Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence


Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 1987 > July 1987 Decisions > G.R. No. L-58781 July 31, 1987 - TEOFILO MAGNO v. COURT OF APPEALS:




PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

SECOND DIVISION

[G.R. No. L-58781. July 31, 1987.]

TEOFILO MAGNO, ISIDRO CABATIC, HERMINIO CABATIC, FELICITAS CABATIC, Assisted by her husband, JOSE CARINO, TOMAS MAGNO, ELPIDIO MAGNO, AURORA MAGNO, Assisted by her husband, ODELON BUGAYONG, NICANOR MAGNO and LOLITA MAGNO, Petitioners, v. HONORABLE COURT OF APPEALS, GAVINO MAGNO, NICETAS MAGNO, and NAZARIA MAGNO, Assisted by her husband, SIMEON DE GUZMAN, Respondents.


SYLLABUS


1. REMEDIAL LAW; CIVIL PROCEDURE; SERVICE OF PLEADINGS; WHEN A PARTY IS REPRESENTED BY COUNSEL NOTICE SHOULD BE MADE UPON COUNSEL AT HIS GIVEN ADDRESS. — It is well-settled that when a party is represented by counsel, notice should be made upon the counsel of record at his given address to which notices of all kinds emanating from the court should be sent in the absence of a proper and adequate notice to the court of a change of address. (Cubar v. Mendoza, 120 SCRA 768).

2. ID.; ID.; ID.; ID.; SERVICE BECOMES EFFECTIVE UPON FAILURE OF COUNSEL TO CLAIM HIS MAIL WITHIN FIVE DAYS FROM DATE OF FIRST NOTICE. — In the case now before Us, the records show that the notice and copy of the decision of respondent Court of Appeals were sent to petitioners’s counsel of record Atty. Atinidoro E. Sison at his given mailing address which is 33 B.M.A. Avenue, Tatalon, Quezon City. The first notice to him by the Postmaster to claim his mail was on July 9, 1981. The rule is that service of notice becomes effective at the expiration of the five-day period upon failure of the addressee to claim his mail within five (5) days from the date of first notice Sec. 8, Rule 13 Rules of Court (Feraren v. Santos, 113 SCRA 707). Therefore in this case the service became effective five days after July 9, 1981 which is July 14, 1981. The decision became final on August 13, 1981. A xerox copy of the said envelope properly addressed appears on page 52 of the Rollo. This fact is further shown by the certification issued by the then Acting Clerk of the Court of Appeals, Atty. Cesar M. Marzan. (p. 51, Rollo). If Atty. Sison moved to another address without informing the respondent of his change of address the omission or neglect will not stay the finality of the decision. The notice sent to petitioners themselves, under the circumstances is not even necessary. (Francisco v. Puno, 108 SCRA 427). It may be stated though that while petitioners claim that Teofilo Magno to whom the notice to the petitioners was addressed is already dead, it is not explained why their present petition before this Court still includes the name Teofilo Magno. There is no indication in the record that he has been duly substituted by his legal representative.


D E C I S I O N


PARAS, J.:


This is a special civil action for Certiorari seeking to declare void ab initio the Resolution of respondent Court of Appeals dated September 22, 1981 which ordered the issuance of an Entry of Judgment in CA-G.R. No. 52655-R. The petition also prays for the issuance of a preliminary injunction to temporarily maintain the status quo by ordering the provincial sheriff of the province of Pangasinan to desist from enforcing the writ of execution issued in Civil Case No. A-413 pursuant to the said Entry of Judgment.

Civil Case No. A-413 is an action for Partition of Certain Properties and for Damages, filed by private respondents against petitioners in the Court of First Instance of Pangasinan, Branch VII thereof. In a Decision ** dated October 5, 1972, the lower court ordered the partition of the properties subject of the complaint in accordance with the schedule therein appearing. It also ordered the petitioners to pay jointly and severally unto the private respondents the amount of P3,000.00 as attorney’s fees.

Petitioners appealed to the Court of Appeals which appeal was docketed as CA-G.R. No. 52655-R. On June 30, 1981, the said court promulgated its Decision *** affirming the decision of the lower court.

