Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence


Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 1981 > August 1981 Decisions > G.R. No. L-56587 August 31, 1981 - BENJAMIN Y. GOLEZ, ET AL. v. TOMAS LEONIDAS, ET AL.:




PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

FIRST DIVISION

[G.R. No. L-56587. August 31, 1981.]

BENJAMIN Y. GOLEZ, REYNALDO B. ARALAR, HONORABLE GERINO M. TOLENTINO, Presiding Judge of Branch IV, City Court of Manila, FRANCISCO L. GARCIA, Deputy Sheriff of the City of Manila, Petitioners, v. HONORABLE TOMAS LEONIDAS, Presiding Judge of Branch XXXVIII, CFI of Manila, and VICENTE V. ALDABA, Respondents.

Reynaldo B. Aralar for Petitioner.

A.G. Basco for petitioner Sheriff.

Ponciano Subido for Respondent.

SYNOPSIS


After receipt of the order of respondent Judge Tomas Leonidas of the Court of First Instance of Manila, dismissing the petition in Civil Case No. 119568 for relief from judgment of City Judge Gerino M. Tolentino in an ejectment case filed by petitioner Benjamin V. Golez against private respondent Vicente V. Aldaba, the decision in aforesaid ejectment case was executed upon motion of petitioner Golez. In view of a writ of preliminary injunction previously issue by Judge Leonidas to stay the execution of said judgment, a petition for contempt was filed by private respondent Aldaba against the petitioners alleging that the order of dismissal issued by said judge has not yet become final. Judge Leonidas denied petitioners’ motion to dismiss the petition for contempt, and their motion for reconsideration.

On certiorari and prohibition, the Supreme Court ruled that when respondent Judge Leonidas dismissed the petition for relief from judgment, such dismissal necessarily carried with it the lifting of the writ of preliminary injunction, which is interlocutory and ancillary in character regardless of whether or not the order has become final.

Orders of respondent judge set aside.


SYLLABUS


1. REMEDIAL LAW; PROVISIONAL REMEDIES; PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION INTERLOCUTORY AND ANCILLARY IN CHARACTER; AUTOMATICALLY LIFTED UPON DISMISSAL OF MAIN CASE WHETHER OR NOT DISMISSAL IS FINAL; CASE AT BAR. — When respondent Judge Leonidas dismissed the petition for relief from judgment, such dismissal necessarily carried with it the lifting of the writ of preliminary injunction he issued upon the filing of the petition for relief from judgment, said writ being interlocutory and ancillary in character which is automatically lifted upon dismissal of the main case (Roldan, Jr. v. Arca, 65 SCRA 336, 344, [1975]; National Sugar Workers’ Union, etc. v. La Carlota Sugar Central, Et Al., 45 SCRA 104, 109 [1972]; Lazaro v. Mariano, 59 Phil. 627, 631 [1934]; Saavedra v. Ibañez, 56 Phil. 33, 37 [1931]; Hi Caiji v. Phil. Sugar Estates and Development Company, 50 Phil. 592, 594 [1927]) regardless of whether the period for filing a motion for reconsideration of the order dismissing the case or appeal therefrom has expired or not.

2. ID.; ID.; ID.; WRIT OF EXECUTION ISSUED AFTER DISMISSAL OF MAIN CASE; NOT CONTEMPTUOUS. — Where a writ of execution was issued after receipt of the order of dismissal of the main case and one day before respondent filed his motion for reconsideration of said order of dismissal and where the writ of execution was evidently implemented with all the formalities of the law and with the least inconvenience to private respondent, respondent judge erred in entertaining the petition for contempt.


D E C I S I O N


MAKASIAR, J.:


It appears that petitioner Benjamin Y. Golez, assisted by his counsel, petitioner Reynaldo B. Aralar, filed an ejectment case against private respondent Vicente V. Aldaba which was docketed as Civil Case No. 035129-CV and assigned to Branch IV of the City Court of Manila presided by petitioner City Judge Gerino M. Tolentino. On September 25, 1978, petitioner Manila City Judge Tolentino rendered a decision by default against private respondent Aldaba, who thereafter filed a petition for relief on November 13, 1978 which was docketed as Civil Case no. 119568 and assigned to Branch XXXVIII of the Manila Court of First Instance presided by Judge Tomas Leonidas who issued on November 21, 1978 a writ of preliminary injunction to stay the execution of the decision of September 25, 1978 rendered by petitioner Manila City Judge Tolentino.

