Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence


Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 1982 > September 1982 Decisions > G.R. No. L-52061 September 30, 1982 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. SALUSTIANO LOOD

202 Phil. 792:




PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

FIRST DIVISION

[G.R. No. L-52061. September 30, 1982.]

THE PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. SALUSTIANO LOOD alias SALES, Defendant-Appellant.

The Solicitor General for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Arturo Catacutan, for Defendant-Appellant.

SYNOPSIS


Pacita was on her way home one evening when appellant suddenly emerged, embraced and kissed her, threw her on the ground, and despite her shouts for help succeeded in forcibly raping her while threatening to strike her with a stone. Pacita promptly reported the incident to her mother. She was examined by a physician the next day and a complaint for rape was lodged against the appellant. Appellant admitted being with the complainant on the night in question but denied raping her. He claimed that the and the complainant were sweethearts and that all he did was kiss her, but because she did not want to be kissed he became angry, pushed her and left her along. The lower court convicted the appellant for rape and sentenced him to reclusion perpetua. Hence, this appeal. Appellant points to improbabilities in complainant’s testimony and to the absence of hymenal laceration and spermatozoa.

The Supreme Court AFFIRMED the decision of the lower court holding that improbabilities on minor matters in complainant’s testimony do not affect credibility; and that rape is committed by mere entry of the labia even without rupture of the hymen and in the absence of spermatozoa.


SYLLABUS


1. REMEDIAL LAW; EVIDENCE; CREDIBILITY OF TESTIMONY; NOT AFFECTED BY IMPROBABILITIES ON MINOR DETAILS. — Relative to the alleged incredibilities and improbabilities its the testimony of complainant, suffice it to say that the matter refers to minor details which complainant could not have possibly remembered after of five (5) months from the commission of the crime.

2. ID.; ID.; CORROBORATED EVIDENCE; NON-PRESENTATION OF CLOTHING NOT VITAL TO PROVE RAPE. — The presentation of the panty worn by the offended party does not render inadequate the People’s evidence. at most, the evidence is merely corroborative.

3. CRIMINAL LAW; RAPE; PRESENCE OF SPERMATOZOA, NOT NECESSARY; PENETRATION, PROOF OF, ENOUGH TO PROVE RAPE. — That she did not bleed and that there was no spermatozoa in her vagina are not valid arguments that rape would not have been committed. It is enough that there is entry of the labia or lips of the female organ, even without rapture of hymen or laceration of the vagina (People v. Hernandez, 49 Phil. 980).


D E C I S I O N


RELOVA, J.:


Appeal from the decision of the Court of First Instance of Bohol sentencing Salustiano Lood alias Sales to the penalty of "Reclusion Perpetua and to pay the costs," for the crime of rape, committed according to the evidence of the prosecution as quoted from the People’s brief, as follows:jgc:chanrobles.com.ph

"In the evening of January 16, 1978, complainant Pacita Bolotaolo escorted her younger sister Elizabeth Bolotaolo to the house of her older sister Liliosa Bunao in Bingag, Dauis, Bohol. After staying in her sister’s house for a while, complainant started on her way home to the house of her parents about one kilometer away. As she was passing the barrio school where the nearest house was 100 meters away, appellant suddenly emerged from the darkness. Appellant held complainant’s left arm with his right hand and embraced her with his left arm. Then he kissed her on the left cheek and threw her to the ground. As she lay prostrate, appellant straddled her and turned her about. Sitting on the top of her body, he eased down his pants and brief and exposed his penis. Complainant shouted for help but nobody came to help her. Appellant picked up a piece of stone and threatened to strike complainant with it. He then forcibly removed her panties. After doing so, he forced his pens into her vagina and made ‘push and pull’ movements. After about five minutes, he stood up and proceeded for home. (pp. 3-10, t.s.n., August 11, 1978).

"Complainant likewise immediately headed for home. She promptly reported to her mother that she was raped by appellant. Her mother brought her to the Barangay Captain to lodge a complaint against appellant. (p. 10, id.).

"In the morning of the following day, complainant appeared before Dr. Sabiniano Labra in the Bohol Provincial Hospital and submitted herself for examination. She also reported the matter to the police. (p. 11, id.).

