Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence


Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 1978 > May 1978 Decisions > G.R. No. L-43512 May 11, 1978 - ROSALIA VDA. DE RANDOY v. WORKMEN’S COMPENSATION COMMISSION, ET AL.:




PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

FIRST DIVISION

[G.R. No. L-43512. May 11, 1978.]

ROSALIA VDA. DE RANDOY, Petitioner, v. THE WORKMEN’S COMPENSATION COMMISSION and UNIVERSAL TEXTILE MILLS, INC., Respondents.

Mercedes M. Respicio (CLAO) for Petitioner.

Jose F. Picaso for Respondent.

SYNOPSIS


Petitioner’s husband while employed as a painter by private respondent died in his sleep due to congestive heart failure. Her claim for death compensation, was controverted by the private respondent on the ground that it was not service connected. The referee dismissed the claim for failure of petitioner to establish the casual relation between the death and the employment of the deceased, no death certificate or physician’s report having been presented. The respondent Commission affirmed the referee’s decision on the ground that the death of the deceased did not arise out of and in the course of his employment.

On review, the Supreme Court held that he illness which caused the deceased’s death may be ruled out as an occupational disease or the casual link between the nature of his employment and his ailment was not suficiently shown, nonetheless, it is presumed as mandated by Section 44 of the Workmen’s Compensation Act that the employee’s illness which supervened during his employment, either arose out of or at least was aggravated by, said employment. With this legal presumption, the burden of proof shifts to the employer and the employee is relieved of the burden to show causation. And the fact that the deceased had no history of cardiac ailments strenghtens the presumption that the deceased’s fatal heart attack during his employment was work connected or aggravated, and, therefore, compensable.

Appealed decision is set aside and private respondent ordered to pay P6,000 as death compensation; P200.00 as burial expenses; P600.00 as attorney’s fees and P53.00 as administrative fee to the successor of the respondent Commission.


SYLLABUS


1. WORKMEN’S COMPENSATION; PRESUMPTION OF COMPENSABILITY. — It is now well-settled that once it is established that the illness supervened during employment, as in this case, there is a rebuttable presumption that such illness arose out of the employment or was at least aggravated by it; and the employer has the burden of proving the contrary by substantial evidence.

2. ID.; ID.; HEART ATTACK PRESUMED WORK-CONNECTED IF DECEASED HAD NO HISTORY OF CARDIAC AILMENTS. — The finding of the respondent Commission that "The records failed to reveal that prior to deceased’s death he had any complaint referable to the heart that could be considered as casually related to his employment" strengthens the presumption that Randoy’s fatal heart attack during his employment was work connected or aggravated and, therefore, compensable.


D E C I S I O N


FERNANDEZ, J.:


This is a petition to review the decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Commission dated March 11, 1976 in RO4-WC Case No. 164748 entitled "Rosalio Vda. de Randoy, claimant, versus Universal Textile Mills, Inc., respondent" affirming the decision of the Acting Referee of Regional Office No. 4, Department of Labor, dismissing the case for lack of merit. 1

The record shows that the petitioner is the widow of Bonifacio Randoy who was employed as a painter by the private respondent, Universal Textile Mills, Inc., Bonifacio Randoy died in his sleep on December 13, 1974 of congestive heart failure.

The petition states that on January 8, 1975, the petitioner, Rosalia Vda. de Randoy, filed with the private respondent an application for separation pay 2 Of her husband attaching thereto a death certificate, that on March 19, 1975, the petitioner filed a notice and claim for compensation by reason of the death of her husband Bonifacio Randoy with Regional Office No. 4, Department of Labor; 3 and that the claim was controverted by the private respondent on the ground that the death of Bonifacio Randoy is not service connected.

The referee, Danilo Bolos, dismissed petitioner’s claim for failure to establish the casual relation between the death and the employment of the deceased no death certificate or physician’s report having been presented.

It is alleged that a motion for reconsideration of the decision with certified copy of the death certificate attached thereto, was denied.

On appeal, the Workmen’s Compensation Commission affirmed the decision of the referee in the following:jgc:chanrobles.com.ph

"DECISION

This is a review of toe decision rendered by Acting Referee Danilo Bolos of Regional Office No. 4, dismissing the case for lack of merit. Claimant appealed, praying that the decision dated October 18, 1975, be reconsidered.

It appears in the notice and claim filed on March 19, 1975. that the late Bonifacio A. Randoy was employed by the respondent as a Painter with an average weekly wage of P70.00. On December 13, 1974, while sleeping at home he died of an alleged illness diagnosed as congestive heart failure, by Dr. Edgardo P. Javier of Marikina, Rizal. (Certificate of Death) He is survived by his wife and the two children the claimants herein.

The respondent controverted the claim on the ground that the death was not caused by employment.

