Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence


Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 1960 > September 1960 Decisions > G.R. Nos. L-13567-68 September 30, 1960 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ROSARIO B. DE LEON

109 Phil 574:




PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

EN BANC

[G.R. Nos. L-13567-68. September 30, 1960.]

THE PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ROSARIO B. DE LEON, Defendant-Appellant.

Jesus Paredes for Appellant.

Solicitor General Edilberto Barot and Solicitor F. R. Rosete for Appellee.


SYLLABUS


1. CENTRAL BANK; CIRCULAR ISSUED TO COMBAT EXCHANGE CRISIS; PRESIDENTIAL APPROVAL; DURATION COEXTENSIVE WITH CRISIS. — Central Bank circular No. 20 which was implemented by circular No. 42, was in fact approved by the President of the Philippines and having been issued to combat the exchange crisis that developed in this country, its period of operation need not be expressly stated but it is deemed co-extensive with the duration of such crisis which up to the present still exists.

2. ID.; CIRCULAR NO. 37; PURPOSE. — Circular No. 37 as amended by section 14, in relation to sections 2 and 64 of Republic Act No. 265, was issued with the primordial purpose of conserving our dwindling dollar reserve and preserving the international value of our peso.

3. CRIMINAL PROCEDURE; VIOLATION OF CENTRAL BANK CIRCULAR; INFORMATION; ALLEGATION OF ESSENTIAL ELEMENT. — Where an information filed in a criminal case for violation of Central Bank Circular fails to state that the accused did not have the necessary license to carry the money that was seized in her possession, said information is fatally defective. The omission makes the charge alleged in the information insufficient to constitute an offense for which appellant may be convicted and rendered amenable to the penalty prescribed by law.


D E C I S I O N


BAUTISTA ANGELO, J.:


On August 5, 1957, two informations were filed before the Court of First Instance of Pasay City accusing defendant Rosario B. de Leon of violating (1) Circular 37, as implemented by Circular 60, Section 1(b) of the Central Bank, in relation to Section 34 of Republic Act No. 265 (Criminal Case No. 4100-P), and (2) Circular No. 42, Section 3(a), as amended by Circular No. 55 of the Central Bank, in relation to Section 34 of the same Act (Criminal Case No 4101-P).

Accused having pleaded not guilty to the charges, the two cases were tried jointly in the course of which the following facts were established: Rosario B. de Leon was a booked outgoing passenger on the Philippine Air Lines Plane No. PI-770 scheduled to leave for Hongkong from the Manila International Airport, Pasay City, at 12:30 p.m. on August 3, 1957. After the inspection of her luggage by the customs authorities and the declaration by De Leon at the Central Bank counter of the money she had in her possession, she repaired to the area reserved for departing passengers. While there, however, she was accosted by agent Socorro de Guzman who asked her how much money she was carrying to which De Leon answered that she had P100.00 only. De Guzman examined her handbag and found the P100.00 which she had declared. Then De Guzman examined De Leon’s passport wallet and found behind its cover the sum of P700.00 and one $100.00 bill. De Guzman again inquired from the accused if that was all the money she had and receiving an affirmative reply the former invited the latter to the ladies’ room for further inspection during which De Guzman found P700.00 sewed at the bottom of De Leon’s panties and P1,000.00 in each of her breast paddings. De Guzman thereafter took De Leon to agent Beleno who also investigated her and it was then that De Leon made a voluntary statement admitting that agent De Guzman had seized from her person the articles and amounts above referred to. It was also proven that De Leon failed to secure the necessary permit from the Central Bank to carry the excess money found in her possession.

