Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence


Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 1965 > May 1965 Decisions > G.R. No. L-20618 May 25, 1965 - HERMENEGILDO R. ROSALES v. FLAVIANO YENKO:




PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

EN BANC

[G.R. No. L-20618. May 25, 1965.]

HERMENEGILDO R. ROSALES, Petitioners, v. FLAVIANO YENKO, Respondent.

Crispin D. Baizas & Associates for Petitioner.

Solicitor General for Respondents.


SYLLABUS


1. PUBLIC OFFICERS; AD-INTERIM APPOINTMENT MUST BE RELEASED TO AND ACCEPTED BY APPOINTEE BEFORE ACTION BY COMMISSION ON APPOINTMENTS. — Where there is no clear allegation and proof that an ad-interim appointment was released to, and accepted by the appointee, and that latter duly qualified for the position, (it is held that) such appointment is incomplete and, as a result, there is in fact and in law no ad-interim appointment that could be validly transmitted to, and acted upon by the Commission on Appointments.


D E C I S I O N


DIZON, J.:


On July 26, 1958, former President Carlos P. Garcia appointed petitioner ad interim Chairman of the Board of Examiners for Chemists, for a term expiring July 15, 1961. This appointment was submitted to, and was confirmed by the Commission on Appointments and petitioner duly qualified and discharged the duties of the office.

On July 16, 1961, petitioner was reappointed as Acting Chairman of the same Board. On November 6 of the same year, President Garcia signed petitioner’s ad interim appointment to the office for another term expiring on July 15, 1964. This ad interim appointment, however was not released and delivered to petitioner, as conclusively indicated by the fact that the original thereof remained in the Office of the President. Respondent, however, admits that a copy thereof was transmitted to the Commission on Appointments on December 26, 1961, on the basis of which said Commission took cognizance of the appointment and confirmed it on May 17, 1962. Then on July 31, 1962, the Commissioner of Civil Service informed petitioner that his last ad interim appointment had been recalled, withdrawn, and declared without effect by virtue of Administrative Order No. 2, dated December 31, 1961, and on November 5, 1962, President Diosdado Macapagal appointed respondent Yenko as Acting Chairman of the Board of Examiners for Chemists, who thereafter assumed the functions and duties of said office.

On December 14, 1962, petitioner filed the petition now before Us praying that we:jgc:chanrobles.com.ph

"1. Declare null and void the designation of respondent as Acting Chairman of the Board of Examiners for Chemists;

"2. Declare as valid, legal and subsisting petitioner’s appointment as Chairman of the Board of Examiners for Chemists for a term expiring on July 15, 1964, which appointment has been duly confirmed by the Commission on Appointments;

"3. By way of provisional remedy, issue a writ of preliminary injunction enjoining and restraining respondent from performing any act pursuant to his appointment aforementioned;

"4. Permanently prohibit respondent from assuming said office and from performing any of the duties and obligations thereof during the term of office of petitioner;

"5. Sentence respondent to pay for the costs of this suit; and

"6. Grant such other relief as may be deemed just and equitable under the premises."cralaw virtua1aw library

It will be noticed that the petition under consideration does not allege that the original of the last ad interim appointment was transmitted to, and was received by petitioner — obviously because said original was never released by the Office of the President. Neither does it allege that, upon receipt thereof, petitioner had accepted the appointment and duly qualified for the position by taking the corresponding oath of office.

In relation to the above matters, petitioner merely alleges that by virtue of his designation as Acting Chairman and later by virtue of the last ad interim appointment, "petitioner performed the duties and obligations of Chairman" of the Board of Examiners for Chemists and enjoyed all the rights and privileges appurtenant thereto. Further on this matter, in an affidavit attached to his memorandum as Annex A, petitioner could go no further than to state that on November 9, 1961, the then Acting Executive Secretary Edilberto Gallares notified him by telephone that his last ad interim appointment had already been signed by President Garcia and was ready for submission to the Commission on Appointments, and that on a subsequent social occasion in Malacañang, President Garcia himself told him that his ad interim appointment had already been signed by him. These allegations are not sufficient to take the place of a clear allegation and proof that the ad interim appointment aforesaid was not only signed but was released to petitioner, and that by virtue thereof, he had accepted it and duly qualified for the position. We are of the opinion, therefore, that, on the basis of petitioner’s own allegations, his last ad interim appointment was incomplete and that, as a result, there was in fact and in law no ad interim appointment that could be validly transmitted to, and acted upon by the Commission on Appointments on May 17, 1962.

WHEREFORE, petitioner having failed to allege and prove that he is rightfully entitled to the Office of Chairman of the Board of Examiners for Chemists, the petition under consideration is hereby dismissed, without costs.

Bengzon, C.J., Bautista Angelo, Reyes, J.B.L., Barrera, Paredes, Regala, Makalintal, Bengzon, J.P. and Zaldivar, JJ., concur.

Concepcion, J., took no part.




