Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence


Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 1989 > October 1989 Decisions > G.R. No. 59228 October 27, 1989 - REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL. v. ENRIQUE V. ATENCIO, ET AL.:




PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

FIRST DIVISION

[G.R. No. 59228. October 27, 1989.]

REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES represented by the DIRECTOR OF LANDS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ENRIQUE V. ATENCIO and the REGISTER OF DEEDS OF DAVAO DEL SUR, Defendants-Appellants.

Castillo Law Offices, for Defendants-Appellants.


SYLLABUS


1. LAND REGISTRATION; PROHIBITION AGAINST SALE OR ENCUMBRANCE OF LAND ACQUIRED UNDER R.A. 477; ACTION FOR REVERSION FOR VIOLATION OF THE PROHIBITION; RENDERED MOOT DUE TO AMENDMENTS TO R.A. 477. — During the pendency of his appeal, P.D. No. 967 was issued on July 24, 1976, amending Section 8 of Republic Act No. 477. Section 8 of Republic Act No. 477 was further amended by P.D. No. 1304 on February 24, 1978. This amendment of Section 8 of P.D. No. 967 eliminating the prohibition against the sale, transfer, conveyance, and encumbrance of lands acquired under R.A. No. 477 including the permanent improvements therein and validating all those which had been consummated prior to July 24, 1976 has extinguished the Government’s cause of action for the recovery of the land from Atencio because the conveyances made by him were prior to July 24, 1976. ("Sale of Rights with Right to Repurchase" in favor of Esteban Salutillo in 1956 and "Transfer of Rights" in favor of Santas Vda. de Salutillo in 1962 which had been nullified in 1969 by the CFI of Davao in Civil Case No. III). The illegality of those transactions has been washed away by P.D. No. 1304. This supervening circumstance has rendered the reversionary action of the Republic against him moot and academic.


D E C I S I O N


GRIÑO-AQUINO, J.:


This case was certified to the Supreme Court by the Court of Appeals because it involves a question of law: the effect of the amendment of Section 8, R.A. 477 which prohibited the sale or encumbrance of land acquired under the provisions of said act within a period of ten (10) years from the issuance of the certificate of title.

The antecedent facts are not disputed.

In October 1950, the National Abaca and Other Fibers Corporation (NAFCO for short) sold to the defendant, Dr. Enrique V. Atencio, Lot No. 179 with an area of 4.55 hectares in the Guihing Plantation in Padada, Davao del Sur, per deed of sale (Exh. B), payable by installments over a period of ten (10) years. The law authorizing NAFCO to sell lots to qualified applicants is Republic Act 477 which was approved on June 9, 1950. Section 8 of R.A. 477 provided:jgc:chanrobles.com.ph

"SEC. 8. Except in favor of the Government or any of its branches, units, or institutions, land acquired under the provisions of this Act or any permanent improvements thereon shall not be subject to encumbrance or alienation from the date of the award of the land or the improvements thereon and for a term of ten years from and after the date of issuance of the certificate of title, nor shall they become liable to the satisfaction of any debt contracted prior to the expiration of such period.

"Any occupant or applicant of lands under this Act who transfers whatever rights he has acquired on said lands and/or on the improvements thereon before the date of the award or signature of the contract of sale, shall not be entitled to apply for another piece of agricultural land or urban, homesite or residential lot, as the case may be, from the National Abaca and Other Fibers Corporation; and such transfer shall be considered null and void."cralaw virtua1aw library

Hence, one of the conditions of the sale of Lot 179 to Dr. Atencio (Exh. B) prohibits him from selling or encumbering the property:jgc:chanrobles.com.ph

"(b) The VENDEE shall not sell and/or encumber this property within a period of ten (10) years from the issuance of the Certificate of Title except by way of mortgage to a Government Banking Institution for the sole purpose of rehabilitating his major crops, abaca and or coconuts."cralaw virtua1aw library

On November 2, 1964, a sales patent was issued to Dr. Atencio. On November 16, 1964, he received OCT No. P-16675 (Exh. C) which contained the aforementioned prohibition.

However, as early as 1956, or before the defendant received a title for Lot 179, he had executed a "Sale of Fruits (Harvest)" of Lot 179 in favor of Carmen Restauro and two others (Exh. D), for a consideration of P3,000 over a period of five years. In 1961, he executed a "Sale of Rights with the Right of Repurchase" (Exh. E), in favor of Esteban Salutillo over the same lot, for the sum of P4,000.

In 1962, defendant further executed a document, entitled "Transfer of Rights" (Exh. F), over the lot for the sum of P7,500 in favor of Santas Vda. de Salutillo. In all these instruments, he delivered the possession of the land to the transferee-vendee.

