Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence


Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 1961 > July 1961 Decisions > G.R. No. L-14738 July 31, 1961 - PAMPANGA SUGAR DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, INC. v. F. A. FUENTES, ET AL. :




PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

EN BANC

[G.R. No. L-14738. July 31, 1961.]

PAMPANGA SUGAR DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, INC., Petitioner, v. F. A. FUENTES, MARCOS PLOMANTES, Administrator and Hearing Officer, respectively of Regional Office No. 3, PABLO ABILLANOZA, PEDRO ABILLANOZA, FRANCISCO AGNETE, JOSE AGUIRRE, RICARDO ALCONGA, FRANCISCO AMMEDA, ET AL., Respondents.

Carlos, Laurea & Associates for Petitioner.

M. A. Calupitan, Edmundo T. Cabal and Luis R. Mauricio for Respondents.


SYLLABUS


1. ADMINISTRATIVE LAW; GOVERNMENT SURVEY AND REORGANIZATION COMMISSION; JURISDICTION; GRANT OF EXCLUSIVE AND ORIGINAL JURISDICTION; TO REGIONAL OFFICES NOT AUTHORIZED BY REPUBLIC ACT No. 997. — The grant to the regional offices of the Department of Labor of original and exclusive jurisdiction over cases involving money claims, including overtime pay, unpaid wages, wages for Sundays and legal holidays, etc., is not authorized by the provisions of Republic Act No. 997, the legislature not having intended to grant authority to the Government Survey and Reorganization Commission to deprive the courts of jurisdiction over said claims and transfer them to regional offices.


D E C I S I O N


DE LEON, J.:


Original petition for certiorari and prohibition with preliminary injunction.

On August 8, 1958, respondents Pablo Abillanoza, Et Al., who are all employed by the Pampanga Sugar Development Company, Inc., herein petitioner, filed a complaint against the latter with Regional Office No. 3 of the Department of Labor for the collection of the balance of wages alleged to be still due them for work rendered on Sundays and legal holidays, with legal interest from the original date of the filing of the complaint until actual payment, plus attorney’s fees.

Instead of answering, the petitioner company, on September 4, 1958, filed a motion to dismiss the complaint on the grounds that it states no cause of action; that the alleged cause of action is barred by prior judgment and the statute of limitations; and that the Regional Office has no jurisdiction over the subject matter of the action due to the unconstitutionality or invalidity of Reorganization Plan No. 20-A, dated December 10, 1956, under which the regional offices of the Department of Labor were established. The motion to dismiss was opposed by respondents Pablo Abillanoza, Et Al., and on September 16, 1958, Marcos Plomantes, Hearing Officer of Regional Office No. 3, denied the same for lack of merit.

Alleging that claims under Commonwealth Act No. 444, as in the case at bar, are exclusively cognizable by the Court of Industrial Relations, petitioner filed a motion for reconsideration. The motion, however, was on October 24, 1958 denied by Hearing Officer Plomantes, whereupon petitioner filed a second motion for reconsideration. The latter motion having been also denied by Plomantes in an order dated November 18, 1958, which required petitioner company to file its answer on or before December 2, 1958, said petitioner filed the present petition for certiorari and prohibition to annul the proceedings had below and to enjoin the respondents from further proceeding with the case, it being alleged, among other things, that Reorganization Plan No. 20-A is unconstitutional and that there is no appeal, nor any other plain, speedy and adequate remedy available in the ordinary course of law. The petition was given due course, and to restrain respondents from further proceeding in the premises in the meanwhile, this Court issued the writ of preliminary injunction prayed for upon petitioner’s filing of a bond of P500.00.

The main point of controversy — the validity of Reorganization Plan No. 20-A, particularly section 25 thereof, which grants to the regional offices of the Department of Labor original and exclusive jurisdiction over money claims of laborers — has already been resolved by Us against the contention of herein respondents in the cases of Jose Corominas, Jr. Et. Al. v. Labor Standards Commission Et. Al., G.R. No. L-14837; Manila Central University v. Jose Calupitan Et. Al., G.R. No. L-15483; Wong Chun v. Diego Carlim Et. Al., G.R. No. L-13940; Balrodgan Co., Ltd., Et. Al. v. F. A. Fuentes, Et Al., G.R. No. L-15015; and Equitable Banking Corporation v. Regional Office 3 Et. Al., G. R. No. L-14442, all of which were decided on June 30, 1961. In the aforecited case of Equitable Banking Corporation v. Regional Office 3 Et. Al., supra, we said:jgc:chanrobles.com.ph

". . . In the cases (Jose Corominas, Jr. Et. Al. v. Labor Standards Commission, Et Al., G.R. No. L-14837, June 30, 1961; Manila Central University v. Calupitan, Et Al., G.R. No. L-15483, June 30, 1961; Wong Chun v. Diego Carlim, Et Al., G.R. No. L-13940, June 30, 1961; Balrodgan Co., Ltd. Et. Al. v. Fuentes Et. Al., G.R. No. L-15015. June 30, 1961) recently decided by Us, We have held that the grant to regional offices of original and exclusive jurisdiction over cases involving money claims, including overtime pay, unpaid wages, wages for Sundays and legal holidays, etc., is not authorized by the provisions of Republic Act No. 997, the legislature not having intended to grant authority to the Reorganization Commission to deprive the courts of jurisdiction over said claims and transfer them to regional offices."cralaw virtua1aw library

WHEREFORE, the instant petition is hereby granted, the orders of the respondent officials, dated September 16, October 24 and November 18, 1958 set aside, and the preliminary injunction heretofore issued made permanent. No pronouncements as to costs.

