Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence


Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 1985 > May 1985 Decisions > G.R. No. L-50345 May 14, 1985 - HEIRS OF AGUSTIN FIESTA v. COURT OF APPEALS:




PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

FIRST DIVISION

[G.R. No. L-50345. May 14, 1985.]

HEIRS OF AGUSTIN FIESTA and SIMEON JUAN, Petitioners, v. THE HONORABLE COURT OF APPEALS and POTENCIANO REAÑO, Respondents.

Reynolds S. Fajardo, Rosario R. Rapanut and Mercedes M. Respicio, for Petitioners.

Cesar E. Palma for Private Respondent.


R E S O L U T I O N


MELENCIO-HERRERA, J.:


This Petition for Review on Certiorari seeks the reversal of the Decision of the then Court of Appeals (in CA-G.R. No. 58190-R), affirming in toto the Decision of the former Court of First Instance of Nueva Ecija, Branch I, awarding the lots in question to private respondent Potenciano REAÑO.

On January 14, 1934, after a cadastral survey of the Municipality of Sta. Rosa, Nueva Ecija, the Director of Lands filed a petition before the then Court of First Instance of Nueva Ecija (Cadastral Court, for short) praying that titles to the cadastral lots be settled and adjudicated (Cad. Case No. 67; LRC Cad. Rec. No. 1556).

The deceased, Agustin FIESTA, filed an Answer on June 15, 1940 claiming Lot No. 1858 and on July 6, 1940, a claim for Lot No. 1890. Petitioner Simeon JUAN claimed Lots Nos. 1877 and 1888.

After its Order of General Default issued on July 8, 1940, the Cadastral Court took no further action due to the outbreak of the 2nd World War.

On May 26, 1948, petitioner JUAN obtained OCT No. P-241 covering Lots Nos. 1877 and 1888. He died in 1965 and his heirs succeeded him in possession.

On his part, FIESTA obtained OCT No. P-695 for Lots Nos. 1858 and 1890, pursuant to a Homestead Patent granted on April 7, 1951. Upon his death in 1953, TCT No. NT-22990 was issued in favor of his heirs who have since substituted him in this case.chanrobles virtual lawlibrary

On January 24, 1958, or eighteen years after the Order of General Default, the case was reset for hearing upon motion of another claimant, Rosalina Z. Tiongco.

On May 16, 1966, private respondent REAÑO prayed for the lifting of the Order of General Default and for the admission of his Answer claiming approximately 30 cadastral lots including the lots already titled in the names of FIESTA and JUAN. REAÑO based his claim on a deed of sale from the Heirs of Pedro Padilla who traced their title to an "informacion possessoria."

After protracted litigation, the Cadastral Court rendered a Decision on November 25, 1971 adjudicating a number of lots in favor of REAÑO, including the lots claimed by petitioners FIESTA and JUAN. The Cadastral Court declared:jgc:chanrobles.com.ph

"All homestead patents or free patents covering areas in the premises in question issued by the Director of Lands after January 18, 1934 are hereby declared null and void."cralaw virtua1aw library

After several pleadings filed and resolved, the reconsideration sought by petitioners was ultimately granted. On appeal by REAÑO, however, respondent Appellate Court set aside the Order granting reconsideration and reinstated the Cadastral Court Decision of November 25, 1971 adjudicating the lots here in question to REAÑO. Hence, the present Petition for Review, to which we gave due course.

The sole issue presented for determination is whether or not the Director of Lands could validly grant homestead patents in petitioners’ favor during the pendency of cadastral proceedings for lands the nature and character of which had not yet been determined.

The issue raised has already been resolved in the following related cases: De la Cruz, et al v. Reaño, Et Al., G.R. No. L-29792; Francisco Juan, et al v. Reaño, Et Al., G.R. No. L-29866 (34 SCRA 585 [1970]); and more recently in De la Cruz, Et. Al. v. Hon. Pobre Yñigo, Et Al., G.R. No. L-39899 (126 SCRA 413 [1983])- As a matter of fact, those cases and the present one involve the same cadastral proceeding (Cad. Case No. 67, LRC Cad. Rec. No. 1656 of the Nueva Ecija CFI), and differ only as to claimants and lots involved.chanrobles virtual lawlibrary

In G.R. No. L-29792 and G.R. No. L-29866, this Court held:jgc:chanrobles.com.ph

"The issue arising from the above facts may be briefly stated as follows:jgc:chanrobles.com.ph

"May a parcel of land already titled for more than ten years in the name of a party by virtue of a Homestead Patent issued by the Government in the ordinary course of administrative proceedings, be registered again in the name of another party as a result of subsequent cadastral proceedings?

"The answer, We believe, must be in the negative.