The Referee below decided the claim pursuant to Department Order No. 3, as amended. in implementation of the Letter of Instruction No. 190 of the Office of the President of the Philippines.

The records will show that the late Bonifacio A. Randoy was employed by the respondent as a Painter. On December 13, 1974. per records, he reported to his duty from 6:00 a.m. up to 2:00 p.m.; that in the night of the same date, while sleeping he died due to his alleged illness of congestive heart failure.

The records failed to reveal that prior to deceased’s death he had any complaint referable to the heart that could be considered as casually related to employment. Death occurred suddenly when he was asleep in his house, thus neither the theory of presumption and/or aggravation can be made to apply in this case.

Premises considered, this Commission is of the opinion and so hold, that the death of the deceased did not arise out of and in the course of his employment. Besides, there is no showing in the records that on or before he died on December 13, 1974, he was suffering from any illness while in the employ of the Respondent. There is no reason therefore, to reverse the ruling of the Unit a quo, dismissing the claim for lack of merit.

WHEREFORE, the decision appealed from should be, as it is hereby, AFFIRMED, and the case dismissed for lack of merit.

SO ORDERED.

Quezon City, Philippines, March 11, 1976.

(SGD.) HERMINIA CASTELO-SOTTO, MD.

Associate (Medical) Commissioner

(SGD.) EUGENIO I. SAGMIT, JR.

Associate Commissioner" 4

The principal issue is whether congestive heart failure which caused the death of Bonifacio Randoy is compensable.

The question is not new. In Talip v. Workmen’s Compensation Commission Et. Al., 5 this Court held:jgc:chanrobles.com.ph

"Respondent commission’s decision was patent error and must be set aside on the strength of controlling and established jurisprudence that assuming that the deceased employee’s illness which caused his death may be ruled out as an occupational disease or that the casual link between the nature of his employment and his ailment has been insufficiently shown, nevertheless it is to be presumed as mandated by Section 44 of the Workmen’s Compensation Act that the employee’s illness which supervened during his employment, either rose out of, or at least was aggravated by, said employment; and with this legal presumption, the burden of proof shifts to the employer and the employee is relieved of the burden to show causation. Respondent employer has failed to discharge the burden of disproving the claim by substantial evidence and the Referee’s Award must therefore be maintained. Contrary to the commission’s gratuitous conclusion that the death was not compensable (for alleged want of a preliminary link between the deceased’s work and his death contrary to the legal presumption), its very finding that the deceased has no history or cardiac ailments strengthens the work-connected or aggravated and therefore compensable.

As was restated by former Chief Justice Makalintal in Maria Cristina Fertilizer Corp. v. Workmen’s Compensation Commission, ‘it is now well-settled that once it is established that the illness supervened during employment, as in this case, there is a rebuttable presumption that such illness arose out of the employment or was at least aggravated by it; and the employer has the burden of proving the contrary by substantial evidence.’"

In the case at bar, the certificate of death dated December 17, 1974 stated that the death of Bonifacio Randoy was "due to congestive heart failure on December 13, 1975." 6 He died while in the employ of the private Respondent.chanroblesvirtualawlibrary

The finding of the respondent Commission that "The records failed to reveal that prior to deceased’s death he had any complaint referable to the heart that could be considered as casually related to his employment . . . strengthens the presumption that Randoy’s fatal heart attack during his employment was work connected or aggravated and, therefore, compensable.

WHEREFORE, the decision of the respondent Commission is hereby set aside and the private respondent, Universal Textile Mills, Inc., is ordered:chanrob1es virtual 1aw library

1. To pay the petitioner the amount of Six Thousand Pesos (P6,000.00) as death compensation benefit;

2. To pay the petitioner the sum of Two Hundred Pesos (P200.00) as burial expenses;

3. To pay the petitioner’s counsel or record the amount of P600.00 as attorney’s fees; and

4. To pay the successor of the respondent Commission the amount of P53.00 as administration fee.

SO ORDERED.

Teehankee (Chairman), Makasiar, Santos and Guerrero, JJ., concur.

Endnotes:



1. Annex "D", Rollo, pp. 18-19.

2. Annex "B", Rollo, p. 16.

3. Annex "C", Rollo, p. 17.

4. Annex "D", Rollo, pp. 18-19.

5. 71 SCRA, 218, 220-221.

6. Annex "B", Roll, p 16.




Back to Home | Back to Main




















chanrobles.com





ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com






May-1978 Jurisprudence                 

  • G.R. No. L-25265 May 9, 1978 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. SOCORRO C. RAMOS

  • G.R. No. L-32547 May 9, 1978 - CONCHITA CORTEZ, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-27350-51 May 11, 1978 - WIL WILHEMSEN, INC., ET AL. v. TOMAS BALUYUT

  • G.R. No. L-29217 May 11, 1978 - MARIA CRISTINA FERTILIZER PLANT EMPLOYEES ASSOC., ET AL. v. TEODULO C. TANDAYAG, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-32959 May 11, 1978 - JAGUAR TRANSPORTATION CO., INC., ET AL. v. JUAN CORNISTA, ET AL.

