Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence


Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 1962 > May 1962 Decisions > G.R. No. L-17338 May 30, 1962 - ADRIANO D. DASALLA, ET AL. v. CITY ATTORNEY OF QUEZON CITY, ET AL. :




PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

EN BANC

[G.R. No. L-17338. May 30, 1962.]

ADRIANO D. DASALLA, JESUSA F. DE DASALLA and CONSUELO DASALLA, Petitioners-Appellants, v. CITY ATTORNEY OF QUEZON CITY, and FRANCISCO T. KOH, Respondents-Appellees.

Adriano D. Dasalla for and in his own behalf as Petitioner-Appellant.

City Attorney for and in his own behalf as Respondent-Appellee.


SYLLABUS


1. CRIMINAL PROCEDURE; TIME TO ASK SUSPENSION OF CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS DUE TO PENDING PREJUDICIAL QUESTION. — The time to ask for the suspension of the criminal proceedings on the ground that there is a prejudicial question raised in a civil action that is pending trial is not during the period of preliminary investigation of the criminal complaint by the prosecuting officer but after such investigation and after he shall have filed the corresponding information.


D E C I S I O N


PADILLA, J.:


Appeal from an order entered on 20 May 1960 by the Court of First Instance of Rizal, Quezon City branch, dismissing for lack of merit a petition which sought to prohibit the Attorney of Quezon City or his assistants from proceeding with the preliminary investigation of three criminal complaints for usurpation, grave coercion and estafa filed against the petitioners.

In an amended complaint dated 8 June 1959 filed in the Court of First Instance of Rizal, Quezon City branch, the petitioners alleged that on 28 September 1950 they were induced to sign an instrument mortgaging their two parcels of land situate in Quezon City; that under the terms and conditions thereof the Philippine Bank of Commerce was to grant them a loan of P8,500, and, for and in consideration of P850, the Republic Surety & Insurance Co., Inc. was to guarantee the payment of the loan; that in default of such payment of the surety company bound itself to pay it and was granted the right to foreclose the mortgage on the two parcels of land; that on 9 April 1959 they found out that the Philippine Bank of Commerce had not granted any loan to them and the Republic Surety & Insurance Co., Inc. had not assumed any guaranty obligation; and that on 9 May 1959 the defendants twice attempted to enter forcibly upon their property but failed because of police intervention; and prayed that a writ of preliminary injunction issue to restrain the defendants from entering upon their property; that the instrument purporting to constitute a mortgage on their two parcels of land be declared null and void; that transfer certificates of title Nos. 23595 and 23596 in the name of the Republic Surety & Insurance Co., Inc., issued in lieu of their certificates of title, be cancelled; that the extra-judicial foreclosure of the mortgage by the surety company also be declared null and void; that the defendants Francisco T. Koh and the Republic Surety & Insurance Co., Inc. be ordered to pay them the sum of P10,000 as moral damages and also the costs, and for just and equitable relief (Annex B, civil case No. Q-4328).

On 15 May 1959 the respondent Francisco T. Koh, as president of the Republic Surety & Insurance Co., Inc., filed against the petitioners three complaints for usurpation (I.S. No. 1893, Annex A), grave coercion (I.S. No. 1894, Annex A-1) and estafa (I.S. No. 1895, Annex A-2). On 18 August 1959 the petitioners asked the Quezon City Attorney to suspend the preliminary investigation of the criminal complaints on the ground that there was a prejudicial question raised in a civil action that had been filed by them and was pending trial in the Court of First Instance of Rizal, Quezon City branch (Annex C). On 1 September 1959 the Quezon Assistant City Attorney set the resumption of the investigation for the 16th day of the same month and notified the parties thereof "in view of certain points which need clarification" and the petition to suspend the investigation would be acted upon after the parties against whom the complaints had been filed shall have been heard (Annex D). On 14 September 1959 the petitioners filed in the Court of Appeals a petition for a writ of prohibition against the respondents, the Quezon City Attorney and Francisco T. Koh, docketed as CA-G.R. No. 25313-R (Annex E). On 26 October 1959 the Court of Appeals denied the petition (Annex F). On 4 November 1959 the Quezon Assistant City Attorney set anew the resumption of the preliminary investigation of the criminal complaints for 27 November 1959 at 2:00 p.m. To prevent him from proceeding with the preliminary investigation, on 16 November 1959 in the Court of First Instance of Rizal, Quezon City branch, the petitioners commenced this special civil action for prohibition against the same parties (No. 4800). On 13 January 1960 the Quezon Assistant City Attorney filed an answer to the petition for prohibition; and on the same day respondent Francisco T. Koh, a motion to dismiss. On 19 January 1960 the petitioners objected to the motion to dismiss. As already stated, on 20 May 1960 the Court dismissed the petition for lack of merit and from that order the petitioners have appealed.

