Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence


Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 1975 > July 1975 Decisions > A.M. No. T-344 July 22, 1975 - IN RE: PEDRO P. TONGSON:




PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

FIRST DIVISION

[A.M. No. T-344. July 22, 1975.]

In Re PEDRO P. TONGSON.

SYNOPSIS


On October 13, 1972, the Secretary of Justice dismissed petitioner, a Budget Officer-Deputy Clerk of Court of the Quezon City JDRC, "for abandonment of office" in view of his "long unexplained absence since July 7, 1971." Petitioner appealed, not to the Civil Service Commission as provided for by Presidential Decree No. 6, but to the President. The Office of the President, nonetheless, took cognizance of the matter referred the same to the Secretary of Justice for comment. The latter in turn referred it to the Quezon City JDRC Presiding Judge, who, thereafter, issued an indorsement, dated January 10, 1973, containing "after-dismissal" charges against petitioner. Before the Executive Department could take final action on the appeal, the President proclaimed the ratification of the New Constitution, which transferred the administrative supervision of all courts and its personnel to the Supreme Court. However, the record of the case was not immediately turned over to the Supreme Court, which was apprised thereof only when petitioner on January 6, 1975 requested a review of his removal.

Petitioner attributed his long absence to events beyond his control. His son was involved in a melee which resulted in the death of an activist and he had to move his family to a safer place in the face of danger from his son’s enemies. Because of this development, his sickly wife became hysterical. His family attended the funeral of a relative in the province where they were stranded for sometime by the July 1972 floods. Petitioner, however, did not file a formal application for leave, although he informed responsible officials of the JDRC that he was going on indefinite leave of absence.

The Supreme Court found petitioner’s unassailed explanation satisfactory and ordered his reinstatement to his former position. Payment of his salary corresponding to the period of his absence, however, was denied in view of his failure to file the proper application for leave of absence.


SYLLABUS


1. PUBLIC OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES; ABSENCE; EFFECT OF FAILURE TO FILE PROPER APPLICATION FOR LEAVE OF ABSENCE. — Petitioner must be faulted for his failure to notify his immediate superior or file application for leave of absence when it became evident that he could not report for office. Hence, non-payment of his salaries corresponding to the period of his absence is proper even in the face of his satisfactory explanation for his absence from office.

2. ID.; PRESIDENTIAL DECREE NO. 6; DEPARTMENT HEADS EMPOWERED TO DISCIPLINE OR REMOVE SUBORDINATES. — Presidential Decree No. 6 authorizes a department head, such as the Secretary of Justice, to remove, separate, and discipline officers and employees under his jurisdiction. If the penalty imposed is removal, the respondent may appeal to the Civil Service Commission, but the appeal does not stop the decision from becoming executory. In the event that appellant wins his case on appeal, he shall be considered as having been suspended during the pendency of the appeal.

3. ID.; TARDINESS OF APPEAL; FAILURE TO TAKE UP HIS APPEAL TO THE COURT WITHIN A REASONABLE TIME JUSTIFIES DENIAL OF PAY. — Because of petitioner’s own tardiness in taking the initiative in pursuing his appeal to the Supreme Court, a period of about three years from the transfer to said Court of administrative supervision over all courts and court personnel, he should not be paid during the pendency of his appeal.


R E S O L U T I O N


CASTRO, J.:


For consideration by the Court is a letter dated January 6, 1975 of Pedro P. Tongson, Budget Officer-Deputy Clerk of Court of the Juvenile and Domestic Relations Court of Quezon City, requesting a review of the action taken on October 13, 1972 by the Secretary of Justice dismissing him from the service "for abandonment of office" in view of his "long unexplained absence since July 7, 1972 up to the present." Tongson’s letter to the Court is, in his own words, "a delayed appeal for justice;" he presumes, in the said letter, that he was dismissed as being "notoriously undesirable," and decries the belatedness of the charges of "absence from duty" and "neglect of duty" leveled against him by Judge Leonor Ines Luciano of the JDRC of Quezon City in her 1st Indorsement, dated January 10, 1973.