"The result of the examination of Dr. Labra is shown in his medical certificate (Exhibit D), to wit:jgc:chanrobles.com.ph

"INTROITUS ADMITS TWO FINGERS

WITH EASE; NO FRESH HYMENAL

LACERATION NOTED;

NO BLEEDING;

SPERMATOZOA — NEGATIVE"

The foregoing version of the prosecution is not disputed by the appellant except as to the commission of the rape. In his brief, appellant claims he is a simple farmer from Bingag, Dauis, Bohol, specializing in the preparation of land suited to the planting of ubi. He claims that complainant was his sweetheart since April 4, 1977. They live in the same barrio, their residence about a kilometer apart. About 8:00 in the evening of January 16, 1978, complainant came to his house and asked him to accompany her in going home. As requested, he accompanied her. It was a moonlight night. On their way, appellant hugged and kissed his sweetheart for the first time She did not want to be kissed so she pinched him. Appellant got angry at the reaction of complainant who has been his sweetheart for quite a time already, hence, he pushed her to the side and went home leaving complainant alone on her way home.chanrobles.com.ph : virtual law library

Appellant assailed the testimony of the complainant as totally incredible and unworthy of belief. Thus, he points to the testimony of the medico-legal witness that no injury was found on the body of the complainant and that there was no bleeding or fresh hymenal laceration, or a smear of spermatozoa in her vagina. While he admits his presence at the time and place of the alleged commission of the crime, he claims that he only took liberties on the person of the complainant by hugging her and kissing her on the left cheek.

As the Solicitor General clearly submits, the proof of the rape are the following:jgc:chanrobles.com.ph

"1. Complainant’s unequivocal testimony that she was sexually assaulted by Appellant.

"2. Lack of motive on complainant’s part to falsely accuse appellant of rape. There mere act of appellant of hugging and kissing complainant, which infuriated her, is hardly enough to cause her to fabricate the serious charge of rape. On the contrary, if what appellant says is all that happened, it was more likely for complainant to have remained silent and keep the incident to herself because it occurred in a secluded place and nobody had witnessed it.

"3. The prompt report of the atrocity made by complainant to her mother.

"4. The prompt complaint made by complainant and her mother to the Barangay Captain.

"5. The prompt submission by complainant of herself to a doctor of the Bohol Provincial Hospital for examination.

"6. The report of the doctor who examined complainant showing that complainant had linear abrasions on her face and neck.

"7. The prompt complaint lodged by complainant with the police.

"It can be noted from the above that complainant spontaneously reported the outrage on her honor to her mother and the authorities. If the incident did not really happen, as appellant claims, complainant would not have made the report as it is not shown that she has a motive to fabricate a criminal charge against appellant. Or if she intended to make a major issue of the unwelcome hug and kiss of appellant, she would have delayed making the reports and complaints in order to be able to conjure a story with ‘finesse,’ as appellant puts it."cralaw virtua1aw library

On the claim of appellant that complainant had been his sweetheart, WE are inclined to believe her denial because appellant mentioned in his testimony that she had written him a love letter which, however, he failed to submit in evidence, or even to present a witness to corroborate his claim that complainant was his girlfriend.

Relative to the alleged incredibilities and improbabilities in the testimony of complainant, suffice it to say that the matter refers to minor details which complainant could not have possibly remembered after the lapse of five (5) months from the commission of the crime. And, the allegation that the panty (Exhibit "E") was not presented to the police or to the municipal judge who conducted the preliminary investigation of the case cannot be given any importance. The complainant, having a limited education, could not have possibly known that it was necessary for her to present the same considering that neither the police nor the municipal judge asked for its presentation during the investigations. Further, the non-presentation of the panty worn by the offended party at the time she was sexually assaulted does not render inadequate the People’s evidence. At most, the evidence is merely corroborative.chanrobles.com : virtual law library

Further, the fact that she did not bleed and that there was no spermatozoa in her vagina are not valid arguments that rape would not have been committed. In the first place, the medical certificate shows that complainant suffered a linear abrasion in her right face and right neck. Dr. Labra testified that the linear abrasion was probably caused by a fingernail. The medical finding confirms complainant’s testimony that when he was attacking her and she resisted, appellant choked her. Neither is the absence of spermatozoa in the vagina an indication that rape was not committed. It was in the morning of the following day after the sexual assault was committed when she was examined by the doctor and the spermatozoa could have been washed away after she had urinated and cleaned herself. And, it is possible that the rapist did not ejaculate. It is enough that there is entry of the labia or lips of the female organ, without rupture of the hymen or laceration of the vagina (People v. Hernandez, 49 Phil. 980).

