Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence


Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 1965 > November 1965 Decisions > G.R. No. L-20715 November 27, 1965 - HENRY TIONG, ET AL. v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.:




PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

EN BANC

[G.R. No. L-20715. November 27, 1965.]

HENRY TIONG, ET AL., Petitioners-Appellees, v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES, Oppositor-Appellant.

De Santos & Delfino for Petitioners-Appellees.

Solicitor General for Oppositor-Appellant.


SYLLABUS


1. CIVIL REGISTRY; CORRECTION OF ENTRIES; CHANGES BROUGHT ABOUT BY JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS AFTER PETITIONERS’ BIRTH. CASE AT BAR. — Petitioners are the legitimate children of a Chinese citizen who, later, became a Filipino through naturalization. Since they were minors when their father became a Filipino citizen, the law gives them the right to be considered as Filipino citizens as a consequence of the naturalization of their father. And because the names appearing in their birth certificates which appear on file in the office of the local civil registrar were those given to them when they were born and before the naturalization of their father, it is but fair that the corresponding annotation thereon regarding their true status and citizenship be made to avoid any misunderstanding in the future. The corrections or changes sought to be made not being controversial but matters which are supported by indubitable documents, the same can be made under Art. 412 of the new Civil Code.


D E C I S I O N


BAUTISTA ANGELO, J.:


Petitioners seek to make certain corrections or annotations on their respective certificates of birth on file in the office of the local civil registrar to show their present citizenship as well as their new surnames upon payment of the requisite fees. The government filed an opposition contending that the entries sought to be corrected are substantial and controversial in nature and as such they cannot be made under Article 412 of the new Civil Code.

On the basis of the stipulation of facts submitted by the parties, the court a quo issued an order granting the petition prayed for.

It appears that petitioners Henry Tiong, Robert Tiong, and George Tiu are the legitimate children of Tiong Sim @ Go Bon King and Benita Tiu; that Henry Tiong was born on April 20, 1939, Robert Tiong on April 12, 1947 and George Tiu on February 19, 1949; that Tiong Sim @ Go Bon King became a Filipino citizen by virtue of a decree issued by the Court of First Instance of Manila on December 5, 1953, which became final and executory on December 15, 1955, on which date he took his oath as a Filipino citizen; that Tiong Sim @ Go Bon King later applied with the same court for a change of name from his present name to that of Daniel C. Go, which was granted, the decision to that effect having become final; that after said change has been made a notation thereof was made on the certificate of naturalization issued in favor of Tiong Sim @ Go Bon King after having obtained the requisite judicial authority; that after their father obtained the Filipino citizenship petitioners were issued the corresponding identification certificates by the Bureau of Immigration wherein their citizenship as Filipino was duly recorded as a consequence of the naturalization of their father; and because these facts are undisputed the court a quo allowed the necessary correction or annotation to be made on the birth certificates of petitioners on file in the office of the local civil registrar.

The government now comes before this Court contending that the court a quo erred in granting the petition notwithstanding its pronouncement that what it seeks to change in the birth certificates of petitioners is not the correction of an error committed at the time of the preparation of the birth certificates but certain changes that were brought about by certain judicial proceedings undertaken after petitioner’s birth. It is claimed that his impression is incorrect for the real purpose of the petition is in effect to correct certain mistakes which are not merely clerical but which involve a change of names and citizenship which in substance affects the status of petitioners.

We disagree with this claim for the simple reason that the corrections or changes which are sought to be made are not controversial but matters which are supported by indubitable documents. Thus, it appears that petitioners were the minor children of Tiong Sim @ Go Bon King who while at first was a Chinese citizen later became a Filipino through naturalization having taken his oath as Filipino citizen after the reglementary period prescribed by law on December 15, 1955. Then, he applied for a change of name from the original name given to him at birth to that of Daniel C. Go, the decision to that effect having become final on January 16, 1956. And this change of name, as well as his change of citizenship, was annotated on the respective identification certificates issued to petitioners by the Bureau of Immigration pursuant to the naturalization of their father. These facts are undisputed. And because the names appearing in their birth certificates which appear on file in the office of the local civil registrar were those given to them when they were born and before the naturalization of their father, it is but fair that the corresponding annotation thereon regarding their true status and citizenship be made to avoid any misunderstanding in the future.

As may be seen the changes that are sought to be made in the civil registry are not controversial but based on undisputed evidence. Nor can it be disputed that petitioners are legitimate children who are entitled to bear the surname of their father. And since they are minors when their father became a Filipino citizen, the law also gives them the right to be considered as Filipino citizens as a consequence of the naturalization of their father pursuant to the proviso that "Minor children of persons naturalized under this law who have been born in the Philippines shall be considered citizens thereof." (Commonwealth Act No. 473, Section 15, as amended by Republic Act No. 530). This also finds support in Article 407 of the new Civil Code which provides: "Acts, events and judicial decrees concerning the civil status of persons shall be recorded in the civil register."cralaw virtua1aw library

WHEREFORE, the order appealed from is affirmed. No costs.

Bengzon, C.J., Concepcion, Reyes, J. B L., Dizon, Regala, Makalintal, Bengzon, J.P., and Zaldivar, JJ., concur.




