Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence


Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 1989 > November 1989 Decisions > G.R. No. 64414 November 15, 1989 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. SABINO VERONAS, ET AL.:




PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

FIRST DIVISION

[G.R. No. 64414. November 15, 1989.]

PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. SABINO VERONAS, RODRIGO CAÑETE, NELSON C. ABALA and ANACLETO ASISTER, alias "ANNIE," defendants, NELSON C. ABALA and ANACLETO ASISTER, alias "ANNIE", Appellants.

The Office of the Solicitor General for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Adelino B. Sitoy for appellants.


D E C I S I O N


GRIÑO-AQUINO, J.:


Anacleto Asister has appealed the decision of the Court of First Instance (now Regional Trial Court) of Cebu, Branch XII, in Criminal Case No. CU-7690 entitled "The People of the Philippines v. Sabino Veronas, Rodrigo Cañete, Nelson C. Abala and Anacleto Asister alias ‘Annie," ‘ convicting him together with the other accused of the crime of robbery with rape and sentencing them to suffer the penalty of reclusion perpetua, to indemnify jointly and severally the rape victim, Marciana Legaspi, in the sum of P30,000 and to pay the costs of the action.

On November 20, 1980, at about 7:30 in the evening, Marciana Legaspi, a sixty-five (65) year old widow, was rolling tobacco for a cigar on the bamboo bed inside her house in the distant barrio of Tubod, Barili, Cebu, while her younger widowed fifty-four (54) year old sister, Demetria Mancao, was sitting by the door about five feet away, watching a "siga" (small fire) which she had earlier built to smoke the flowering fruit trees in their yard. From where she was seated, Demetria saw three men squatting under the pomelo tree which was around three armslength away. Although she did not recognize them, she could see their faces clearly under the full moonlight, prompting her to shout "why are you hiding there?" Thereupon, one of the man, whom she later came to know as Sabino Veronas, rushed at her, pushing her down while pointing a kitchen knife at her. Demetria shouted for help and tried to grapple with the man for possession of the knife but she was wounded on the left hand. Veronas boxed her, hitting her on the right cheek and when she again shouted for help, Veronas cut out a piece of cloth from her dress, stuffed it into her mouth, then tied a handkerchief over it around her neck. The second man, whom she later recognized as Nelson Abala, kicked her three times and tied her legs with a piece of rope.chanrobles.com : virtual law library

Marciana Legaspi heard her sister’s cry for help but before she could do anything, the third man, whom the sisters later recognized as Rodrigo Cañete, ran directly toward her, pointing a knife at her mouth, threatening to stab her if she shouted. Abala tried to stab her in the abdomen but she parried the thrust with her left hand, causing the weapon to penetrate her left palm. Both Cañete and Abala hogtied her with a piece of rope and divested her of her earrings, wrist watch, spiritual ring, transistor radio, a pair of eyeglasses, money amounting to P500 from a shoulderbag worth P110 and a US$100 bill hidden inside a money belt tied around her waist, all worth P3,320. Thereafter, Nelson Abala took off his pants, stripped Marciana of her underwear and proceeded to have sexual intercourse with her against her will and despite her entreaties for him to desist from his evil design because he was even younger than her own grandson. Cañete followed suit and succeeded in having sexual congress with her.

Afterwards, Abala, with the use of his knife, dug a hole under the staircase and under the earthen stove looking for something and muttering in the Cebuano dialect: "Ingon ni Annie, baga, wala man lagi." (According to Annie, she is wealthy, but there is nothing.) Veronas suggested that he "go and ask Annie where the money is buried." Abala left to talk to someone outside. When he came back to the house, the three men huddled and spoke in whispers. Probably realizing that they could not get more than what they had already taken, they left the two sisters who were still tied with ropes.

Demetria Mancao struggled to free herself from her bonds after which she untied her sister Marciana. Both of them went out of their house through a hole in the window. Outside, they saw Anacleto Asister, sitting on a piece of bamboo near the mudhole a few meters away from their house. He did not speak a word and neither did they. As their nearest neighbor was nearly one kilometer away, they proceeded toward the Poblacion of Barili to report the crime to the police. Afterwards, they went to Cabuangan to see Dr. Castro Villegas, the Municipal Health Officer of Barili, Cebu, for treatment of their wounds. Meanwhile, a PC detachment headed by Sgt. Cortes combed the nearby towns in search of the perpetrators of the crime. They succeeded in apprehending them in Ka-ipilan, Guadalupe, a barrio between Mantalongon and Carcar. At about 2:00 o’clock the following morning (November 21, 1980), Marciana Legaspi and Demetria Mancao were summoned to the PC headquarters in Mantalongon, Barili, where the three men were detained. The sisters positively identified them as the ones who had robbed them and raped Marciana.

