Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence


Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 1964 > March 1964 Decisions > G.R. No. L-19098 March 31, 1964 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. PLACIDO SUSANO, ET AL.:




PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

EN BANC

[G.R. No. L-19098. March 31, 1964.]

THE PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. PLACIDO SUSANO, ET AL., Defendant-Appellant.

Solicitor General for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Cornelio M. Aguila, for Defendants-Appellants.


SYLLABUS


1. ROBBERY WITH HOMICIDE; ALIBI NOT CREDIBLE WHERE SUPPORTED BY INTERESTED WITNESSES. — The defense of alibi cannot merit credence where the witnesses for the defense have a clear interest in the fate of the accused, being his wife, his mother-in-law, and another one who is his relative, and especially where his presence and participation in the occurrence have been established by the positive testimonies of eyewitnesses.


D E C I S I O N


CONCEPCION, J.:


Appeal by defendant Placido Susano, from a decision of the Court of First Instance of Rizal convicting him of the crime of robbery with homicide and less serious physical injuries, with which he is charged, and sentencing him to the extreme penalty, to indemnify the heirs of the deceased Gregorio Vergara in the sum of P6,000, and to pay the costs.

It is not disputed that on May 22, 1959, between 10:00 and 11:00 p.m., while Gregorio Vergara and Victoria Rivera were asleep in their house, in the barrio of Bagumbayan or Bagombong, municipality of Caloocan, Province of Rizal, several persons broke into the house and beat said couple; that one of the malefactors fired the gun with which he was armed; that Victoria Rivera lost consciousness in consequence of the maltreatment; that when she came to, her husband was already dead, and the sum of P25, as well as several pieces of jewelry, valued altogether P440, had disappeared; and that a medical examination performed the next day showed that Gregorio Vergara had sustained several lacerated wounds, as well as contusions, and fractures, particularly in the occipital and temporal regions, which caused his death due to hemorrhage, intracranial, and traumatic, whereas Victoria Rivera had a contusion which required medical treatment from five (5) to seven (7) days.

About two (2) weeks later, or on June 5, 1959, the corresponding information for robbery with homicide and less serious physical injuries was filed against Placido Susano and two (2) other persons whose identity has not been established. On April 16, 1960, or less than ten (10) months later, and about eleven (11) months after the occurrence, Susano was apprehended in the barrio of Kalina, municipality of Tagkaoayan, Quezon. After due trial, under a plea of not guilty, the aforementioned decision was rendered. Hence, this appeal.

The issue in this case hinges on the identity of the person who killed Gregorio Vergara. In this connection, Victoria Rivera and her son-in-law Antonio Zuñiga, identified Placido Susano as one of the malefactors. More specifically, Victoria Rivera testified that the person who hit her husband with a gun was said appellant; that as she tried to rise from the floor, a companion held her by the neck; that, at this juncture, appellant fired his gun: that immediately thereafter, she became unconscious for he kicked her on the face; that, when she came to, the malefactors were gone, her husband was dead and the money and articles above referred to were missing; that she was able to recognize appellant, because there was a lighted gas lamp in her house, and moon was shining, apart from the fact she had known appellant since his childhood, they being neighbors; and that, soon after the occurrence, her son-in-law, Antonio Zuñiga and other persons came to her assistance.

Zuñiga in turn asserted that, while he was asleep in his house, about fifty (50) meters away from that of his parents-in-law, he was awakened by the report of a gun; that, thereupon, he went to his window and looked towards the house of the Vergaras, where the shot had seemingly been fired; that, being unable to see anything therein, he proceeded to said house; that, when he was about ten (10) meters away from the same, appellant — whom he had known since his childhood — darted from the gate and pointed a gun at him; that, accordingly, he ran away shouting for help; that, shortly, thereafter, he and several other neighbors went to the house of the Vergaras and there found Victoria Rivera sobbing, with swollen eyes, over the dead body of her husband; and that her "aparador" appeared to have been ransacked and the contents thereof were scattered on the floor.

Upon the other hand, appellant has set up an alibi. He would have us believe that, in the evening of May 20, 1959, he eloped with one Mercedes Marcos, whom he brought from her house in Meycauayan, Bulacan, to that of one Ramon Mendoza, in Santa Maria, Bulacan, where they stayed up to May 27, 1959; that on May 28, 1959 appellant went to Manila, from hence he returned to Santa Maria, Bulacan, on May 31, 1959; and that then he and Mercedes Marcos went to Tagkaoayan, Quezon Province, where he was arrested by the Constabulary on April 16, 1960.

However, Bismarco Tuazon, a member of the intelligence section of the Constabulary and a resident of the same barrio in Meycauayan where Mercedes Marcos was living, testified that she had never left that barrio during the month of May, 1959. Moreover, appellant’s corroborating witnesses were said Mercedes Marcos, whom he married on August 3, 1959, his mother-in-law and Roman Mendoza, who is also related to appellant, although at first he (Mendoza) tried to deny such relationship.

Considering that these witnesses for the defense have a clear interest in the fate of the accused and that his presence and participation in the occurrence have been established by the positive testimonies of Victoria Rivera and Antonio Zuñiga, we are satisfied that the lower court has not erred in finding appellant guilty as charged. For lack of the requisite number of votes, the extreme penalty imposed by the lower court should be and is hereby commuted to life imprisonment. With this modification, the decision appealed from is hereby affirmed, in all other respects, with costs against appellant Placido Susano. It is so ordered.

Padilla, Bautista Angelo, Labrador Reyes, J.B.L., Barrera, Paredes, Dizon, Regala and Makalintal, JJ., concur.