On February 8, 1979, after hearing, respondent Judge Leonidas dismissed Civil Case No. 119568 for relief from judgment upon finding that the allegations of the petition are not true.chanrobles law library : red

After receipt of the order dismissing said Civil Case No. 119568, petitioner Golez reiterated, and petitioner Manila City Judge Tolentino granted on February 12, 1979, the pending motion of petitioner Golez for execution pending appeal; and the decision in the ejectment case No. 035129-CV was accordingly executed.

After such execution of said judgment, private respondent Aldaba filed on March 2, 1979 a petition for contempt in the same Civil Case No. 119568 against petitioners Golez, Aralar, City Judge Tolentino and the sheriff on the ground that the February 8, 1979 order of dismissal issued by respondent Judge Leonidas in said Civil Case has not yet become final.

Respondent Judge Leonidas denied on June 3, 1980 the motion to dismiss the petition for contempt filed on May 16, 1980 by herein petitioners Golez and Aralar, and on March 16, 1981 their motion for reconsideration.

Hence, this petition.

When respondent Judge Leonidas dismissed the petition for relief from judgment such dismissal necessarily carried with it the lifting of the writ of preliminary injunction he issued upon the filing of the petition for relief from judgment, said writ being interlocutory and ancillary in character which is automatically lifted upon dismissal of the main case (Roldan, Jr. v. Arca, 65 SCRA 336, 344 [1975]; National Sugar Workers’ Union, etc. v. La Carlota Sugar Central, Et Al., 45 SCRA 104, 109 [1972]; Lazaro v. Mariano, 59 Phil. 627, 631 [1934]; Saavedra v. Ibañez, 56 Phil. 33, 37 [1931]; Hi Caiji v. Phil. Sugar Estates and Development Company, 50 Phil. 592, 594 [1927]), regardless of whether the period for filing a motion for reconsideration of the order dismissing the case or appeal therefrom has expired or not.

Moreover, the writ of execution was issued on February 20, 1979, one day before respondent Aldaba filed on February 21, 1979 his motion dated February 17, 1979 for reconsideration of said order of dismissal.cralawnad

At the bottom left of the writ of execution, appears a notice to vacate signed by herein petitioner deputy sheriff Francisco L. Garcia giving private respondents Aldaba and all other persons living under him five (5) days from February 22, 1979 or up to February 26, 1979 to voluntarily vacate the premises (Annex 4-B, p. 32-A, rec.). And upon ex parte motion of said deputy sheriff to force open the premises, City Judge Tolentino granted such authority on March 1, 1979 provided that such forcible opening of the premises is done in the presence of a police officer (Annex 5, p. 33, rec.). The notice of sale or execution of the personal properties seized from the premises occupied by private respondent Aldaba pursuant to the writ of execution, was issued on March 26, 1979 by the acting executive sheriff (Annexes 9 & 9-A, p. 40, rec.).

Evidently, the writ of execution was implemented with all the formalities of the law and with the least inconvenience to private Respondent.

Hence, the respondent judge erred in entertaining the petition for contempt filed by private respondent against herein petitioners.

WHEREFORE, THE ORDERS OF RESPONDENT JUDGE LEONIDAS DATED JUNE 3, 1980 AND MARCH 16, 1981 ARE HEREBY SET ASIDE AND THE RESPONDENT JUDGE IS HEREBY DIRECTED TO DESIST FROM FURTHER PROCEEDING IN THE PETITION FOR CONTEMPT IN CIVIL CASE NO. 119568. NO COST.

SO ORDERED.

Teehankee (Chairman), Fernandez, Guerrero and Melencio-Herrera, JJ., concur.




