Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence


Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 1992 > March 1992 Decisions > G.R. No. 97346 March 23, 1992 - RODOLFO YOSORES v. EMPLOYEES’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION:




PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

FIRST DIVISION

[G.R. No. 97346. March 23, 1992.]

RODOLFO YOSORES, Petitioner, v. EMPLOYEES’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION, Respondent.

Felipe A. Lopez for Petitioner.


SYLLABUS


1. LABOR AND SOCIAL LEGISLATION; EMPLOYEES COMPENSATION; TOTAL AND PERMANENT DISABILITY; PARKINSON’S DISEASE; CONSIDERED JOB-CONNECTED DISEASE IN CASE AT BAR. — The Court is unable to accept the sweeping statement in the ECC decision that the disease has no causal relation with the nature and working conditions of Yosores’ job, for it is not improbable that there were factors affecting his work as a field collection officer, coupled with the hypertension which he contracted in the course of his hypertension which may have constituted "predisposing or exciting factors" in the development of the disease. This conclusion finds affirmation in the ECC’s decisions in the cases of Francisco Samuray (ECC Resolution No. 1580 dated August 21, 1980) and Rufino Chungalao (ECC Resolution No. 3041 dated October 5, 1988). The following observation of the ECC in the case of Chungalao is relevant: ". . . said official’s development of Hypertensive Cardiovascular Disease, which triggered his ailment of Basal Ganglia (Parkinson’s Disease) as the evidence on record had borne out substantially, was directly causally job-connected and that the same risk exacerbated by employment conditions." We cannot see how Chungalao’s case can be any different from the case at bar. Yosores, who spent the prime years of his life as a GSIS employee, is entitled to the same beneficial consideration from the Government. We, therefore, hold that petitioner’s debilitating ailment which caused his total and permanent disability is compensable under the employees’ compensation program in P.D. No. 626.


D E C I S I O N


GRIÑO-AQUINO, J.:


This petition seeks the review of the decision dated December 20, 1990 of the Employees’ Compensation Commission in ECC Case No. 4827 entitled, "Rodolfo Yosores v. Government Service Insurance System," affirming the decision of the System which denied petitioner’s claim for compensation benefits.cralawnad

Rodolfo Yosores was employed by the GSIS for a period of twenty-five (25) years, commencing on May 3, 1963. He was doing electrical work during the first ten (10) years until his assignment in 1973 as Field Collection Officer, doing the rounds of GSIS mortgagees in different areas of Metro Manila in the performance of his collection work.chanrobles lawlibrary : rednad

On July 31, 1988, Yosores retired from the GSIS for total and permanent disability. The cause of his disability, as indicated in his claim papers and approved by Cesar Alina (Senior Vice-President & Chairman of the Social Insurance Group) and by Dr. Orlando C. Misa (Vice-President & Medical Director), was Parkinson’s Disease.

On August 9, 1988, he filed a claim for compensation benefits, but was awarded disability benefits for only nine (9) months "due to pulmonary tuberculosis." He asked for a reconsideration of the action taken on his claim. A re-evaluation was made by the GSIS Medical Evaluation and Underwriting Group, which rendered a Report on April 6, 1990, denying his request for reconsideration on the ground that his ailment was not work-connected.

Not satisfied with the GSIS’ decision, he appealed to the Employees’ Compensation Commission (ECC Case No. 4827), praying for compensation based on his actual ailment as diagnosed by the company physicians, citing two decided Employees’ Compensation cases (ECC Case No. 1580 in favor of one Francisco B. Samuray and ECC Case No. 3041 in favor of one Rufino Chungalao), where the Commission settled their respective claims by declaring their disabilities, caused by Parkinson’s Disease, compensable, and thereby entitling each of them to benefits pursuant to Presidential Decree No. 626.

