Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence


Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 1961 > January 1961 Decisions > G.R. No. L-13186 January 28, 1961 - BISLIG BAY LUMBER COMPANY, INC. v. COLLECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE:




PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

EN BANC

[G.R. No. L-13186. January 28, 1961.]

BISLIG BAY LUMBER COMPANY, INC., Petitioner, v. COLLECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent.

Formilleza & Latorre for Petitioner.

Solicitor General for Respondent.


SYLLABUS


1. TAXATION; SALES TAX ON LOGS; CASE AT BAR. — The contracts were negotiated by petitioner’s agent in Japan and were confirmed by said agent by means of purchase notes sent to the seller and seller’s notes to the buyers. The logs were shipped either under terms F.O.B., Bislig, Surigao, or C. & I., Bislig, Surigao. By the terms of the bills of lading, the logs were consigned to the order of the seller. All freight charges were paid by the buyers and in shipments under terms F.O.B., Bislig, the logs were insured by the buyers; in shipments under terms C. & I., Bislig, the logs were insured by the seller. The bills of lading, insurance policies taken in the name of the seller, and other commercial and shipping documents were indorsed in blank and presented to the bank in Manila for collection through whom the foreign buyers opened letter of credit. Held: Ownership in the logs passed in the Philippines from seller to the foreign buyers. Hence, petitioner is liable for sales tax under the provisions of section 186 of the National Internal Revenue Code, as amended by Republic Acts Nos. 588 and 594.


D E C I S I O N


PADILLA, J.:


Bislig Bay Lumber Company, Inc. seeks a review under section 18, Republic Act No. 1125, of that part of a judgment rendered by the Court of Tax Appeals on 9 October 1957, ordering it to pay the Government the sum of P175,681.30, as deficiency sales tax and surcharge on shipments of logs to buyers in Japan from 14 June 1951 to 19 June 1953 (C.T.A. Case No. 155; Annex C).

On 27 September 1954 the respondent assessed the petitioner pursuant to section 186 of the National Revenue Code, as amended by Republic Acts Nos. 588 and 594, as follows:chanrob1es virtual 1aw library

1. Deficiency sales tax on sales of

logs to buyers in Japan from

June 14, 1951 to June 19,

1953, with an aggregate selling

price of P2,810,900.00 P140,545.04

25% surcharge 35,136.26 P175,681.30

2. Deficiency sales tax on sales of

lumber to buyers in Manila

and Cebu from the first

quarter of 1951 to the first

quarter of 1954 5,330.96

25% surcharge 1,332.74 6,663.70

————— —————

P182,345.00

—————

On 29 October 1954 the petitioner requested the respondent to reconsider the assessment on the ground that with respect to the first item, title to the logs passed from the petitioner to the foreign buyers outside of the Philippines, hence such sales of logs were not subject to tax, and, with respect to the second item, the assessment should be based on the final invoices covering the actual selling price and not on the shipping tallies or mill invoices covering the estimated selling price of lumber. On 16 June 1955 the petitioner received a letter from the respondent dated 3 June 1955 denying his request for reconsideration. On 13 July 1955 the petitioner filed in the Court of Tax Appeals a petition for review of the respondent’s assessment (Annex A). On 24 August 1955 the respondent filed his answer to the petition for review (Annex B). After hearing, on 9 October 1957 the Court rendered judgment modifying the decision of the respondent and ordering the petitioner —

. . . to pay (the Government) the sum of P175,681.30, representing deficiency sales tax and surcharge on shipments of logs to buyers in Japan under terms F.O.B. and C. & I., Bislig, covering the period from June 14, 1951 to June 19, 1953. The deficiency assessment on domestic sales of logs and lumber amounting to P6,626.65 is set aside. With costs against petitioner. (Annex C)

copy of which the petitioner received on 2 November 1957. On 2 December 1957 the petitioner filed this petition for review in this Court.

