Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence


Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 1977 > October 1977 Decisions > G.R. No. L-40174 October 11, 1977 - PEDRO ILINGAN v. WORKMEN’S COMPENSATION COMMISSION, ET AL.:




PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

FIRST DIVISION

[G.R. No. L-40174. October 11, 1977.]

PEDRO ILINGAN, Petitioner, v. WORKMEN’S COMPENSATION COMMISSION and PHILIPPINE NATIONAL RAILWAYS, Respondents.

Rogelio P. Terrado for Petitioner.

Enrique V. Español & Victoriano A. Miguel for respondent WCC.


D E C I S I O N


MAKASIAR, J.:


Petition for review on certiorari of the decision dated January 30, 1975 of the Workmen’s Compensation Commission in RO4-WC Case No. 12552 reversing the decision dated September 4, 1972 of the acting labor referee of Regional Office No. IV of the Department of Labor, awarding compensation benefit to the petitioner Pedro Ilingan.

Petitioner Pedro Ilingan was employed by respondent in various capacities as clerk-telegrapher, relief station agent and ultimately as station agent, until he stopped working on April 1, 1967 upon reaching the age of 63, after which he filed his application for optional retirement.

On April 27, 1970, he filed, through counsel, a claim for disability benefit with the Department of Labor.

On September 7, 1970, private respondent filed its report controverting the claim.

On September 4, 1972, after hearing on the merits, Regional Office No. IV of the Department of Labor, rendered an award granting compensation benefits to petitioner herein (Annex A, pp. 11-16, rec.). Dissatisfied, private respondent appealed the decision to the Commission.chanrobles virtualawlibrary chanrobles.com:chanrobles.com.ph

On January 30, 1975, the Commission rendered its decision, reversing the award (Annex C, pp. 22-24, rec.).

Petitioner urges that the Commission erred:jgc:chanrobles.com.ph

"IN NOT TAKING INTO ACCOUNT THAT PETITIONER’S ILLNESS HAD SUPERVENED AT THE TIME OF HIS EMPLOYMENT AND HENCE SHOULD BE PRESUMED TO HAVE ARISEN OUT OF SAID EMPLOYMENT OR WAS AGGRAVATED BY THE SAME" and

"IN NOT APPLYING SECTION 45 OF ACT NO. 3428, AS AMENDED, CONSIDERING THAT RESPONDENT PHILIPPINE NATIONAL RAILWAYS FAILED TO FILE A TIMELY CONTROVERSION TO THE RIGHTS OF CLAIMANT COMPENSATION."cralaw virtua1aw library

Indeed, the physician’s report (p. 116, WCC rec.) dated July 10, 1970 and the certificate of chest X-ray results (p. 117, id.) dated March 15, 1967 of petitioner with the impression "PTB minimal right", and "chronic bronchial asthma" were ignored by the respondent Commission. Evidently, the findings in his chest X-ray prompted petitioner to stop working upon reaching the age of 63 on April 1, 1967 and to apply for optional retirement. He may not wait for his body to waste away or his condition to worsen by applying for retirement at the age of 65, when he is entitled under the law to an earlier retirement. The chest x-ray report should have been given great weight and credence: This is the best evidence that petitioner can submit under the circumstances. For, under Section 23 of Act 3428, as amended, "after receiving an injury or contracting sickness and during the period of his disability and rehabilitation, the laborer shall at reasonable times and places submit to examination by a duly qualified physician or surgeon and rehabilitation technician designated and paid by the employer or insurance carrier. The laborer shall be entitled to have a physician or surgeon and rehabilitation technician designated by himself at such examination; . . ." (Emphasis supplied)

WE ruled times without number that:chanrobles law library

". . . (T)he law presumes, in the absence of substantial evidence to the contrary, that the claim is compensable. The burden to disconnect, by substantial evidence, the injury or sickness from employment, is laid at the employer’s door. Petitioner failed to discharge this burden. So rigid is the rule that even where the cause of the employee’s death is unknown — as petitioner claims — the right to compensation subsists. Reason for this is that the Workmen’s Compensation Act is a social legislation; it is designed to give relief to the workman; therefore, to effectuate its purpose, it must be liberally construed" (ITEMCOP v. Florzo, L-21969, Aug. 31, 1966, 17 SCRA 1104, 1110, citing Sec. 44[I], Workmen’s Compensation Act; Vda. de Acosta, Et. Al. v. Workmen’s Compensation Commission, Et Al., L-19772, Oct. 31, 1964, 12 SCRA 168, 173; see also Galang v. WCC, Et Al., L-42531, March 30, 1977; Vallo v. WCC, L-41816, Oct. 29, 1976; Simon v. RP, L-42510, June 10, 1976).