In an information dated February 23, 1981 filed by the Office of the Provincial Fiscal in the Court of First Instance of Cebu, Anacleto Asister and his three friends were charged with the crime of robbery with rape and double less serious physical injuries. On arraignment, they all pleaded not guilty.

During trial, the accused were positively identified by the offended parties. A bus conductor of the Amadora Transportation also recognized them as the persons who rode on his bus from Cebu City to Tubod, Barili on November 20, 1980, with Asister paying for all their fares.chanrobles law library

Abala admitted his participation in the robbery. He was corroborated by Veronas. They admitted that on November 20, 1980 at around 1:00 p.m., they and Cañete met outside the Lane Theatre to watch a movie. They encountered Annie Asister, who invited them to the South Expressway Terminal for drinks. After few hours of drinking, they proceeded to Asister’s house in Barili. In Asister’s house, they ate and drank tuba to their heart’s content. During their drinking spree, Asister revealed to them his grudge against Marciana Legaspi because he had taken care of her carabao but when she sold it for P1,000, she gave him only P20 as his share. Asister induced them to rob Marciana, also known as Emma, because she had a son working abroad and supposedly had much money. They all agreed to execute the plan. Asister guided them to the house of Marciana, but hid himself a few meters away while his friends entered the house.

Abala and Cañete denied having raped Marciana, but the trial judge, observing how the two sisters testified with utmost sincerity and candor, rendered judgment finding all the accused guilty beyond reasonable doubt as co-conspirators in the commission of the crime charged.

Asister and Abala, represented by different counsel appealed the judgment. However, Abala later withdrew his appeal.

The lone appellant, Asister, alleges that the trial court erred in finding him guilty as a co-conspirator in the commission of the crime of robbery with rape and in denying his motion for new trial.

His appeal has no merit. The findings of the trial court are supported by the evidence on record and its decision is in accordance with law.

Asister’s defense of alibi (that he was plowing Josefa Deluna’s land until 5:00 in the afternoon and attended the barangay procession the whole night of November 20, 1980) aside from being inherently weak, is not supported by clear and convincing evidence. It cannot prevail over the positive identification made by the prosecution witnesses who saw him at the scene of the crime and the interlocking confessions of his co-accused who implicated him as the mastermind of the robbery. It was he who led them to Marciana’s house. He watched everything that transpired therein, but made no attempt to prevent the commission of the crime by his companions. The rule is well-settled that in a conspiracy, the act of one is the act of all, and each of the conspirators is liable for all the crimes committed by the other conspirators.

"The rule in conspiracy is that all those who participated in the conspiracy are liable for the crime, unless there is proof that they tried to prevent it." (People v. James Arbis, 144 SCRA 687 [citing People v. Atencio, 22 SCRA 88; People v. Reyes, 4 SCRA 807].)

"The evidence shows that it was Benito Garcia only who clubbed Lontoc twice on the head but because the appellants manifested a community of purpose indicative of conspiracy, all are equally guilty." (People v. Benito Garcia, Et Al., 141 SCRA 337.)

Hence, even if only Abala and Cañete committed rape during the robbery, their companions who lifted not a finger to prevent it, are equally guilty.chanrobles law library : red

With respect to the appellant’s motion for new trial on the ground that the other accused retracted their testimonies in court, the trial court correctly denied the motion for the retractions were made after it had rendered its decision convicting the accused. The retraction of previous testimony is not a ground for new trial (People v. Navasca, 76 SCRA 70).

WHEREFORE, the assailed decision is affirmed in toto.

SO ORDERED.

Narvasa, Cruz, Gancayco and Medialdea, JJ., concur.