Notice of the decision was sent to petitioners’ counsel Atty. Atinidoro B. Sison at his given mailing address which is 33 BMA Ave., Tatalon, Quezon City. The same, however, was returned to the court with the certification of the postmaster — "Return to sender, Reason — moved."cralaw virtua1aw library

On September 14, 1981, respondent Court of Appeals issued the following Resolution: —

"Considering that the copy of Decision dated June 30, 1981 addressed to Atty. Atinidoro B. Sison of 33 BMA Tatalon, Quezon City, counsel for the appellants was returned unclaimed with the notation on the envelope "MOVED", the Court Resolved to resend the said copy of the Decision to the appellants themselves at Alaminos, Pangasinan, and the appellants are hereby informed that the fifteen (15) days period within which to file for reconsideration will be counted from the receipt of the decision herewith attached. (Annex "5-A" p. 54, Rollo)

A copy of this Resolution was sent to petitioners themselves addressed as follows — Mr. Teofilo Magno Et. Al., Patricio, Alaminos, Pangasinan. It is not disputed that this address is the address on record of petitioners. But again the enveloped addressed to them was returned to the court with the notation — deceased.chanrobles.com : virtual law library

On September 22, 1981, the respondent court issued its now assailed Resolution ordering the issuance of the entry of judgment.

Petitioners’ motion for reconsideration was denied hence, they filed the present petition, which We find to be without merit.

It is well-settled that when a party is represented by counsel, notice should be made upon the counsel of record at his given address to which notices of all kinds emanating from the court should be sent in the absence of a proper and adequate notice to the court of a change of address. (Cubar v. Mendoza, 120 SCRA 768).

In the case now before Us, the records show that the notice and copy of the decision of respondent Court of Appeals were sent to petitioners’s counsel of record Atty. Atinidoro E. Sison at his given mailing address which is 33 B.M.A. Avenue, Tatalon, Quezon City. The first notice to him by the Postmaster to claim his mail was on July 9, 1981. The rule is that service of notice becomes effective at the expiration of the five-day period upon failure of the addressee to claim his mail within five (5) days from the date of first notice Sec. 8, Rule 13 Rules of Court (Feraren v. Santos, 113 SCRA 707). Therefore in this case the service became effective five days after July 9, 1981 which is July 14, 1981. The decision became final on August 13, 1981. A xerox copy of the said envelope properly addressed appears on page 52 of the Rollo. This fact is further shown by the certification issued by the then Acting Clerk of the Court of Appeals, Atty. Cesar M. Marzan. (p. 51, Rollo). If Atty. Sison moved to another address without informing the respondent of his change of address the omission or neglect will not stay the finality of the decision. The notice sent to petitioners themselves, under the circumstances is not even necessary. (Francisco v. Puno, 108 SCRA 427). It may be stated though that while petitioners claim that Teofilo Magno to whom the notice to the petitioners was addressed is already dead, it is not explained why their present petition before this Court still includes the name Teofilo Magno. There is no indication in the record that he has been duly substituted by his legal representative.

The decision in this case having become final on July 29, 1981, there being no appeal taken therefrom, respondent court committed no error in issuing its resolution dated September 22, 1981 ordering the issuance of the corresponding entry of judgment.

WHEREFORE, for lack of merit, this petition is hereby DISMISSED. The restraining order earlier issued is lifted.

SO ORDERED.

Yap (Chairman), Melencio-Herrera, Padilla and Sarmiento, JJ., concur.

Endnotes:



* Penned by Judge Magno B. Pablo.

** Penned by Justice Porfirio V. Sison, and concurred in by Justices Elias B. Asuncion and Juan A. Sison.




Back to Home | Back to Main




















chanrobles.com





ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com






July-1987 Jurisprudence                 

  • G.R. No. L-47147 July 3, 1987 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. SENEN OLA

  • G.R. No. L-67472 July 3, 1987 - DARIO C. CABIGAS v. PEOPLE OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. Nos. L-48879-82 July 7, 1987 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ROGELIO LASANAS

  • A.C. No. 2655 July 9, 1987 - LEONARD W. RICHARDS v. PATRICIO A. ASOY

  • G.R. No. L-49728 July 15, 1987 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. CRISANTO F. AUSAN

  • G.R. No. L-63438 July 15, 1987 - MANUEL OLONDRIZ, JR. v. PEOPLE OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. L-30637 July 16, 1987 - LIANGA BAY LOGGING, CO., INC. v. MANUEL L. ENAGE