The petitioners insist that there is a prejudicial question brought about by the institution of the civil case that puts in issue the validity of the mortgage and foreclosure of the two parcels of land that precisely are involved in or connected with the criminal complaints for usurpation, grave coercion and estafa filed against them. They contend that the investigation by the Quezon Assistant City Attorney should be stopped or suspended until after the prejudicial question shall have been determined or decided in the aforementioned civil case, for, they argue, if the mortgage on the two parcels of land referred to and their extra-judicial foreclosure be annulled, the criminal complaints for usurpation, grave coercion and estafa, all in connection with the mortgage of the aforesaid two parcels of land, their extra-judicial foreclosure and the attempts by the complainants to take possession of the parcels of land, would no longer have any ground on which to stand.

Instead of filing a brief, respondent-appellee Francisco T. Koh moved for the dismissal of the appeal on the ground that there is no specific assignment of errors in the petitioners-appellants’ brief and that the appeal is frivolous.

Granting that the prejudicial question raised by the appellants be legally correct, still the time or moment to ask for the suspension of the criminal proceedings is not during the period of preliminary investigation by the city prosecuting officer but after such investigation and after he shall have filed the informations against the appellants. Should the prosecuting officer find that the mortgage on the parcels of land was not really executed, or, if executed, it was through deceit and misrepresentation, he certainly would not file the informations.

The order appealed from is affirmed, without pronouncement as to costs in both instances.

Bautista Angelo, Concepcion, Barrera, Paredes and Dizon, JJ., concur.

Labrador, J., took no part.

Reyes, J.B.L., J., concurs in the result.




Back to Home | Back to Main




















chanrobles.com





ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com






May-1962 Jurisprudence                 

  • G.R. No. L-19721 May 10, 1962 - CARLOS CUNANAN v. JORGE TAN, JR.

  • G.R. No. L-15580 May 10, 1962 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. PACIFICO CLOMA

  • G.R. No. L-19593 May 10, 1962 - DELFIN B. ALBANO v. PROVINCIAL BOARD OF CANVASSERS OF ISABELA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-14975 May 15, 1962 - NATIONAL LABOR UNION v. COURT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-11938 May 18, 1962 - LA CAMPANA STARCH FACTORY, ET AL. v. KAISAHAN NG MGA MANGGAGAWA SA LA CAMPANA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-12658 May 18, 1962 - FORTUNATO PICHAY, ET AL. v. MICHAEL S. KAIRUZ

  • G.R. No. L-14573 May 18, 1962 - CONCEPCION FELICIANO v. COURT OF AGRARIAN RELATIONS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-15092 May 18, 1962 - ALFREDO MONTELIBANO, ET AL. v. BACOLOD-MURCIA MILLING CO., INC.

  • G.R. Nos. L-17041-17042 May 18, 1962 - TOMAS LITIMCO v. LA MALLORCA

  • G.R. No. L-17153 May 18, 1962 - UNITED STATES RUBBER CO. v. MARIANO MEDINA

  • G.R. No. L-17524 May 18, 1962 - FELICIANO VERGARA v. CIRIACO VERGARA

  • G.R. No. L-18883 May 18, 1962 - PEDRO ESTELLA v. PEDRO EDAÑO

  • G.R. No. L-10457 May 22, 1962 - CONCEPCION H. LUNA, ET AL. v. PEDRO P. SANTOS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-16472 May 23, 1962 - JUANA VDA DE MARTEL, ET AL. v. JULIANA F. ADRALES, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-16628 May 23, 1962 - VIVENCIO LASALA, ET AL. v. JOSE F. FERNANDEZ, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-17593 May 24, 1962 - INES SAPONG CASEÑAS, ET AL. v. RICARDO JANDAYAN

  • G.R. No. L-18420 May 24, 1962 - DALMACIO PREPOTENTE v. JOSE SURTIDA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-17788 May 25, 1962 - LUIS RECATO DY, ET AL. v. COURT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-17905 May 25, 1962 - IGNACIO CAMPOS, ET AL. v. MANILA RAILROAD COMPANY, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-15345 May 26, 1962 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. RICARDO MAPA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-15915 May 26, 1962 - MARCELINO T. MACARAEG, ET AL. v. PHILIPPINE NATIONAL BANK

  • G.R. No. L-17923 May 26, 1962 - REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL. v. ROMAN CANSINO, JR., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-18069 May 26, 1962 - ALFONSO DY CUECO v. SEC. OF JUSTICE, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-16732 May 29, 1962 - RAMON AUGUSTO, ET AL. v. ARCADIO ABING, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-17622 May 29, 1962 - IN RE: FERNANDO UY v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. L-12613 May 30, 1962 - FARM IMPLEMENT MACHINERY CO. v. COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS

  • G.R. No. L-13250 May 30, 1962 - COLLECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. ANTONIO CAMPOS RUEDA

  • G.R. No. L-13555 May 30, 1962 - SOCIAL SECURITY COMMISSION v. FROILAN BAYONA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-14010 May 30, 1962 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. LUIS M. TARUC, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-14207 May 30, 1962 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. DIONISIO MENDIOLA

