Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence


Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 1980 > November 1980 Decisions > A.M. No. 1171-MJ November 17, 1980 - MARCELINO SINGSON, SR. v. PABLO L. VILLANUEVA:




PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

SECOND DIVISION

[A.M. No. 1171-MJ. November 17, 1980.]

MARCELINO SINGSON, SR., Complainant, v. MUNICIPAL JUDGE PABLO L. VILLANUEVA of Tabuk, Kalinga-Apayao, Respondent.


D E C I S I O N


AQUINO, J.:


Criminal Case No. 1119 for homicide through reckless imprudence was filed against Henry Manuit in the municipal court of Tabuk, Kalinga-Apayao on June 30, 1972. It was submitted for decision on July 30, 1973. It was decided by respondent judge on November 13, 1975 or more than two years after it was submitted for decision.

In his nineteen-decision, respondent judge convicted Manuit of homicide through reckless imprudence and sentenced him to an indeterminate penalty of four months and one day of arresto mayor as minimum to three years, six months and twenty-one days of prision correccional as maximum and to pay the heirs of the victim ten thousand pesos as damages (p. 34, Rollo).cralawnad

That decision did not come to the immediate notice of Marcelino Singson, Sr. of Bontoc, Mountain Province (whose son was the victim in that case), as shown by the fact that in a complaint dated November 14, 1975, filed in this Court on November 24, he denounced respondent judge for "gross neglect of duty" in not deciding the case.

At the hearing of this administrative case, Singson also complained that the bail bond of three thousand pesos fixed for the provisional liberty of the accused was "very low considering that there were four (4) victims in all" (p. 51, Rollo).

Respondent judge explained that the delay in the rendition of his decision may be attributed to the circumstance that he had no separate chamber wherein he could prepare his decisions. He worked in the session hall where he was often liable to be disturbed. His clerk of court had resigned. He had to type his decisions because his stenographer and clerk-stenographer were busy with their own work. There were many cases filed in his court.

Respondent further explained that even if he worked in his home he could not concentrate because several persons from the barrios used to see him and ask for assistance. He said that in this monthly certificate of service he indicated that there were cases pending decision which he had not decided after the expiration of the ninety-day period.

We hold that the more than two years’ delay in deciding the said case is inexcusable and shows that the respondent was not performing his duties properly (See sec. 97, Judiciary Law). That holding is warranted even if we take into account the alleged inadequacy of personnel and the unfavorable working conditions in respondent’s office which were supposedly not conducive to the prompt adjudication of pending cases.chanrobles.com : virtual law library

We also hold that the respondent should have fixed a higher bail bond, a circumstance which might have prevented the accused from jumping bail, eluding arrest and evading his duty to appear in court for the immediate promulgation of the judgment of conviction. (As of May 3, 1977, when the Investigating Judge made his report herein, the decision had not yet been promulgated and Manuit had not been surrendered to the court by his surety.)

WHEREFORE, respondent judge * is severely censured for the delay in deciding Criminal Case 1119 and he is ordered to pay a fine equivalent to his salary for one month. A copy of this decision should be attached to his personal record.

SO ORDERED.

Barredo (Chairman), Concepcion, Jr., Abad Santos and De Castro, JJ., concur.

Endnotes:



* Note that Dolores Vda. de Bunao charged Judge Villanueva with undue delay in the adjudication of Civil Case No. 202, a forcible entry case filed in 1967 which in 1979 had not yet been decided. Raymundo G. Barruzo also filed a complaint against the respondent for delay in the adjudication of Civil Case No. 279




Back to Home | Back to Main




















chanrobles.com





ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com






November-1980 Jurisprudence                 

  • A.M. No. 2268-MJ November 7, 1980 - RICARDO ESCARDA v. JACINTO MANALO

  • G.R. No. 53466 November 10, 1980 - RURAL BANK OF OROQUIETA v. COURT OF APPEALS

  • G.R. No. 54169 November 10, 1980 - ROSARIO S. QUE v. COURT OF APPEALS

  • A.C. No. 761 November 17, 1980 - ESTER FLORES v. LUIS CASTILLO REYNO

  • A.C. No. 1681 November 17, 1980 - MODESTA RODRIGUEZ v. PEDRO TAGALA, ET AL.