Back to Home | Back to Main




















chanrobles.com





ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com






November-1989 Jurisprudence                 

  • G.R. No. 50654 November 6, 1989 - RUDY GLEO ARMIGOS v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 53401 November 6, 1989 - ILOCOS NORTE ELECTRIC COMPANY v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 57876 November 6, 1989 - FRANCISCA PUZON GAERLAN v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 60159 November 6, 1989 - FAUSTO ANDAL v. SANDIGANBAYAN, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 63462 November 6, 1989 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. JOSE PIRRERAS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 71871 November 6, 1989 - TEODORO M. HERNANDEZ v. COMMISSION ON AUDIT

  • G.R. No. 74431 November 6, 1989 - PURITA MIRANDA VESTIL, ET AL. v. INTERMEDIATE APPELLATE COURT, ET AL.

  • G.R. Nos. 74989-90 November 6, 1989 - JOEL B. CAES v. INTERMEDIATE APPELLATE COURT, ET AL.

  • G.R. Nos. 76019-20 November 6, 1989 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. MARTIN BRUCA

  • G.R. No. 79743 November 6, 1989 - MARIA PILAR MARQUEZ v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. Nos. 83938-40 November 6, 1989 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. HENRY B. BASILLA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 84458 November 6, 1989 - ABOITIZ SHIPPING CORPORATION v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 84497 November 6, 1989 - ALFONSO ESCOVILLA, JR., ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 84979 November 6, 1989 - STRONGHOLD INSURANCE CO. INC. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 85085 November 6, 1989 - ASSOCIATED LABOR UNIONS v. PURA FERRER-CALLEJA, ET AL.

  • G.R. Nos. 86540-41 November 6, 1989 - MANTRUSTE SYSTEMS, INC. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. Nos. 89095 & 89555 November 6, 1989 - SIXTO P. CRISOSTOMO v. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. Nos. 68580-81 November 7, 1989 - AGUSTIN T. DIOQUINO, ET AL. v. INTERMEDIATE APPELLATE COURT, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 82895 November 7, 1989 - LLORA MOTORS, INC., ET AL. v. FRANKLIN DRILON, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 48518 November 8, 1989 - GREGORIO SANTIAGO v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 55750 November 8, 1989 - RUBEN MELGAR, ET AL. v. CARLOS R. BUENVIAJE, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 74817 November 8, 1989 - SIMEON ESTOESTA, SR., ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 78051 November 8, 1989 - ISAGANI M. JUNGCO v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 78413 November 8, 1989 - CAGAYAN VALLEY ENTERPRISES, INC. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 80796 November 8, 1989 - PROVINCE OF CAMARINES NORTE v. PROVINCE OF QUEZON

  • G.R. No. 82180 November 8, 1989 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. HAIDE DE LUNA

  • G.R. No. 72323 November 9, 1989 - MANUEL VILLAR, ET AL. v. PHILIPPINE DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORP., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 76193 November 9, 1989 - UNITED FEATURE SYNDICATE, INC. v. MUNSINGWEAR CREATION MANUFACTURING COMPANY

  • G.R. No. 82805 November 9, 1989 - BRIAD AGRO DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION v. DIONISIO DELA CERNA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 86819 November 9, 1989 - ADAMSON UNIVERSITY v. ADAMSON UNIVERSITY FACULTY AND EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 89651 November 10, 1989 - FIRDAUSI I.Y. ABBAS, ET AL. v. COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS, ET AL.

  • G.R. Nos. 53926-29 November 13, 1989 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. MANUEL MATEO, JR., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 65017 November 13, 1989 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. STALIN P. GUEVARRA

  • G.R. No. 66944 November 13, 1989 - ALLIANCE TOBACCO CORPORATION, INC. v. PHILIPPINE VIRGINIA TOBACCO ADMINISTRATION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 75041 November 13, 1989 - ROSA N. EDRA, ET AL. v. INTERMEDIATE APPELLATE COURT, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 79403 November 13, 1989 - EMETERIO M. MOZAR v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. Nos. 82238-42 November 13, 1989 - ANTONIO T. GUERRERO, ET AL. v. ADRIANO R. VILLAMOR

  • G.R. No. 83664 November 13, 1989 - RENATO S. SANTOS v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 49668 November 14, 1989 - POLICARPIO GALICIA, ET AL. v. WENCESLAO M. POLO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 60490 November 14, 1989 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. SERGIO SERENIO