Furthermore, respondent failed to seasonably controvert the claim. It has been invariably held that "failure on the part of the employer to file a seasonable notice of controversion of the right of employees to compensation as required by Section 45 of the Workmen’s Compensation Act, as amended, constitutes a waiver by operation of law of his right to controvert the employee’s claim for compensation on non-jurisdictional grounds and such legal defect does not violate the requirement of due process (Carlos v. Dela Rosa, 5 SCRA 262, Guardian Security & Investigation Agency v. WCC, 34 SCRA 29; Development Bank of the Phil. v. WCC, 49 SCRA 365; Phil. Graphics Arts, Inc. v. Mariano, 53 SCRA 409; Camotes Shipping Corp. v. Otadoy, 35 SCRA 456 (cited in Simon v. Rep. of the Phil. [Supreme Court], G.R. No. L-42510, June 30, 1970). A claim for compensation filed by an employee against his employer under the Workmen’s Compensation Act is deemed admitted if not controverted within the time provided by law (Victorias Milling Co., Inc. v. WCC, Et Al., L-25665, May 22, 1969; Filipino Pipe and Foundry Corp. v. WCC, Et Al., L-20381, Dec. 24, 1963; Malan Bros. Watchman Agency v. Conanan, 7 SCRA 856; A.D. Santos, Inc. v. Ventura Vasquez, L-23586, March 20, 1968; General Textiles, Inc. v. WCC, Et Al., L-30428, Feb. 7, 1973, id.). Consequently, respondent cannot now claim that the illness of petitioner was not work-connected or that it was not aggravated by the nature of his employment.

WHEREFORE, THE DECISION DATED JANUARY 30, 1975 OF THE RESPONDENT WORKMEN’S COMPENSATION COMMISSION IS HEREBY REVERSED AND SET ASIDE AND RESPONDENT PHILIPPINE NATIONAL RAILWAYS IS HEREBY ORDERED.

1. TO PAY CLAIMANT PEDRO ILINGAN THE SUM OF SIX THOUSAND (P6,000.00) PESOS AS DISABILITY BENEFITS;

2. TO REIMBURSE CLAIMANT HIS MEDICAL AND HOSPITAL EXPENSES, SUPPORTED BY PROPER RECEIPTS;

3. TO PAY PETITIONER’S COUNSEL THE AMOUNT OF SIX HUNDRED (P600.00) PESOS; AND

4. TO PAY THE WORKMEN’S COMPENSATION COMMISSION THE SUM OF SIXTY-ONE PESOS (P61.00) AS ADMINISTRATIVE FEES.

SO ORDERED.

Teehankee (Chairman), Muñoz Palma, Martin, Fernandez and Guerrero, JJ., concur.




Back to Home | Back to Main




















chanrobles.com





ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com






October-1977 Jurisprudence                 

  • G.R. No. L-28070 October 5, 1977 - MARDONIO ALMEDA, ET AL. v. JUAN R. DALURO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-43058 October 6, 1977 - TERESITA GALINDEZ, ET AL. v. WORKMEN’S COMPENSATION COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-44088 October 6, 1977 - NORBERTO G. SUDARIO, JR. v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. L-40174 October 11, 1977 - PEDRO ILINGAN v. WORKMEN’S COMPENSATION COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-41710 October 12, 1977 - WILLIAMS EQUIPMENT CO. LTD. v. WORKMEN’S COMPENSATION COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-29596 October 14, 1977 - JULIAN RODRIGUEZ, JR., ET AL. v. SABINA TORENO, ET AL.

  • A.M. No. 190-RET October 18, 1977 - IN RE: MARIO V. CHANLIONGCO, ET AL.

  • A.C. No. 669 October 18, 1977 - IN RE: EMMANUEL S. TIPON

  • G.R. No. L-21960 October 18, 1977 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ZOSIMO EQUIPILAG, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-26933 October 18, 1977 - CESAR JAYME, ET AL. v. SEVERIANO DE LEON, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-27013 October 18, 1977 - ANGEL MASCUÑANA, ET AL. v. PROVINCIAL BOARD OF NEGROS OCCIDENTAL, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-27745 October 18, 1977 - MISAEL P. VERA v. PEDRO C. NAVARRO

  • G.R. No. L-31369 October 18, 1977 - DY PAC & COMPANY, INC. v. COURT OF TAX APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-32166 October 18, 1977 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. MAXIMO A. MACEREN, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-45916 October 18, 1977 - MAXIMINO ENTIENZA, ET AL. v. ALFREDO C. LAYA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-46286 October 28, 1977 - JOSEPH ONG v. MIDPANTAO ADIL, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-24709 October 20, 1977 - ASIAN SURETY & INSURANCE CO., INC. v. RAMON O. NOLASCO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-27169 October 20, 1977 - PURITA S. AGUILON v. MONTANO BOHOL

  • G.R. No. L-36627 October 20, 1977 - SEVERO J. SANTIAGO v. EUGENIO JUAN GONZALEZ, ET. AL.

  • G.R. No. L-44317 October 20, 1977 - FULCEDA BUKID VDA. DE ONA v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • A.C. No. 674 October 21, 1977 - TERESITA BANZUELA v. JOSE C. TABILIRAN, JR.