In September 1969, Dr. Atencio filed a complaint (Civil Case No. 111) in the CFI of Davao del Sur against Santas Vda. de Salutillo, widow of Esteban Salutillo, to annul and/or reform the above documents. The lower court declared the transactions null and void in view of the prohibition in Section 8, R.A. 477 (NAFCO LAW) which prohibits the encumbrance or alienation of lands acquired under that law within a term of ten (10) years from the issuance of the certificate of title. The court in Civil Case No. 111 ordered the return of Lot 179 to Dr. Atencio (Appellant’s Brief, p. 4).

In September 1974, plaintiff Republic of the Philippines filed a complaint against Dr. Atencio and the Register of Deeds of Davao del Sur for annulment of patent and title and the reversion of the land to the State for violation of the prohibition in R.A. 477 (Civil Case No. 842-Court of First Instance of Davao del Sur).

On December 24, 1975, the lower court rendered judgment finding that Dr. Atencio had violated the terms of his contract with the NAFCO; ordering the reversion of Lot 179 to the Republic of the Philippines; and requiring the defendant, Dr. Atencio, to deliver to the Board of Liquidators within ten (10) days from the finality of the decision, the possession of the land and its improvements with an accounting of the fruits received by him from the filing of the case until he surrenders possession of the land to the Republic. The court further ordered the Register of Deeds of Davao del Sur, upon the finality of the decision, to cancel Atencio’s OCT No. P-16675 (Record on Appeal, p. 17).

The defendant appealed to the Court of Appeals (CA-G.R. No. 60754-R). During the pendency of his appeal, P.D. No. 967 was issued on July 24, 1976, amending Section 8 of Republic Act No. 477 as follows:jgc:chanrobles.com.ph

"SEC. 8. Any provision of law, executive order, rules or regulations to the contrary notwithstanding, an applicant who has acquired land pursuant to the provisions of this Act and to whom a certificate of title has been issued covering such lend may sell, cede, transfer, or convey his rights and interests therein, including the permanent improvements on the land, to any interested party."cralaw virtua1aw library

Section 8 of Republic Act No. 477 was further amended by P.D. No. 1304 on February 24, 1978, as follows:jgc:chanrobles.com.ph

"SEC. 8. Any provision of law, executive order, rules and regulations to the contrary notwithstanding, an applicant who has acquired land pursuant to the provisions of this Act and to whom a certificate of title has been issued covering such land may sell, cede, transfer, or convey his rights and interests therein, including the permanent improvements on the land, to any interested party; and all previous sales, transfers, conveyances and encumbrances regarding such land including the permanent improvements therein, made and consummated prior to July 24, 1976, are hereby confirmed, ratified and validated."cralaw virtua1aw library

This amendment of Section 8 of P.D. No. 967 eliminating the prohibition against the sale, transfer, conveyance, and encumbrance of lands acquired under R.A. No. 477 including the permanent improvements therein and validating all those which had been consummated prior to July 24, 1976 has extinguished the Government’s cause of action for the recovery of the land from Atencio because the conveyances made by him were prior to July 24, 1976. ("Sale of Rights with Right to Repurchase" in favor of Esteban Salutillo in 1956 and "Transfer of Rights" in favor of Santas Vda. de Salutillo in 1962 which had been nullified in 1969 by the CFI of Davao in Civil Case No. 111). The illegality of those transactions has been washed away by P.D. No. 1304. This supervening circumstance has rendered the reversionary action of the Republic against him moot and academic.

WHEREFORE, the decision of the Court of First Instance of Davao del Sur in Civil Case No. 842 is hereby reversed and set aside. The complaint therein of the Republic of the Philippines against the defendant-appellant Enrique V. Atencio is dismissed. No costs.

SO ORDERED.

Narvasa, Cruz, Gancayco and Medialdea, JJ., concur.




Back to Home | Back to Main




















chanrobles.com





ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com






October-1989 Jurisprudence                 

  • G.R. No. 75713 October 2, 1989 - PHIL. COCONUT PRODUCERS FEDERATION v. PRESIDENTIAL COMMISSION ON GOOD GOVERNMENT

  • G.R. No. 84571 October 2, 1989 - REYNALDO A. JACINTO v. SANDIGANBAYAN, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 85999 October 2, 1989 - LUZ C. OÑAS v. SANDIGANBAYAN, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 86010 October 3, 1989 - LEOPOLDO GUARIN, ET AL. v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 42478 October 4, 1989 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. SIMEON A. CASTRO

  • G.R. No. 48686 October 4, 1989 - NEW ZEALAND INSURANCE COMPANY, LTD. v. MIGUEL R. NAVARRO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 81541 October 4, 1989 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. REGIONAL TRIAL COURT OF MANILA

  • G.R. No. 85108 October 4, 1989 - VICENTE MALLARTE v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 30960 October 5, 1989 - MACARIA ABARRIENTOS VDA. DE CAPULONG, ET AL. v. WORKMEN’S INSURANCE CO., INC., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 67289 October 5, 1989 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. MACARIO P. DIAMSAY

  • G.R. No. 71137 October 5, 1989 - FEDERICO FRANCO, ET AL. v. INTERMEDIATE APPELLATE COURT, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 73656 October 5, 1989 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ROGELIO B. VILLAPANDO

  • G.R. No. 77530 October 5, 1989 - ABOITIZ SHIPPING CORPORATION v. PHILIPPINE AMERICAN GENERAL INSURANCE CO.

