Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence


Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 1964 > November 1964 Decisions > G.R. No. L-19642 November 9, 1964 - IN RE: NILDA TSE v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.:




PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

FIRST DIVISION

[G.R. No. L-19642. November 9, 1964.]

IN THE MATTER OF THE PETITION FOR ADMISSION TO PHILIPPINE CITIZENSHIP. NILDA TSE @ NIL, Petitioner-Appellee, v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES, Oppositor-Appellant.

Dominador M. Gonzales for Petitioner-Appellee.

Solicitor General for Oppositor-Appellant.


SYLLABUS


1. CITIZENSHIP: NATURALIZATION; REQUIREMENT OF LUCRATIVE TRADE; BONUSES AND COMMISSIONS NOT CONSIDERED. — Alleged bonuses and commissions of an applicant for naturalization cannot be taken into consideration in determining compliance with the requirement of a lucrative trade or occupation, because they are, by their nature, indefinite and unsteady.

2. ID.; ID.; ID.; EMPLOYMENT AS PURCHASING AGENT BY FATHER AND AS PHARMACY STUDENT DURING SAME PERIOD IN DIFFERENT PLACES INCREDIBLE. — It is incredible that an applicant for naturalization could be employed by her father as a purchasing agent for a store in Leyte, when she was, during the same period, a pharmacy student of a university in Cebu.

3. ID.; ID.; CHARACTER WITNESSES MUST BE MORE THAN MERE NODDING ACQUAINTANCES OF APPLICANT. — The character witnesses of the applicant, who are respectively merely a customer of the applicant’s store and a neighbor who meets here every day or a period not stated in the record, are not competent enough to vouch for her good moral character during the entire period of her residence because this knowledge of her character needs more than a mere nodding acquaintanceship with the applicant.


D E C I S I O N


BARRERA, J.:


In the decision of the Court of First Instance of Southern Leyte, granting the petition for naturalization of Nilda Tse, alias Nil, it appears that said petitioner was born in Danao, Cebu on April 25, 1935, of Chinese parents; that her father was admitted to Philippine citizenship, but she was no longer a minor when he took his oath as a Filipino citizen; that petitioner was employed as a purchasing agent of the Evergreen Grocery, an establishment owned by her father, with a monthly salary of P250.00; that at the time of the hearing, she was on her fifth year as pharmacy student at the University of San Carlos. Two witnesses testified to her good moral character, and behavior. Based on said evidence, the court found petitioner as possessing all the qualifications and none of the disqualifications to become a citizen of the Philippines. The Solicitor General appealed from said decision, contesting the finding of the lower court that petitioner has a gainful or lucrative trade or occupation.

Petitioner’s claim that she has a lucrative occupation is not supported by the records. She testified during the hearing that as an employee of her father, in his establishment at Maasin, Leyte, she receives a monthly salary of P130.00, aside from commission and bonus, which give her a total income of P300.00 a month. In the first place, a salary of P120.00 a month cannot be considered lucrative. We cannot take into consideration the alleged bonuses and commissions because they are, by their nature, indefinite and unsteady. Secondly, as certified to by the Registrar of the University of San Carlos, she was in June, 1961 a fifth year student in Pharmacy of said institution. It is indeed incredible that she could be employed by her father as a purchasing agent for the store in Leyte when she was, during the same period, a student of the University of San Carlos in Cebu. There is even no showing that she has ever paid the necessary tax for such alleged income. Other than her bare assertion, there is really no evidence that petitioner has a lucrative trade or employment.

We also found that petitioner failed to satisfy the requirement of the law on proof of good moral character. In support of her allegation, of good moral character and behavior, petitioner put up two witnesses, Raymundo Gonzales, who declared that he had known petitioner since 1953 when petitioner’s father set up a store in Maasin, Leyte, from where he "used to buy cigarettes", and Vicente Kangleon, who testified that he is a neighbor and meets petitioner almost everyday. Kangleon, however, failed to specify the length of time that they had been neighbors.

It cannot be said that the first witness’ casual acquaintance with petitioner, as such customer of their store, qualified him to vouch for the good moral character and behavior of petitioner. Neither the fact that one is a neighbor and meets her everyday make of said witness competent to testify on her morality and character. Witnesses in naturalization proceedings are required to vouch on their good moral character during the entire period that they had known applicant and this certainly needs more than a mere nodding acquaintanceship with the latter.

FOR THE FOREGOING REASONS, the decision of the lower court granting the petition for naturalization of Nilda Tse is hereby reversed and set aside. No costs. So ordered.

Bengzon, C.J., Bautista Angelo, Concepcion, Reyes, J.B.L., Paredes, Makalintal, Regala, Bengzon, J.P. and Zaldivar, JJ., concur.




