Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence


Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 1980 > September 1980 Decisions > G.R. No. L-44232 September 11, 1980 - PACIENCIO BAYOGBOG v. WORKMEN’S COMPENSATION COMMISSION, ET AL.:




PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

FIRST DIVISION

[G.R. No. L-44232. September 11, 1980.]

PACIENCIO BAYOGBOG, Petitioner, v. WORKMEN’S COMPENSATION COMMISSION and MARINDUQUE MINING & INDUSTRIAL CORPORATION, Surigao Nickel Project, Respondents.


D E C I S I O N


FERNANDEZ, J.:


This is a petition to review the decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Commission dated March 29, 1976 in Case No. RO9-WCC-14721 entitled "Paciencio Bayogbog, Claimant, versus, Marinduque Mining & Industrial Corp., (Talisay, Surigao City), Respondent" reversing the award granted to claimant by Regional Office No. 9, Department of Labor, Tacloban City, and dismissing the claim. 1

Despite the resolution of this Court dated August 13, 1976 requiring the respondents to comment to the petition, 2 no comment was filed. In a resolution dated October 25, 1976, this Court resolved to treat the petition for review as a special civil action and to require both parties to submit simultaneous memoranda within thirty (30) days from notice thereof. 3

Only the petitioner filed a memorandum.

The claimant, petitioner herein, Paciencio Bayogbog, filed a Notice of Injury or Sickness and Claim for Compensation on March 3, 1975 with the Regional Office No. 9, Department of Labor, Tacloban City, wherein he alleged that he contracted "pulmonary tuberculosis, moderately advanced infection" while in the course of his employment with the Marinduque Mining & Industrial Corporation, SNP. 4

The private respondent, through the Assistant Vice-President, filed an Employer’s Report stating that it is not controverting the claimant’s right to compensation.

The Acting Referee and Chief, Workmen’s Compensation Unit, Regional Office No. 9, Department of Labor, Tacloban City, issued on October 8, 1975 an award in favor of Paciencio Bayogbog in the amount of P4,505.34 as disability compensation.chanrobles law library

It is alleged that the parties received a copy each of the award on November 5, 1975 at Nonoc Island, Talisay, Surigao City. Not having received a motion for reconsideration or petition for review of the private respondent, the petitioner filed a motion for execution and the Referee issued a writ of execution on February 17, 1976.

The private respondent filed a motion to set aside the award and writ of execution on March 22, 1976 on the ground that the award dated October 8, 1975 is null and void for lack of jurisdiction.

The Chairman of the Workmen’s Compensation Commission rendered a decision dated March 29, 1976 reversing the Referee’s award. 5

The record shows that the petitioner was employed as a laborer with the private respondent from September 13, 1968 until February 1, 1975 when his employment was terminated on the ground that he was suffering from pulmonary tuberculosis, moderately advanced infection since November 18, 1974.

The Physician’s Report of Dr. Jose P. Bayana, Jr. states that the illness of the petitioner supervened on November 18, 1974 and the same was the result of the nature of the petitioner’s employment. 6

The illness of the petitioner having supervened on November 18, 1974, the Workmen’s Compensation Act applies.

The undisputed fact is that the petitioner contracted the illness of pulmonary tuberculosis during his employment with the private respondent, Marinduque Mining & Industrial Corporation, SNP. Hence, there is a disputable presumption that the claim is compensable. 7 The claimant is relieved of the duty to prove causation as it is then legally presumed that the illness arose out of the employment. To the employer is shifted the burden of proof to establish that the illness is not compensable. 8 The petitioner did not rely on the disputable presumption alone. He presented evidence that he acquired his illness as a result of the nature of his employment with the private Respondent. 9

The private respondent neither controverted the claim nor adduced evidence to rebut the presumption and the evidence adduced by the petitioner.

The Acting Referee awarded to the petitioner the amount of P4,505.34 as disability benefit. The record shows that the petitioner acquired his illness on November 18, 1974 and he was terminated on February 1, 1975 by reason thereof. The award granted by the Acting Referee of Regional Office No. 9 is reasonable.

The petitioner is also entitled to reimbursement of medical expenses.

WHEREFORE, the decision sought to be reviewed is hereby set aside and the Marinduque Mining & Industrial Corporation, SNP, is ordered:chanrobles virtualawlibrary chanrobles.com:chanrobles.com.ph

1. To pay the petitioner the amount of Four Thousand Five Hundred Five Pesos and 34/100 (P4,505.34) as disability compensation;

2. To reimburse the petitioner of medical expenses supported by proper receipts;

3. To pay the petitioner the amount of Four Hundred Fifty Pesos (P450.00) as attorney’s fees; and

4. To pay the successor of the Workmen’s Compensation Commission the amount of Sixty-one Pesos (P61.00) as administrative fee.