WHEREFORE, the judgment appealed from being in accordance with law and evidence, is AFFIRMED, with the modification that appellant should indemnify the victim Pacita Bolotaolo the sum of P12,000,00 without subsidiary imprisonment in case of insolvency, and to pay the costs.

SO ORDERED.

Makasiar, Melencio-Herrera, Plana, Vasquez and Gutierrez, Jr., JJ., concur.

Teehankee (Chairman), J., took no part.




Back to Home | Back to Main




















chanrobles.com





ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com






September-1982 Jurisprudence                 

  • G.R. No. L-31276 September 9, 1982 - NATIONAL LABOR UNION v. COURT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS, ET AL.

    202 Phil. 1

  • G.R. No. L-31854 September 9, 1982 - NICANOR T. SANTOS v. ROSA GANAYO

    202 Phil. 16

  • G.R. No. L-32260 September 9, 1982 - RAYMUNDA VDA. DE SAN JUAN, ET AL. v. SIXTO TAN

    202 Phil. 31

  • G.R. No. L-38579 September 9, 1982 - JULIET T. DIOQUINO v. NICANOR J. CRUZ, JR., ET AL.

    202 Phil. 35

  • G.R. No. L-39154 September 9, 1982 - LITEX EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION, ET AL. v. COURT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-40641 September 9, 1982 - FILOMENO ABROT, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

    202 Phil. 53

  • G.R. No. L-42335 September 9, 1982 - PEDRO AMIGABLE v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

    202 Phil. 64

  • G.R. No. L-52410 September 9, 1982 - FLORO ENTERPRISES, INC. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

    202 Phil. 66

  • G.R. No. L-40791 September 11, 1982 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ERNESTO MALATE

    202 Phil. 74

  • G.R. No. L-41115 September 11, 1982 - REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL., ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-48756 September 11, 1982 - K.O. GLASS CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. v. MANUEL VALENZUELA

  • G.R. No. L-49524 September 11, 1982 - LEONARDO GONZALES, ET AL. v. SECRETARY OF LABOR, ET AL.

    202 Phil. 151

  • G.R. No. L-59825 September 11, 1982 - ERNESTO MEDINA, ET AL. v. FLORELIANA CASTRO-BARTOLOME

    202 Phil. 163

  • G.R. No. L-60368 September 11, 1982 - BEATRIZ DE ZUZUARREGUI VDA. DE REYES v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

    202 Phil. 172

  • A.C. No. 2784-M September 21, 1982 - CECILIO P. IYOG v. LEONARDO L. SERRANO

    202 Phil. 175

  • G.R. No. L-23106 September 21, 1982 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. GAUDENCIO EMANENCE

    202 Phil. 179

  • G.R. No. L-28774 September 21, 1982 - DEVELOPMENT BANK OF THE PHILIPPINES v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

    202 Phil. 200

  • G.R. No. L-27886 September 21, 1982 - CELSO VALERA v. DOMINGO BAÑEZ

    202 Phil. 193

  • G.R. No. L-29255 September 21, 1982 - LEONARDO MIÑANO, ET AL. v. ALBERTO MIÑANO, ET AL.

    202 Phil. 213

  • G.R. No. L-48547 September 21, 1982 - ALFONSO ANGLIONGTO, JR. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

    202 Phil. 215

  • G.R. No. L-55315 September 21, 1982 - WILLIAM COLE, ET AL. v. POTENCIANA CASUGA VDA. DE GREGORIO, ET AL.

    202 Phil. 226

  • G.R. No. L-56014 September 21, 1982 - SANTIAGO SYJUCO, INC. v. JOSE TECSON

    202 Phil. 240

  • G.R. No. L-56902 September 21, 1982 - CONFEDERATION OF CITIZENS LABOR UNIONS, ET AL. v. CARMELO C. NORIEL, ET AL.

