Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence


Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 1985 > August 1985 Decisions > G.R. No. L-45277 August 5, 1985 - AUGUSTO BASA v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL., ET AL.:




PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

SECOND DIVISION

[G.R. No. L-45277. August 5, 1985.]

AUGUSTO BASA, Petitioner, v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES, represented by the Solicitor General, and Judge GUILLERMO F. VILLASOR, Branch XV, Court of First Instance of Manila, Respondents.

Angel R. Gonzales for Petitioner.

The Solicitor General for Respondents.


D E C I S I O N


AQUINO, J.:


The issue in this case is whether the decision of the Court of First Instance of Manila (not the Tax Court) in an income tax case is reviewable by the Appellate Court or by this Court.chanrobles virtual lawlibrary

In a demand letter dated August 31, 1967, the Commissioner of Internal Revenue assessed against Augusto Basa deficiency income taxes for 1957 to 1960 totalling P16,353.12. *

As may be noted, the deficiencies were based on the taxpayer’s failure to report in full his capital gains on the sales of land. This omission or underdeclaration of income justified the imposition of 50% surcharge.

The taxpayer did not contest the assessments in the Tax Court. The Commissioner’s letter-decision on the case was dated December 6, 1974. On the assumption that the assessments had become final and incontestable, the Commissioner on September 3, 1975 sued the taxpayer in the Manila Court of First Instance for the collection of said amount.

The trial court in a decision dated April 20, 1976 affirmed the assessments and ordered Basa to pay P16,353.12 plus 5% surcharge and one percent monthly interest from August 31, 1967 to August 31,1970.

Instead of appealing to this Court directly under Republic Act No. 5440, in relation to Rules 41 and 45 of the Rules of Court, since no factual issues are involved, Basa tried to appeal to the Court of Appeals. He did not perfect his appeal within the reglementary period. The trial court dismissed it in its order dated October 1, 1976.

On December 23,1976 Basa filed the instant special civil action of certiorari wherein he assailed the trial court’s decision.

We hold that the petition is devoid of merit. The trial court acted within its jurisdiction in rendering its decision and dismissing Basa’s appeal. He should have appealed to this Court. His failure to do so rendered the decision final and executory. He has no cause of action for certiorari.

The decision is correct. If he wanted to contest the assessments, he should have appealed to the Tax Court. Not having done so, he could not contest the same in the Court of First Instance.

The issue of prescription raised by him is baseless. The assessments were predicated on the fact that his income tax returns, if not fraudulent, were false because he underdeclared his income. In such a case, the deficiency assessments may be made within ten years after the discovery of the falsity or omission. The court action should be instituted within five years after the assessment but this period is suspended during the time that the Commission is prohibited from instituting a court action. . . .

As explained in the Solicitor General’s memorandum, Basa’s requests for reinvestigation tolled the prescriptive period of five years within which court action may be brought (Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Capitol Subdivision, Inc., 119 Phil. 1051; Collector of Internal Revenue v. Suyoc Consolidated Mining Company, 104 Phil. 819). Moreover, the issue of prescription should have been raised in the Tax Court.chanrobles virtual lawlibrary

WHEREFORE, the trial court’s judgment is affirmed. No costs.

SO ORDERED.

Makasiar, C.J., Concepcion Jr., Escolin and Cuevas, JJ., concur.

Abad Santos, J., did not take part.

Endnotes:



* 90-AR-6805-67/57

Net income per return P 6,982.03

Add: Underdeclaration of Capital Gain

on Sale of Land:chanrob1es virtual 1aw library

Per investigation P18,628.24

Per return 5,127.88 P13,500.36

Net income per investigation P20,482.39

Less: personal and additional exemptions 6,000.00

Amount subject to tax 14,482.39

Tax due thereon P 1,642.00

Less: Amount already assessed P 29.00

Balance P 1,613.00

Add: 50% surcharge 806.50

1/2% mo. int. from 6-20-59

to 6-20-62 P 290.34

TOTAL AMOUNT DUE AND COLLECTIBLE P 2,709.84

90-AR-8520-67/58

Net income per return P 9,195.59

Add: Underdeclaration of capital gain

on Sale of Land:chanrob1es virtual 1aw library

Per investigation P 27,925.61

Per return 6,225.00 P 21,700.61

Net income per investigation P 30,896.20

Less: Personal and Additional

Exemptions 6,000.00

Amount subject to tax P 24,896.20

Tax due thereon 3,697.00

Less: Amount already assessed 132.00

Balance P 3,525.00

Add: 50% surcharge P 1,762.50

1/2% mo. mt. from 6-20-59

to 6-20-62 P 634.50

TOTAL AMOUNT DUE AND COLLECTIBLE P 5,922.00

90-AR-313480-67/59

Net income per return P 9,608.53

Add: Underdeclaration of capital gain

on Sale of Land:chanrob1es virtual 1aw library

Per investigation P 22,878.32

Per return 8,200.00 14,678.32

Net income per investigation P24,286.85

Less: personal and additional

exemptions P 8,000.00

Amount subject to tax P16,286.85

Tax due thereon P 2,589.00

Less: Amount already assessed P 48.00

Balance P 2,541.00

Add: 50% surcharge 1,270.50

1/2% mo. int. from 4-19-60

to 4-19-63 P 457.38

TOTAL AMOUNT DUE AND COLLECTIBLE P 4,268.88

90-AR-32250-67/60

Net income per return P 9,694.48

Add: Underdeclaration of capital gain

on sale of land:chanrob1es virtual 1aw library

Per investigation P18,281.03

Per return 5,700.00 P12,581.03

Net income per investigation P22,275.51

Less: Personal and additional

exemptions P 8,000.00

Amount subject to tax P14,275.51

Tax due thereon P 2,106.00

Less: Amount already assessed P 51.00

Balance P 2,055.00

Add: 50% surcharge P 1,027.50

1/2% mo. int. from 4-18-61

to 4-18-64 P 369.90

TOTAL AMOUNT DUE AND COLLECTIBLE P 3,452.40

GRAND TOTAL P16,353.12

** "SEC. 332. Exceptions as to period of limitation of assessment and collection of taxes. — (a) In the case of a false or fraudulent return with intent to evade tax or of a failure to file a return, the tax may be assessed or a proceeding in court for the collection of such tax may be begun without assessment, at any time within ten years after the discovery of the falsity, fraud, or omission.

