Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence


Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 1970 > September 1970 Decisions > G.R. No. L-21972 September 30, 1970 - GREGORIO ARANETA, INC. v. DOLORES DE MESA:




PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

FIRST DIVISION

[G.R. No. L-21972. September 30, 1970.]

GREGORIO ARANETA, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DOLORES DE MESA, Defendant-Appellee.

Araneta & Araneta, for Plaintiff-Appellant.


SYLLABUS


1. REMEDIAL LAW; APPEAL; DISMISSAL; ISSUE MOOT; PERIOD EXTENDING LEASE FOR THREE (3) YEARS IN DECISION EXPIRED PENDING APPEAL. — It appearing that in this ejectment case, the amended decision was dated August 10, 1963, and according to the decision the lease in question was extended for three years from that date, it results that the period of the lease in question has by now expired. The question raised in the present appeal has, therefore, become academic, and this case has become moot. The appeal should be dismissed.


D E C I S I O N


ZALDIVAR, J.:


Appeal, on a question of law, from the decision of the Court of First Instance of Manila in its Civil Case No. 50702.

Plaintiff Gregorio Araneta, Inc., a duly organized domestic corporation, is the owner of the premises located at 1030 Vermont St. Malate, Manila, which it leased to defendant Dolores de Mesa on a month-to-month basis at the rate of P12.00 a month. On September 28, 1961, plaintiff sent to defendant a letter advising the latter of the termination of the lease effective October 31, 1961, and demanding payment of the rental covering the month of September as well as that corresponding to the month of October and the vacation of the premises not later than October 31, 1961. 1

Defendant having failed to vacate the premises, plaintiff filed a complaint for ejectment in the city court of Manila on February 3, 1962. On May 17, 1962, the city court rendered a decision ordering the defendant to vacate the lot in question, and to pay plaintiff the sum of P60.00 representing rents in arrears as of January 1962, plus the sum of P12.00 a month beginning February, 1962 for the use and occupation of the premises until she had completely vacated and surrendered the possession thereof to plaintiff, to pay P30.00 as and for attorney’s fees and the costs.

The defendant appealed the decision of the city court to the Court of First Instance of Manila. On June 24, 1963, the Court of First Instance of Manila rendered a decision, the pertinent portions of which read as follows:jgc:chanrobles.com.ph

"Plaintiff of course is within its rights in terminating the contract of lease. It is to be noted, however, that this action for ejectment is premised not upon the failure of the defendant to pay the rent, but upon notice of the termination of the lease given by the plaintiff to the defendant on Sept. 28, 1961. But defendant has been occupying this premises for over 50 years. In accordance with Art. 1687 of the New Civil Code, defendant is entitled to an extension of the lease. This period of extension should be commensurate with the period during which the defendant had been occupying the premises as lessee. As defendant had been occupying the premises for over 50 years, the Court believes that three years would be a reasonable extension of the period of the lease.

"WHEREFORE, defendant is hereby granted a period of THREE (3) years, counted from the date of this decision within which she may occupy the premises. Without pronouncement as to costs."cralaw virtua1aw library

The plaintiff filed a motion for reconsideration of the foregoing decision, but said motion was denied by the lower court on July 16, 1963. Plaintiff filed a second motion for reconsideration on August 7, 1963, and on August 10, 1963, the lower court amended the dispositive portion of the decision to read as follows:jgc:chanrobles.com.ph

"WHEREFORE, defendant is hereby granted a period of THREE (3) years, counted from the date of this amendatory decision within which she may occupy the premises at the same rental of P12.00 a month. Judgment is hereby rendered in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant for the payment of back rentals from September, 1961 to January, 1962 at the same rate of P12.00 monthly rental." 2

Plaintiff’s third motion for reconsideration dated August 17, 1963 was denied on August 26, 1963.

On September 2, 1963, plaintiff filed its notice of appeal from: (a) the decision dated June 24, 1963 as modified on August 10, 1963; (b) the order dated July 16, 1963 denying the first motion for reconsideration, and (c) the order dated August 26, 1963 denying the third motion for reconsideration. The appeal was duly perfected.

Plaintiff-appellant assigns in its brief only one error allegedly committed by the court, as follows:jgc:chanrobles.com.ph

"The lower court erred in extending the lease for a period of three (3) years from the date of the amendatory decision."cralaw virtua1aw library

The main point stressed by plaintiff-appellant in its appeal is that the trial court had incorrectly applied the provision of Article 1687 of the Civil Code in granting the defendant-appellee an extension of the lease for three years.