    202 Phil. 249

  • G.R. No. L-57892 September 21, 1982 - ANASTACIO AREVALO v. VALENTIN QUILATAN

    202 Phil. 256

  • G.R. No. L-59962 September 21, 1982 - RICARTE B. VILLEGAS v. RAMON MONTAÑO

    202 Phil. 265

  • G.R. No. L-22414 September 23, 1982 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. FRANCISCO BUENAVENTURA, ET AL.

    202 Phil. 270

  • G.R. No. L-36850 September 23, 1982 - ROSARIO PEREZ, ET AL. v. PILAR ONG CHUA, ET AL.

    202 Phil. 287

  • G.R. No. L-50905 September 23, 1982 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. FRANCISCO JUMAWAN

    202 Phil. 294

  • G.R. No. L-52178 September 28, 1982 - DEMETRIO ERNESTO, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

    202 Phil. 310

  • A.C. No. 439 September 30, 1982 - IN RE: QUINCIANO D. VAILOCES

    202 Phil. 322

  • A.C. No. 681 September 30, 1982 - ELISEO GUEVARA v. MAXIMO CALALANG

    202 Phil. 328

  • A.M. No. 1879-MJ September 30, 1982 - ROSALITO FAJARDO v. GUALBERTO B. BACARRO, SR., ET AL.

    202 Phil. 332

  • A.M. No. 1888-CFI September 30, 1982 - FRANCISCO I. PULIDO v. MAGNO B. PABLO

    202 Phil. 336

  • A.M. No. 2415-CFI September 30, 1982 - TOMAS SHAN, JR. v. CANDIDO C. AGUINALDO

    202 Phil. 354

  • A.M. No. P-2710 September 30, 1982 - BARBARA PIOQUINTO v. LUCRECIA A. HERNANDEZ

    202 Phil. 360

  • G.R. No. L-25778 September 30, 1982 - JOESTEEL CONTAINER CORPORATION v. COMMONWEALTH FINANCING CORPORATION

    202 Phil. 364

  • G.R. No. L-26243 September 30, 1982 - CLARA REGALARIO v. NORTHWEST FINANCE CORPORATION, ET AL.

    202 Phil. 366

  • G.R. No. L-26289 September 30, 1982 - IN RE: JUAN N. PECKSON v. GABRIEL F. ANADASE, ET AL.

    202 Phil. 374

  • G.R. No. L-27695 September 30, 1982 - ANTONIO CALLANTA v. MANUEL LOPEZ ENAGE, ET AL.

    202 Phil. 377

  • G.R. No. L-27819 September 30, 1982 - HARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY v. UNITED STATES LINES COMPANY, ET AL.

    202 Phil. 381

  • G.R. No. L-28501 September 30, 1982 - PEDRO ARCE v. CAPITAL INSURANCE & SURETY CO., INC., Defendant-Appellant.

    202 Phil. 386

  • G.R. No. L-28996 September 30, 1982 - MAXIMO SANTOS, ET AL. v. GENERAL WOODCRAFT AND DESIGN CORPORATION, ET AL.

    202 Phil. 390

  • G.R. No. L-29086 September 30, 1982 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. EDILBERTO GOMEZ, ET AL.

    202 Phil. 395

  • G.R. No. L-29590 September 30, 1982 - PHILIPPINE REFINING CO., INC. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

    202 Phil. 402

  • G.R. No. L-29636 September 30, 1982 - FILOIL MARKETING CORPORATION v. MARINE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF THE PHIL.

    202 Phil. 410

  • G.R. No. L-30353 September 30, 1982 - PATRICIO BELLO v. EUGENIA UBO, ET AL.

    202 Phil. 415

  • G.R. No. L-30452 September 30, 1982 - MERCURY DRUG CO., INC. v. NARDO DAYAO, ET AL.

    202 Phil. 424

  • G.R. No. L-30455 September 30, 1982 - MARIA LANDAYAN, ET AL. v. ANGEL BACANI, ET AL.

    202 Phil. 440

  • G.R. No. L-30675 September 30, 1982 - HAWAIIAN-PHIL COMPANY v. COURT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS, ET AL.