"In Manalo v. Lukban, Et Al., Vol. 48, Phil. p. 973, We held that land granted by the Government to a private individual who applied for it as a homestead is considered no longer registerable within the meaning of the Land Registration Act after the issuance of the homestead patent and the original certificate of title issued in accordance therewith.

"In Pamintuan v. San Agustin, Et Al., 43 Phil. 558, as well as in El Hog Filipino v. Olive, 60 Phil. p. 17, We likewise held that in a cadastral proceeding the Court has no jurisdiction to decree again the registration of land already decreed and registered in an earlier registration case, and that the second decree entered for the same land is null and void.

"Moreover, considering that the petitioners in both cases before Us and their predecessors had been in possession of the land, first as homesteaders and later as absolute owners, for more than ten years before respondent Reaño filed his application for registration; that, as a result of the proceedings had in connection with their Homestead application, the homestead patents and original certificates of title mentioned heretofore were issued in their name, no further argument is needed to show that said petitioners and their predecessors had acquired title to the land by prescription."cralaw virtua1aw library

In the present case, petitioner JUAN obtained OCT No. P-241 covering Lots Nos. 1877 and 1888 in 1948, or eighteen years before respondent REAÑO filed his Answer in the cadastral case. Similarly, FIESTA obtained OCT No. P-695 for Lots Nos. 1858 and 1890 pursuant to a Homestead Patent granted on April 7, 1951, or fifteen (15) years before REAÑO’s Answer had been presented to the Cadastral Court. Significantly, too, before petitioners became registered owners, they were already homesteaders in possession of their respective lots.

Since the lots in question had been already titled in the names of FIESTA and JUAN for more than ten years before REAÑO intervened in the cadastral case, the Cadastral Court had no jurisdiction to adjudicate the lands again in favor of another party (Manalo v. Lukban, 48 Phil. 973; Pamintuan v. San Agustin, Et Al., 43 Phil. 558).

ACCORDINGLY, the judgment under review is hereby set aside. Transfer Certificate of Title No. NT-22990 covering Lots Nos. 1858 and 1890 issued in the name of the Heirs of Agustin Fiesta; and Original Certificate of Title No. P-241 covering Lots Nos. 1877 and 1888 in the name of Simeon Juan, are hereby declared valid and effective.chanroblesvirtualawlibrary

Costs against private respondent Potenciano Reaño.

SO ORDERED.

Teehankee, Actg. C.J., Plana, Relova, Gutierrez, Jr., Dela Fuente and Alampay, JJ., concur.




Back to Home | Back to Main




















chanrobles.com





ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com






May-1985 Jurisprudence                 

  • G.R. No. L-56893 May 3, 1985 - PEDRO SISON, SR. v. MINISTRY OF NATIONAL DEFENSE

  • G.R. No. L-59787 May 3, 1985 - CRISTINA V. JASMINEZ v. FABIAN C. VER

  • G.R. No. L-58912 May 7, 1985 - ROBERTO R. DE LUZURIAGA, SR. v. MIDPANTAO L. ADIL

  • G.R. No. L-66547 May 7, 1985 - FRANCISCO MOGUEIS, JR. v. COURT OF APPEALS

  • G.R. No. L-67540 May 7, 1985 - FLORENDA SALCEDO v. ESTHER NOBLES BANS

  • G.R. No. L-69800 May 7, 1985 - ALFREDO MONTELIBANO v. BACOLOD-MURCIA MILLING CO., INC.

  • G.R. No. L-32737 May 8, 1985 - GREGORIO A. CONCON v. COURT OF APPEALS

  • G.R. No. L-43086 May 8, 1985 - FELIPE Z. CAÑETE v. WORKMEN’S COMPENSATION COMMISSION

  • G.R. No. L-45234 May 8, 1985 - R and B SURETY & INSURANCE CO., INC. v. VICTORINO A. SAVELLANO

  • G.R. No. L-60509 May 8, 1985 - LEOPOLDO TOLOSA v. EMPLOYEE’S COMPENSATION COMMISSION

  • G.R. No. L-62354 May 9, 1985 - ROSALINDA GODIZANO v. EMPLOYEES’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION

  • A.C. No. 2131 May 10, 1985 - ADRIANO E. DACANAY v. BAKER & MCKENZIE

  • G.R. No. L-20395 May 13, 1985 - ELTON W. CHASE v. VICTOR BUENCAMINO, SR.

  • G.R. No. L-45382 May 13, 1985 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. NICOLAS SERRANO

  • G.R. No. L-59879 May 13, 1985 - PATRICIO SINAON v. ANDRES SOROÑGON

  • G.R. No. L-68126 May 13, 1985 - MACTAN RURAL BANK, INC. v. VICENTE LEOGARDO, JR.