Bengzon, C.J., took no part.




Back to Home | Back to Main




















chanrobles.com





ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com






March-1964 Jurisprudence                 

  • G.R. No. L-14077 March 31, 1964 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. TEODULO RIVERAL, ET AL

  • G.R. No. L-15470 March 31, 1964 - CONNELL BROS. CO. (PHIL.) v. COLLECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE

  • G.R. No. L-15598 & 15726 March 31, 1964 - CONRADO HABAÑA, ET AL v. JOSE T. IMBO, ET AL

  • G.R. No. L-16018 March 31, 1964 - JOSE BUMANGLAG v. MELECIO BARAOIDAN, ET AL

  • G.R. No. L-16152 March 31, 1964 - JOSE T. ARIVE SR. v. HON. VICENTE S. TUASON

  • G.R. No. L-16243 March 31, 1964 - MANILA YELLOW TAXICAB Co. v. FRANCISCA VILUAN

  • G.R. No. L-16466 March 31, 1964 - PLYWOOD INDUSTRIES, INC. v. JOSE ARAÑAS

  • G.R. No. L-16991 March 31, 1964 - ROBERTO LAPERAL, JR., ET AL. v. RAMON L. KATIGBAK, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-17032 March 31, 1964 - INSURANCE CO. OF NORTH AMERICA v. UNITED STATES LINES CO., ET AL

  • G.R. No. L-17074 March 31, 1964 - NAT’L. MARKETING CORP. v. HON. BIENVENIDO TAN, ET AL

  • G.R. No. L-17085 March 31, 1964 - LUZON BROKERAGE CO. v. LUZON LABOR UNION

  • G.R. No. L-17234 March 31, 1964 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. NICOLAS G. MOJICA

  • G.R. No. L-17629 March 31, 1964 - GREGORIO ROBLES v. CONCEPCION FERNANDO BLAYLOCK

  • G.R. No. L-17790 March 31, 1964 - LORENZO LIM, ET AL v. FRANCISCO DE LA ROSA

  • G.R. No. L-17847 March 31, 1964 - MANUEL A. Q. SORIANO v. FIDEL SAHAGUN

  • G.R. No. L-18046 March 31, 1964 - PAULINO M. CASTRILLO, ET AL v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL

  • G.R. No. L-18289 March 31, 1964 - ANDRES ROMERO v. MAIDEN FORM BRASSIERE CO., INC., ET AL

  • G.R. No. L-18354 March 31, 1964 - CHENG BAN YEK CO., INC. v. AUDITOR GENERAL

  • G.R. No. L-18492 March 31, 1964 - MAMERTO TUBERA, ET AL. v. MARGARITA FERNANDO

  • G.R. No. L-18517 March 31, 1964 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. LORENZO CANDAVA, ET AL

  • G.R. No. L-18616 March 31, 1964 - VICENTE M. COLEONGCO v. EDUARDO L. CLAPAROLS

  • G.R. No. L-18664 March 31, 1964 - ISMAEL CALMA v. HON. JUDGE DOMINGO M. CABAÑGON, ET AL

  • G.R. No. L-18799 March 31, 1964 - HON. JOSE F. FERNANDEZ, ET AL v. HERMINIO MARAVILLA

  • G.R. No. L-18897 March 31, 1964 - MAXIMA NIETO DE COMILANG v. ABDON DELENELA, ET AL

  • G.R. No. L-18899 March 31, 1964 - IN RE: SIXTO MAGDALUYO, ET AL. v. ACTING DIRECTOR, NBI

  • G.R. No. L-19098 March 31, 1964 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. PLACIDO SUSANO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-19115 March 31, 1964 - REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL. v. MANILA PORT SERVICE

  • G.R. No. L-19254 March 31, 1964 - BENGUET CONSOLIDATED, INC. v. SOCIAL SECURITY SYSTEM

  • G.R. No. L-19349 March 31, 1964 - FELICISIMO B. SERRANO, ET AL. v. NAT’L. SCIENCE DEV’T. BOARD, ET AL.

  • G.R. Nos. L-19358-59 March 31, 1964 - CITY OF MANILA v. VENANCIO BACAY, ET AL

  • G.R. No. L-19389 March 31, 1964 - VALENTIN EDUQUE v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL

  • G.R. No. L-19557 March 31, 1964 - MANILA ELECTRIC CO. v. PASCUAL ORTAÑEZ, ET AL

  • G.R. No. L-19568 March 31, 1964 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. JOSE L. CHUPECO

  • G.R. No. L-19619 March 31, 1964 - PRISCO ILAGAN v. MACARIO ADAME, ET AL.

  • G.R. Nos. L-19629 and L-19672-92 March 31, 1964 - GUILLERMO PONCE v. MARCELO GUEVARRA, ET AL

  • G.R. No. L-19654 March 31, 1964 - EMILIANO LUSTRE, ET AL v. COURT OF AGRARIAN RELATIONS, ET AL

  • G.R. No. L-19799 March 31, 1964 - DIRECTOR OF LANDS v. PAULINO MANUEL, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-20137 March 31, 1964 - REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL. v. FRANCISCO AMIL, ET AL

  • G.R. No. L-21991 March 31, 1964 - LUIS ASISTIO, ET AL. v. HON. LOURDES P. SAN DIEGO

  • G.R. No. L-22342 March 31, 1964 - HADJI AZIZ LUMNA TANGO v. HON. CRISTOBAL ALEJANDRO, ET AL