To clarify the apparent time-conflict in Judge Luciano’s charges, and in justice to her, it must be stated that her aforesaid indorsement was made by way of comment on Tongson’s letter to the Secretary of Justice, dated December 6, 1972, wherein he requested a copy of the letter of Judge Luciano charging him with absence without leave. On December 12, 1972 Tongson appealed the Secretary’s order to the President; acting thereon, Assistant Executive Secretary Ronaldo B. Zamora referred the same on January 2, 1973 to the Secretary of Justice "for immediate comment." It would appear that the Secretary of Justice, in turn, referred the matter to Judge Luciano, who thereafter issued her aforesaid 1st indorsement, dated January 10, 1973, containing the "after-dismissal" charges against Tongson.

The petitioner Tongson was born on June 29, 1920. He had a record of about thirty (30) years of military and civil service when he was "dropped" from the service on October 13, 1972. 1 He was a conscientious and dedicated employee, succeeding in implementing the projects of the JDRC of Quezon City. 2

During the period of his absence from office, which began on July 7, 1972, untoward events transpired. His son was involved in a melee wherein an activist of pre-martial law days was killed, and the Tongson family had to flee their place of usual residence for a safer one, as the companions of the deceased were hunting for them. And because of this development, his wife became hysterical. On July 8, 1972 he informed three responsible officials of the JDRC that he was going on indefinite leave of absence.

The Tongson family took temporary refuge in the house of Col. Jose Isposo at 144 Scout Fuentebella St., Quezon City. While there, the petitioner received a telegram informing him that his wife’s cousin, who took care of his children when they were studying in Magsingal, Ilocos Sur, died on July 16, 1972. 3 The family then left for the province to attend the funeral. On July 20, 1972 the petitioner sent from Vigan, Ilocos Sur a telegram to Judge Luciano asking for the extension of his leave, 4 but, as he had not filed a formal application for leave of absence, Judge Luciano noted on the telegram that she was not aware of any leave to be extended. 5 Then came the July floods, and because the roads were impassable, Tongson and his family were stranded in the province for a time. 6

When Tongson returned on August 12, 1972, he was informed that the enemies of his son had visited the office of his wife. Her fright recurred while she was suffering from hemorrhage of the uterus. 7

The unassailed explanation of the petitioner’s absence from office, which we consider satisfactory, thus parries the charges against him of "absence from duty," "neglect of duty" and "abandonment of office." The misfortunes that were visited upon his family and which prevented him from attending office were not of his own making and were beyond his control. It was but natural for him to move his family in the face of danger from his son’s enemies, to attend the funeral of one to whom he owed gratitude, and to comfort a sick wife. And when he was in the province, even had he wanted to return, he could not do so on account of the floods.

But Tongson must be faulted for his failure to notify his immediate superior or file the proper application for leave of absence when it became evident that he could not report for office. Considering this infraction or neglect, even in the face of his satisfactory explanation for his absence from office, and, further, that he did not render any service during the entire period of his absence, non-payment of his salary corresponding to the period of has absence is in order.

The record does not disclose that Tongson was summarily dismissed by the Secretary of Justice pursuant to Letter of Instruction 14-A, issued on September 29, 1972, but at the time of his dismissal on October 13, 1972, Presidential Decree 6, promulgated on September 27, 1972, was already in effect. The said decree authorizes a Department Head, such as the Secretary of Justice, to remove, separate, suspend and otherwise discipline officers and employees under his jurisdiction; if he imposes the penalty of removal, the respondent may appeal to the Civil Service Commission, but the appeal does not stop the decision from becoming executory.