The petitioner’s appeal is only from the assessment of deficiency sales tax on sales of logs to buyers in Japan from 14 June 1951 to 19 June 1953 amounting to P140,545.04 and 25% surcharge amounting to P35,136.26, or a total of P175,681.30. The findings of the Court of Tax Appeals with respect thereto are:chanrob1es virtual 1aw library

From the stipulation of facts submitted by the parties and the evidence adduced during the hearing of the case, it appears that the contracts of sale were negotiated by petitioner’s agent in Japan; that the contracts of sale were confirmed by said agent by means of purchase notes sent to the sellers and seller’s notes to the buyers; that the logs were shipped either under terms F.O.B. Bislig, Surigao, or C. & I., Bislig, Surigao; that by the terms of the bills of lading the logs were "consigned to the order of the seller (notify respective buyers)" ; that all freight charges were paid by the buyers; that in shipments under terms F.O.B. Bislig, the logs were insured by the buyers; that in shipments under terms C. & I., Bislig, the logs were insured by the seller, petitioner herein; and that the bills of lading, insurance policies taken in the name of the seller, and other commercial and shipping documents were indorsed in blank and presented to the bank in Manila for collection through whom the foreign buyers opened letters of credit. (Annex C.)

In Misamis Lumber Co., Inc. v. Collector of Internal Revenue, 102 Phil., 116; 56 Off. Gaz., 517, where the petitioner shipped for export on board foreign merchant vessels, lumber and logs purchased by foreign buyers established abroad, F.O.B. (free on board) Misamis City port, the petitioner defraying all expenses incurred from the sawmills to the loading on board the vessels, the buyers paying in Manila all freight and insurance charges, and the price; and in Western Mindanao Lumber Development Go., Inc., G.R. No. L-11710, 30 June 1958, where the facts are similar to the first case, except that the loading was made in Basilan or Cotabato, and while the price was paid in Manila too, payment was made upon presentation of the corresponding invoices and bills of lading to the local banks where the buyers had opened letters of credit, after the various shipments had been made 1 this Court upheld the legality of the assessments for sales tax under the provisions of section 186 of the National Internal Revenue Code, as amended by Republic Acts Nos. 588 and 594, made by the Collector of Internal Revenue. The facts in the case at bar are not different from those of the two cited cases and nothing would warrant a departure from the ruling laid down therein.

The fact that, as pointed out by the petitioner, it has a legal representative in Japan whereas the buyers have none in the Philippines to whom the logs could be delivered; that all the shipping documents such as export sales invoices, export entry, export license, exchange control license, certificate of inspection by the Bureau of Forestry, and certificate of origin together with the bills of lading, were all issued in the name of the petitioner as exporter and not of the Japanese buyers; that the logs were consigned to the petitioner or its order; and that in all the bills of lading made by the petitioner covering shipments of logs to Japan there were drafts attached to the bills of lading and the amounts in the drafts represent the selling price of the logs shipped to Japan, do not necessarily prove that title to the logs passed into the buyers in Japan and not in the Philippines, thereby exempting it from the payment of sales tax. They are mere schemes to ensure the performance by the buyers of their obligations under their contracts. 2 As the Court of Tax Appeals held,." . . ownership in the logs passed in the Philippines from the seller to the foreign buyers because the freight charges were paid by the buyers; the shipments were insured by the buyers (and in those cases where insurance was taken by the seller the policies were indorsed in blank and delivered to the agent in Manila of the foreign buyers, which has the same effect as if the insurance was taken by the buyers); and, what is more important, the bills of lading and other shipping documents were indorsed in blank by the seller and presented for collection to a local bank with whom the foreign buyers opened irrevocable letters of credit. Therefore, neither the fact that the bills of lading in this case provided that the logs were deliverable to the seller or its order, or that a draft was invariably attached to each bill of lading, is of legal consequence."cralaw virtua1aw library

The judgment under review is affirmed, with costs against the petitioner.