Back to Home | Back to Main




















chanrobles.com





ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com






May-1965 Jurisprudence                 

  • G.R. No. L-16784 May 19, 1965 - IN RE: LIANE C. GOMEZ v. AUGUSTO G. SYJUCO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-19997 May 19, 1965 - VISAYAN BICYCLE MANUFACTURING CO. v. NATIONAL LABOR UNION, ET AL

  • G.R. No. L-20139 May 19, 1965 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. SEGUNDO MARQUEZ Y CASTRO, ET AL

  • G.R. No. L-20282 May 19, 1965 - FORTUNATO F. HALILI v. EUSEBIO DAPLAS

  • G.R. No. L-20791 May 19, 1965 - MANUEL F. AQUINO, ET AL v. NUMERIANO G. ESTENZO, ET AL

  • G.R. No. L-20815 May 19, 1965 - SANTIAGO MANZANO v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-19537 May 20, 1965 - LINO GUTIERREZ, ET AL v. COLLECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE

  • G.R. No. L-18766 May 20, 1965 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. RAMON LOPEZ

  • G.R. No. L-19537 May 20, 1965 - LINO GUTIERREZ, ET AL. v. COLLECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE

  • G.R. No. L-19727 May 20, 1965 - COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. PHOENIX ASSURANCE CO., LTD.

  • G.R. No. L-20430 May 20, 1965 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. EDUVIGES SAN ANTONIO

  • A.C. No. 611 May 25, 1965 - BONIFACIO GARCIA, ET AL v. ATTY. ABELARDO MILLA

  • G.R. No. L-20448 May 25, 1965 - NAPOLEON MAGALIT, ET AL. v. COURT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-20618 May 25, 1965 - HERMENEGILDO R. ROSALES v. FLAVIANO YENKO

  • G.R. No. L-14532 & L-14533 May 26, 1965 - JOSE LEON GONZALES v. COURT OF TAX APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-13469 May 27, 1965 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. PABLO EGUAL, ET AL

  • G.R. No. L-15706 May 27, 1965 - ILDEFONSO D. YAP, ET AL v. MANUEL L. CARREON

  • G.R. No. L-18804 May 27, 1965 - COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. WESTERN PACIFIC CORPORATION

  • G.R. No. L-19450 May 27, 1965 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. SIMPLICIO VILLANUEVA

  • G.R. No. L-21997 May 27, 1965 - JOSE C. ZULUETA v. COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS

  • G.R. No. L-13816 May 31, 1965 - SEVERO ROMERO, ET AL. v. ISABELO DE LOS REYES, JR.

  • G.R. No. L-17132 May 31, 1965 - JUAN BENEMERITO, ET AL v. PETRONILA COSTANILLA, ET AL

  • G.R. No. L-17320 May 31, 1965 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ROMEO PAZ, ET AL

  • G.R. No. L-17712 May 31, 1965 - BASILIO UNSAY, ET AL v. CECILIA MUÑOZ PALMA, ET AL

  • G.R. No. L-18038 May 31, 1965 - ROSA GUSTILO v. AUGUSTO GUSTILO, ET AL

  • G.R. No. L-18348 May 31, 1965 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. CAMILO CALACALA

  • G.R. No. L-18443 May 31, 1965 - ENRIQUE SISON, ET AL v. JUAN PAJO, ET AL

  • G.R. No. L-18452 May 31, 1965 - AUGUSTO COSIO, ET AL v. CHERIE PALILEO

  • G.R. No. L-18497 May 31, 1965 - DAGUPAN TRADING COMPANY v. RUSTICO MACAM

  • G.R. No. L-19346 May 31, 1965 - SOLEDAD L. LACSON, ET AL. v. ABELARDO G. DIAZ

  • G.R. No. L-19587 May 31, 1965 - RAFAEL JALOTJOT v. MARINDUQUE IRON MINES AGENTS, INC., ET AL

  • G.R. No. L-19646 May 31, 1965 - IN RE: ESPIRITU NG v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. L-19659 May 31, 1965 - DR. POLICARPIO C. ALISOSO v. TARCELA LASTIMOSO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-19967 May 31, 1965 - ARSENIO REYES v. SINAI C. HAMADA, ET AL

  • G.R. No. L-20202 May 31, 1965 - CIRIACO HERNANDEZ v. WORKMEN’S COMPENSATION COMMISSION, ET AL

  • G.R. No. L-20227 May 31, 1965 - IN RE: GO KEM LIM v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. Nos. L-20275-79 May 31, 1965 - VIRGINIA B. UICHANCO, ET AL v. FIDEL GUTIERREZ, ET AL

  • G.R. No. L-20394 May 31, 1965 - STEPHEN W. MARTIN v. CELESTINO GOMEZ

  • G.R. No. L-20472 May 31, 1965 - MARIO F. OUANO, ET AL v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-20577 May 31, 1965 - VISAYAN PACKING CORP. v. REPARATIONS COMMISSION

  • G.R. No. L-20617 May 31, 1965 - BRUNO GARCIA v. DALMACIO ANAS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-20737 May 31, 1965 - ROQUE ESCAÑO v. RODRIGO C. LIM

  • G.R. No. L-20792 May 31, 1965 - ELIZALDE & CO., INC. v. ALLIED WORKERS ASSO. OF THE PHIL., ET AL

  • G.R. No. L-20950 May 31, 1965 - REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL. v. AYALA Y CIA, ET AL

  • G.R. No. L-21235 May 31, 1965 - RODOLFO TIRONA v. M. CUDIAMAT

  • G.R. No. L-21653 May 31, 1965 - VICENTE DE LARA, JR., ET AL v. GAUDENCIO CLORIBEL, ET AL

  • G.R. No. L-21764 May 31, 1965 - VICENTE CABILING, ET AL. v. EUSEBIO PABULAAN, ET AL.