Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence


Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 1988 > January 1988 Decisions > G.R. No. L-46373 January 22, 1988 - YAP PENG CHONG v. PEOPLE OF THE PHIL., ET AL.:




PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

SECOND DIVISION

[G.R. No. L-46373. January 22, 1988.]

YAP PENG CHONG, Petitioner, v. PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES and COURT OF APPEALS, Respondents.


SYLLABUS


1. REMEDIAL LAW; EVIDENCE; FACTUAL FINDINGS OF TRIAL COURT; ENTITLED TO GREAT WEIGHT. — Petitioner has not made a sufficient showing to justify the Court in disregarding the findings of facts of the appellate court. Petitioner’s claim that his extrajudicial confession was made by him involuntarily was not given credence by the appellate court. Moreover, the respondent court found that, even without the extrajudicial confession, there was sufficient evidence to establish the guilt of petitioner beyond reasonable doubt. We find no reason to disturb the findings of the respondent court.


D E C I S I O N


YAP, J.:


Assailed in this petition for review are the decision of the Court of Appeals dated February 17, 1977, affirming the conviction of petitioner for violation of Republic Act No. 3720 (Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act) and the resolution of June 6, 1977 denying petitioner’s motion for reconsideration.

Petitioner Yap Peng Chong, together with Clarita Terragosa, Rolando Lacdao, Mario Uy and Dario Camarao, was charged with having violated Section 11, in relation to Sections 12, 18 and 19, of Republic Act No. 3720 for having allegedly conspired in the manufacture, sale, distribution and delivery, without proper authority, of drugs and/or tablets which were fake or adulterated and mislabelled. Inasmuch as accused Clarita Terragosa and Dario Camarao remained at large, trial proceeded against accused Yap Peng Chong, Rolando Lacdao and Mario Uy.

After trial by the Court of First Instance of Rizal, Accused Mario Uy was acquitted, while the accused Yap Peng Chong (herein petitioner) and Rolando Lacdao were convicted and sentenced to suffer an indeterminate penalty ranging from six (6) months and one (1) day of prision correccional as minimum, to five (5) years of prision correccional as maximum, to pay a fine of P1,000.00 each with subsidiary imprisonment in case of insolvency at the rate of P8.00 a day which in no case shall exceed more than 1/3 of the principal penalty and to pay the costs.

From the above decision, herein petitioner Yap Peng Chong appealed to the Court of Appeals which rendered the questioned decision, the dispositive portion of which reads as follows:jgc:chanrobles.com.ph

"WHEREFORE, except as to the deletion of the word prision correccional in the penalty imposed by the trial court, the decision appealed from is AFFIRMED. Costs against the appellant."cralaw virtua1aw library

Petitioner raises two issues in the instant petition. Firstly, petitioner contends that the court a quo convicted him mainly on the basis of the extrajudicial confession which he claims was prepared by the NBI agents without his participation and which he signed without knowing its contents because he was maltreated and threatened with deportation to China. In short, petitioner alleges that his extrajudicial confession was involuntary, and thus, inadmissible as evidence.cralawnad

Secondly, petitioner maintains that the evidence presented is insufficient to overcome the presumption of innocence and to warrant his conviction.

There is no merit in petitioner’s appeal. Petitioner has not made a sufficient showing to justify the Court in disregarding the findings of facts of the appellate court.

Petitioner’s claim that his extrajudicial confession was made by him involuntarily was not given credence by the appellate court. Said the court:jgc:chanrobles.com.ph

"It is claimed by appellant that his signed confession was made involuntarily upon being subjected ‘to the shrewd and brutal treatment’ accorded him by the NBI agents during the investigation. He alleges that even before being taken to the NBI headquarters, the agents roughed him up and confiscated his alien identification. He further claims that he was forced to sign Exhibits "A," "A-1" to "A-2" under the false impression that the same was going to be used merely as evidence against Dario Camarao.