Paras, C.J., Bengzon, Bautista Angelo, Labrador, Concepcion, Reyes, J.B.L., Barrera, Gutierrez David, Paredes and Dizon, JJ., concur.

Endnotes:



1. In these two cases the shipments were made before the enactment into law of Republic Act No. 894 on 20 June 1953, providing "That with respect to goods or products shipped or exported abroad, no percentage tax shall be levied thereon irrespective of any shipping arrangement that may be agreed upon which may influence or determine the transfer of ownership of the goods or products exported."cralaw virtua1aw library

2. Article 1503, new Civil Code.




Back to Home | Back to Main




















chanrobles.com





ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com






January-1961 Jurisprudence                 

  • G.R. No. L-14086 January 20, 1961 - ASARI YOKO CO., LTD. v. KEE BOC, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-14116 January 20, 1961 - LAUREANA A. CID v. IRENE P. JAVIER, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-15045 January 20, 1961 - In RE: CATHOLIC ARCHBISCHOP OF MANILA v. SOCIAL SECURITY COMMISSION

  • G.R. No. L-15834 January 20, 1961 - NATIONAL FASTENER CORPORATION OF THE PHIL. v. CIR, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-15826 January 23, 1961 - ORMOC SUGAR CO., INC., ET AL. v. OSCO WORKERS FRATERNITY LABOR UNION, ET AL.

  • UNAV January 28, 1961 - IN RE: FILOTEO DIANALA JO

  • G.R. No. L-10104 January 28, 1961 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. SEVERINO CORPUZ, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-10358 January 28, 1961 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. FAUSTO LINDE, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-10473 January 28, 1961 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ROSARIO LAO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-10557 January 28, 1961 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. LEONCIO CURAMBAO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-11268 January 28, 1961 - CARLOS M. SISON v. GONZALO D. DAVID

  • G.R. No. L-11494 January 28, 1961 - COLLECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. COURT OF TAX APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-11622 and L-11668 January 28, 1961 - COLLECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. DOUGLAS FISHER, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-11807 January 28, 1961 - COLLECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. CONVENTION OF PHILIPPINE BAPTIST CHURCHES, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-11985 January 28, 1961 - MARIANO CONDE v. NATIONAL TOBACCO CORPORATION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-12080 January 28, 1961 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. MANUEL GALLARDO

  • G.R. No. L-12173 January 28, 1961 - MAMERTO DAILISAN, ET AL. v. SEBASTIAN SO ENG SO, ET AL.

  • G.R. Nos. L-12582 and L-12598 January 28, 1961 - LVN PICTURES, INC. v. PHILIPPINE MUSICIANS GUILD, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-12816 January 28, 1961 - QUIRINO DUMLAO, ET.AL v. PASTOR L. DE GUZMAN, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-12894 January 28, 1961 - LILIA JUANA BARLES, ET AL. v. DON ALFONSO PONCE ENRILE

  • G.R. No. L-13062 January 28, 1961 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. DOMINADOR CRISTOBAL

  • G.R. No. L-13186 January 28, 1961 - BISLIG BAY LUMBER COMPANY, INC. v. COLLECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE

  • G.R. No. L-13203 January 28, 1961 - YUTIVO SONS HARDWARE COMPANY v. COURT OF TAX APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-13355 January 28, 1961 - PHILIPPINE MANUFACTURING COMPANY v. COLLECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE

  • G.R. No. L-13541 January 28, 1961 - EDUARDO TUASON v. LUZON STEVEDORING CO., INC., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-13780 January 28, 1961 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ANTONIO YU

  • G.R. No. L-13814 January 28, 1961 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. FEDERICO D. DESPAVELLADOR

  • G.R. No. L-13982 January 28, 1961 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ESTANISLAO MANGAHAS

  • G.R. No. L-14333 28 January 28,1961

    OSCAR VENTANILLA v. GREGORIO CENTENO

  • G.R. No. L-14399 January 28, 1961 - FELICIANA EDRALIN v. ANDRES EDRALIN, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-14634 January 28, 1961 - ARTURO NIETO v. BARTOLOME QUINES, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-14697 January 28, 1961 - SILVINO LASTIMOZA, ET AL. v. RAMON BLANCO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-14732 January 28, 1961 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. JOSEFINO G. SELFAISON, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-14747 January 2, 1961 - LEONARDO C. PADILLA v. RIZAL SURETY & INSURANCE CO.