x       x       x


"(c) Where the assessment of any internal revenue tax has been made within the period of limitation above-prescribed such tax may be collected by distraint or levy or by a proceeding in court, but only if begun (1) within five years after the assessment of the tax, or (2) prior to the expiration of any period for collection agreed upon in writing by the Commissioner of Internal Revenue and the taxpayer before the expiration of such five-year period. The period so agreed upon may be extended by subsequent agreements in writing made before the expiration of the period previously agreed upon.

"SEC. 333. Suspension of running of statute. — The running of the statute of Limitations provided in section three hundred thirty one or three hundred thirty-two on the making of assessments and the beginning of distraint or levy or a proceeding in court for collection, in respect of any deficiency, shall be suspended for the period during which the Commissioner of Internal Revenue is prohibited from making the assessment or beginning distraint or levy a proceeding in court, and for sixty days thereafter."




Back to Home | Back to Main




















chanrobles.com





ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com






August-1985 Jurisprudence                 

  • G.R. No. L-42636 August 1, 1985 - MARIA LUISA DE LEON ESCALER, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-57905 August 1, 1985 - DEVELOPMENT BANK OF THE PHILIPPINES v. JOAQUIN ILUSTRE, JR., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-29146 August 5, 1985 - BENITA SALAO v. BENITO CRISOSTOMO

  • G.R. No. L-36936 August 5, 1985 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ARSENIO ARBOIS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-45277 August 5, 1985 - AUGUSTO BASA v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-45967 August 5, 1985 - CESARIO DIONG-AN, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 70895 August 5, 1985 - HABALUYAS ENTERPRISES, INC., ET AL. v. MAXIMO M. JAPZON, ET AL.

  • A.M. No. 2796-P August 7, 1985 - JOSE L. MOYA, ET AL. v. RENATO A. BASSIG

  • G.R. No. L-42400 August 7, 1985 - ISAURO ABCEDE, ET AL. v. WORKMEN’S COMPENSATION COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-42916 August 7, 1985 - DONATO JEREZA v. LUIS T. MONDIA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-49930 August 7, 1985 - FRANCISCO MALONG, ET AL. v. PHILIPPINE NATIONAL RAILWAYS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-63048 August 7, 1985 - EMILIO TEJIDO, ET AL. v. JUAN URIARTE ZAMACOMA, ET AL.

  • G.R. Nos. L-63408 & 64026 August 7, 1985 - GAUDIOSO C. LLAMOSO, ET AL. v. SANDIGANBAYAN, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-68458 August 7, 1985 - LORENZO BOLAÑOS, ET AL. v. INTERMEDIATE APPELLATE COURT, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-69491 August 7, 1985 - MAXIMO DE LA TORRE, ET AL. v. EMPLOYEES’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-66395 August 7, 1985 - BENEDICTO MALIA, ET AL. v. INTERMEDIATE APPELLATE COURT, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-44944 August 9, 1985 - TOP-WELD MANUFACTURING, INC. v. ECED, S.A., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-61898 August 9, 1985 - LAO SOK v. LYDIA SABAYSABAY, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-62043 August 13, 1985 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. NICOLAS CANAMO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-67766 & L-70881 August 14, 1986

    ISIDRO T. HILDAWA v. JUAN PONCE ENRILE, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-27935 August 16, 1985 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. JUAN L. BOCAR, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-29359 August 16, 1985 - URSULA CALDERON, ET AL. v. VICTORIANO DE LA CRUZ

  • G.R. No. L-45749 August 16, 1985 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. FELICIDAD C. VILLALON, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-41605 August 19, 1985 - ROGELIO PRING, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-45662 August 20, 1985 - FELIPE U. ERESE v. EMPLOYEES’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION

  • G.R. Nos. L-40367-69 August 22, 1985 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. PACITO STO. TOMAS

  • G.R. No. L-45123 August 26, 1985 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. MANGGAYANAN SINAW-AY, ET AL.

  • G.R. Nos. L-49607-13 August 26, 1985 - BENJAMIN LU HAYCO v. COURT OF APPEALS

  • G.R. No. L-67207 August 26, 1985 - ST. DOMINIC CORPORATION v. INTERMEDIATE APPELLATE COURT, ET AL.

  • A.M. No. R-156-P August 27, 1985 - PEPITA CELIS v. LEVY Q. MARQUEZ

  • G.R. No. L-34147 August 28, 1985 - TERESITA ALO, ET AL. v. VALERIO V. ROVIRA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-41745 August 28, 1985 - MUNICIPALITY OF DAET v. HIDALGO ENTERPRISES, INC., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-44717 August 28, 1985 - CHARTERED BANK EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION v. BLAS F. OPLE, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-45278 August 28, 1985 - NAPOLEON ANTAZO v. PEOPLE OF THE PHIL., ET AL.

  • G.R. Nos. 71208-09 August 30, 1985 - SATURNINA GALMAN, ET AL. v. MANUEL PAMARAN, ET AL.