It appearing, however, that the amended decision was dated August 10, 1963, and according to the decision the lease in question was extended for three years from that date, it results that the period of the lease in question has by now expired. The question raised in the present appeal has, therefore, become academic and this case has become moot.

WHEREFORE, the appeal of plaintiff-appellant is dismissed, and the decision appealed from is considered final and immediately executory. No costs. It is so ordered.

Reyes, J.B.L., Actg. C.J., Dizon, Makalintal, Castro, Fernando, Teehankee, Barredo and Makasiar, JJ., concur.

Concepcion, C.J., is on official leave.

Villamor, J., did not take part.

Endnotes:



1. Record on Appeal, p. 5.

2. Record on Appeal, pp. 40-41.




Back to Home | Back to Main




















chanrobles.com





ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com






September-1970 Jurisprudence                 

  • G.R. No. L-32436 September 9, 1970 - IN RE ABELARDO SUBIDO

  • G.R. No. L-32432 September 11, 1970 - MANUEL B. IMBONG v. JAIME FERRER

  • A.C. No. 960 September 24, 1970 - IN RE ARTURO N. ARAFILES

  • G.R. No. L-21958 September 28, 1970 - IN RE: FELIPE DE JESUS DY v. REPUBLIC OF PHIL.

  • Adm. Case No. 927 September 28, 1970 - IN RE: POTENCIANO A. PALANCA v. POTENCIANO A. PALANCA

  • G.R. No. L-23915 September 28, 1970 - SATURNINA M. VDA. DE LOPEZ v. DAHLIA LOPEZ

  • G.R. No. L-23826 September 28, 1970 - EUFROCINA FLORENTIN ELLA v. ANGELINO C. SALANGA

  • G.R. No. L-24314 September 28, 1970 - MANILA HOTEL COMPANY v. PINES HOTEL EMPLOYEES ASSN.

  • G.R. No. L-28602 September 29, 1970 - UNIVERSITY OF THE PHILIPPINES v. WALFRIDO DE LOS ANGELES

  • G.R. No. L-28918 September 29, 1970 - PACIENCIA BENIGA v. RUFINA BUGAS

  • G.R. No. L-23119 September 30, 1970 - UNION SURETY AND INS., CO. v. METROPOLITAN THEATER CO.

  • G.R. No. L-26977 September 30, 1970 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. DOMINADOR CELIS

  • G.R. No. L-26588 September 30, 1970 - IN RE: ADELINA C. VIRAY v. REPUBLIC OF PHIL.

  • G.R. No. L-21972 September 30, 1970 - GREGORIO ARANETA, INC. v. DOLORES DE MESA

  • G.R. No. L-28226 September 30, 1970 - HONGKONG & SHANGHAI BANKING CORP. v. PEOPLES BANK & TRUST CO.

  • G.R. No. L-23495 September 30, 1970 - LVN PICTURES EMPLOYEES AND WORKERS ASSO. v. LVN PICTURES, INC.

  • G.R. No. L-24101 September 30, 1970 - MARIA TERESA Y. CUADRA v. ALFONSO MONFORT

  • G.R. No. L-28895 September 30, 1970 - BIENVENIDO JORDAN v. J. DE DIOS ENTERPRISES, INC.

  • G.R. No. L-23374 September 30, 1970 - TEOFILA FELICES v. FRANCISCO COLEGADO

  • G.R. No. L-30680 September 30, 1970 - GUILLERMO LEGASPI v. RENE ESPINA

  • G.R. No. L-28671 September 30, 1970 - JOSE UYTIEPO, ET., AL. v. MICAELA AGGABAO

  • G.R. No. L-29422 September 30, 1970 - DEVELOPMENT BANK OF THE PHIL. v. MATEO CANONOY

  • G.R. No. L-26849 September 30, 1970 - CONTINENTAL MANUFACTURING EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION v. COURT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS

  • G.R. No. L-28337 September 30, 1970 - RUFINO ALVERO v. MARIANO REAS

  • G.R. No. L-28400 September 30, 1970 - SAMUEL BONIEL v. MANASES G. REYES

  • G.R. No. L-29304 September 30, 1970 - CARABAO, INC. v. AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTIVITY COMMISSION

  • G.R. No. L-31676 September 30, 1970 - ASSOCIATED LABOR UNION v. EMILIANO C. TABIGNE

  • G.R. No. L-24652 September 30, 1970 - JAIME BANDIALA v. COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE OF MISAMIS OCC.

  • G.R. No. L-28234 September 30, 1970 - JOSE REYES v. FRANCISCO ARCA