Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence


Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 1963 > September 1963 Decisions > G.R. No. L-20183 September 30, 1963 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. EDUARDO BERDICA, ET AL.:




PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

EN BANC

[G.R. No. L-20183. September 30, 1963.]

THE PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. EDUARDO BERDICA Y INGUITO, ET AL., Defendants-Appellants.


SYLLABUS


1. ATTORNEYS; DISCIPLINARY ACTION FOR FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF FOR CLIENTS ON TIME; IMPOSITION OF FINE SET ASIDE IN INSTANT CASE. — Where the record shows that the person who appears to have received the first notice to file brief was not duly authorized by counsel but it is shown that a second notice was duly served on the latter through his wife, on June 9, 1963 and that before the period therein given expired in filed the corresponding motion for 30 days extension which was granted in a resolution by this Court, the extension to expire on August 9, of the same year, and that on August 8, he filed a second motion for an extension of 30 days, the resolution imposing fine of P100.00 upon counsel is set aside and his last motion is granted.


D E C I S I O N


DIZON, J.:


The present case was forwarded to Us by the Court of First Instance of Manila for compulsory review, the defendants (Criminal Case No. 52339 of the lower court) having been sentenced to death, etc. On March 13, 1963, Atty. Agustin R. Homeres, with address at 1-A Road 8 St., Project 6, Quezon City, was notified by registered mail to file his brief for appellants Loreto Saberon and Jesus Felicia within thirty (30) days from notice. The corresponding return card appears to have been signed by one S. Flores on April 22, 1963.

On May 13, 1963, the Clerk of this Court addressed a letter to the Chief of Police, Quezon City, with another copy of the notice mentioned above, with the request that the same be served upon Atty. Homeres, and to inform the court thereafter of the date of said service. The Chief of Police of Quezon City subsequently reported in writing that the notice was delivered to Mrs. Soledad C. Homeres on June 9, 1963.

On June 14, 1963, we passed a resolution requiring Atty. Homeres to explain, within ten (10) days from notice, why disciplinary action should not be taken against him for his failure to file the brief for his clients, notice in connection therewith having been served upon him (apparently through one S. Flores, as stated above), since April 22 of the same year. No explanation appears to have been submitted by him, but on July 8, 1963, he filed an urgent petition for a thirty (30) day extension of time, alleging therein that he had received the notice to file brief only on June 9, 1963, (the notice served through the Quezon City Police Department). This petition was granted by our resolution of July 15 of the same year. Prior to this, however, it appears that due to the non-filing of the brief by Atty. Homeres within the time given in the first notice for the purpose, dated March 13, 1963, and received by one S. Flores on April 22 of the same year, Atty. Rafael Ortigas, Jr. was appointed counsel de officio for Saberon and Felicia and required to prepare their brief within thirty (30) days from notice. On July 29 of the same year, Atty. Ortigas appear to have filed a motion for thirty (30) days extension which was also granted by our resolution of August 8, 1963.

On June 27, 1963, we passed a resolution imposing a fine of P100.00 upon Atty. Agustin Homeres for his failure to file the brief for appellants Saberon and Felicia, copy of which resolution was addressed to him at 1-A Road 8 St., Project 6, Quezon City, but was returned to sender because it was not claimed by the addressee.

Finally, on August 8, 1963, Atty. Homeres filed a written explanation coupled with a petition for thirty (30) days extension from August 9, 1963, alleging that he had not received the notice of March 13, 1963; that the S. Flores who appears to have received the same on his behalf on April 22, 1963 is totally unknown to him and was not a resident of 1-A Road 8 St., Project 6, Quezon City; that the only notice he had received was the one served upon his wife through the Quezon City Police Department on June 9, 1963, in connection with which, on July 8 of the same year, he filed a motion for an extension of thirty (30) days, which was granted, the extension to expire on August 9 of the same year.

We do not find in the record any conclusive proof that the S. Flores who appears to have received the first notice to file brief was duly authorized by Atty. Homeres. On the other hand, what the record discloses is that a second notice was duly served on him, through his wife, by the Quezon City Police Department, on June 9, 1963 and that before the period therein given expired, he filed the corresponding motion for thirty (30) days extension, which was granted by our resolution of July 15, 1963, the extension to expire on August 9 of the same year, and that on August 8, he filed a second motion for an extension of thirty (30) days.

IN VIEW, OF ALL THE FOREGOING, our resolution of June 27, 1963 imposing a fine of P100.00 upon Atty. Homeres is hereby set aside, and his last motion is granted and he is hereby granted a definitely last extension of thirty (30) days from notice hereof within which to file the brief for appellants Saberon and Felicia.

The appointment of Atty. Rafael Ortigas, Jr. as counsel de officio for the same appellants is hereby set aside, and let the corresponding notice be served on him accordingly.

