Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence


Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 1964 > January 1964 Decisions > G.R. No. L-15027 January 31, 1964 - IN RE: JIMMY LEE v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.:




PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

EN BANC

[G.R. No. L-15027. January 31, 1964.]

IN THE MATTER OF THE PETITION OF JIMMY LEE TO BE ADMITTED A CITIZEN OF THE PHILIPPINES. JIMMY LEE, Petitioner-Appellee, v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES, Oppositor-Appellant.

Nicolas P. Baban for Petitioner-Appellee.

Solicitor General for Oppositor-Appellant.


SYLLABUS


1. CITIZENSHIP; NATURALIZATION; DECLARATION OF INTENTION; LATE PAYMENT OF FILING FEE ANNULS PROCEEDINGS. — Where petitioner’s verified declaration of intention was sent by registered mail to the Solicitor General’s Office in 1953 but the required filing fee was paid only in 1956, barely 5 1/2 months prior to the filing of the petition for citizenship, it is held that the declaration was not filed in accordance with the legal requirement that such declaration be filed at least one year before the filing of the petition for citizenship.


D E C I S I O N


DIZON, J.:


On November 17, 1956, Jimmy Lee, a Chinese national, filed a petition for naturalization with the Court of First Instance of Iloilo (Special Proceedings No. 54), attaching thereto a copy of his declaration of intention to become a Filipino citizen, the original of which was sent, by registered mail, to the Office of the Solicitor General on October 23, 1953; a copy of an order of the Court of First Instance of Iloilo in Special Proceedings No. 1219 authorizing him to change his name from Yip Hap to Jimmy Lee, and the affidavit of his character witnesses.

The Solicitor General, through the City Fiscal of Iloilo, filed an opposition on the general ground that petitioner did not possess all the qualifications requisite for naturalization.

On August 15, 1958, after trial, the Court rendered judgment admitting petitioner to Philippine citizenship upon fulfillment of all the conditions and requisites provided for by law. The same became final and executory for the reason that the Office of the Solicitor General filed the required record on appeal beyond the reglementary period.

Upon a re-examination of the record of the case in his office, the Solicitor General discovered that, although petitioner’s declaration of intention appeared to have been sworn to by him and sent to said Office by registered mail on October 23, 1953, the required filing fee of P10.00 was paid only on May 23, 1956 upon demand made on petitioner. In view thereof, the Solicitor General, on October 29, 1958, filed a motion to annul the proceedings in the case on the ground that the one-year jurisdictional requirement provided for in Section 5 of the Naturalization Law, as amended, had not been, complied with, because petitioner’s declaration of intention was validly filed only on May 23, 1956 when the aforesaid filing fee was remitted, barely 5 1/2 months prior to the filing of the petition for naturalization. The Court denied the motion in its order of December 6, 1958. Hence, this appeal.

The point raised by the Solicitor General is well taken and should have been sustained by the lower court.

It is not disputed that petitioner’s case is one where, according to law, a Declaration of Intention should have been filed with the Office of the Solicitor General at least one year before the filing of the petition for citizenship in court. On the other hand, Section 21 of the Naturalization Law authorizes the Secretary of Justice to issue the necessary regulations for the proper enforcement of said act, while it similarly authorizes the Solicitor General to prepare and furnish the necessary naturalization certificate blanks and other forms required to carry out the provisions of the law, subject to the approval of the Secretary of Justice. One such regulation requires the payment of a filing fee of P10.00 upon the filing of the requisite Declaration of Intention. In this connection, it is not denied that petitioner Lee limited himself to sending his declaration of intention to the Office of the Solicitor General by registered mail on May 23, 1956, without paying the required filing fee. This obviously was not in compliance with the law and the regulations validly promulgated for the enforcement of its provisions.

We have held heretofore, in pari materia, that if half only of the appellate court’s docket fee was deposited and the other half was tendered after the expiration of the period of appeal, no appeal is deemed perfected. (Lazaro v. Endencia, 57, Phil. 552). Stated otherwise, the ruling means that all steps taken by an appellant for purposes of appeal, including the partial payment of the appellate court’s docket fee, become of no legal value if the unpaid balance on the latter is not paid before the expiration of the period of appeal. In the light of this ruling, we must conclude that the filing of petitioner’s declaration of intention on October 23, 1953 produced no legal effect until the required filing fee was paid on May 23, 1956, that is, about 5 1/2 months before petitioner filed his petition for citizenship on November 17, 1956 — obviously not in compliance with the law on the matter.

WHEREFORE, the order appealed from is set aside. As a result, all proceedings below leading to the rendition of the judgment granting petitioner’s application for citizenship are declared null and void. With costs.

Bengzon, C.J., Padilla, Bautista Angelo, Labrador, Concepcion, Reyes, J.B.L., Barrera, Paredes, Regala and Makalintal, JJ., concur.




Back to Home | Back to Main




















chanrobles.com





ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com






January-1964 Jurisprudence                 

  • G.R. No. L-17605 January 22, 1964 - POBLETE CONSTRUCTION CO. ET AL v. SOCIAL SECURITY COMMISSION, ET AL

  • G.R. No. L-18511 January 22, 1964 - IGNACIO VERDERA, ET AL v. JAIME HERNANDEZ, ET AL

  • G.R. No. L-15894 January 30, 1964 - REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL. v. EQUITABLE BANKING CORP.

