Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence


Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 1970 > October 1970 Decisions > G.R. No. L-26327 October 16, 1970 - IN RE: FELICIANO T. TAN v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.:




PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

FIRST DIVISION

[G.R. No. L-26327. October 16, 1970.]

IN THE MATTER OF THE PETITION OF FELICIANO T. TAN, TO BE ADMITTED A CITIZEN OF THE PHILIPPINES, Petitioner, v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES, oppositor.

Geminiano M. Eleccion for Petitioner.

Solicitor General Antonio P. Barredo, Assistant Solicitor General Isidro C. Borromeo and Solicitor Norberto P. Eduardo for oppositor.


SYLLABUS


1. POLITICAL LAW; NATURALIZATION; ONE YEAR RESIDENCE IMMEDIATELY PRECEDING FILING OF PETITION, REQUIRED. — As the record shows that petitioner had been residing at 1036 Reina Regente Street, Manila, since March 1960 up to and during the hearing of his petition for naturalization which was filed in the Court of First Instance of Oriental Negros on June 16, 1961, it is clear that he did not have the requisite one year residence in Oriental Negros immediately preceding the filing of his petition. This is in violation of the provision of the revised naturalization law to the effect that the Court of First Instance of the province in which the petitioner had resided at least one year immediately preceding the filing of his petition has the exclusive original jurisdiction to hear his petition for naturalization. The Court below, therefore, had no jurisdiction over petitioner’s case.

2. ID.; ID.; FAILURE TO STATE PLACES OF RESIDENCE, FATAL. — The record discloses that petitioner resided at different times in different places while his petition for naturalization made only a broad allegation to the effect that he had resided continuously in the Philippines for a term of not less than thirty years immediately preceding the date of said petition and at the municipality of Larena, Oriental Negros. Held: These circumstances make the petition fatally defective, it having been consistently held by this Court that petitioner’s failure to state in his petition all his residences affects the authority of the Court to act upon his case.

3. ID.; ID.; MONTHLY INCOME OF P200, NOT LUCRATIVE. — The evidence shows that petitioner’s income at the time when he filed his petition for naturalization was only two hundred pesos per month--an amount which, according to the standard set in previous decisions of this Court, cannot be considered lucrative.


D E C I S I O N


DIZON, J.:


Appeal taken by the Republic of the Philippines from a decision of the Court of First Instance of Oriental Negros granting the petition for naturalization filed by Feliciano T. Tan on June 16, 1961 which alleged, inter alia, the following:chanrob1es virtual 1aw library

That petitioner was a Chinese citizen born on June 9, 1931, in Larena, Oriental Negros, which place had since then been his residence; that he was single, working as a salesman at the Motor Supply located at 1032-36 Reina Regente Street, Manila, with a monthly salary of two hundred pesos; that he had all the qualifications and none of the disqualifications provided by law; that he was exempt from filing a declaration of intention: that Esperidion G. Heceta and Cornelio Padayhag, both Filipinos of legal age, whose joint affidavit was attached to the petition, would appear and testify as his character witnesses.

The State prays for the reversal of the appealed decision claiming that the following errors were committed by the trial court:chanrob1es virtual 1aw library

"I


THE LOWER COURT ERRED IN ASSUMING JURISDICTION OVER THE CASE DESPITE THE FACT THAT PETITIONER HAS NOT RESIDED IN NEGROS ORIENTAL AT LEAST FOR ONE YEAR IMMEDIATELY BEFORE THE FILING OF THE PETITION.

II


THE LOWER COURT ERRED IN ALLOWING WITNESSES OTHER THAN THOSE WHO WERE ENUMERATED IN THE PETITION TO TESTIFY ON THE QUALIFICATIONS AND MORAL CHARACTER OF THE PETITIONER.

III


THE LOWER COURT ERRED IN NOT DISMISSING THE PETITION FOR FAILURE OF THE PETITIONER TO STATE IN THE PETITION ALL HIS FORMER PLACES OF RESIDENCE.

IV


THE LOWER COURT ERRED IN NOT FINDING THAT PETITIONER DOES NOT HAVE A LUCRATIVE INCOME."cralaw virtua1aw library

The first, third and fourth assignments of error are meritorious.

The record shows that petitioner had been residing at 1036 Reina Regente Street, Manila, since March 1960, up to and during the hearing of the petition. Since the petition was filed on June 21, 1961, it is clear that petitioner did not have the requisite one-year residence in Oriental Negros immediately preceding the filing of his petition in violation of the provision of the revised naturalization law to the effect that the Court of First Instance of the province in which the petitioner had resided at least one year immediately preceding the filing of his petition has the exclusive original jurisdiction to hear his petition for naturalization. Consequently, the court below had no jurisdiction over petitioner’s case (Chin Cuan Go v. Republic, G.R. L-15794, December 29, 1962; Cheng Yen v. Republic, G.R. L-18885, January 31, 1964; Lim v. Republic, G.R. L-9999, December 24, 1957).