Back to Home | Back to Main




















chanrobles.com





ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com






August-1981 Jurisprudence                 

  • G.R. No. L-47691 August 5, 1981 - CONSOLACION F. RELENTE v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 50405-06 August 5, 1981 - VICENTA P. TOLENTINO, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • A.M. No. 2269-MJ August 10, 1981 - JESUS A. TAPALES v. MACARIO BALCON

  • A.M. No. 2507-CFI August 10, 1981 - RICARDO B. MOYA v. RICARDO TENSUAN

  • G.R. No. L-28805 August 10, 1981 - NATIONAL POWER CORPORATION SUPERVISORS’ UNION v. NATIONAL POWER CORPORATION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-35363 August 10, 1981 - TRANS WORLD AIRLINES, INC. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-38095 August 10, 1981 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. CARLOS MELENDRES, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-52056 August 10, 1981 - BONIFACIO DE LEON v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • A.C. No. 1608 August 14, 1981 - MAGDALENA T. ARCIGA v. SEGUNDINO D. MANIWANG

  • G.R. No. L-26848 August 17, 1981 - CARIDAD O. DE GALLEGO v. LAND AUTHORITY

  • G.R. No. L-31402 August 17, 1981 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. FELICIANO C. HIPOLITO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-50142 August 17, 1981 - JOSE E. BARRAMEDA v. EMPLOYEES’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-50633 August 17, 1981 - CALASIAO FARMERS COOPERATIVE MARKETING ASSOCIATION, INC., ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-56627 August 17, 1981 - CEBU STEVEDORING COMPANY, INC. v. JOSE R. RAMOLETE, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-49793 August 20, 1981 - EMETERIO IPAPO v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • A.M. No. 791-MJ August 27, 1981 - DIOSDADO B. PAALA v. ALBERTO REGINO

  • A.M. No. P-1657 August 27, 1981 - BARTOLOME MACARAEG v. OSCAR BERMUDEZ

  • A.C. No. L-1797-CCC August 27, 1981 - WARLITO MENDOZA v. ONOFRE A. VILLALUZ

  • A.M. No. 2209-CTJ August 27, 1981 - ABDON SEGUISABAL v. JOSE R. CABRERA

  • G.R. No. L-57439 August 27, 1981 - J. ANTONIO M. CARPIO, ET AL. v. EDGAR GUEVARA

  • A.C. No. 1053 August 31, 1981 - SANTA PANGAN v. DIONISIO RAMOS

  • A.M. No. 1155-CAR August 31, 1981 - IN RE: CLAIM OF CAR JUDGE ALFREDO L. NOEL

  • A.M. No. 1270-RET August 31, 1981 - IN RE: RETIREMENT BENEFITS OF CITY JUDGE ALEJANDRO GALANG, JR.

  • A.M. No. 1893-MJ August 31, 1981 - EDGARDO S. CABANGON v. JAIME L. VALEÑA

  • A.M. No. 2001-CFI August 31, 1981 - PABLO DOMINGO v. JESUS M. ELBINIAS

  • A.M. No. 2224-CFI August 31, 1981 - EDNA BAGUYO v. OSCAR LEVISTE

  • A.M. No. 2360-MJ August 31, 1981 - TEODORICO MARFIL, ET AL. v. ORLANDO CUACHON, ET AL.

  • A.M. No. 2426-CFI August 31, 1981 - ALEJANDRO BALATBAT v. JESUS DE VEGA

  • G.R. No. L-30434 August 31, 1981 - FELOMENA FABIO, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-32746 August 31, 1981 - REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL. v. FLORENTINA C. CAPAROSSO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-33052 August 31, 1981 - ANGEL R. QUIMPO v. LEONCIO MENDOZA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-36896 August 31, 1981 - USEAEA, ET AL. v. USEA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-37251 August 31, 1981 - CITY OF MANILA, ET AL. v. AMADOR E. GOMEZ, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-49336 August 31, 1981 - PROVINCE OF ABRA v. HAROLD M. HERNANDO

  • G.R. No. L-50688 August 31, 1981 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. JAIME PINGKIAN, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-51370 August 31, 1981 - AMADO IZON, ET AL. v. PEOPLE OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. L-52043 August 31, 1981 - TOMMY REYES, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-52737 August 31, 1981 - DAVID Q. SANDALO v. COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 52793 August 31, 1981 - FELIPE M. SEVILLEJA v. COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-52797 August 31, 1981 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ANGELO UMAGUING

  • G.R. No. L-55028 August 31, 1981 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. JOSE TEJADA

  • G.R. No. L-56587 August 31, 1981 - BENJAMIN Y. GOLEZ, ET AL. v. TOMAS LEONIDAS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-57069 August 31, 1981 - IN RE: ABDON A. ARRIBA v. PEOPLE OF THE PHIL.