  • G.R. No. L-60328 July 16, 1987 - KAPISANANG MANGGAGAWANG PINAGYAKAP v. NAT’L LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION

  • G.R. No. 76639 July 16, 1987 - EMILIO SY v. JUAN C. TUVERA

  • G.R. No. L-37007 July 20, 1987 - RAMON S. MILO v. ANGELITO C. SALANGA

  • G.R. No. L-69377 July 20, 1987 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ALEXANDER ALBOFERA

  • G.R. No. 71813 July 20, 1987 - ROSALINA P. ABELLA v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION

  • G.R. No. L-33050 July 23, 1987 - PABLO V. ZAGALA v. JOSE B. JIMENEZ

  • G.R. No. L-33654 July 23, 1987 - MEYNARDO Q. JAMILIANO v. SERAFIN B. CUEVAS

  • G.R. No. L-35800 July 23, 1987 - ROSALINDA PA-AC v. ITOGON-SUYOC MINES, INC.

  • G.R. No. L-41171 July 23, 1987 - PATROCINIO BORROMEO-HERRERA v. FORTUNATO BORROMEO

  • G.R. No. L-46010 July 23, 1987 - CANDIDA B. MUNEZ v. COURT OF APPEALS

  • G.R. No. L-46903 July 23, 1987 - BUHAY DE ROMA v. COURT OF APPEALS

  • G.R. No. L-50383 July 23, 1987 - PACKAGING PRODUCTS CORP. v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION

  • G.R. No. L-56398 July 23, 1987 - ASIA WORLD PUBLISHING HOUSE, INC. v. BLAS OPLE

  • G.R. No. L-57338 July 23, 1987 - WILLIAM B. BORTHWICK v. FLORELIANA CASTRO-BARTOLOME

  • G.R. No. L-58292 July 23, 1987 - ADAMSON & ADAMSON, INC. v. AUGUSTO M. AMORES

  • G.R. No. L-69303 July 23, 1987 - HEIRS OF MARIA MARASIGAN v. INTERMEDIATE APPELLATE COURT

  • G.R. No. 73008 July 23, 1987 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. RODOLFO A. BOHOLST

  • G.R. No. 76872 July 23, 1987 - WILFREDO S. TORRES v. NEPTALI A. GONZALES

  • G.R. No. L-78780 July 23, 1987 - DAVID G. NITAFAN v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE

  • A.C. No. 1327 July 27, 1987 - RE: ATTY. OCTAVIO D. FULE

  • G.R. Nos. L-36906-07 July 27, 1987 - ISAAC O. TOLENTINO v. ONOFRE A. VILLALUZ

  • G.R. Nos. 71131-32 July 27, 1987 - REPUBLIC SURETY AND INSURANCE CO., INC. v. INTERMEDIATE APPELLATE COURT

  • G.R. Nos. 72316-17 July 27, 1987 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. BALMUDE LIZA

  • G.R. No. 76746 July 27, 1987 - DURABUILT RECAPPING PLANT & COMPANY v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION

  • G.R. No. 77918 July 27, 1987 - FRANCISCO LECAROZ v. JAIME N. FERRER

  • G.R. No. L-46591 July 28, 1987 - BANCO FILIPINO SAVINGS AND MORTGAGE BANK v. MIGUEL NAVARRO

  • G.R. No. L-49162 July 28, 1987 - JANICE MARIE JAO v. COURT OF APPEALS

  • G.R. No. L-54045 July 28, 1987 - DIRECTOR OF LANDS v. EDUARDO R. BENGZON

  • G.R. No. L-56614 July 28, 1987 - ROMAN SANTOS, JR. v. COURT OF APPEALS

  • G.R. No. L-71768 July 28, 1987 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. NORBERTO TANAMAN

  • G.R. No. L-32621 July 29, 1987 - ASSOC. OF BAPTISTS FOR WORLD EVANGELISM, INC. v. FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH

  • G.R. No. L-51306 July 29, 1987 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ROLANDO CAMAY

  • G.R. No. L-51369 July 29, 1987 - MODESTA BADILLO v. CLARITA FERRER

  • G.R. No. 74041 July 29, 1987 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ROGELIO T. LIGON

  • G.R. Nos. 77317-50 July 29, 1987 - MADID MACAGA-AN v. PEOPLE OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. L-58651 July 30, 1987 - VIRGINIA T. VELASCO v. GRACIANO P. GAYAPA, JR.