Bengzon, C.J., Padilla, Bautista Angelo, Labrador, Barrera, Paredes, Regala and Makalintal, JJ., concur.

Concepcion and Reyes, J.B.L., JJ., took no part.




Back to Home | Back to Main




















chanrobles.com





ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com






September-1963 Jurisprudence                 

  • G.R. No. L-18685 September 13, 1963 - EMB. MOTORS WORKERS UNION v. COURT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-19856 September 16, 1963 - KINDIPAN BELLENG v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. L-18342 September 19, 1963 - PNB v. GALICANO ADOR DIONISIO, ET AL.

  • A.C. No. 408 September 30, 1963 - GERVACIO DAUZ v. NAPOLEON O. FONTANOSA

  • G.R. No. L-10280 September 30, 1963 - QUA CHEE GAN, ET AL. v. DEPORTATION BOARD

  • G.R. No. L-13895 September 30, 1963 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. AMBROCIO BELEN, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-14890 September 30, 1963 - CONRADO ALCANTARA v. MACAPANTON ABBAS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-15159 September 30, 1963 - VENEFRIDA A. DE RIVERA, ET AL. v. FORTUNATO F. HALILI

  • G.R. No. L-15287 September 30, 1963 - VIVENCIO JORNALES, ET AL. v. CENTRAL AZUCARERA DE BAIS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-15430 September 30, 1963 - IPEKDJIAN MERCHANDISING CO., INC. v. COURT OF TAX APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-15540 September 30, 1963 - DIRECTOR OF LANDS v. TUASON & LEGARDA, LTD., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-15620 September 30, 1963 - ANTONIO M. PATERNO, ET AL. v. JOSE V. SALUD

  • G.R. No. L-16365 September 30, 1963 - CITY BOARD OF CANVASSERS, ET AL. v. HON. SEGUNDO MOSCOSO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-16499 September 30, 1963 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. LEODIZON HONRADO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-16928 September 30, 1963 - GREGORIO GUECO, ET AL. v. ATANASIA VDA. DE LACSON, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-16937 September 30, 1963 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. AURELIA MAGBORANG

  • G.R. No. L-17091 September 30, 1963 - IN RE: CHUNG LIU v. CHUNG KIAT HUA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-17092 September 30, 1963 - REMEDIOS E. ESPIRITU v. ARMINIO RIVERA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-17182 September 30, 1963 - NATIVIDAD CASTELLVI RAQUIZA v. RAYMUNDA CAREAGA OFILADA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-17598 September 30, 1963 - JACINTO TIANGCO, ET AL. v. FAUSTINA LAUCHANG

  • G.R. No. L-17895 September 30, 1963 - FELIX ASTURIAS, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-17956 September 30, 1963 - ELISA D. GABRIEL v. REGISTER OF DEEDS OF RIZAL, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-18223 & L-18224 September 30, 1963 - COMM. BANK & TRUST CO. OF THE PHIL. v. REP. ARMORED CAR SERVICE CORP., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-18403 September 30, 1963 - MAURICIA G. DE VILLANUEVA v. PNB

  • G.R. No. L-18405 September 30, 1963 - URBANO DE VENECIA, ET AL. v. AQUILINO DEL ROSARIO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-18467 September 30, 1963 - VICTORIAS MILLING CO., INC. v. VICTORIAS-MANAPLA WORKERS ORG.-PAFLU, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-18566 September 30, 1963 - IN RE: GILBERT R. BREHM, ET AL. v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. L-18567 September 30, 1963 - CAPITAL INS. AND SURETY CO., INC. v. MARIO DELGADO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-18824 September 30, 1963 - RODRIGO COLOSO v. DOMINGO DE JESUS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-18873 September 30, 1963 - MANILA HOTEL CO. v. COURT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-18927 September 30, 1963 - GOV`T. SERVICE INS. SYSTEM EMP. ASSO., ET AL. v. GREGORIO T. LANTIN, ET AL.

  • G.R. Nos. L-18932-33-34 September 30, 1963 - J. M. TUASON & CO., INC. v. LIBERATO, JARAMILLO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-18974 September 30, 1963 - ITOGON-SUYOC MINES, INC. v. FRUTO DULAY, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-20079 September 30, 1963 - ROBERTO V. MERRERA v. JUAN R. LIWAG, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-20183 September 30, 1963 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. EDUARDO BERDICA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-20235 September 30, 1963 - REMEGIO GABUYA v. EUTAQUIO M. DAYAO

  • G.R. No. L-20245 September 30, 1963 - TOMAS A. BORJA v. DIOSCORO DE LEON, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-20585 September 30, 1963 - ARSENIO VELUZ v. COURT OF APPEALS, (Special First Division), ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-21256 September 30, 1963 - SALVADOR L. CALO v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.