The petitioner Tongson appealed, not to the Civil Service Commission, but to the President; despite the appeal not having been taken to the Civil Service Commission, the office of the President took cognizance thereof as is evident from a memorandum of the Executive Secretary dated November 6, 1972 "directing that action be taken on appeals or requests for reconsideration submitted to this Office by government officials and employees who were dismissed or considered resigned or, otherwise separated from the service pursuant to the pertinent Letter of Instructions." 8 But then, no decisive action on Tongson’s appeal was taken by the Executive Department, for, on January 17, 1973, the President proclaimed the ratification of the new Constitution, which transferred to the Supreme Court the power of administrative supervision over all courts and the personnel thereof. 9

The records of Tongson’s case were not forthwith transmitted to the Court, which was apprised of the case only when Tongson sent his letter of January 6, 1975. In the light of the attendant circumstances, the Court considers his appeal as subsisting, and, as heretofore discussed, meritorious.

Presidential Decree No. 6 provides pertinently that "in the event that the respondent wins an appeal, he shall be considered as having been under suspension during the pendency of the appeal." Conformably therewith, and considering the petitioner’s own tardiness in taking the initiative in pursuing his appeal to the Court, a period of about three years from the transfer to the Court of administrative supervision over all courts and court personnel, he should not be paid during the pendency of his appeal.

ACCORDINGLY, the petitioner Pedro P. Tongson is hereby ordered reinstated to his former position. His absence from office from July 7, 1972 to the time he reports back for duty, which must take place within thirty days from his receipt of a copy of this resolution, shall be considered as leave without pay.

Makasiar, Esguerra, Muñoz Palma and Martin, JJ., concur.

Teehankee, J., is on leave.

Endnotes:



1. Service Record.

2. 1st Indorsement, January 10, 1973, of Judge Leonor Ines Luciano to the Sec. of Justice.

3. Record, pp. 3 and 33.

4. Id., p. 18.

5. Id., p. 24.

6. Id., p. 33.

7. Id., p. 34.

8. 1st Indorsement, Jan. 2, 1973, of Assistant Executive Secretary Ronaldo B. Zamora to the Secretary of Justice, rollo, p. 11.

9. Const., Art. X, Sec. 6.




Back to Home | Back to Main




















chanrobles.com





ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com






July-1975 Jurisprudence                 

  • G.R. No. L-30736 July 11, 1975 - LIRAG TEXTILE MILLS, INC., ET AL. v. COURT ON APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-21814 July 15, 1975 - DIRECTOR OF LANDS v. MELECIO ABANZADO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-28017 July 15, 1975 - PHILIPPINE COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL BANK, ET AL. v. WILLIAM PFLEIDER, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-30543 July 15, 1975 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. RODRIGO CAWILI

  • G.R. No. L-30727 July 15, 1975 - CITY OF OZAMIZ v. SERAPIO S. LUMAPAS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-34897 July 15, 1975 - RAUL ARELLANO v. CFI OF SORSOGON, BRANCH I, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-37312 July 15, 1975 - MARCOS B. COMILANG v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-37662 July 15, 1975 - RCPI v. PHIL. COMMUNICATIONS ELECTRONICS & ELECTRICITY WORKERS’ FEDERATION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-39721 July 15, 1975 - BRAULIO BERNABE v. AMBROSIO M. GERALDEZ

  • G.R. No. L-39324 July 16, 1975 - CATALINO MAGDANGAL, ET AL. v. HAWAIIAN-PHILIPPINE COMPANY, ET AL.

  • A.M. No. P-15 July 17, 1975 - ALFONSO GUEVARRA, ET AL. v. EULALIO JUANSON

  • A.M. No. P-55 July 17, 1975 - ESPERANZA SARMIENTO v. FLORENCIO M. DAGDAG

  • G.R. No. L-37645 July 17, 1975 - JESUS L. SANTOS v. MARIANO CASTAÑEDA, JR.

  • G.R. No. L-38137 July 17, 1975 - JOSE M. CASTILLO v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-65120 July 18, 1975 - IN RE: PEDRO A. AMPARO

  • A.M. No. 32-MJ July 18, 1975 - LEON FRANADA, ET AL. v. VICENTE M. ERICTA, JR.