Back to Home | Back to Main




















chanrobles.com





ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com






November-1965 Jurisprudence                 

  • G.R. No. L-22697 November 2, 1965 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. DONION TAN Y CUI @ DIONING

  • G.R. No. L-17159 November 23, 1965 - AFAG VETERAN CORPS, INC. v. MARIANO G. PINEDA

  • G.R. No. L-20199 November 23, 1965 - COSMOPOLITAN INSURANCE CO., INC. v. ANGEL B. REYES

  • G.R. No. L-20715 November 27, 1965 - HENRY TIONG, ET AL. v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. L-20910 November 27, 1965 - YAO LONG v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. L-21138 November 27, 1965 - IN RE: ROBERTO TING TONG v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. L-20915 November 27, 1965 - IN RE: TEOFILO LU v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. L-15939 November 29, 1965 - ANGELES UBALDE PUIG, ET AL. v. ESTELA MAGBANUA PEÑAFLORIDA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-16905 November 29, 1965 - ROSARIO OLIVEROS, ET., AL. v. JOSE QUERUBIN

  • G.R. No. L-17027 November 29, 1965 - YU KIMTENG CONSTRUCTION CORP. v. MANILA RAILROAD CO.

  • G.R. No. L-17059 November 29, 1965 - PEDRO MANIQUE, ET AL. v. CEFERINO F. CAYCO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-17160 November 29, 1965 - PHIL. PRODUCTS CO. v. PRIMATERIA SOCIETE ANONYME POUR

    LE COMMERCE EXTERIEUR: PRIMATERIA (PHIL.) INC.

  • G.R. No. L-17294 November 29, 1965 - CU BIE, ET., AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS

  • G.R. No. L-17312 November 29, 1965 - ARTURO R. TANCO, JR. v. PHILIPPINE GUARANTY CO.

  • G.R. No. L-17406 November 29, 1965 - FINLEY J. GIBBS, ET AL. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-17640 November 29, 1965 - VIRGINIA I. VDA. DE LIMJOCO v. DIRECTOR OF COMMERCE

  • G.R. No. L-17884 November 29, 1965 - ADOLFO GASPAR v. LEOPOLDO DORADO

  • G.R. No. L-18669 November 29, 1965 - IN RE: TY BIO GIAO v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. L-18673 November 29, 1965 - ALEX LO KIONG v. UNITED STATES LINES CO.

  • G.R. No. L-19120 November 29, 1965 - LA MALLORCA v. ARMANDO MERCADO

  • G.R. No. L-19193 November 29, 1965 - FERNANDO O. PALAROAN v. AURORA A. ANAYA, ET., AL.

  • G.R. No. L-19585 November 29, 1965 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. NAPOLEON C. ORTIZ

  • G.R. No. L-19671 November 29, 1965 - PASTOR B. TENCHAVEZ v. VICENTA F. ESCAÑO, ET., AL.

  • G.R. No. L-20160 November 29, 1965 - IN RE: GREGORIO GO v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. L-20281 November 29, 1965 - DOMINGO MALOGA v. VICENTE G. GELLA, ET., AL.

  • G.R. No. L-20342 November 29, 1965 - GOVERNMENT SERVICE INSURANCE SYSTEM v. MANILA RAILROAD COMPANY, ET., AL.

  • G.R. No. L-20643 November 29, 1965 - PEOPLE’S HOMESITE & HOUSING CORP. v. MARCIANO BAYLON, ET., AL.

  • G.R. No. L-20764 November 29, 1965 - SANTOS JUAT v. COURT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS

  • G.R. No. L-20799 November 29, 1965 - IN RE: JOSE T. UY v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. L-20805 November 29, 1965 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. IGNACIO DESIDERIO

  • G.R. No. L-20819 November 29, 1965 - IN RE: GAN TSITUNG v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. L-20845 November 29, 1965 - MANILA RAILROAD CO. v. LADISLAO MANALANG

  • G.R. No. L-20850 November 29, 1965 - EDWARD J. NELL COMPANY v. PACIFIC FARMS, INC.

  • G.R. No. L-20912 November 29, 1965 - LI TONG PEK v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. L-20980 November 29, 1965 - PHIL. INTERNATIONAL SURETY CO. v. COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS

  • G.R. No. L-21017 November 29, 1965 - IN RE: SENECIO DY ONG v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. L-21192 November 29, 1965 - IN RE: JESUS YAP v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. L-21217 November 29, 1965 - SERREE INVESTMENT CO. v. COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS

  • G.R. No. L-21255 November 29, 1965 - PHILIPPINE NATIONAL BANK v. JAIME R. NUEVAS

  • G.R. No. L-21316 November 29, 1965 - CEFERINA V. DAVID v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. L-21447 November 29, 1965 - JOSE REYES, ET., AL. v. FRANCISCO ARCA

  • G.R. No. L-21453 November 29, 1965 - AURORA VILLAMIN SY v. COMMISSIONER OF IMMIGRATION

  • G.R. No. L-21811 November 29, 1965 - SEE GUAN v. COMMISSIONER OF IMMIGRATION

  • G.R. No. L-22040 November 29, 1965 - YU CHI HAN v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. L-22712 November 29, 1965 - CANDIDO UY alias RICARDO UY v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. L-22778 November 29, 1965 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. TEOFILO B. BUSLON

  • G.R. No. L-24962 November 29, 1965 - VICE MAYOR ANTONIO C. JARO v. ROSARIO P. ISIDERIO, ET., AL.