    202 Phil. 445

  • G.R. No. L-30994 September 30, 1982 - OLIMPIA BASA, ET AL. v. ANDRES C. AGUILAR, ET AL.

    202 Phil. 452

  • G.R. No. L-31226 September 30, 1982 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. FRANCISCO BELLO, ET AL.

    202 Phil. 456

  • G.R. No. L-32383 September 30, 1982 - BAZA MARKETING CORPORATION v. BOLINAO SECURITY AND INVESTIGATION SERVICE, INC.

    202 Phil. 478

  • G.R. No. L-32860 September 30, 1982 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. RENATO MARQUEZ, ET AL.

    202 Phil. 488

  • G.R. No. L-33995 September 30, 1982 - ELISEO C. DE GUZMAN v. ONOFRE A. VILLALUZ, ET AL.

    202 Phil. 503

  • G.R. No. L-34200 September 30, 1982 - REGINA L. EDILLON, ET AL. v. MANILA BANKERS LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION, ET AL.

    202 Phil. 508

  • G.R. No. L-34947 September 30, 1982 - ESTEBAN MEDINA, ET AL. v. FRANCISCO MA. CHANCO, ET AL.

    202 Phil. 515

  • G.R. No. L-37431 September 30, 1982 - PEDRO ENTERA, ET AL. v. PEOPLE OF THE PHIL., ET AL.

    202 Phil. 521

  • G.R. No. L-37733 September 30, 1982 - ALMARIO T. SALTA v. JESUS DE VEYRA

    202 Phil. 527

  • G.R. No. L-38603 September 30, 1982 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. PACIANO CHAVEZ, ET AL.

    202 Phil. 535

  • G.R. No. L-38728 September 30, 1982 - CONRADO V. MACATANGAY v. CHAIRMAN OF COMMISSION ON AUDIT

    202 Phil. 545

  • G.R. No. L-39026 September 30, 1982 - SOTERO RECTO v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

    202 Phil. 553

  • G.R. No. L-39401 September 30, 1982 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. BERTO SIMBRA, ET AL.

    202 Phil. 558

  • G.R. No. L-39644 September 30, 1982 - EDUARDO BIEN, ET AL. v. DELFIN VIR. SUNGA, ET AL.

    202 Phil. 565

  • G.R. No. L-39716 September 30, 1982 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ALFREDO D. GABIANA

    202 Phil. 577

  • G.R. No. L-40842 September 30, 1982 - BENJAMIN A. G. VEGA, ET AL. v. DOMINGO D. PANIS, ET AL.

    202 Phil. 587

  • G.R. No. L-41052 September 30, 1982 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. HENRY GASENDO

    202 Phil. 600

  • G.R. No. L-43783 September 30, 1982 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. WILLIAM BOKINGKITO TERANO

    202 Phil. 610

  • G.R. No. 44033 September 30, 1982 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. FEDERICO B. BESO, JR.

    202 Phil. 618

  • G.R. No. L-44408 September 30, 1982 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ERNESTO SAMBILI

    202 Phil. 629

  • G.R. No. L-45430 September 30, 1982 - DESA ENTERPRISES, INC., ET AL. v. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, ET AL.

    202 Phil. 639

  • G.R. No. L-45436 September 30, 1982 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. JOSE PON-AN

    202 Phil. 653

  • G.R. No. L-45679 September 30, 1982 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. RODOLFO MENDOZA

    202 Phil. 660

  • G.R. Nos. L-46068-69 September 30, 1982 - DIRECTOR OF LANDS v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-46125 September 30, 1982 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. LEON ALVIS, JR.

    202 Phil. 682

  • G.R. No. L-48478 September 30, 1982 - AGUSMIN PROMOTIONAL ENTERPRISES, INC. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-48727 September 30, 1982 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. JOSEPH D. LEONES

    202 Phil. 703

  • G.R. No. L-48747 September 30, 1982 - ANGEL JEREOS v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

    202 Phil. 715

  • G.R. No. L-49307 September 30, 1982 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. MELCHOR MALATE

    202 Phil. 721

  • G.R. No. L-49990 September 30, 1982 - UNITED STATES LINES, INC. v. AMADO INCIONG, ET AL.