  • G.R. No. L-26857-58 October 21, 1977 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. AVELINO RONCAL, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-28488 October 21, 1977 - ECONOMIC INSURANCE COMPANY, INC. v. GUILLERMO E. TORRES, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-29213 October 21, 1977 - MANUEL B. RUIZ, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-42582 October 21, 1977 - ARNULFO C. LOPEZ v. WORKMEN’S COMPENSATION COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-24398 October 25, 1977 - CAYETANO DE BORJA v. COURT OF AGRARIAN RELATIONS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-32040 October 25, 1977 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. PEDRO M. PAGAL, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-36557 October 25, 1977 - HONESTO GAYOTIN v. MARTA TOLENTINO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-38504 October 25, 1977 - BATANGAS LAGUNA TAYABAS BUS COMPANY v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-19819 October 26, 1977 - WILLIAM UY v. BARTOLOME PUZON

  • G.R. No. L-31582 October 26, 1977 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. RAYMUNDO S. VISTIDO

  • G.R. No. L-37324 October 26, 1977 - ELADIO CONTRATISTA v. ARTEX DEVELOPMENT CO., INC., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-46394 October 26, 1977 - FABAR, INCORPORATED v. RUPERTO RODELAS

  • G.R. No. L-44763 October 27, 1977 - TOMAS U. SOLIVEN v. WORKMEN’S COMPENSATION COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • A.C. No. 233 October 28, 1977 - NATALIO F. BELTRAN v. CORNELIO R. MAGSARILI

  • A.C. No. 920 October 28, 1977 - PROSPERO HIPOLITO v. ROMEO J. CALLEJO

  • A.M. No. 1226-MJ October 28, 1977 - ELASCIO ESTUCADO, ET AL. v. JOSE F. LORIEGA

  • A.C. No. 1701-CFI October 28, 1977 - BELLA FALCIS v. VICENTE CUSI, JR.

  • G.R. No. L-22768 October 28, 1977 - LIRAG TEXTILE MILLS, INC. v. REPARATIONS COMMISSIONS

  • G.R. No. L-23092 October 28, 1977 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ANITO BEBERINO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-23213 October 28, 1977 - WESTERN MINDANAO LUMBER CO., INC., ET AL. v. NATIVIDAD M. MEDALLE, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-26058 October 28, 1977 - AMPARO JOVEN DE CORTES, ET AL. v. MARY E. VENTURANZA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-27569 October 28, 1977 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. DOMINGO PASCUAL

  • G.R. No. L-29752 October 28, 1977 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. SILVERIO LOPEZ

  • G.R. No. L-29769 October 28, 1977 - INSULAR LUMBER CO., (PHIL.) INC. v. COURT OF APPEALS

  • G.R. No. L-30559 October 28, 1977 - FRANCISCO PERIQUET v. ANDRES REYES

  • G.R. No. L-30587 October 28, 1977 - NORTHERN MOTORS, INC. v. WORKMEN’S COMPENSATION COMMISSION

  • G.R. Nos. L-31243-44 October 28, 1977 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ALFREDO C. RAPADA

  • G.R. No. L-31642 October 28, 1977 - COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS v. FRANCISCO GERONIMO

  • G.R. No. L-32159 October 28, 1977 - ZOILA MENDEZ v. MAXIMO BIONSON

  • G.R. No. L-32723 October 28, 1977 - JUAN DACASIN v. COURT OF APPEALS

  • G.R. No. L-35989 October 28, 1977 - FERMIN JALOVER v. PORFERIO YTORIAGA

  • G.R. No. L-36769 October 28, 1977 - REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES v. MARIANO CASTAÑEDA, JR.

  • G.R. No. L-38587 October 28, 1977 - PROVINCE OF PANGASINAN v. PRESIDING JUDGE OF BRANCH VIII OF THE CFI OF PANGASINAN

  • G.R. No. L-40490 October 28, 1977 - ALFREDO BALQUIDRA v. COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE OF CAPIZ, BRANCH II

  • G.R. No. L-41351 October 28, 1977 - REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL. v. LUIS LARDIZABAL

  • G.R. No. L-41680 October 28, 1977 - JENNIFER S. REYES v. COURT OF APPEALS

  • G.R. No. L-43018 October 28, 1977 - LOURDES S. BELLO v. WORKMEN’S COMPENSATION COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-43024 October 28, 1977 - MARIA V. DIMAGIBA v. CENTRAL BANK OF THE PHILIPPINES

  • G.R. No. L-43675 October 28, 1977 - VICTORIA M. ROMA v. WORKMEN’S COMPENSATION COMMISSION

  • G.R. No. L-43731 October 28, 1977 - REGINA BILBAO v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. L-44059 October 28, 1977 - INSULAR LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY, LTD. v. CARPONIA T. EBRADO

  • G.R. No. L-45837 October 28, 1977 - HEIRS OF JULIANA CLAVANO v. MELECIO A. GENATO

  • G.R. Nos. L-46103-12 October 28, 1977 - NARCISO D. SALCEDO v. PABLO D. SUAREZ

  • G.R. No. L-46255 October 28, 1977 - AURELIO LITONJUA v. COURT OF APPEALS

  • G.R. No. L-46641 October 28, 1977 - FELIPA ARANICO-RABINO v. NARCISO A. AQUINO

  • G.R. No. L-46723 October 28, 1977 - BENJAMIN PAULINO, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.