  • A.M. No. P-107 July 18, 1975 - ANTONIO PALAFOX, JR. v. CHARITO AKUT, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-22375 July 18, 1975 - CAPITAL INSURANCE & SURETY CO., INC. v. PLASTIC ERA CO., INC., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-24754 July 18, 1975 - COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. P. J. KIENER COMPANY, LTD., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-29678 July 18, 1975 - JOSEFINA LODOVICA v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-39381 July 18, 1975 - FELISA LIM v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • A.M. No. 72-MJ July 22, 1975 - IGMEDIO T. LI v. JOSE H. MIJARES

  • A.M. No. P-105 July 22, 1975 - AUREA G. PEÑALOSA v. LIGAYA P SALAYON

  • A.M. No. P-167 July 22, 1975 - ALFREDO T. MENDOZA v. FRANCISCO C. ECLAVEA

  • A.M. No. P-202 July 22, 1975 - RENE P. RAMOS v. MOISES R. RADA

  • A.M. No. T-344 July 22, 1975 - IN RE: PEDRO P. TONGSON

  • G.R. No. L-25012 July 22, 1975 - REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-26544 July 22, 1975 - NONATO BARROSO v. CASTRENSE C. VELOSO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-28853 July 22, 1975 - BICOL FEDERATION OF LABOR v. G. S. CUYUGAN, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-28905 July 22, 1975 - TIU PO v. LILY LIM TAN, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-28967 July 22, 1975 - AMELIA G. TIBLE v. JOSE C. AQUINO

  • G.R. No. L-30477 July 22, 1975 - CRESCENTE VICTORINO v. FELIX ELLO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-30915 July 22, 1975 - REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL. v. WORKMEN’S COMPENSATION COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-31150 July 22, 1915

    KLM ROYAL DUTCH AIRLINES v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-37635 July 22, 1975 - CRESENCIO MARTINEZ v. LEOPODO B. GIRONELLA

  • G.R. No. L-38196 July 22, 1975 - FEDERICO PINEDA, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-39677 July 22, 1975 - INTER-REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT CORP. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-39990 July 22, 1975 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. RAFAEL LICERA

  • A.M. No. P-1 July 25, 1975 - CIRILO TINAHA v. BENJAMIN MARAVILLA

  • A.M. No. 301-MJ July 25, 1975 - PABLO FETALINO v. CESAR L. MACALISANG

  • A.M. No. 306-MJ July 25, 1975 - MONICA SARMIENTO v. RAYMUNDO R. CRUZ

  • A.C. No. 532-MJ July 25, 1975 - PAULA S. QUIZON, ET. AL. v. JOSE G. BALTAZAR, JR.

  • A.C. No. 610-MJ July 25, 1975 - GEORGE P. SUAN v. DELSANTO RESUELLO

  • A.C. No. 936 July 25, 1975 - FERMINA LEGASPI DAROY, ET AL. v. RAMON CHAVES LEGASPI

  • G.R. No. L-19462 July 25, 1975 - ANTONIO V. ZARAGOZA v. ENRIQUE A. DIAZ, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-22781 July 25, 1975 - BIENVENIDO CAPULONG v. ACTING COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS

  • G.R. No. L-24917 July 25, 1975 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. GETULIO VERZO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-25434 July 25, 1975 - ARSENIO N. ROLDAN, JR. v. FRANCISCO ARCA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-26872 July 25, 1975 - VILLONCO REALTY COMPANY v. BORMAHECO, INC., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-27408 July 25, 1975 - CITY OF BACOLOD v. EDUARDO D. ENRIQUEZ, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-28271 July 25, 1975 - SMITH, BELL & CO. (PHIL.), INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE

  • G.R. No. L-28399 July 25, 1975 - COMPANIA MARITIMA, ET AL. v. UNITED SEAMEN’S UNION OF THE PHIL., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-30343 July 25, 1975 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. SEVERO MENGOTE, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-31460 July 25, 1975 - GENEROSO VILLANUEVA TRANSPORTATION CO., INC. v. LETICIA B. LOCSIN, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-32052 July 25, 1975 - PHILIPPINE VIRGINIA TOBACCO ADMINISTRATION v. COURT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-33502 July 25, 1975 - FEDERICO CABREJAS, ET AL. v. LUIS P. DONGALLO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-34952 July 25, 1975 - RAMON D. BAGATSING, ET AL. v. A. MELENCIO-HERRERA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-38135 July 25, 1975 - HILARIO C. ANTONIO v. ARTURO R. TANCO, JR., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-38624 July 25, 1975 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. CONRADO BAUTISTA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-40511 July 25, 1975 - MARA, INC. v. JUSTINIANO C. ESTRELLA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-40879 July 25, 1975 - IN RE: MAXIMO PAMPLONA v. MUNICIPAL JUDGE OF CALAMBA

  • G.R. No. L-22006 July 28, 1975 - BASILIO PEREZ, ET AL. v. NICOLAS MENDOZA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-21231 July 30, 1975 - CONCORDIA LALUAN, ET AL. v. APOLINARIO MALPAYA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-28546 July 30, 1975 - VENANCIO CASTAÑEDA, ET AL. v. PASTOR D. AGO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-33713 July 30, 1975 - EUSEBIO B. GARCIA v. ERNESTO S. MATA, ET AL.

  • A.M. No. P-143 July 31, 1975 - IN RE: APOLINAR O. FLORES

  • A.M. No. 392 July 31, 1975 - LUISA DE NACIONAL v. SEGUNDO M. ZOSA

  • A.C. No. 775 July 31, 1975 - BENJAMIN BAYOT v. JESUS R. BLANCA

  • A.M. No. 866-CJ July 31, 1975 - MIGUEL AGlLADA v. ALOYSIUS C. ALDAY

  • A.M. No. 899-MJ July 31, 1975 - MELQUIADES UDANI, JR. v. ALFONSO T. PAGHARION

  • A.C. No. 1236 July 31, 1975 - BERNARDA ARGANA v. VIRGILIO ANZ. CRUZ

  • G.R. No. L-22493 July 31, 1975 - ISLAND SALES, INC. v. UNITED PIONEERS GENERAL CONSTRUCTION COMPANY

  • G.R. No. L-23035 July 31, 1975 - PHILIPPINE NUT INDUSTRY, INC. v. STANDARD BRANDS INCORPORATED, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-26363 July 31, 1975 - BATANGAS LAGUNA TAYABAS BUS CO., INC. v. WORKMEN’S COMPENSATION COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. Nos. L-26478-79 July 31, 1975 - HEIRS OF ANSELMA TUGADI, ET AL. v. MANILA RAILROAD COMPANY, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-27088 July 31, 1975 - HEIRS OF BATIOG LACAMEN v. HEIRS OF LARUAN

  • G.R. No. L-30822 July 31, 1975 - EDUARDO CLAPAROLS, ET AL. v. COURT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-31685 July 31, 1975 - RAMON A. GONZALES v. IMELDA R. MARCOS, ET AL.

  • G.R. Nos. L-35377-78 July 31, 1975 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. CAMILO PILOTIN, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-36424 July 31, 1975 - INTEGRATED CONSTRUCTION SERVICES, INC., ET AL. v. LORENZO RELOVA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-38224 July 31, 1975 - CENTRAL BANK OF THE PHIL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-38388 July 31, 1975 - GABRIEL LOQUIAS v. CESARIO RODRIGUEZ, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-38577 July 31, 1975 - C.K. SAN v. ELIAS B. ASUNCION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-40403 July 31, 1975 - RUPERTA CONSTANTINO v. NUMERIANO C. ESTENZO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-40796 July 31, 1975 - REPUBLIC BANK v. MAURICIA T. EBRADA