  • G.R. No. L-15680 May 30, 1962 - LUZON STEVEDORING CORPORATION v. LAND REGISTRATION COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-16027 May 30, 1962 - LUMEN POLICARPIO v. MANILA TIMES PUBLICATION CO., INC., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-16383 May 30, 1962 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. FELIPE LUMANTAS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-16407 May 30, 1962 - ARCADIO G. MATELA v. CHUA TAY

  • G.R. No. L-16828 May 30, 1962 - SI NE v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. L-16850 May 30, 1962 - COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. UNITED STATES LINES COMPANY

  • G.R. No. L-16955 May 30, 1962 - SALVADOR PANLILIO v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-17013 May 30, 1962 - IN RE: YAN HANG v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. L-17025 May 30, 1962 - IN RE: SY SEE v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. L-17338 May 30, 1962 - ADRIANO D. DASALLA, ET AL. v. CITY ATTORNEY OF QUEZON CITY, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-17394 May 30, 1962 - AMADOR D. SANTOS v. DOLORES BANZON TOLENTINO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-17396 May 30, 1962 - CECILIO PE, ET AL. v. ALFONSO PE

  • G.R. No. L-17458 May 30, 1962 - DANILO DAVID v. ALASKA LUMBER COMPANY

  • G.R. No. L-17502 May 30, 1962 - A. V. H. & COMPANY OF THE PHIL. v. WORKMEN’S COMPENSATION COMMISSIONER, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-17588 May 30, 1962 - TERESA REALTY, INC. v. MAXIMA BLOUSE DE POTENCIANO

  • G.R. No. L-17591 May 30, 1962 - CLEOTILDE LAT v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-17616 May 30, 1962 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. FELIPE ABUY

  • G.R. No. L-17656 May 30, 1962 - EDUARDO TAYLOR v. PEDRO M. GIMENEZ, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-17663 May 30, 1962 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ISAURO SANTIAGO

  • G.R. Nos. L-17684-85 May 30, 1962 - VILLA REY TRANSIT, INC. v. PANGASINAN TRANSPORTATION COMPANY, INC., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-17757 May 30, 1962 - MAMERTA DE LA MERCED v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-17896 May 30, 1962 - VALENTIN A. FERNANDO v. ANGAT LABOR UNION

  • G.R. No. L-17920 May 30, 1962 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ORLANDO CARREON

  • G.R. No. L-17932 May 30, 1962 - JOSE D. DE LA CRUZ v. SULPICIO DOLLETE, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-17939 May 30, 1962 - RICARDO CARLOS v. MARIA DE LA ROSA

  • G.R. No. L-17977 May 30, 1962 - JEREMIAS MONTEJO v. DOMINGO CABANGON, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-18023 May 30, 1962 - ANGEL OTIBAR, ET AL. v. DEMETRIO G. VINSON, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-18026 May 30, 1962 - SAN FELIPE IRON MINES, INC. v. JOSE A. NALDO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-18165 May 30, 1962 - PLYWOOD INDUSTRIES, INC. v. WORKMEN’S COMPENSATION COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-18530 May 30, 1962 - JOSE ALCANTARA v. DIONISIA YAP, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-18535 May 30, 1962 - VALDERRAMA LUMBER MANUFACTURERS’ COMPANY, INC. v. L. S. SARMIENTO, CO., INC., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-18871 May 30, 1962 - EDUARDO SOTTO v. DIRECTOR OF PRISONS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-11357 May 31, 1962 - FELIPE B. OLLADA, ETC. v. CENTRAL BANK OF THE PHILIPPINES

  • G.R. No. L-11621 May 31, 1962 - ANTONIA DE GUZMAN VDA. DE RONQUILLO, ET AL. v. FRANCISCO MARASIGAN

  • G.R. No. L-11848 May 31, 1962 - IN RE: ADELA SANTOS GUTIERREZ v. JOSE D. VILLEGAS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-12719 May 31, 1962 - COLLECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. CLUB FILIPINO, INC., DE CEBU

  • G.R. No. L-14180 May 31, 1962 - LUDOVICO ESTRADA, ET AL. v. AMADO S. SANTIAGO, ETC., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-16045 May 31, 1962 - IN RE: CHUA CHIONG v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. Nos. L-16185-86 May 31, 1962 - BENIGNO T. PEREZ, ET AL. v. ANTONIO M. PEREZ

  • G.R. No. L-17437 May 31, 1962 - MENO PE BENITO v. ZOSIMO MONTEMAYOR

  • G.R. No. L-17520 May 31, 1962 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. FAUSTINO BALANCIO, ET AL.

  • G.R. Nos. L-17603-04 May 31, 1962 - CEFERINA SAMO v. PEOPLE OF THE PHIL., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-17835 May 31, 1962 - GONZALO SANTOS RIVERA, ET AL. v. ANTONIO J. VILLEGAS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-17852 May 31, 1962 - REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL. v. AMADOR E. GOMEZ, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-17955 May 31, 1962 - PILAR LAZARO VDA. DE JACINTO, ET AL. v. SALUD DEL ROSARIO VDA. DE JACINTO, ET AL.