  • G.R. Nos. L-38663 and L-40740 May 11, 1978 - JOSE BRIONES, JR. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-39958 May 11, 1978 - JESUS D. JUREIDINI v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-41753 May 11, 1978 - JOSE V. HERRERA v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-43213 May 11, 1978 - SOCORRO T. AGUILAR v. WORKMEN’S COMPENSATION COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-43512 May 11, 1978 - ROSALIA VDA. DE RANDOY v. WORKMEN’S COMPENSATION COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-47570-71 May 11, 1978 - MONARK INTERNATIONAL, INC. v. CARMELO C. NORIEL, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-31298 May 12, 1978 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. RAMON BLANCO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-32529 May 12, 1978 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. TY SUI WONG, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-45768 May 12, 1978 - DEMETRIO D. MOLET v. WORKMEN’S COMPENSATION COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-47494 May 15, 1978 - AIDA ROBLES v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-27800 May 16, 1978 - PHILIPPINE CHARITY SWEEPSTAKES OFFICE v. ARSENIO OLMOS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-38006 May 16, 1978 - NATALIA DE LAS ALAS, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-47448 May 17, 1978 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. EMETERIO C. OCAYA

  • A.C. No. 301 May 18, 1978 - BENITO SACO v. DONATO A. CARDONA

  • G.R. No. L-24375 May 18, 1978 - TAN BENG v. CITY SHERIFF OF MANILA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-27155 May 18, 1978 - PHILIPPINE NATIONAL BANK v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-27732 May 18, 1978 - ANGELES CHIQUILLO, ET AL. v. ELIAS B. ASUNCION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-28454 May 18, 1978 - EMILIO APACHECHA, ET AL. v. VALERIO V. ROVIRA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-29276 May 18, 1978 - TESTATE ESTATE OF FELIX J. DE GUZMAN v. CRISPINA DE GUZMAN-CARILLO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-29466 May 18, 1978 - ABOITIZ AND CO., INC., ET AL. v. COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS OF CEBU

  • G.R. No. L-34770 May 18, 1978 - SAURA IMPORT & EXPORT CO., INC. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-40885 May 18, 1978 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. MARCIAL GARGOLES

  • G.R. No. L-44351 May 18, 1978 - HOECHST PHILIPPINES, INC. v. FRANCISCO TORRES, ET AL.

  • A.C. No. L-1768 May 19, 1978 - ANGELES G. DACANAY v. CONRADO B. LEONARDO, SR.

  • G.R. Nos. L-28324-5 May 19, 1978 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. RAFAEL MARCO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-35093 May 19, 1978 - E.S. BALTAO & CO., INC. v. CHINA BANKING CORPORATION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-37750 May 19, 1978 - SWEET LINE, INC. v. BERNARDO TEVES, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-44537 May 26, 1978 - EMMA C. ONA v. SERAFIN R. CUEVAS

  • A.M. No. 1530-MJ May 30, 1978 - NENITA CASTAÑETO v. BUENAVENTURA S. NIDOY

  • G.R. No. L-32850 May 30, 1978 - ROGELIO LAFIGUERA, ET AL. v. V. M. RUIZ, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-37162 May 30, 1978 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. WARLITO C. PLATEROS

  • G.R. No. L-38375 May 30, 1978 - ALFONSA TIMBAS VDA. DE PALOPO, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-29262 May 31, 1978 - SALVADOR BARENG v. SHINTOIST SHRINE & JAPANESE CHARITY BUREAU

  • G.R. No. L-30355 May 31, 1978 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. UNION KAYANAN, ET AL.

  • G.R. Nos. L-31303-04 May 31, 1978 - REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-37174 May 31, 1978 - LITTON MILLS WORKERS UNION-CCLU v. LITTON MILLS, INC., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-37697. May 31, 1978.

    SEGUNDO ABANDO v. CA

  • G.R. No. L-42713 May 31, 1978 - NORBERTA MARTILLO v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-43358 May 31, 1978 - PRESENTACION D. DELANA v. WORKMEN’S COMPENSATION COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-43811 May 31, 1978 - CAYETANO FRANCISCO v. WORKMEN’S COMPENSATION COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-44563 May 31, 1978 - GERONIMO REALTY COMPANY v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-47263 May 31, 1978 - HACIENDA DOLORES AGRO-INDUSTRIAL & DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-47536 May 31, 1978 - WILLIAM H. QUASHA v. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, ET AL.