  • G.R. No. 80806 October 5, 1989 - LEO PITA v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 83092 October 5, 1989 - LEONARDA T. AVEDANA, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 83335 October 5, 1989 - ROCHE (PHILIPPINES), ET AL. v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • Bar Matter No. 491 October 6, 1989 - IN RE: INQUIRY INTO THE 1989 ELECTIONS OF THE INTEGRATED BAR OF THE PHILIPPINES

  • G.R. No. 40452 October 12, 1989 - GREGORIO GENOBIAGON v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. Nos. 59012-13 October 12, 1989 - RIZAL-MEMORIAL COLLEGES FACULTY UNION-DAVAO WORKERS UNION, ET AL. v. NLRC, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 65236 October 12, 1989 - MARIA V. DE CASIMIRO v. INTERMEDIATE APPELLATE COURT, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 85243 October 12, 1989 - CESAR R. DE LEON v. J. ANTONIO M. CARPIO

  • G.R. No. 56268 October 13, 1989 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. GREGORIO A. ARANJA, ET AL.

  • G.R. Nos. 80226-27 October 13, 1989 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. LEVY FRED JAMANDRON, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 82088 October 13, 1989 - ZAMBOANGA WOOD PRODUCTS, INC. v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 82499 October 13, 1989 - CAPITOL MEDICAL CENTER, INC., ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 82564 October 13, 1989 - IGMIDIO ABANDO, ET AL. v. FRANCISCO LOZADA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 83524 October 13, 1989 - ERNESTO KRAMER, JR., ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 85868 October 13, 1989 - ALLIED BANKING CORPORATION v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 87672 October 13, 1989 - WISE AND CO., INC. v. WISE & CO., INC. EMPLOYEES UNION-NATU, ET AL.

  • A.M. No. MTJ-88-184 October 13, 1989 - CALI A. IMPAO, ET AL. v. JACOSALEM D. MAKILALA

  • G.R. No. 69307 October 16, 1989 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. CANDIDO ROBANTE, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 76431 October 16, 1989 - FORTUNE MOTORS, (PHILS.), INC. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 78085 October 16, 1989 - ROYAL CROWN INTERNATIONALE v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 78389 October 16, 1989 - JOSE LUIS MARTIN C. GASCON, ET AL. v. JOKER T. ARROYO

  • G.R. No. 84294 October 16, 1989 - BA FINANCE CORPORATION v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 83138 October 17, 1989 - AMALIO L. SARMIENTO, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 49852 October 19, 1989 - EMILIA TENGCO v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 51207 October 19, 1989 - CATALINA VDA. DE CARREON, ET AL. v. HERMILA CARTAGENA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 84163 October 19, 1989 - LITO VINO v. THE PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES and THE COURT OF APPEALS

  • G.R. No. 85839 October 19, 1989 - EMMANUEL S. LICUP, ET AL. v. UNIVERSITY OF SAN CARLOS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 73162 October 23, 1989 - PHILIPPINE VETERANS BANK v. INTERMEDIATE APPELLATE COURT, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 78050 October 23, 1989 - CAESAR U. SOMOSO, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 86657 October 23, 1989 - PRECISION ELECTRONICS CORPORATION v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 78538 October 25, 1989 - BELLA S.D. UY, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 36155 October 26, 1989 - HERMINIA MONTINOLA, ET AL. v. CARLOS Y. GONZALES, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 76873 October 26, 1989 - DOROTEA UYGUANGCO v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 77243 October 26, 1989 - REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL. v. ASSOCIACION BENEVOLA de CEBU, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 80030 October 26, 1989 - ROGELIO A. MIRANDA v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 83609 October 26, 1989 - DIRECTOR OF LANDS v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 59228 October 27, 1989 - REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL. v. ENRIQUE V. ATENCIO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 74287 October 27, 1989 - AGUSTIN FLORES, ET AL. v. INTERMEDIATE APPELLATE COURT, ET AL.

  • G.R. Nos. 79039-41 October 27, 1989 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. MAMERTO ALTERADO, JR., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 81467 October 27, 1989 - NARCISO Y. SANTIAGO, JR. v. CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 85396 October 27, 1989 - RIZAL COMMERCIAL BANKING CORPORATION v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. Nos. 86362-63 October 27, 1989 - RAMON D. DUREMDES v. COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 88211 October 27, 1989 - FERDINAND E. MARCOS, ET AL. v. RAUL MANGLAPUS, ET AL.