January 1985 - Philippine Supreme Court Decisions/Resolutions

Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence


Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 1985 > January 1985 Decisions > G.R. No. L-67215 January 4, 1985 - RAFAEL LAZATIN, ET AL. v. COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS, ET AL.:




PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

EN BANC

[G.R. No. L-67215. January 4, 1985.]

RAFAEL LAZATIN, JUANITA NEPOMUCENO, BREN GUIAO, and IMIGDIO LINGAD, Petitioners, v. COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS, THE REGIONAL COMMANDERS OF REGION III, THE PC PROVINCIAL COMMANDER OF PAMPANGA, and KILUSANG BAGONG LIPUNAN (Pampanga Chapter), Respondents.

Melvin Arquillo, Wilfredo Untalan, and Romeo Manalo, for Petitioners.

The Solicitor General for Respondents.


SYLLABUS


CONSTITUTIONAL LAW; ELECTIONS; PETITION FOR MANDAMUS DECLARED MOOT AND ACADEMIC; CASE AT BAR. — Where the Solicitor General manifested to the Court that he has no objection to the position of the petitioners that the Commission on Elections should act one way or the other on the petitioners’ letter requesting the Commission on Elections to (a) deputize the Citizen Military Training Corps to protect and safeguard the conduct of the elections in Pampanga on May 14, 1984; and (b) direct all election registrars of the province not to allow ballot boxes to be transferred in any other place other than the specified precincts during the actual voting and counting of votes and counsel for the Commission assured the Court that the matter would be resolved according to law; where the election was duly held and petitioners apparently satisfied with the manner respondent Commission discharged its function, were not heard from thereafter, the case is declared moot and academic.


R E S O L U T I O N


FERNANDO, C.J.:


In this suit for mandamus with preliminary injunction and/or temporary restraining order, filed on May 7, 1984, petitioners Rafael Lazatin, Juanita Nepomuceno, Bren Guiao and Imigdio Lingad sought to direct respondent Commission on Elections "to order all Election registrars of Pampanga and Angeles City not to transfer the ballot boxes to places other than the designated election precincts for purposes of voting and counting of ballots" and to "deputize the Citizen Military Training Corps (formerly ROTC) to safeguard the May 14, 1984 election in Pampanga and Angeles City in lieu of the Military Respondents." 1 The petition was placed on the agenda for May 8, 1984. After deliberation, the Court issued the following resolution: "The Court, after considering the pleadings filed and deliberating on the issues raised, without giving due course to the petition for mandamus with preliminary injunction and/or temporary restraining order, Resolved to: (a) file COMMENT, not to file a motion to dismiss, not later than 1:00 P.M. tomorrow, May 9, 1984; and (b) SET this case for hearing also tomorrow, May 9, 1984, at 3:00 P.M." 2 The required Comment was filed on May 9, 1984 by Assistant Solicitor Generals Nathanael P. de Pano, Jr. and Ruben E. Agpalo and Solicitor Aurora Cortes Jorge. It contended that there was lack of jurisdiction of the Court to entertain the petition for mandamus, its competence not extending to the supervision and direction of the purely administrative function of enforcing and administering the election law. Moreover, it also contended that mandamus does not lie. This was in answer to the allegation that respondent Commission was asked in a letter dated April 25, 1984 to deputize the military training corps to enforce election laws for the May 14, 1984 election and to direct all election registrars not to allow the counting of ballots or votes in places other than the specified or designated precincts, but that no action was taken on such plea. The Comment stated that there was no rejection of such request but only that the actions sought "are not appropriate nor called for." 3 It prayed for the dismissal of the petition.chanrobles virtual lawlibrary

The parties were thereafter heard on May 9, 1984. On the same day, this resolution was issued after the hearing: "The Solicitor General manifested to the Court that he has no objection to the position of the petitioners that the Commission on Elections should act one way or the other on the petitioners’ letter dated April 24, 1984 requesting the Commission on Elections to (a) deputize the Citizen Military Training Corps [formerly ROTC] to protect and safeguard the conduct of the elections in Pampanga on May 14, 1984; and (b) direct all election registrars of the province not to allow ballot boxes to be transferred in any other place other than the specified precincts during the actual voting and the counting of votes." 4 Counsel for the Commission, Attorney Zoilo Gomez, Jr., assured the Court that the matter would be resolved according to law.

It is thus clear that no question arises as to the supervisory authority of this Court extending to an inquiry into an alleged failure of respondent Commission to act. If such indeed be the case, then mandamus may issue for the Commission on Elections to decide the issue raised. That is the body called upon to act, not this Court, except in those rare instances where the imminence of the election calls for a prompt determination lest the exercise of the constitutional right of suffrage is rendered futile. 5 This is not one of such cases. The election of May 14, 1984 was duly held. Petitioners apparently were satisfied with the manner respondent Commission discharged its function as they were not heard from thereafter.cralawnad

WHEREFORE, the Court Resolved to declare this case as moot and academic. No costs.

Makasiar, Aquino, Concepcion, Jr., Abad Santos, Melencio-Herrera, Plana, Escolin, Relova, Gutierrez, Jr., De la Fuente and Cuevas, JJ., concur.

Teehankee, J., reserves the filing of a separate opinion.