  • G.R. Nos. 79050-51 November 14, 1989 - PANTRANCO NORTH EXPRESS, INC. v. MARICAR BASCOS BAESA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 83870 November 14, 1989 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. REYNATO ASUNCION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 84951 November 14, 1989 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. SUSANA M. NAPAT-A

  • G.R. No. 39632 November 15, 1989 - APOLONIO G. MALENIZA v. COMMISSION ON AUDIT

  • G.R. No. 63396 November 15, 1989 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ARNULFO LISTON, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 64414 November 15, 1989 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. SABINO VERONAS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 71159 November 15, 1989 - CITY OF MANILA, ET AL. v. INTERMEDIATE APPELLATE COURT, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 76531 November 15, 1989 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. RICARDO B. SALITA

  • G.R. No. 80486 November 15, 1989 - SALVADOR ESMILLA, ET AL. v. FEDERICO ALVAREZ, ET AL.

  • G.R. Nos. 83380-81 November 15, 1989 - MAKATI HABERDASHERY, INC., ET AL. v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 84484 November 15, 1989 - INSULAR LIFE ASSURANCE CO., LTD. v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 88379 November 15, 1989 - PHILIPPINE CHARTER INSURANCE CORPORATION v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. Nos. 90273-75 November 15, 1989 - FINMAN GENERAL ASSURANCE CORP. v. WILLIAM INOCENCIO, ET AL.

  • A.C. No. 2974 November 15, 1989 - ROGELIO A. MIRANDA v. ORLANDO A. RAYOS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 69122 November 16, 1989 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. PEDRO T. OLAPANI, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 83286 November 16, 1989 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. FERNANDO T. HERNANDEZ, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 83828 November 16, 1989 - LEONOR MAGDANGAL, ET AL. v. CITY OF OLONGAPO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 84628 November 16, 1989 - HEIRS OF ILDEFONSO COSCOLLUELA, SR., INC. v. RICO GENERAL INSURANCE CORPORATION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 45061 November 20, 1989 - DIRECTOR OF LANDS v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. Nos. 30475-76 November 22, 1989 - GENERAL INSURANCE & SURETY CORPORATION v. UNION INSURANCE SOCIETY OF CANTON, ET AL.

  • G.R. Nos. 48468-69 November 22, 1989 - ORLANDO PRIMERO v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 61466 November 22, 1989 - ENRIQUE T. JOCSON, ET AL. v. ALFONSO BAGUIO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 69450 November 22, 1988

    EASTERN ASSURANCE & SURETY CORPORATION v. INTERMEDIATE APPELLATE COURT, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 79886 November 22, 1989 - QUALITRANS LIMOUSINE SERVICE, INC. v. ROYAL CLASS LIMOUSINE SERVICE, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 88725 November 22, 1989 - ASIAN TRANSMISSION CORPORATION v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 38984 November 24, 1989 - MACARIO D. EMBUSCADO v. PEOPLE OF THE PHIL., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 60690 November 24, 1989 - VIRGINIA JORGE, ET AL. v. FRANCISCO Z. CONSOLACION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 79564 November 24, 1989 - AURORA B. CAMACHO v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 80405 November 24, 1989 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL., ET AL. v. ARNEL MITRA, ET AL.

  • G.R. Nos. 46898-99 November 28, 1989 - PHIL. NATIONAL BANK v. RUSTICO DE LOS REYES, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 79351 November 28, 1989 - DEVELOPMENT BANK OF THE PHILIPPINES v. SECRETARY OF LABOR, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 85141 November 28, 1989 - FILIPINO MERCHANTS INSURANCE CO., INC. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 86025 November 28, 1989 - RODOLFO R. AQUINO, ET AL. v. DEODORO J. SISON, ET AL.

  • A.C. No. 1334 November 28, 1989 - ROSARIO DELOS REYES v. JOSE B. AZNAR

  • G.R. No. 51655 November 29, 1989 - VICENTE DEL ROSARIO v. JULIO BANSIL, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 72199 November 29, 1989 - ADELINO R. MONTANEZ, ET AL. v. PEOPLE OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. 82304 November 29, 1989 - HONORATO M. FRUTO v. RAINERO O. REYES, ET AL.

  • A.C. No. 3249 November 29, 1989 - SALVACION DELIZO CORDOVA v. LAURENCE D. CORDOVA