  • G.R. No. L-69261 May 13, 1985 - RAJAH LAHUY MINING COMPANY v. JAMES B. PAJARES

  • G.R. No. L-50345 May 14, 1985 - HEIRS OF AGUSTIN FIESTA v. COURT OF APPEALS

  • G.R. No. L-52832 May 14, 1985 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. HENRY SAMIANO

  • G.R. No. L-60504 May 14, 1985 - MELITON C. GERONIMO v. FIDEL V. RAMOS

  • G.R. No. L-66371 May 15, 1985 - ARMANDO ANG v. JOSE P. CASTRO

  • A.M. No. 2864-P May 16, 1985 - OFFICE OF THE COURT ADMINISTRATOR v. AMANDO S. SORIANO

  • G.R. No. L-52292 May 16, 1985 - FEDERATION OF FREE WORKERS v. EDUARDO P. CAGUIOA

  • G.R. No. L-57348 May 16, 1985 - FRANCISCO DEPRA v. AGUSTIN DUMLAO

  • G.R. No. L-35645 May 22, 1985 - UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. V.M. RUIZ

  • G.R. No. L-40118 May 22, 1985 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. IGNACIO Z. PANUELOS

  • G.R. No. L-46126 May 22, 1985 - ESTEBAN S. CRUZ v. DIRECTOR, NATIONAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION

  • G.R. No. L-65555 May 22, 1985 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ANTINOMENES DUERO

  • A.C. No. 2481 May 24, 1985 - LEONCIO DELA CRUZ v. RICARDO A. FABROS, JR.

  • G.R. No. L-34856 May 24, 1985 - IRENEO MIRALLES v. PEDRO ORO

  • G.R. No. L-62465 May 24, 1985 - ERNESTO S. NIETO v. ROMEO D. MAGAT

  • G.R. No. L-65848 May 24, 1985 - HERNANDO C. LAYNO, SR. v. SANDIGANBAYAN

  • G.R. No. L-68212 May 24, 1985 - SEA-LAND SERVICE, INC. v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION

  • G.R. No. L-27718 May 27, 1985 - INDUSTRIAL TEXTILES MANUFACTURING COMPANY v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE

  • G.R. No. L-39388 May 27, 1985 - RAYMUNDO ERFE v. WILLELMO C. FORTUN

  • G.R. No. L-41412 May 27, 1985 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. SANCHO NEPOMUCENO

  • G.R. No. L-42419 May 27, 1985 - PACIENCIA VDA. DE PONGAN v. WORKMEN’S COMPENSATION COMMISSION

  • G.R. No. L-44258 May 27, 1985 - CENEN G. DIZON v. COURT OF APPEALS

  • G.R. No. L-57051 May 27, 1985 - MERLY M. PAGALUNAN v. STATION COMMANDER ANGELES CITY

  • G.R. No. L-61549 May 27, 1985 - FRANCISCO DE ASIS & CO., INC. v. COURT OF APPEALS

  • G.R. No. L-63535 May 27, 1985 - PHIL. INTERNATIONAL SHIPPING CORP. v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION

  • G.R. No. 70185 May 27, 1985 - SANDIGAN NG MANGGAGAWA SA SHOEMART v. CRESENCIO B. TRAJANO

  • G.R. No. L-23524 May 31, 1985 - REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES v. GABRIEL V. VALERO

  • G.R. No. L-45637 May 31, 1985 - ROBERTO JUNTILLA v. CLEMENTE FONTANAR

  • G.R. No. L-56022 May 31, 1985 - GEMILIANO C. LOPEZ, JR. v. COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS

  • G.R. No. L-56744 May 31, 1985 - ROMUALDO AVELLANEDA v. COURT OF APPEALS

  • G.R. Nos. L-57627 & 58966 May 31, 1985 - ROLANDO TINIO v. JOSE P. CASTRO

  • G.R. No. L-63729 May 31, 1985 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ERNESTO DEUS

  • G.R. No. L-64204 May 31, 1985 - DEL ROSARIO & SONS LOGGING ENTERPRISES, INC. v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION

  • G.R. No. L-65689 May 31, 1986

    SANDOVAL SHIPYARDS, INC. v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION

  • G.R. No. L-68032 May 31, 1985 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. FLORENCIO V. HINSOY

  • G.R. No. L-69098 May 31, 1985 - GEORGIA G. TUMANG v. ODILON I. BAUTISTA

  • G.R. No. L-69437 May 31, 1985 - SIEGFREDO D. OBIAS v. MELECIO B. BORJA

  • G.R. No. L-69623 May 31, 1985 - MASAGANA TELAMART, INC. v. INTERMEDIATE APPELLATE COURT

  • G.R. No. L-69907 May 31, 1985 - PRUDENTIAL BANK v. JOSE P. CASTRO

  • G.R. No. 70744 May 31, 1985 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. FELIPE RAMIREZ