  • G.R. No. L-63132 July 30, 1987 - ELIAS S. MENDOZA v. INTERMEDIATE APPELLATE COURT

  • G.R. No. 71907 July 30, 1987 - EDI-STAFF BUILDERS INTERNATIONAL v. VICENTE LEOGARDO, JR.

  • G.R. No. 72727 July 30, 1987 - BENITO DILAG v. INTERMEDIATE APPELLATE COURT

  • G.R. Nos. 74485-86 July 30, 1987 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. EFREN GARUFIL

  • G.R. No. 77353 July 30, 1987 - ASSOCIATED BANK v. ARSENIO M. GONONG

  • A.M. No. R-181-P July 31, 1987 - ADELIO C. CRUZ v. QUITERIO L. DALISAY

  • G.R. No. L-31681 July 31, 1987 - DIRECTOR OF LANDS v. COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE OF RIZAL, BR. XII

  • G.R. No. L-31974 July 31, 1987 - NICOLAS LEYTE v. VICENTE N. CUSI, JR.

  • G.R. No. L-47521 July 31, 1987 - CAROLINA CLEMENTE v. GOVERNMENT SERVICE INSURANCE SYSTEM

  • G.R. No. L-46724 July 31, 1987 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. MAMERTO SERANTE

  • G.R. No. L-47661 July 31, 1987 - JUANITO CARIÑO v. COURT OF APPEALS

  • G.R. No. L-48672 July 31, 1987 - TROPICAL HOMES, INC. v. NATIONAL HOUSING AUTHORITY

  • G.R. No. L-49703 July 31, 1987 - REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL. v. NAPOLEON R. FLOJO

  • G.R. No. L-58781 July 31, 1987 - TEOFILO MAGNO v. COURT OF APPEALS

  • G.R. No. L-58831 July 31, 1987 - ALFREDO R. CORNEJO, SR. v. SANDIGANBAYAN

  • G.R. No. L-63862 July 31, 1987 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. VICENTE ANDAYA

  • G.R. No. L-65211 July 31, 1987 - EDGARDO P. TOLEDO v. INTERMEDIATE APPELLATE COURT

  • G.R. No. L-66186 July 31, 1987 - AMANCIO SESE v. INTERMEDIATE APPELLATE COURT

  • G.R. No. L-66419 July 31, 1987 - FILINVEST CREDIT CORPORATION v. IVAN MENDEZ

  • G.R. No. L-67583 July 31, 1987 - BASILISA S. ESCONDE v. SAMILO N. BARLONGAY

  • G.R. No. L-69542 July 31, 1987 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ALFONSO AUDITOR

  • G.R. No. L-69901 July 31, 1987 - ANTONIO RAMON ONGSIAKO v. INTERMEDIATE APPELLATE COURT

  • G.R. No. 70287 July 31, 1987 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. FELICIANO B. RUALO

  • G.R. No. 70648 July 31, 1987 - COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS v. COURT OF TAX APPEALS

  • G.R. No. L-72301 July 31, 1987 - ROLANDO PONSICA, ET AL. v. EMILIO M. IGNALAGA

  • G.R. No. L-72555 July 31, 1987 - TABACALERA INSURANCE CO. v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION

  • G.R. No. 74007 July 31, 1987 - UNIVERSITY OF THE EAST v. MINISTER OF LABOR.

  • G.R. No. 74289 July 31, 1987 - GOLDEN GATE REALTY CORP. v. INTERMEDIATE APPELLATE COURT

  • G.R. No. 74562 July 31, 1987 - PHIL. LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE CO. v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION

  • G.R. No. 74625 July 31, 1987 - MATEO P. FRANCISCO v. PELAGIO S. MANDI

  • G.R. No. 75380 July 31, 1987 - VICTORIA M. TOLENTINO v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION

  • G.R. No. 76273 July 31, 1987 - FEU-DR. NICANOR REYES MEDICAL FOUNDATION v. CRESENCIANO TRAJANO

  • G.R. No. 78164 July 31, 1987 - TERESITA TABLARIN, ET AL. v. ANGELINA S. GUTIERREZ