  • A.M. No. 1171-MJ November 17, 1980 - MARCELINO SINGSON, SR. v. PABLO L. VILLANUEVA

  • A.M. No. 1387-MJ November 17, 1980 - LOURDES FLOR v. NICANOR J. CRUZ, JR.

  • A.M. No. P-1549 November 17, 1980 - RAUL C. BRIZ v. FAUSTINO ENCINARES, JR., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-26823 November 17, 1980 - MALAYAN INSURANCE COMPANY v. SMITH, BELL & CO. (PHIL.) INC., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-38635 November 17, 1980 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. DANIEL HAYAG

  • G.R. No. L-41686 November 17, 1980 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE OF RIZAL

  • G.R. No. 50097 November 17, 1980 - CONTINENTAL BAZAR LABOR UNION-PAFLU v. AMADO G. INCIONG

  • G.R. No. 50711 November 17, 1980 - SIMEON ARAMBURO v. COURT OF APPEALS

  • G.R. No. 51269 November 17, 1980 - DEVELOPMENT BANK OF THE PHILIPPINES v. RUFO TOMELDAN, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 51944 November 17, 1980 - AGAPITA OPEÑA VDA. DE IMPERIAL v. RAFAEL DE LA CRUZ

  • G.R. Nos. 52153 & 52154 November 17, 1980 - KLM ROYAL DUTCH AIRLINES v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-52242 November 17, 1980 - MIGUEL R. UNSON III v. PEDRO C. NAVARRO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 54324-28 November 19, 1980 - JASMIN S. NOGOY v. FILEMON MENDOZA, JR.

  • A.M. No. 1541-MJ November 21, 1980 - FIDEL MORTA, SR. v. CIPRIANO B. ALVIZO, JR.

  • A.M. No. 2044-CFI November 21, 1980 - PEDRO G. PERALTA v. ROMEO N. FIRME

  • G.R. No. L-29485 November 21, 1980 - COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. AYALA SECURITIES CORP., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-29576 November 21, 1980 - FRANCISCO COCOTANO v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHILS.

  • G.R. No. L-33303 November 21, 1980 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. RODOLFO GONZALES

  • G.R. No. L-39712 November 21, 1980 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. GOMEZ SALIGAN

  • G.R. No. L-53619. November 21, 1980 - MODESTA SABENIANO v. COMELEC

  • A.M. No. P-260 November 28, 1980 - FLORENTINO R. CALAYAG v. RUFINO DE ASAS

  • G.R. No. L-24238 November 28, 1980 - JOSE SANTOS v. LORENZO J. LIWAG

  • G.R. No. L-24852 November 28, 1980 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. RODOLFO TALAY

  • G.R. No. L-30019 November 28, 1980 - AGRIPINA BERNARDO v. COURT OF APPEALS

  • G.R. No. L-30780 November 28, 1980 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. DALMACIO PAHIL

  • G.R. No. L-32949 November 28, 1980 - JOSE D. SANTOS v. BENJAMIN H. AQUINO

  • G.R. No. L-33296 November 28, 1980 - PHILIPPINE ASSOCIATION OF FREE LABOR UNIONS v. COURT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS

  • G.R. No. L-35148 November 28, 1980 - CONSTANCIO JAUGAN v. VICENTE P BULLECER

  • G.R. No. L-43833 November 28, 1980 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. SOTERO NAVARRETE

  • G.R. No. L-49910 November 28, 1980 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. LORETO AQUIAPAS

  • G.R. No. 52830 November 28, 1980 - ANTONIO O. SINGCO v. COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS

  • G.R. No. 54039 November 28, 1980 - GUILLERMO S. ARCENAS v. COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS

  • G.R. No. 54043 November 28, 1980 - BANGUED WATER DISTRICT v. HAROLD M. HERNANDO

  • G.R. No. L-54641 November 28, 1980 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. COURT OF APPEALS

  • G.R. No. L-36008 November 28, 1980 - MAURO G. AGDA v. CRISPIN N. SAN JUAN