriage shall be void," it appearing that the deed of donation as well as the demise of the donor occurred in 1948. Consequently, the donation in question, being patently null and void, cannot be invoked by Asuncion Sucilla to defeat the claim of appellants, and the trial court, in absolving the defendant from the complaint, committed a reversible error which should be corrected.

Wherefore, the decision appealed from is reversed, and the case ordered remanded to the court of origin for further proceedings. Without pronouncement as to costs.

Paras, C.J., Bengzon, Padilla, Montemayor, Reyes, A., Bautista Angelo, Labrador, Concepcion, Reyes, J. B. L. and Felix, JJ., concur.




Back to Home | Back to Main




















chanrobles.com





ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com






January-1958 Jurisprudence                 

  • G.R. Nos. L-9456 & L-9481 January 6, 1958 - THE COLLECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. DOMINGO DE LARA

    102 Phil 813

  • G.R. No. L-9692 January 6, 1958 - COLLECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. BATANGAS TRANSPORTATION COMPANY

    102 Phil 822

  • G.R. Nos. L-8845-46 January 7, 1958 - BATANGAS TRANSPORTATION COMPANY v. MARTIN SOUZA

    102 Phil 835

  • G.R. No. L-10202 January 8, 1958 - IN RE: SY CHHUT alias TAN BING TIONG v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

    102 Phil 839

  • G.R. No. L-10420 January 10, 1958 - IN RE: LIM KIM So alias FRANCISCO LIM KIM SO v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

    102 Phil 843

  • G.R. Nos. L-10249-60 January 14, 1958 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. RUFINO CRISOSTOMO

    102 Phil 846

  • G.R. No. L-10285 January 14, 1958 - SAMPAGUITA SHOE v. COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS

    102 Phil 850

  • G.R. No. L-10423 January 21, 1958 - AMADO P. JALANDONI v. ANGELA MARTIR-GUANZON

    102 Phil 859

  • G.R. No. L-11000 January 21, 1958 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ALICIA RAPIRAP

    102 Phil 863

  • G.R. No. L-11014 January 21, 1958 - VICTORIANA ESPIRITU v. THE MUNICIPAL COUNCIL

    102 Phil 866

  • G.R. No. L-10196 January 22, 1958 - SANTOS LUMBER COMPANY v. CITY OF CEBU

    102 Phil 870

  • G.R. No. L-10776 January 23, 1958 - MELITON HERRERA v. THE AUDITOR GENERAL OF THE REP. OF THE PHIL.

    102 Phil 875

  • G.R. No. L-10922 January 23, 1958 - GREGORIO P. DE GUZMAN v. JOSE B. RAMOSO

    102 Phil 883

  • G.R. No. L-12294 January 23, 1958 - UNITED PEPSI-COLA SALES ORGANIZATION (PAFLU) v. HON. ANTONIO CA�‘IZARES

    102 Phil 887

  • G.R. No. L-10234 January 24, 1958 - IN RE: Victoriano Yap Subieng to be admitted a citizen of the Phil.; VICTORIANO YAP SUBIENG v. REP. OF THE PHIL.

    102 Phil 892

  • G.R. No. L-9689 January 27, 1958 - JESUS T. QUIAMBAO v. PEDRO R. PERALTA

    102 Phil 899

  • G.R. No. L-10806 January 27, 1958 - DAVID AZNAR v. ASUNCION SUCILLA

    102 Phil 902

  • G.R. No. L-11093 January 27, 1958 - LEONARDO ENAGE LABAJO v. CIRIACO ENRIQUEZ

    102 Phil 907

  • G.R. No. L-10446 January 28, 1958 - COLLEGE OF ORAL & DENTAL SURGERY v. COURT OF TAX APPEALS

    102 Phil 912

  • G.R. No. L-10874 January 28, 1958 - RUFINO D. ANDRES v. THE CROWN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY

    102 Phil 919

  • G.R. No. L-10702 January 29, 1958 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. SIXTO CABARLES

    102 Phil 926

  • G.R. No. L-10091 January 29, 1958 - BOY SCOUTS OF THE PHIL. v. JULIANA V. ARAOS

    102 Phil 1080

  • G.R. No. L-11343 January 29, 1958 - CARLOS LEDESMA v. COURT OF TAX APPEALS

    102 Phil 931

  • G.R. No. L-11248 January 30, 1958 - ANACLETA VILLAROMAN v. QUIRINO STA. MARIA

    102 Phil 937

  • Adm. Case No. 195 January 31, 1958 - IN RE: Attorney JESUS T. QUIAMBAO

    102 Phil 940

  • G.R. No. L-8252 January 31, 1958 - JOSE C. ZULUETA v. NICANOR NICOLAS

    102 Phil 944

  • G.R. No. L-9871 January 31, 1958 - ATKINS v. B. CUA HIAN TEK

    102 Phil 948

  • G.R. No. L-9928 January 31, 1958 - REP. OF THE PHIL. v. THE COURT OF APPEALS

    102 Phil 953

  • G.R. No. L-10022 January 31, 1958 - NORTHERN MOTORS v. NATIONAL LABOR UNION

    102 Phil 958

  • G.R. No. L-10141 January 31, 1958 - REP. OF THE PHIL. v. PHILIPPINE RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION

    102 Phil 960

  • G.R. Nos. L-10236-48 January 31, 1958 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. EUSTACIO DE LUNA

    102 Phil 968

  • G.R. No. L-10370 January 31, 1958 - THE COLLECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. MATIAS H. AZNAR

    102 Phil 979

  • G.R. No. L-10547 January 31, 1958 - THE PHIL. GUARANTY CO. v. LAURA DINIO

    102 Phil 991

  • G.R. No. L-10691 January 31, 1958 - ERLINDA STERNBERG v. GONZALO SOLOMON

    102 Phil 995

  • G.R. No. L-10747 January 31, 1958 - MARIANO DIAZ v. PASCUAL MACALINAO

    102 Phil 999

  • G.R. No. L-10902 January 31, 1958 - FLORIDA LAGMAY v. EMERENCIANA QUINIT

    102 Phil 1003

  • G.R. No. L-11024 January 31, 1958 - ALFONSO ANGELES v. THE COURT OF APPEALS, GREOGORIO STA. INES

    102 Phil 1006

  • G.R. No. L-11186 January 31, 1958 - ALFONSO CABABA v. PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION

    102 Phil 1013

  • G.R. No. L-11395 January 31, 1958 - SOTERA GARCIA DIMAGIBA v. HON. AMBROSIO M. GERALDEZ

    102 Phil 1016

  • G.R. No. L-11647 January 31, 1958 - FLORENTINO NAVARRO v. HON. ELOY BELLO

    102 Phil 1019

  • G.R. No. L-12724 January 31, 1958 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. CARIDAD CAPISTRANO

    102 Phil 1025