After the prosecution had presented its evidence, defendant filed a motion to dismiss manifesting that if same is denied the cases would be deemed submitted for decision. Subsequently, the trial court denied the motion and rendered decision on February 27, 1958 finding De Leon guilty in both cases as follows:jgc:chanrobles.com.ph

"(1) In Criminal Case No. 4100-P the accused Rosario B. de Leon is hereby sentenced to suffer imprisonment for three (3) months, pay a fine of THREE THOUSAND (P3,000.00) PESOS, with subsidiary imprisonment in case of insolvency and to pay the costs. The twenty pieces of one hundred-peso bills, exhibits ‘F’.’F-1’, to ‘F-19’, inclusive, and the twenty-eight pieces of fifty-peso bills, exhibits ‘F-20’ to ‘F-47’, inclusive, are hereby declared forfeited in favor of the government; and,

"(2) In Criminal Case No. 4101-P the accused Rosario B. de Leon is hereby sentenced to suffer imprisonment for three (3) months, pay a final of THREE HUNDRED (P300.00) PESOS, with subsidiary imprisonment in case of insolvency and to pay the costs. The one hundred dollar bill (exhibit ‘E’) is hereby declared forfeited in favor of the government."cralaw virtua1aw library

Defendant is now appealing from the above decision contending that the trial court erred in not acquitting her on the following grounds: (1) that Circular No. 42, being merely an implementation of Circular No. 20 which was issued without the approval of the President of the Philippines and contains no provision limiting the period of its operation or enforcement, is null and void; (2) that Circulars Nos. 20 and 42, as amended, contravene the Articles of Agreement of the International Monetary Fund to which the Philippines is a signatory; (3) that the aforementioned circulars were issued without the approval of the President of the United States pursuant to the agreement entered into between that country and the Philippines concerning trade and related matters; (4) that the issuance of Circulars Nos. 42 and 37, as amended, cannot be legally based on Sections 74 and 14 of Republic Act No. 265; and (5) since the information filed in Criminal Case No. 4100-P does not allege that the accused did not have the requisite license to carry the money found in her possession, the same fails to state facts sufficient to constitute the crime charged.

The issues raised by appellant are not new. They have already been passed upon by this Court in a number of cases wherein this Court held that Circular No. 20, which was implemented by Circular No. 42, was in fact approved by the President of the Philippines and that, having been issued to combat the exchange crisis that developed in this country, its period of operation need not be expressly stated but that it is deemed co-extensive with the duration of such crisis which up to the present still exists. 1 And with regard to the contention that the above circulars contravene the Articles of Agreement of the International Monetary Fund and were passed without the approval of the President of the United States, this Court in People v. Koh, supra, said:jgc:chanrobles.com.ph

"As to the international aspect, it is not incumbent upon the prosecution to prove that the provisions of Circular 20 complied with all pertinent international agreements binding on our Government. The Central Bank and the President certify that it accords therewith, and it is presumed that said officials knew whereof they spoke and that they performed their duties properly. It is rather for the defense to show conflict, if any, between the Circular and our international commitments.

x       x       x


"Appellees’ counsel have quoted here some provisions of the International Monetary Fund Agreement. But none of them may be interpreted to prohibit the action taken by our Central Bank. In fact, there are of record, the annual reports of the International Monetary Fund of April 30, 1950 and 1951, commenting on the exchange controls of the Philippines without criticism or opposition.

"We are quoted in this connection the following provision in the Agreement between the Philippines and the limited States concerning Trade and Related Matters:chanrob1es virtual 1aw library

x       x       x


"But there is an official statement of the American Embassy in Manila wherein it is said that the United States ‘would concur’ in the adoption of such temporary measures (exchange controls) by the Philippine Government as might be deemed appropriate for safeguarding the dollar reserves of the Philippines. From the tenor of the statement, one could conclude that the U.S. Government did not object to, even approved the imposition of dollar exchange restrictions." (See also People v. Lim Ho, supra.)

Anent the fourth issue posed by appellant, it is likewise unquestionable that Circulars Nos. 42 and 37, as amended, were legally promulgated by the Monetary Board in the exercise of its power under the law, this Court having ruled that Circular No. 42, as amended, was issued by virtue of the authority granted by Section 74 of Republic Act No. 265 (People v. Lim Ho, supra), while Circular No. 37, as amended, by Section 14, in relation to Sections 2 and 64 of the same Act (People v. Exconde, 100 Phil., 1125), the same having been issued with the primordial purpose of conserving our dwindling dollar reserve and preserving the international value of our peso.