  • G.R. No. L-14761 and L-17981 January 28, 1961 - ARCE SONS AND COMPANY v. SELECTA BISCUIT COMPANY, INC., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-14787 January 28, 1961 - COLGATE-PALMOLIVE PHILIPPINES, INC. v. PEDRO M. GIMENEZ, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-14821 January 28, 1961 - DOMINGO DE JESUS v. RODRIGO COLOSO

  • G.R. No. L-14832 January 28, 1961 - NG CHO CIO, ET AL. v. NG DIONG, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-14905 January 28, 1961 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. MANUEL BANIAGA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-14938 January 28, 1961 - MAGDALENA C. DE BARRETTO, ET AL. v. JOSE G. VILLANUEVA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-15008 January 28, 1961 - TAN CHIU v. COLLECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE

  • G.R. No. L-15113 January 28, 1961 - ANTONIO MEDINA v. COLLECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-15351 January 28, 1961 - MORCOIN CO., LTD. v. CITY OF MANILA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-15458 January 28, 1961 - DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SERVICES LABOR UNION v. COURT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-15480 January 28, 1961 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. JG BERGUNIO LUNA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-15495 January 28, 1961 - MONICA PASTRANA BAMBAO, ET AL. v. VICTOR E. LEDNICKY, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-15522 January 28, 1961 - DOLORES EVANGELISTA, ET AL. v. PERPETUO MENDOZA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-15751 January 28, 1961 - BUREAU OF PRINTING, ET AL. v. BUREAU OF PRINTING EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-16148 January 28, 1961 - BERNARDINO O. ALMEDA v. PROVINCIAL TREASURER OF SURIGAO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-16377 January 28, 1961 - PURA TOLEDO v. SUPERINTENDENT OF THE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION FOR WOMEN

  • G.R. No. L-16505 January 28, 1961 - JUAN P. GERENA, ET AL. v. CITY OF MANILA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-16561 January 28, 1961 - FREEMAN SHIRT MANUFACTURING CO., ET AL. v. COURT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-16676 January 28, 1961 - EDUARDO GOSIENGFIAO v. NICASIO YATCO

  • G.R. No. L-17080 January 28, 1961 - ROSARIO S. JUAT, ET AL. v. LAND TENURE ADMINISTRATION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-11633 January 31, 1961 - JOSE L. SORIANO v. ATANASIA UBAT DE MONTES, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-11815 January 31, 1961 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. PAMPILO DE TORRES

  • G.R. No. L-14040 January 33, 1961 - SEGUNDA PORNELLOSA v. LAND TENURE ADMINISTRATION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-14887 January 31, 1961 - AVELINO NATIVIDAD v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-15088 January 31, 1961 - TORIBIA FONTANILLA PACIO, ET AL. v. MANUELA PACIO BILLO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-15388 January 31, 1961 - DORA PERKINS ANDERSON v. IDONAH SLADE PERKINS

  • G.R. No. L-15438 January 31, 1961 - TEOPISTA B. DE BALANGA v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-15742 January 31, 1961 - MIGUEL TOLENTINO v. CIRILO P. BAYLOSIS

  • G.R. No. L-16501 January 31, 1961 - CONCORDIO A. TRAZO v. MANILA PENCIL CO., INC., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-17043 January 31, 1961 - NATIVIDAD HERRERA, ET AL. v. LUY KIM GUAN, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-11807 January 28, 1961 - COLLECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. CONVENTION OF PHIL. BAPTIST CHURCHES, ET AL.