"It must be noted that the confession was dated February 1, 1967, the date when the raid and the arrest of appellant and others were made. Why then would appellant be subjected to brutal treatment when on the first day he had already signed a confession? Likewise, if appellant was really tortured and brutally maltreated, why did not one word of such maltreatment surface during the trial. And apart from the allegations that he was brutally treated, appellant offered no evidence to establish his contention. No evidence was ever presented to prove that the appellant complained to the swearing officer nor was there any sign of suspicious character tending to cast doubt upon the integrity of the extrajudicial confession." (pp. 36-37, Rollo)

Moreover, the respondent court found that, even without the extrajudicial confession, there was sufficient evidence to establish the guilt of petitioner beyond reasonable doubt. The respondent court held:chanroblesvirtualawlibrary

"The evidence of the prosecution shows that in the morning of February 1, 1967, several agents of the National Bureau of Investigation conducted a raid in the house located at 135 P. Milagros St., San Juan, Rizal, armed with a search warrant issued by then Judge Andres Reyes of the Court of First Instance of Rizal (Exhibit ‘B’). The NBI agents headed by Federico M. Opinion, Jr. seized several assorted kinds of drugs including labels, empty cans, literature, printed plates, skin dryers tableting machines, punches and moulds, coloring liquid, plastic cells and other paraphernalia. Yap Peng Chong, Clarita Terragosa and a houseboy Bartolome Berrame, who were inside the house, were apprehended. The raiders prepared an inventory of the articles seized, which was acknowledged by the appellant through his signature. Pictures of the surroundings as well as the confiscated articles were likewise taken.

"It appears that the raid was made after more than one month surveillance of the house by the NBI agents based on an information that the house where the appellant was staying was being used in the manufacture of the fake drugs. Prior to the raid, Agent Opinion posing as an ordinary buyer was able to buy from appellant drugs which included among others Winstral tablets centanim and carboguanacil.

"After the raid, appellant and his companions were brought to the NBI headquarters and their statements were taken down. The statement of the appellant dated February 2, 1967 (Exhibits A, A-1, to A-4) consisted of four (4) pages and at the bottom of the last page of which, appellant signed his name in English and in Chinese character and affixed his thumbmarks.

"Laboratory analysis of the confiscated drugs were made by Mr. Arsenio Regala, Chief, Laboratory Division, Food and Drug Administration, who compared them with the authentic drugs and found the seized drugs to be fake. His analysis revealed that the ingredients of the seized drugs which were unlabelled did not conform with the specification of ingredients or formula provided for under Republic Act 3720. He likewise stated in his report that although the confiscated samples were fake, they were not injurious to health." (pp. 33-34, Rollo)

We find no reason to disturb the findings of the respondent court. Accordingly, the petition is DENIED and the decision appealed from is hereby AFFIRMED. Costs against the petitioner.

SO ORDERED.

Melencio-Herrera, Paras, Padilla and Sarmiento, JJ., concur.




Back to Home | Back to Main




















chanrobles.com





ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com






January-1988 Jurisprudence                 

  • G.R. No. L-72964 January 7, 1988 - FILOMENO URBANO v. INTERMEDIATE APPELLATE COURT, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-78936 January 7, 1988 - VILLA RHECAR BUS v. FRUCTUOUSO DE LA CRUZ, ET AL.

  • G.R. Nos. L-70193-96 January 11, 1988 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. PABLO C. GALLO

  • G.R. Nos. L-42956-57 January 12, 1988 - A. DORONILA RESOURCES DEV., INC. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-43714 January 15, 1988 - FELIX GUEVARRA, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-49396 January 15, 1988 - JUAN A. GOCHANGO, ET AL. v. COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE OF NEGROS OCCIDENTAL, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-67970 January 15, 1988 - JOSE ABROGAR, ET AL. v. INTERMEDIATE APPELLATE COURT, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-68303 January 15, 1988 - REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL. v. INTERMEDIATE APPELLATE COURT, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-72400 January 15, 1988 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. BENIGNO D. PINEDA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-75740 January 15, 1988 - CITYTRUST FINANCE CORPORATION v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-76233 January 15, 1988 - ZAYDA BISCOCHO v. PEOPLE OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. L-77502 January 15, 1988 - EMILIA B. SANTIAGO v. PIONEER SAVINGS AND LOAN BANK, ET. AL.