We find, however, merit in the fifth issue, it appearing that the information filed in Criminal Case No. 4100-P fails to state that the accused did not have the necessary license to carry the money that was seized in her possession, and hence the same is fatally defective. As this Court aptly said in People v. Capistrano, 102 Phil., 1025; 54 Off. Gaz. (11) 3499, "in order that the pertinent portion of the circular may be infringed, it is necessary to allege that the outgoing Philippine resident or transient visitor has taken or is about to take out of the Philippines Philippine coins and notes in excess of the exempted amount without the necessary license issued by the Central Bank. An examination of the information does not show any averment of this element. This omission makes the charge alleged in the information insufficient to constitute an offense for which appellant may be convicted and rendered amenable for the penalty prescribed by law." (Italics supplied.)

Wherefore, with the modification that the information filed in Criminal Case No. 4100-P (G.R. No. L-13567) should be dismissed without prejudice, the rest of the decision is hereby affirmed, with costs against Appellant.

Paras, C.J., Bengzon, Padilla, Concepcion, Reyes, J.B.L., Barrera, Gutierrez David, Paredes, and Dizon, JJ., concur.

Endnotes:



1. People v. Jolliffe, 105 Phil., 1242; People v. Henderson, 105 Phil., 859; 56 Off. Gaz. (46) 7031; People v. Koh, 105 Phil., 925; 57 Off. Gaz. (21) 3907; People v. Lim Ho, 106 Phil., 887; People v. Tan, 108 Phil., 667; 60 Off. Gaz. 3420.




Back to Home | Back to Main




















chanrobles.com





ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com






September-1960 Jurisprudence                 

  • G.R. No. L-12645 September 15, 1960 - JUANA PADRON VDA. DE VALENZUELA, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

    109 Phil 396

  • G.R. No. L-14179 September 15, 1960 - PERMANENT CONCRETE PRODUCTS, INC., ET AL. v. JUAN FRIVALDO

    109 Phil 404

  • G.R. No. L-13943 September 19, 1960 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. MARCELIANO ARRANCHADO, ET AL.

    109 Phil 410

  • G.R. No. L-13815 September 26, 1960 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ELIAS OYCO

    109 Phil 415

  • G.R. No. L-14740 September 26, 1960 - ANDRES SANTOS, ET AL. v. HON. NUMERIANO G. ESTENZO, ETC.

    109 Phil 419

  • G.R. No. L-14939 September 26, 1960 - ELVIRA VIDAL TUASON DE RICKARDS v. ANDRES F. GONZALES

    109 Phil 423

  • G.R. No. L-12298 September 29, 1960 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. FEDERICO AGARIN

    109 Phil 430

  • G.R. No. L-12906 September 29, 1960 - DUMANGAY GUITING v. DIRECTOR OF LANDS, ET AL.

    109 Phil 436

  • G.R. No. L-13255 September 29, 1960 - COLLECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. JOSE COJUANGCO

    109 Phil 443

  • G.R. No. L-13475 September 29, 1960 - PHIL. SUGAR INSTITUTE v. COURT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS, ET AL.

    109 Phil 452

  • G.R. No. L-15226 September 29, 1960 - LEE GUAN v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

    109 Phil 460

  • G.R. No. L-10119 September 30, 1960 - RAFAEL LACSON v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

    109 Phil 462

  • G.R. Nos. L-10352-53 September 30, 1960 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. GAUDENCIO MANlGBAS, ET AL.

    109 Phil 469

  • G.R. No. L-11329 September 30, 1960 - CIPRIANO B. MOTOS v. ROBERTO SOLER, ET AL.

    109 Phil 481

  • G.R. No. L-11440 September 30, 1960 - SERGIO F. DEL CASTILLO v. EDUARDO D. ENRIQUEZ, ET AL.

