Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence


Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 1969 > November 1969 Decisions > G.R. No. L-26919 November 25, 1969 - HANOVER INSURANCE COMPANY v. UNITED STATES LINES COMPANY, ET AL:




PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

EN BANC

[G.R. No. L-26919. November 25, 1969.]

THE HANOVER INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES LINES COMPANY, PACIFIC FAR EAST LINE, INC. and REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES, Defendants-Appellees.

Quasha, Asperilla, Blanco, Zafra & Tayag, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Solicitor General Antonio P. Barredo, Assistant Solicitor General Antonio G. Ibarra and Solicitor Pio P. Cordero for defendant-appellee Republic of the Philippines.


SYLLABUS


1. POLITICAL LAW; STATE; CUSTOMS ARRASTRE SERVICE; IMMUNITY FROM SUIT; CASE OF MOBIL PHILIPPINES EXPLORATION, INC. v. ARRASTRE SERVICE APPLICABLE IN INSTANT CASE. — The points raised by appellant in instant case that the Republic had shed its immunity from suit were raised and squarely decided in Case G.R. No. L-23139, Mobil Philippines Exploration, Inc. v. Customs Arrastre Service, promulgated on 17 .December 1966, wherein this Court ruled that arrastre operations by the Bureau of Customs were purely incidental to the governmental function of assessing and collecting customs duties due on imported merchandise; that in engaging in such necessary incidental activity the government did not waive its immunity from suit without its express consent. Since that decision down to our judgment in Phoenix Assurance Co. v. Republic of the Philippines, L-16531, rendered only last October (1969), the Mobil doctrine has been consistently upheld and reaffirmed in over twenty decisions of this Court. No adequate reason has been shown here to vary from such well-established and uniform rulings.


D E C I S I O N


REYES, J.B.L., J.:


Appeal from the judgment of the Court of First Instance of Manila, in its Case No. 61831, dismissing petitioner-appellant’s suit for damages.

Appellant had insured a cargo of materials for paint manufacture shipped by Connel Bros. Company, Ltd. on board the SS "Philippine Bear" of the United States Lines and consigned to National Lead Co. (Phil.), Inc. of Manila. Discharged at the latter port into the custody of the Bureau of Customs Arrastre Service of the Philippine Republic, the cargo was delivered with part of it missing or damaged by rain to the extent of P5,948.00. As insurer, appellant paid the damage and brought suit, as subrogee of the consignee of the cargo, to recover the amount from the shipping company and the Republic as "arrastre" operator.

The action was dismissed as aforesaid by Judge Jose N. Leuterio, on the grounds that the shipping company’s liability ended upon delivery of the cargo to the Customs Arrastre Service and that the Republic was not suable for the negligence of the Customs Arrastre officials.

On appeal to this Court, the insurance company insists that the Republic had shed its immunity from suit by engaging in non-governmental activities.

The appeal must fail. The points raised by appellant were raised and squarely decided in Case G.R. No. L-23139, Mobil Philippines Exploration, Inc. v. Customs Arrastre Service, promulgated on 17 December 1966 (18 SCRA 1120), wherein this Court ruled that arrastre operations by the Bureau of Customs were purely incidental to the governmental function of assessing and collecting customs duties due on imported merchandise; that in engaging in such necessary incidental activity the Government did not waive its immunity from suit without its express consent. Since that decision down to our judgment in Phoenix Assurance Co. v. Republic of the Philippines, L-16531, rendered only last October (1969), the Mobil doctrine has been consistently upheld and reaffirmed in over twenty decisions of this Court. No adequate reason has been shown here to vary from such well-established and uniform rulings.

The judgment appealed from is affirmed. Costs against appellants.

Concepcion, C.J., Dizon, Makalintal, Zaldivar, Sanchez, Castro, Fernando, Teehankee and Barredo, JJ., concur.




Back to Home | Back to Main




















chanrobles.com





ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com






November-1969 Jurisprudence                 

  • G.R. No. L-31127 November 5, 1969 - NICANOR D. YÑIGUEZ v. COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS

  • G.R. No. L-26395 November 21, 1969 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. MONICO O. CERVERA

  • G.R. No. L-25534 November 22, 1969 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. FELIPE C. FASTIDIO

  • G.R. No. L-26919 November 25, 1969 - HANOVER INSURANCE COMPANY v. UNITED STATES LINES COMPANY, ET AL

  • G.R. No. L-28132 November 25, 1969 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. FORTUNATO G. CASILLAR, ET AL

  • G.R. No. L-29117 November 25, 1969 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. CIPRIANO DIGAMON

  • G.R. No. L-27444 November 27, 1969 - ADOLFO E. CASTILLO, ET AL v. ISAAC ABALAYAN

  • G.R. No. L-28864 November 27, 1969 - MODESTA GANABAN, ET AL v. MAGDALENA BAYLE

  • G.R. No. L-18916 November 28, 1969 - JOSE ABESAMIS v. WOODCRAFT WORKS, LTD.