  • G.R. No. L-16490 January 30, 1964 - PANGASINAN TRANS. CO., INC. v. WORKMEN’S COMPENSATION COM., ET AL

  • G.R. No. L-18345 January 30, 1964 - PAN-AM WORLD AIRWAYS v. PAA EMPLOYEES’ ASSO., ET AL

  • G.R. No. L-18506 January 30, 1964 - IN RE: AO LIN v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. L-18516 January 30, 1964 - IN RE: YAP CHUN v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. L-18521 January 30, 1964 - IN RE: KWAN KWOCK HOW v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. L-18611 January 30, 1964 - CITY LUMBER, INC. v. HON. MELECIO R. DOMINGO, ET AL

  • G.R. No. L-18776 January 30, 1964 - URBANO SAPICO, ET AL. v. MANILA OCEANIC LINES, INC., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-19377 January 30, 1964 - MANILA RAILROAD CO. v. WORKMEN’S COMPENSATION COM. ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-19850 January 30, 1964 - VIGAN ELECTRIC LIGHT CO. INC. v. PUBLIC SERVICE CO.

  • G.R. No. L-20416 January 30, 1964 - JUAN N. EVANGELISTA, ET AL v. HON. LUIS B. REYES, ET AL

  • G.R. No. L-14941 January 31, 1964 - NATALIO VENTOSA v. HON. WENCESLAO L. FERNAN, ET AL

  • G.R. No. L-15027 January 31, 1964 - IN RE: JIMMY LEE v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. L-15334 January 31, 1964 - BOARD OF ASSESSMENT APPEALS, ET AL v. MANILA ELECTRIC CO.

  • G.R. No. 15460 January 31, 1974

    PEDRO SAN DIEGO v. AUDITOR GENERAL

  • G.R. No. L-15645 January 31, 1964 - PAZ P. ARRIETA, ET AL v. NATIONAL RICE & CORN CORP.

  • G.R. No. L-16349 January 31, 1964 - VICENTE J. FRANCISCO v. AUREA MATIAS

  • G.R. No. L-16896 January 31, 1964 - CATALINA B. ALBERCA v. SUPERINTENDENT OF THE CORRECTIONAL INST. FOR WOMEN

  • G.R. No. L-17749 January 31, 1964 - VICENTE TAMAYO v. SAN MIGUEL BREWERY, INC.

  • G.R. No. L-17871 January 31, 1964 - MANILA RAILROAD CO. v. COURT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS, ET AL

  • G.R. Nos. L-18071-72 January 31, 1964 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. BONIFACIO INDIC, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-18236 January 31, 1964 - ANGEL ESLER v. DOMINGO ELLAMA, ET AL

  • G.R. No. L-18237 January 31, 1964 - IRINEO V. BERNARDO v. VICENTE DEL ROSARIO, ET AL

  • G.R. No. L-18291 January 31, 1964 - PHIL. INTERNATIONAL SURETY CO. INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS

  • G.R. No. L-18482 January 31, 1964 - MARIA ROA v. HON. JUDGE L. PASICOLAN, ET AL

  • G.R. No. L-18510 January 31, 1964 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ALBERTO M. SABBUN

  • G.R. No. L-18583 January 31, 1964 - VICENTE D. SARMIENTO v. HON. MONTANO A. ORTIZ, ET AL

  • G.R. No. L-18773 January 31, 1964 - CMS ESTATE, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-18788 January 31, 1964 - ROMULO LOPEZ, ET AL. v. LUIS GONZAGA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-18885 January 31, 1964 - CHIENG YEN v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. L-19064 January 31, 1964 - IN RE: PAZ E. SIGUION TORRES v. CONCHITA TORRES, ET AL

  • G.R. No. L-19065 January 31, 1964 - MANUELA ADVINCULA v. MANUEL ADVINCULA

  • G.R. No. L-19420 January 31, 1964 - PHIL. ASSO. OF FREE LABOR UNION, ET AL v. SERGIO BOGNOT, ET AL

  • G.R. No. L-19554 January 31, 1964 - PURIFICACION PASCUA v. HON. JESUS Y. PEREZ, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-19631 January 31, 1964 - PASTOR D. AGO v. HON. TEOFILO B. BUSLON, ET AL

  • G.R. No. L-19742 January 31, 1964 - LUZON STEVEDORING CO., INC. v. WORKMEN’S COMPENSATION COM. ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-19745 January 31, 1964 - ELISEO FLORA, ET AL. v. VICENTE OXIMANA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-19782 January 31, 1964 - COMMISSIONER OF IMMIGRATION v. HON. HONORIO ROMERO, ET AL

  • G.R. No. L-19881 January 31, 1964 - ALFREDO CERBO v. HON, GREGORIO D. MONTEJO, ET AL

  • G.R. No. L-20025 January 31, 1964 - FAUSTINO CUNETA v. MANUEL CASTAÑEDA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-20242 January 31, 1964 - FRANCISCO ALLAM, ET AL. v. VALENTINA ACOSTA, ET AL

  • G.R. No. L-20741 January 31, 1964 - SOCORRO A. GILLERA v. CORAZON FERNANDEZ, ET AL

  • G.R. No. L-21399 January 31, 1964 - VILLA-REY TRANSIT, INC. v. HON. ELOY B. BELLO, ET AL.