    109 Phil 491

  • G.R. No. L-12030 September 30, 1960 - JOSE J. ROTEA v. FORTUNATO F. HALILI

    109 Phil 495

  • G.R. No. L-12149 September 30, 1960 - HEIRS OF EMILIO CANDELARIA, ETC. v. LUISA ROMERO, ET AL.

    109 Phil 500

  • G.R. No. L-12328 September 30, 1960 - CARLOS J. RIVERA v. TOMAS T. TIRONA, ET AL.

    109 Phil 505

  • G.R. No. L-12353 September 30, 1960 - NORTH CAMARINES LUMBER CO., INC. v. COLLECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE

    109 Phil 511

  • G.R. No. L-12641 September 30, 1960 - EMILIANA C. ESTRELLA v. PUBLIC SERVICE COM., ET AL.

    109 Phil 514

  • G.R. Nos. L-12664-65 September 30, 1960 - ANTONINO LAZARO, ET AL. v. FIDELA R. GOMEZ, ET AL.

    109 Phil 518

  • G.R. No. L-12894 September 30, 1960 - LILIA JUANA BARLES, ET AL. v. DON ALFONSO PONCE ENRILE

    109 Phil 522

  • G.R. No. L-13023 September 30, 1960 - INSULAR LIFE ASSURANCE CO., LTD. v. TERESA DUAT VDA. DE FERNANDEZ, ET AL.

    109 Phil 530

  • G.R. No. L-13283 September 30, 1960 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. SERAPIO CARUNUNGAN, ET AL.

    109 Phil 534

  • G.R. No. L-13349 September 30, 1960 - MIGUEL GAMAO, ET AL. v. DOMINADOR C. CALAMBA, ET AL.

    109 Phil 542

  • G.R. Nos. L-13389-90 September 30, 1960 - CAPITOL SUBD., INC., ET AL. v. ALFREDO LOPEZ MONTELIBANO, ET AL.

    109 Phil 546

  • G.R. No. L-13417 September 30, 1960 - JOSE B. VILLACORTA, ETC. v. HON. FERNANDO VILLAROSA, ET AL.

    109 Phil 551

  • G.R. No. L-13426 September 30, 1960 - INT’L. OIL FACTORY v. TOMASA MARTINEZ VDA. DE DORIA, ET AL.

    109 Phil 553

  • G.R. No. L-13446 September 30, 1960 - MAXIMO SISON v. HON. FROILAN BAYONA, ET AL.

    109 Phil 557

  • G.R. No. L-13467 September 30, 1960 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. JUAN NECESITO, ET AL.

    109 Phil 563

  • G.R. No. L-13546 September 30, 1960 - GREGORIO VERZOSA v. CITY OF BAGUIO, ET AL.

    109 Phil 571

  • G.R. Nos. L-13567-68 September 30, 1960 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ROSARIO B. DE LEON

    109 Phil 574

  • G.R. No. L-13582 September 30, 1960 - REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL. v. CIRILO P. BAYLOSIS, ET AL.

    109 Phil 580

  • G.R. No. L-13686 September 30, 1960 - HEIRS OF JUSTO MALFORE v. DlR. OF FORESTRY

    109 Phil 586

  • G.R. No. L-13912 September 30, 1960 - COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. CONSUELO L. VDA. DE PRIETO

    109 Phil 592

  • G.R. No. L-13941 September 30, 1960 - ANTONIO A. RODRIGUEZ, ETC. v. S. BLAQUERA, ETC.

    109 Phil 598

  • G.R. Nos. L-13992 & L-14035 September 30, 1960 - MANILA ELECTRIC CO. v. PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, ET AL.

    109 Phil 603

  • G.R. No. L-14008 September 30, 1960 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. TRIZON REMOLLINO

    109 Phil 607

  • G.R. No. L-14348 September 30, 1960 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. CIRIACO YEBRA

    109 Phil 613

  • G.R. No. L-14395 September 30, 1960 - MALAYAN INSURANCE CO., INC. v. CATALINA V. YANDOC, ET AL.