Bengzon, C.J., Padilla, Labrador, Concepcion, Reyes, J.B.L., Barrera, Paredes, Dizon and Natividad, JJ., concur.




Back to Home | Back to Main




















chanrobles.com





ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com






July-1961 Jurisprudence                 

  • G.R. No. L-14345 July 20, 1961 - FAUSTINO LAGRIMAS v. JUSTICE OF THE PEACE OF CAMlLlNG, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-15341 July 20, 1961 - JOSE COLLANTES v. JUAN M. COLLANTES, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-16439 July 20, 1961 - ANTONIO GELUZ v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-17692 July 20, 1961 - KAISAHAN NG MGA MANGGAGAWA SA LA CAMPANA v. HERMOGENES CALUAG, ETC., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-12429 July 21, 1961 - ERMIDIA A. MARIANO v. ROYAL INTEROCEAN LINES

  • G.R. No. L-15055 July 21, 1961 - CONSOLACION ROSETE, ET AL. v. PABLO ROSETE

  • G.R. No. L-16815 July 24, 1961 - ARSENIO L. CANLAS, ET AL. v. BERNABE DE AQUINO

  • G.R. No. L-15424 July 28, 1961 - ALBERTO DE SANTOS, ET AL. v. JOSE N. SANTOS, ET AL.

  • A.C. No. 321 July 31, 1961 - NATIONAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION v. MINERVA L. MORADA

  • G.R. No. L-11827 July 31, 1961 - FERNANDO A. GAITE v. ISABELO FONACIER, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-12736 July 31, 1961 - FRANCISCO L. LAZATIN v. ANGEL C. TWAÑO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-12903 July 31, 1961 - PEDRO C. PASTORAL v. COMMISSIONERS OF THE WORKMEN’S COMPENSATION COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-12938 July 31, 1961 - IN RE: RAFAEL YAP v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. L-13798 July 31, 1961 - CIPRIANO E. UNSON v. ARSENIO H. LACSON, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-13945 31 July 31, 1961 - MERCY A. DE VERA v. FLORDELIZA PALOMA SUPITRAN, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-14212 July 31, 1961 - CU BU LIONG v. JULIANO E. ESTRELLA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-14551 July 31, 1961 - MAXIMO BAQUIRAN v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-14575 July 31, 1961 - MITHI NG BAYAN COOPERATIVE MARKETING ASSOCIATION INC. v. J. ANTONIO ARANETA

  • G.R. No. L-14657 July 31, 1961 - PABLO FELICIANO v. LADISLAO PASICOLAN

  • G.R. No. L-14738 July 31, 1961 - PAMPANGA SUGAR DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, INC. v. F. A. FUENTES, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-14759 July 31, 1961 - EARNSHAWS DOCKS, ET AL. v. ATANACIO A. MARDO

  • G.R. No. L-15138 July 31, 1961 - CHIN HUA TRADING COMPANY, ET AL. v. ATANACIO A. MARDO, ET AL.

  • G.R. Nos. L-15230 and L-15979-81 July 31, 1961 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. RENATO DELFIN, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-15363 July 31, 1961 - NATIONAL LABOR UNION v. INSULAR-YEBANA TOBACCO CORPORATION

  • G.R. No. L-15371 July 31, 1961 - MARCELO LIWANAG v. CENTRAL AZUCARERA DON PEDRO

  • G.R. No. L-15582 July 31, 1961 - BENJAMIN LEUNG v. F. A. FUENTES, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-15693 July 31, 1961 - LUCIA PITOGO v. SEN BEE TRADING COMPANY, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-15862 July 31, 1961 - PAULO ANG, ET AL. v. FULTON FIRE INSURANCE CO., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-15954 July 31, 1961 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. BENITO R. DE LA CRUZ, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-15971 July 31, 1961 - PEDRO REBADULLA, ET AL. v. EMILIO BENITEZ

  • G.R. No. L-16165 July 31, 1961 - PEDRO S. ALIALY, ET AL. v. COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS

  • G.R. No. L-16578 July 31, 1961 - EULALIO PARINGIT v. HONORATO MASAKAYAN

  • G.R. No. L-16734 July 31, 1961 - IN RE: MARIA V. LINDAYAG v. DIOSCORO M. DANA

  • G.R. No. L-16929 July 31, 1961 - ESTANISLAWA CANLAS v. CHAN LIN PO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-18562 July 31, 1961 - UNIVERSITY OF THE PHILIPPINES, ET AL. v. CITY FISCAL OF QUEZON CITY