Back to Home | Back to Main




















chanrobles.com





ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com






November-1964 Jurisprudence                 

  • G.R. No. L-17064 November 9, 1964 - FIDEL GERALDEZ v. JOSE S. RODRIGUEZ

  • G.R. No. L-19642 November 9, 1964 - IN RE: NILDA TSE v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. L-17020 November 17, 1964 - PABLO ALMARINEZ v. CRESENCIANA MANABAT POTENCIANO

  • G.R. No. L-17118 November 17, 1964 - IN RE: UY ENG HIOK v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. L-16677 November 27, 1964 - LAMBERTO YNOTORIO, ET AL. v. CANUTA LIRA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-17445 November 27, 1964 - MANILA UNDERWRITERS INSURANCE CO., INC. v. BIENVENIDO A. TAN

  • G.R. No. L-17642 November 27, 1964 - CANDIDA REYES v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. L-18922 November 27, 1964 - NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT CO. v. WORKMEN’S COMPENSATION COMMISSION

  • G.R. No. L-18208 November 27, 1964 - REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL. v. MANILA PORT SERVICE

  • G.R. No. L-19133 November 27, 1964 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. FELIX MAGPANTAY

  • G.R. No. L-20138 November 27, 1964 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. DOMINADOR SEGARINO Y BORGA

  • G.R. No. L-21951 November 27, 1964 - IN RE: UGGI LINDAMAND THERKELSE v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. L-9866-7 November 28, 1964 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. JULIAN TIONGSON Y DE LA CRUZ

  • G.R. No. L-14250 November 28, 1964 - MARIA LOURDES PRIANES v. FERMIN HENSON

  • G.R. No. L-15945 November 28, 1964 - PORFIRIO VILLAMOR v. ARSENIO H. LACSON

  • G.R. Nos. L-16076-77 November 28, 1964 - ESTEBAN VILLANUEVA v. MISAMIS LUMBER Co., INC.

  • G.R. No. L-17249 November 28, 1964 - LICOTEDRA PARCOTILO v. FILOMENA PARCOTILO

  • G.R. No. L-17401 November 28, 1964 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. SANTIAGO RAQUEL

  • G.R. No. L-17469 November 28, 1964 - JUAN SORIANO v. PERFECTO R. PALACIO

  • G.R. No. L-17850 November 28, 1964 - JOSE MALIMIT v. ESTEBAN DEGAMO

  • G.R. No. L-18116 November 28, 1964 - CLODUALDO MENESES v. ESTANISLAO LUAT

  • G.R. Nos L-18444-45 November 28, 1964 - MANILA RAILROAD CO. v. UNION DE MAQUINISTAS, FOGONEROS Y MOTORMEN

  • G.R. No. L-18487 November 28, 1964 - GENERAL ENTERPRISES, INC. v. LIANGA BAY LOGGING CO., INC.

  • G.R. No. L-18621 November 28, 1964 - SALVADOR D. LACUNA v. BOARD OF LIQUIDATORS

  • G.R. No. L-18891 November 28, 1964 - PEOPLE’S HOMESITE & HOUSING CORP. v. MELCHOR TIONGCO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-19299 November 28, 1964 - FELIZA JOVEN DE JESUS v. PHILIPPINE NATIONAL BANK

  • G.R. No. L-19473 November 28, 1964 - REMEDIOS L. VDA. DE LACSAMANA v. DOMINGO M. CABANGON

  • G.R. No. L-19518 November 28, 1964 - TRINIDAD A. DEAÑO v. DIOGENEZ GODINEZ

  • G.R. No. L-19519 November 28, 1964 - IN RE: ANANIAS ABUSTAN v. RUPERTO FERRER

  • G.R. No. L-19564 November 28, 1964 - SERREE INVESTMENT CO. v. COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS

  • G.R. No. L-19733 November 28, 1964 - ARSENIO L. CANLAS v. JUDGE OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE OF TARLAC

  • G.R. No. L-20031 November 28, 1964 - MAGDALENA RULLAN v. BERNARDO O. VALDEZ

  • G.R. No. L-20043 November 28, 1964 - LOURDES RAMIREZ-CUADERNO v. ANGEL CUADERNO

  • G.R. No. L-20228 November 28, 1964 - ROMANA CAMPITA v. AQUILINO L. VILLANUEVA

  • G.R. No. L-20345 November 28, 1964 - RICARDO HAUTEA v. RAMON S. MAGALLON, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-20403 November 28, 1964 - TOMAS S. CARPIO v. CORAZON JULIANO AGRAVA

  • G.R. No. L-20484 November 28, 1964 - VIDAL PAULINO v. ADELAIDA ROSENDO

  • G.R. No. L-20860 November 28, 1964 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. GLICERIO NAVARRO

  • G.R. No. L-21189 November 28, 1964 - JOSE AVENDAÑO, ET AL. v. FEDERICO C. ALIKPALA, ET AL.