In connection with the third assignment of error the record also shows that petitioner had resided at different times in the following places:chanrob1es virtual 1aw library

1. At Larena, Negros Oriental from birth on June 9, 1931 until 1947 when he finished his Elementary grades (p. 28, tsn.);

2. At Dumaguete, Negros Oriental from 1947 to 1949 (pp. 28, 33-34);

3. In Manila from 1949-51 (pp. 28, 34, 35, t.s.n.);

4. In Dumaguete City from 1951 to 1952 (p. 34, t.s.n.);

5. In Cebu City, from 1952 to 1954 (p. 34, t.s.n.); and

6. In Manila at 1036 Reina Regente from March 1960 up to the time of the hearing of the Petition (pp. 22, 40, t.s.n.).

His petition for naturalization (Record on Appeal, page 2), however, simply alleges that he had resided continuously in the Philippines for a term of not less than thirty years immediately preceding the date of his petition, and at the municipality of Larena, Oriental Negros. This makes petitioner’s application fatally defective, it having been consistently held by this Court that petitioner’s failure to state in his petition all his residences affects the authority of the Court to act upon his case (Yap v. Republic, G.R. L-19832, August 23, 1966; Nerio Tan v. Republic, G.R. L-22207, May 30, 1946; Agueda Go v. Republic, G.R. L-21895, April 29, 1960; Tan v. Republic, G.R. L-13224, April 24, 1960; So v. Republic, G.R. L-20558, March 31, 1965).

Anent the fourth assignment of error, the evidence shows that petitioner’s income at the time when he filed his petition for naturalization was only two hundred pesos per month — an amount which, according to the standard set in previous decisions of this Court, cannot be considered lucrative.

PREMISES CONSIDERED the decision appealed from is hereby reversed, and the petition for naturalization filed by petitioner is dismissed, with costs.

Reyes, J.B.L., Actg. C.J., Makalintal, Zaldivar, Castro, Fernando, Teehankee, Barredo, Villamor and Makasiar, JJ., concur.

Concepcion, C.J., is on official leave.




Back to Home | Back to Main




















chanrobles.com





ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com






October-1970 Jurisprudence                 

  • G.R. No. L-27971 October 16, 1970 - TAN TY v. LAND TENURE ADMINISTRATION

  • G.R. No. L-24821 October 16, 1970 - BANK OF THE PHIL. ISLANDS v. DE RENY FABRIC INDUSTRIES, INC.

  • G.R. No. L-26198 October 16, 1970 - IN RE: CESAR UN v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. L-26327 October 16, 1970 - IN RE: FELICIANO T. TAN v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. L-26419 October 16, 1970 - GEDEON G. QUIJANO v. DEVELOPMENT BANK OF THE PHILIPPINES

  • G.R. No. L-26754 October 16, 1970 - MATEO CASELA v. COURT OF APPEALS

  • G.R. No. L-31105 October 16, 1970 - NEGROS ICE HOUSE CORPORATION v. INOCENCIO CHUA

  • G.R. No. L-32546 October 17, 1970 - ANACLETO D. BADOY, JR. v. JAIME N. FERRER

  • Adm. Case No. 95 October 20, 1970 - CLEMENTE M. SORIANO v. ENRIQUE MEDINA

  • G.R. No. L-21203 October 20, 1970 - FELIPA JOLATORIA v. SIMPLICIO APOLINARIO

  • G.R. No. L-24148 October 20, 1970 - PRIMO ZUÑIGA v. PABLO MARQUEZ

  • G.R. No. L-26403 October 20, 1970 - CECILIA DEL VALLE-TIONGSON v. MELECIO FERNANDEZ

  • G.R. No. L-32476 October 20, 1970 - SIMEON G. DEL ROSARIO v. UBALDO CARBONELL

  • G.R. No. L-23868 October 22, 1970 - ZACARIAS C. AQUINO v. FRANCISCO SOCORRO

  • G.R. No. L-26151 October 22, 1970 - ALBERTO VALINO v. EMANUEL M. MUÑOZ

  • G.R. No. L-30083 October 22, 1970 - INDUSTRIAL COMPANY, INC. v. COURT OF APPEALS

  • G.R. No. L-32485 October 22, 1970 - IN RE: KAY VILLEGAS KAMI, INC.

  • G.R. No. L-32560-61 October 22, 1970 - ESMERALDO M. GATCHALIAN v. COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS

  • G.R. No. L-24011 October 24, 1970 - MANUEL BASTIDA v. ACTING COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS

  • G.R. No. L-27699 October 24, 1970 - CAMOTES SHIPPING CORPORATION v. JULIAN OTADOY

  • G.R. No. L-28574 October 24, 1970 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. REYNALDO VILLASEÑOR Y CORDERO

  • G.R. No. L-32096 October 24, 1970 - ROMEO F. EDU v. VICENTE G. ERICTA

  • G.R. No. L-29061 October 29, 1970 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. JULY LACSAMANA

  • G.R. No. L-25375 October 30, 1970 - ANICIA T. REYES v. GREGORIO APOSTOL

  • G.R. No. L-25510 October 30, 1970 - CANDELARIA PECSON JOSE v. PRISCILA SANTOS

  • G.R. No. L-25984 October 30, 1970 - ALHAMBRA INDUSTRIES, INC. v. COURT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS

  • G.R. No. L-26768 October 30, 1970 - FAUSTINO GOJO v. SEGUNDO GOYALA

  • G.R. No. L-26966 October 30, 1970 - DE LA RAMA STEAMSHIP CO. v. NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT CO.

  • G.R. No. L-27651 October 30, 1970 - LEONIDA CRUZ, ET., AL. v. RICARDO T. FRANCO

  • G.R. No. L-28114 October 30, 1970 - IN RE: ANGELA TUAZON DE PEREZ

  • G.R. No. L-28115 October 30, 1970 - APOLINARIO OKOL v. TAYUG RURAL BANK, INC.

  • G.R. No. L-28604 October 30, 1970 - JESUS CONTEMPRATE v. ACTING COMMISSIONER OF IMMIGRATION

  • G.R. No. L-29057 October 30, 1970 - THE PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. BERMILLO SORIANO

  • G.R. No. L-29144 October 30, 1970 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. EUSTAQUIO MODELO