    202 Phil. 729

  • G.R. No. L-50378 September 30, 1982 - FILINVEST CREDIT CORPORATION v. BENJAMIN RELOVA

    202 Phil. 741

  • G.R. No. L-51042 September 30, 1982 - DIONISIO MALACORA, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

    202 Phil. 756

  • G.R. No. L-52059 September 30, 1982 - BONIFACIA CALVERO v. EMPLOYEES’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION, ET AL.

    202 Phil. 774

  • G.R. No. L-52061 September 30, 1982 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. SALUSTIANO LOOD

    202 Phil. 792

  • G.R. No. L-53627 September 30, 1982 - CAPITAL GARMENT CORPORATION v. BLAS OPLE, ET AL.

    202 Phil. 797

  • G.R. No. L-53983 September 30, 1982 - LUCIANA DALIDA, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-54204 September 30, 1982 - NORSE MANAGEMENT CO., ET AL. v. NATIONAL SEAMEN BOARD, ET AL.

  • G.R. Nos. L-54272-73 September 30, 1982 - JUAN C. CALUBAQUIB v. SANDIGANBAYAN, ET AL.

    202 Phil. 817

  • G.R. No. L-54280 September 30, 1982 - ITOGON-SUYOC MINES, INC. v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION, ET AL.

    202 Phil. 850

  • G.R. No. L-55225 September 30, 1982 - HEIRS OF CATALINO JARDIN, ET AL v. HEIRS OF SIXTO HALLASGO, ET AL.

    202 Phil. 858

  • G.R. No. L-56624 September 30, 1982 - DARNOC REALTY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION v. AYALA CORPORATION

    202 Phil. 865

  • G.R. Nos. L-56950-51 September 30, 1982 - M. F. VIOLAGO OILER TANK TRUCKS v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION, ET AL.

    202 Phil. 872

  • G.R. No. L-57387 September 30, 1982 - UNIVERSITY OF THE EAST v. UNIVERSITY OF THE EAST FACULTY ASSOCIATION, ET AL.

    202 Phil. 881

  • G.R. No. L-58187 September 30, 1982 - REMEDIOS VELASCO VDA. DE CALDITO v. ROSALIO C. SEGUNDO, ETC., ET AL.

    202 Phil. 900

  • G.R. No. L-58452 September 30, 1982 - RAZA APPLIANCE CENTER v. ROLANDO R. VILLARAZA

    202 Phil. 903

  • G.R. No. L-58610 September 30, 1982 - BABELO BERIÑA, ET AL. v. PHILIPPINE MARITIME INSTITUTE, ET AL.

    202 Phil. 908

  • G.R. No. L-58623 September 30, 1982 - NATIONAL MINES AND ALLIED WORKERS’ UNION v. DOMINGO CORONEL REYES

    202 Phil. 912

  • G.R. No. L-58820 September 30, 1982 - BENITO E. DOMINGUEZ, JR. v. FILIPINAS INTEGRATED SERVICES CORPORATION, ET AL.

    202 Phil. 916

  • G.R. No. L-59234 September 30, 1982 - TAXICAB OPERATORS OF METRO MANILA, INC., ET AL. v. BOARD OF TRANSPORTATION, ET AL.

    202 Phil. 925

  • G.R. No. L-59935 September 30, 1982 - FLORA DE GRACIA REGNER VDA. DE DAYRIT v. JOSE R. RAMOLETE

    202 Phil. 937

  • G.R. No. L-60367 September 30, 1982 - VENUSTIANO T. TAVORA v. ROSARIO R. VELOSO

    202 Phil. 943

  • G.R. No. L-60602 September 30, 1982 - IN RE: MA. DEL SOCORRO SOBREMONTE, ET AL. v. JUAN PONCE ENRILE, ET AL.

    202 Phil. 949

  • G.R. No. L-60637 September 30, 1982 - BANK OF THE PHILIPPINE ISLANDS v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

    202 Phil. 959

  • G.R. No. L-60842 September 30, 1982 - ROLANDO DIMACUHA v. ALFREDO B. CONCEPCION

    202 Phil. 961