    109 Phil 616

  • G.R. No. L-14497 September 30, 1960 - FELIX PAULINO, SR., ET AL. v. HON. JOSE T. SURTIDA, ET AL.

    109 Phil 621

  • G.R. No. L-14628 September 30, 1960 - FRANCISCO HERMOSISIMA v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

    109 Phil 629

  • G.R. No. L-14630 September 30, 1960 - LY HONG v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

    109 Phil 635

  • G.R. No. L-14733 September 30, 1960 - ERLINDA ESTOPA v. LORETO PIANSAY, JR.

    109 Phil 640

  • G.R. No. L-14737 September 30, 1960 - LEONCIA VELASCO v. COURT OF AGRARIAN RELATIONS, ET AL.

    109 Phil 642

  • G.R. No. L-14817 September 30, 1960 - ANDRES G. SANCHEZ, ET AL. v. NORTHERN LUZON TRANS. CO. INC.

    109 Phil 647

  • G.R. No. L-14822 September 30, 1960 - KHAW DY, ET AL. v. PEOPLE OF THE PHIL., ET AL.

    109 Phil 649

  • G.R. No. L-14874 September 30, 1960 - ANTONIO PEREZ v. ANGELA TUASON DE PEREZ

    109 Phil 654

  • G.R. No. L-14914 September 30, 1960 - JOHN TAN CHIN ENG v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

    109 Phil 660

  • G.R. No. L-14930 September 30, 1960 - MARLI PLYWOOD & VENEER CORP. v. JOSE ARAÑAS, ET AL.

    109 Phil 664

  • G.R. No. L-15021 September 30, 1960 - REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL. v. COURT OF TAX APPEALS, ET AL.

    109 Phil 667

  • G.R. No. L-15101 September 30, 1960 - IN RE: CHUA TIAN SANG v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

    109 Phil 670

  • G.R. No. L-15158 September 30, 1960 - JESUS S. DIZON v. HON. NECIAS O. MENDOZA, ET AL.

    109 Phil 674

  • G.R. No. L-15179 September 30, 1960 - TEODORA AMAR v. JESUS ODIAMAN

    109 Phil 681

  • G.R. No. L-15208 September 30, 1960 - ALIPIO N. CASILAN, ET AL. v. SANTIAGO GANGCAYCO, ET AL.

    109 Phil 686

  • G.R. No. L-15266 September 30, 1960 - TAN HOI v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

    109 Phil 689

  • G.R. No. L-15274 September 30, 1960 - DOMINGO ALMONTE UY v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

    109 Phil 694

  • G.R. No. L-15305 September 30, 1960 - CITY OF MANILA v. ARCADIO PALLUGNA

    109 Phil 698

  • G.R. No. L-15327 September 30, 1960 - FIDEL FERNANDEZ, ET AL. v. HON. GREGORIO D. MONTEJO

    109 Phil 701

  • G.R. No. L-15380 September 30, 1960 - CHAN WAN v. TAN KIM, ET AL.

    109 Phil 706

  • G.R. No. L-15392 September 30, 1960 - REX TAXlCAB CO., INC. v. JOSE BAUTISTA, ET AL.

    109 Phil 712

  • G.R. No. L-15454 September 30, 1960 - MANILA RAILROAD CO. v. EMILIANA FERRER, ET AL.

    109 Phil 716

  • G.R. No. L-15802 September 30, 1960 - REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL. v. ENRIQUE MAGALONA, JR., ET AL.

    109 Phil 723

  • G.R. Nos. L-15928-33 September 30, 1960 - DIOSDADO C. TY v. FILIPINAS CIA. DE SEGUROS, ET AL.

    109 Phil 730

  • G.R. No. L-16088 September 30, 1960 - LUZON SURETY CO., INC. v. FIDELA MORIN DE MARBELLA, ET AL.

    109 Phil 734

  • G.R. No. L-16226 September 30, 1960 - GUILLERMO REÑOSA v. HON. NICASIO YATCO, ET AL.

    109 Phil 740