Endnotes:


1. Petition, Prayer, 8.

2. Resolution of this Court of May 8, 1984.

3. Comment, 9.

4. Resolution of this Court of May 9, 1984.

5. Cf. Moya v. Del Fierro, 69 Phil. 199 (1939).




Back to Home | Back to Main




















chanrobles.com





ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com






January-1985 Jurisprudence                 

  • G.R. No. L-67215 January 4, 1985 - RAFAEL LAZATIN, ET AL. v. COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS, ET AL.

  • A.M. No. R-4-RTJ January 17, 1985 - MANUEL T. UBARRA v. JOSE H. TECSON

  • G.R. No. L-28520 January 17, 1985 - IN RE: SATURNINA VDA. DE CASTRO v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. L-34803 January 17, 1985 - TRIFONA SEECHUNG-FEDERIS v. DELFIN VIR. SUÑGA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-36130 January 17, 1985 - LA SUERTE CIGAR AND CIGARETTE FACTORY, ET AL. v. COURT OF TAX APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-41176 January 17, 1985 - RODOLFO ECHAUS v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-42394 January 17, 1985 - COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. COURT OF TAX APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-43642 January 17, 1985 - SOLFRIDO FEDILLO v. WORKMEN’S COMPENSATION COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-43693 January 17, 1985 - ESTELITA VDA. DE CARDIENTE v. WORKMEN’S COMPENSATION COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-46775 January 17, 1985 - SILVERIO PARAGES v. EMPLOYEES’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 51602 January 17, 1985 - GEORGE & PETER LINES, INC. v. ASSOCIATED LABOR UNIONS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-53334 January 17, 1985 - CARMELITA LIMJAP v. PEDRO SAMSON C. ANIMAS, ET AL.

  • G.R. Nos. 54719-50 January 17, 1985 - LORENZO GA. CESAR v. SANDIGANBAYAN, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 55998 January 17, 1985 - RAMON MAGSAYSAY AWARD FOUNDATION v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 56588 January 17, 1985 - SAMAHANG MANGGAGAWA NG PACIFIC MILLS, INC. v. CARMELO C. NORIEL

  • G.R. No. 56718 January 17, 1985 - ACME SHOE RUBBER & PLASTIC CORPORATION v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 57821 January 17, 1985 - SEGUNDINO TORIBIO, ET AL. v. ABDULWAHID A. BIDIN, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 64313 January 17, 1985 - NATIONAL HOUSING CORPORATION v. BENJAMIN JUCO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 64591 January 17, 1985 - RUFINO CO v. EFICIO B. ACOSTA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 66040 January 17, 1985 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. NORBERTO CASUNDO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 66427 January 17, 1985 - EMILIO DAYAG v. JUAN A. ALONZO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 67540 January 17, 1985 - FLORENDA SALCEDO v. ESTHER NOBLES BANS

  • G.R. No. 67635 January 17, 1985 - JUAN ALBERTO SUMANDI v. VICENTE LEOGARDO, JR., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-42669 January 21, 1985 - FERNANDO MACAWILI v. WORKMEN’S COMPENSATION COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 50473 January 21, 1985 - JOSE TAN KAPOE, ET AL. v. SILVESTRE MASA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 62306 January 21, 1985 - KAPISANAN NG MANGGAGAWANG PINAGYAKAP, ET AL. v. CRESENCIANO TRAJANO, ET AL.

  • G.R. Nos. 63194-96 January 21, 1985 - EDITHA T. DALMAN v. CITY COURT OF DIPOLOG CITY, BR. II, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 38338 January 28, 1985 - IN RE: SIMEON R. ROXAS, ET AL. v. ANDRES R. DE JESUS, JR.

  • G.R. No. L-44388 January 30, 1985 - VICTORIANO BULACAN v. FAUSTINO TORCINO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-25715 January 31, 1985 - HEIRS OF RAYMUNDO C. BAÑAS, ET AL. v. HEIRS OF BIBIANO BAÑAS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-38251 January 31, 1985 - PABLO ARCEO v. JOSE OLIVEROS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-38711 January 31, 1985 - FRANCISCO SYCIP v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-39044 January 31, 1935

    MANOTOK REALTY, INC. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. Nos. L-39288-89 January 31, 1985 - HEIRS OF ABELARDO V. PALOMIQUE, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-43453 January 31, 1985 - NATIONAL HOUSING CORPORATION v. WORKMENS’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-45252 January 31, 1985 - TIMOTEO LAROZA, ET AL. v. DONALD GUIA

  • G.R. No. L-46524 January 31, 1985 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. LEONARDO BANIA

  • G.R. Nos. L-47381 & L-47420 January 31, 1985 - REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 51858 January 31, 1985 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. RICARDO CABRERA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 52713 January 31, 1985 - GELACIO I. YASON v. COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 53620 January 31, 1985 - PEDRO LONZAME v. AUGUSTO M. AMORES, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 59311 January 31, 1985 - RADIO COMMUNICATIONS OF THE PHILIPPINES INC. v. JAIME M. LANTIN, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 61126 January 31, 1985 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. MELECIO ASTURIAS

  • G.R. No. 61129 January 31, 1985 - ESPIRIDION TERUÑEZ, ET AL. v. INTERMEDIATE APPELLATE COURT, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 63612 January 31, 1985 - SERAFIN DELA CRUZ, ET AL. v. INTERMEDIATE APPELLATE COURT, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 64190 January 31, 1985 - POLYMEDIC GENERAL HOSPITAL v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 65832 January 31, 1985 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. FERNANDO P. QUEBRAL, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 67143 January 31, 1985 - NATIONAL POWER CORPORATION v. EMILIO A. JACINTO, ET AL.