  • A.M. No. 1974 January 15, 1988 - ZOILO E. CADELINA v. GENOVEVO Q. MANHILOT

  • G.R. No. L-56431 January 19, 1988 - NATIONAL UNION OF BANK EMPLOYEES v. ALFREDO M. LAZARO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-43445 January 20, 1988 - EUFEMIA VILLANUEVA VDA. DE BARROGA, ET AL. v. ANGEL ALBANO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-63575 January 20, 1988 - ROSA GICANO, ET AL. v. ROSA GEGATO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-71855 January 20, 1988 - RIZALITO VELUNTA v. CHIEF, PHILIPPINE CONSTABULARY, ET AL.

  • G.R. Nos. L-74053-54 January 20, 1988 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL., ET AL. v. NATHANIEL M. GROSPE, ET AL.

  • G.R. Nos. L-74279 & 74801-03 January 20, 1988 - MAXIMO ROXAS, ET AL. v. INTERMEDIATE APPELLATE COURT, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-74655 January 20, 1988 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. CIRILO R. TARUC

  • G.R. No. L-74917 January 20, 1988 - BANCO DE ORO SAVINGS AND MORTGAGE BANK v. EQUITABLE BANKING CORPORATION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-78131 January 20, 1988 - EDUARDO TANCINCO, ET AL. v. PURA FERRER-CALLEJA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-37674 January 21, 1988 - LIMPAN INVESTMENT CORPORATION v. CARLOS L. SUNDIAM, ET AL.

  • G.R. Nos. L-77107-08 January 21, 1988 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. TITO DATAHAN, ET AL.

  • G.R. Nos. L-27677-8-9 January 22, 1988 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ROGELIO TAGARA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-32749 January 22, 1988 - SABAS H. HOMENA, ET AL. v. DIMAS CASA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-34893 January 22, 1988 - GOVERNMENT SERVICE INSURANCE SYSTEM v. GSIS EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-39019 January 22, 1988 - MANILA ELECTRIC COMPANY, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-46373 January 22, 1988 - YAP PENG CHONG v. PEOPLE OF THE PHIL., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-46877 January 22, 1988 - LOURDES CYNTHIA MAKABALI, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-68969 January 22, 1988 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. USMAN A. HASSAN

  • A.M. No. 265-MJ January 22, 1988 - LEONARDO B. BABATIO v. JOSE Z. TAN

  • G.R. No. L-66614 January 25, 1988 - PRIMITIVO LEVERIZA, ET AL. v. INTERMEDIATE APPELLATE COURT, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-69591 January 25, 1988 - ALICIA DE SANTOS v. INTERMEDIATE APPELLATE COURT, ET AL.