  • G.R. No. L-21010 November 28, 1969 - TAN PONG, ET AL v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL., ET AL

  • G.R. No. L-21688 November 28, 1969 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. SALIP MANLA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-22013 November 28, 1969 - PASTOR ESCALANTE v. ABELARDO SUBIDO, ET AL

  • G.R. No. L-22545 November 28, 1969 - BALDOMERO S. LUQUE, ET AL v. HON. ANTONIO J. VILLEGAS, ET AL

  • G.R. No. L-23564 November 28, 1969 - CANUTO PAGDANGANAN v. ELADIO GALLETA, ET AL

  • G.R. No. L-24059 November 28, 1969 - C. M. HOSKINS & CO., INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE

  • G.R. Nos. L-24373-74 November 28, 1969 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. MANUEL MARQUEZ, ET AL

  • G.R. No. L-24390 November 28, 1969 - PASCUAL STA. ANA v. ARCADIO NARVADES, ET AL

  • G.R. No. L-26534 November 28, 1969 - ANTONIO J. VILLEGAS, ET AL v. ABELARDO SUBIDO

  • G.R. No. L-26582 November 28, 1969 - TIMOTEO RUBLICO, ET AL v. FAUSTO ORELLANA

  • G.R. No. L-26733 November 28, 1969 - NATIONAL WATERWORKS & SEWERAGE AUTHORITY v. HON. GAUDENCIO CLORIBEL, ET AL

  • G.R. No. L-26828 November 28, 1969 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. HON. GUILLERMO P. VILLASOR, ET AL

  • G.R. No. L-26885 November 28, 1969 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. LUCENA C. TAPAYAN

  • G.R. No. L-26906 November 28, 1969 - SANCHO B. DE LEON, ET AL. v. MUNICIPALITY OF CALUMPIT

  • G.R. No. L-26978 November 28, 1969 - PROVIDENCE WASHINGTON INSURANCE COMPANY v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-26994 November 28, 1969 - CALTEX (Philippines), INC. v. CUSTOMS ARRASTRE SERVICE

  • G.R. No. L-27150 November 28, 1969 - LUZ JALANDONI VDA. DE SERRA v. HON. RAFAEL M. SALAS, ET AL

  • G.R. No. L-27332 November 28, 1969 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. MIGUEL JAMISOLA, ET AL

  • G.R. No. L-27415 November 28, 1969 - REMBERTO SOLIDUM YBAÑEZ v. INOCENCIO DE LA CERNA

  • G.R. No. L-27638 November 28, 1969 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. MARCELINO BAUTISTA, ET AL

  • G.R. No. L-27645 November 28, 1969 - FILIPINAS INVESTMENT & FINANCE CORP. v. LOURDES V. RIDAD, ET AL

  • G.R. No. L-28280-81 November 28, 1969 - GERONIMO DE LOS REYES v. GREGORIO ESPINELI, ET AL

  • G.R. No. L-28643 November 28, 1969 - CATALINO GAMALOG, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ETC., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-29039 November 28, 1969 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. HON. FELINO D. ABALOS, ET AL

  • G.R. No. L-29243 November 28, 1969 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. PRUDENCIO L. MAGLAYA

  • G.R. No. L-29315 November 28, 1969 - LA MALLORCA v. WORKMEN’S COMPENSATION COMMISSION, ET AL

  • G.R. No. L-29623 November 28, 1969 - EASTERN TAYABAS BUS CO., INC. v. PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, ET AL

  • G.R. No. L-29665 November 28, 1969 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. DEMETRIO B. ENCARNACION

  • G.R. No. L-19621 November 29, 1969 - RURAL BANK OF LUCENA, INC., ET AL. v. CENTRAL BANK OF THE PHIL., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-21484 November 29, 1969 - ACCFA v. CUGCO, ET AL

  • G.R. No. L-21783 November 29, 1969 - PACIFIC FARMS, INC. v. SIMPLICIO G. ESGUERRA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-21937 November 29, 1969 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. FELIPE B. PAREJA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-25292 November 29, 1969 - ZAMBOANGA TRANS. CO., INC., ET AL v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL

  • G.R. No. L-25899 November 29, 1969 - LOURDES ZACARIAS v. HON. FERNANDO A. CRUZ, ET AL

  • G.R. No. L-26272 November 29, 1969 - EDILBERTO R. PUNO v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-26290 November 29, 1969 - IN RE: TAN AN v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. L-27151 November 29, 1969 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ALEXANDER TILOS, ET AL

  • G.R. Nos. L-29510-31 November 29, 1969 - SIMPLICIO PALANCA v. HON. JOSE R. QUERUBIN, ET AL

  • G.R. No. L-29543 November 29, 1969 - GLORIA PAJARES v. JUDGE ESTRELLA ABAD SANTOS, ET AL