SO ORDERED:chanrob1es virtual 1aw library

Teehankee, Makasiar, Guerrero, De Castro and Melencio-Herrera, JJ., concur.

Endnotes:



1. Rollo, pp. 1-3.

2. Rollo, p. 19.

3. Rollo, p. 21.

4. Annex "A", Rollo, p. 4.

5. Rollo, p. 34.

6. Annex "B", Rollo, p. 5.

7. Section 44, Workmen’s Compensation Act; Justiniano v. Workmen’s Compensation Commission, 18 SCRA 677.

8. Balanga v. Workmen’s Compensation Commission, Et Al., 83 SCRA 721.

9. Physician’s Report of Sickness or Accident, Annex "B", Rollo, p. 5.




Back to Home | Back to Main




















chanrobles.com





ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com






September-1980 Jurisprudence                 

  • G.R. No. L-52463 September 4, 1980 - JESUS L. VILLEGAS v. COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-52527 September 4, 1980 - NENA S. POTENCION v. COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS

  • A.M. No. 2124-MJ September 11, 1980 - CARLOS LOPEZ v. AUGUSTO H. FERNANDEZ

  • G.R. No. L-23547 September 11, 1980 - JOSE GANADIN v. RICARDO RAMOS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-28184 September 11, 1980 - PURIFICACION V. GARCIA v. ANGELO PEREZ

  • G.R. No. L-28381 September 11, 1980 - COMPAGNIE DES MESSAGERIES MARITIMES v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-33912 September 11, 1980 - ANTI-GRAFT LEAGUE OF THE PHILIPPINES, INC. v. WENCESLAO ORTEGA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-35376 September 11, 1980 - REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL., ET AL. v. NUMERIANO G. ESTENZO, ETC., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-35919 September 11, 1980 - REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL. v. PRESIDING JUDGE, BRANCH XV, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-40258 September 11, 1980 - LIM YHI LUYA v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-40727 September 11, 1980 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. JESUS GONZALES

  • G.R. No. L-41253 September 11, 1980 - BATANGAS LAGUNA TAYABAS BUS COMPANY v. WORKMEN’S COMPENSATION COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-44232 September 11, 1980 - PACIENCIO BAYOGBOG v. WORKMEN’S COMPENSATION COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-44727 September 11, 1980 - BENIGNO CASTRO, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-45202 September 11, 1980 - REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-46629 September 11, 1980 - LUCERO CORTES, ET AL. v. FERNANDICO BARTOLOME

  • A.M. No. 1553 CFI September 12, 1980 - IN RE: TEOFILO GUADIZ, JR.

  • A.M. No. 1610-MJ September 12, 1980 - FEDERICO ADVINCULA v. MARIANO MALICUDIO

  • G.R. No. L-25230 September 12, 1980 - NORBERTO SANGABOL, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-41695 September 12, 1980 - NOLI DEMONTEVERDE v. WORKMEN’S COMPENSATION COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-47405 September 12, 1980 - CLARITA SANTIAGO v. EMPLOYEES’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-49542 September 12, 1980 - ANTONIO MACADANGDANG v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-49272 September 15, 1980 - ARTHUR TARNATE v. CARMELO C. NORIEL, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-33448 September 17, 1980 - PHILIPPINE SUBURBAN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-29772 September 18, 1980 - CITY OF BAGUIO v. FERNANDO S. BUSUEGO

  • G.R. Nos. L-50441-42 September 18, 1980 - ALEJANDRO RAS v. JAINAL D. RASUL, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-37100 September 19, 1980 - WEE BIN v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. L-38000 September 19, 1980 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. DIOSDADO COMENDADOR

  • G.R. No. L-40224 September 23, 1980 - FRANCISCO C. TOBIAS v. CASTRENSE C. VELOSO, ET AL.

  • A.M. No. P-1881 September 25, 1980 - ALFONSO V. AGCAOILI v. ROUMEL M. REYES

  • G.R. No. L-47207 September 25, 1980 - JOSE F. ESCANO, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-53064 September 25, 1980 - FELIX LANUZO v. SY BON PING, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-54343 September 20, 1980 - DANIEL ABUSO, ET AL. v. EFICIO B. ACOSTA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-38398 September 30, 1980 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. JAIME CLORES, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-48577 September 30, 1980 - SULPICIO A. GARCIA v. PAUL C. MATHIS, ET AL.