  • G.R. Nos. L-71875-76 January 25, 1988 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. DOMINGO C. LOPEZ, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-71939 January 25, 1988 - ELIGIO T. LEYVA v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-73461 January 25, 1988 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. AMADOR MASANGKAY, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-75575 January 25, 1988 - ROGELIO BUCE, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-80007 January 25, 1988 - CARMELO F. LAZATIN v. COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-49046 January 26, 1988 - SATURNO A. VICTORIA v. AMADO G. INCIONG, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-69259 January 26, 1988 - DELPHER TRADES CORPORATION, ET AL. v. INTERMEDIATE APPELLATE COURT, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-37783 January 28, 1988 - LIANGA BAY LOGGING CO., INC., ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-56960 January 28, 1988 - ELISEA G. ROXAS v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-68741 January 28, 1988 - NATIONAL GRAINS AUTHORITY v. INTERMEDIATE APPELLATE COURT, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-68989 January 28, 1988 - ANDREA CORDOVA VDA. DE GUTIERREZ v. INTERMEDIATE APPELLATE COURT, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 73584 January 28, 1988 - LEONARDO FAMISAN v. NLRC, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-74187 January 28, 1988 - STANFORD MICROSYSTEMS, INC. v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-75039 January 28, 1988 - FRANKLIN BAKER COMPANY OF THE PHIL. v. CRESENCIO B. TRAJANO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-76668 January 28, 1988 - DULOS REALTY & DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-77970 January 28, 1988 - AMBRAQUE INT’L. PLACEMENT & SERVICES v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-41154 January 29, 1988 - SILVERIO VERAN, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-44330 January 29, 1988 - JULITA T. VDA. DE SEVERO, ET AL. v. LUNINGNING FELICIANO GO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-44546 January 29, 1988 - RUSTICO ADILLE v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-46484 January 29, 1988 - LEONARDO MENDOZA v. PEOPLE OF THE PHIL., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-47574 January 29, 1988 - FILIPINAS FABRICATORS & SALES INC., ET AL. v. CELSO L. MAGSINO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-48011 January 29, 1988 - PEDRO G. PERALTA v. COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE OF LA UNION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-50141 January 29, 1988 - BEAUTIFONT, INC., ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-51352 January 29, 1988 - VERDANT ACRES, INC. v. PONCIANO HERNANDEZ

  • G.R. No. L-54500 January 29, 1988 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. GENARO BATAC

  • G.R. No. L-54904 January 29, 1988 - HEIRS OF TITO RILLORTA v. ROMEO N. FIRME

  • G.R. No. L-67706 January 29, 1988 - ILIGAN CONCRETE PRODUCTS v. ANASTACIO MAGADAN

  • G.R. No. L-67813 January 29, 1988 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ALFREDO C. TUNDAY

  • G.R. No. L-68331 January 29, 1988 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. JOSE SANTILLAN

  • G.R. No. L-69564 January 29, 1988 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. JUAN G. ESCOBER, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-69622 January 29, 1988 - LILIA Y. GONZALES v. INTERMEDIATE APPELLATE COURT, ET AL.

  • G.R. Nos. L-69757-58 January 29, 1988 - CIRCA NILA DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, ET AL. v. SALVADOR J. BAYLEN, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-70484 January 29, 1988 - ROMAN C. TUASON, ET AL. v. REGISTER OF DEEDS, CALOOCAN CITY, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-71091 January 29, 1988 - HENRY GALUBA, v. ALFREDO LAURETA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 72096 January 29, 1988 - JOHN CLEMENT CONSULTANTS, INC., ET AL. v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-72126 January 29, 1988 - MUNICIPALITY OF MEYCAUAYAN, BULACAN, ET AL. v. INTERMEDIATE APPELLATE COURT, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-72443 January 29, 1988 - COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. AIR INDIA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-72981 January 29, 1988 - FRANCISCA DE LA CRUZ v. INTERMEDIATE APPELLATE COURT, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-73604 January 29, 1988 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ROUBEN H. CORRAL

  • G.R. No. L-73605 January 29, 1988 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ALEJANDRO REUNIR

  • G.R. No. L-73627 January 29, 1988 - TAN HANG v. ANSBERTO PAREDES, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-74345 January 29, 1988 - FAR CORPORATION v. INTERMEDIATE APPELLATE COURT, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-74369 January 29, 1988 - DESTILERIA LIMTUACO & CO., INC. v. INTERMEDIATE APPELLATE COURT, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-75268 January 29, 1988 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ESTEBAN C. MELGAR, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-75577 January 29, 1988 - PIO L. PADILLA v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-77735 January 29, 1988 - WILFREDO VERDEJO v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-78973 January 29, 1988 - MAMINTA M. RADIA v. REVIEW COMMITTEE UNDER EXECUTIVE ORDER NO. 17, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-80718 January 29, 1988 - FELISA P. DE ROY, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • A.C. No. 2409 January 29, 1988 - MANUEL Y. MACIAS v. BENJAMIN B. MALIG