On December 20, 1990, the Employees’ Compensation Commission rendered a decision upholding the adverse decision of the GSIS. The Commission ruled that:jgc:chanrobles.com.ph

"As the foregoing medical findings suggest, the ailment (Parkinson’s Disease) has no causal relation with the nature and working conditions of appellant as Field Collection Officer. Therefore, considering that the records are bereft of any evidence that would indicate that the risk of contracting his ailment was increased by his working conditions, we are constrained to rule against the compensability of the claim." (pp. 35-36, Rollo.)

Hence, this recourse with the petitioner alleging that the respondent Commission erred:chanrob1es virtual 1aw library

1. in stating that the appellant "was already suffering from Parkinson’s Disease as early as 1960 [before his employment] and . . . had already developed fine tremors of the extremities way back in 1960, respectively," (p. 18, Rollo) having no basis in fact or in law; and

2. in holding that the ailment of Parkinson’s Disease has no causal relation with the nature and working conditions of the petitioner as field collection officer.

The petition is meritorious.

Parkinson’s Disease or Parkinsonism, scientifically known as paralysis agitans, is a core syndrome of the late middle life, occurring in most cases between the ages of 50 and 60, observed in all countries, ethnic groups, socio-economic classes and in both sexes, resulting from an excessive loss of melanin pigment and a degeneration of neurones in the substantia nigra, characterized by involuntary tremulous motion, with lessened muscular power in parts of the body which are not in action and even when supported, an expressionless face, poverty and slowness of voluntary movement, stooped posture, rigidity and festinating gait, the senses and intellect being uninjured. Researches have proven that the rate of parkinsonian tremor is increased by emotional excitement and disappears during sleep. Trauma, emotional upset, overwork, exposure to cold, etc., have been suggested as predisposing or exciting factors. Further research on the diagnosis of the cause of parkinsonism mentions the existence of arteriosclerotic parkinsonism (Principles of Neurology by Raymond Adams & Maurice Victor, pp. 874-875; Brain’s Clinical Neurology by Sir Roger Bannister, pp. 339-342; Current Medical Diagnosis & Treatment, 199 Ed. by Steven Schroeder, Marcus Krupp & Lawrence Tierney, Jr., pp. 594-597). Although there is no known treatment that will halt or reverse the neuronal degeneration that presumably underlies this disease, methods are available which can afford considerable relief from its symptoms. It is, for now, merely possible to replace for a time some of the transmitter deficiency, thus making the symptoms more tolerable for a number of years.chanrobles virtual lawlibrary

As field collection officer during the years 1973 to 1988, the petitioner performed collection work around Metro Manila, from eight o’clock in the morning to four o’clock in the afternoon (when he would return to the office to prepare his daily collection report) for five days a week and for fifteen long years. He commuted in all kinds of public transport, and was subjected to the elements of nature and to all kinds of risks. The petitioner’s attending physician also attested to the fact that in 1967 (four years after entering the government service) he contracted essential hypertension with tremors, insomnia, and anxiety neurosis (p. 29, Rollo).

The Court is unable to accept the sweeping statement in the ECC decision that the disease has no causal relation with the nature and working conditions of Yosores’ job, for it is not improbable that there were factors affecting his work as a field collection officer, coupled with the hypertension which he contracted in the course of his hypertension which may have constituted "predisposing or exciting factors" in the development of the disease. This conclusion finds affirmation in the ECC’s decisions in the cases of Francisco Samuray (ECC Resolution No. 1580 dated August 21, 1980) and Rufino Chungalao (ECC Resolution No. 3041 dated October 5, 1988). The following observation of the ECC in the case of Chungalao is relevant:jgc:chanrobles.com.ph

". . . said official’s development of Hypertensive Cardiovascular Disease, which triggered his ailment of Basal Ganglia (Parkinson’s Disease) as the evidence on record had borne out substantially, was directly causally job-connected and that the same risk exacerbated by employment conditions." (p. 42, Rollo.)

We cannot see how Chungalao’s case can be any different from the case at bar. Yosores, who spent the prime years of his life as a GSIS employee, is entitled to the same beneficial consideration from the Government. We, therefore, hold that petitioner’s debilitating ailment which caused his total and permanent disability is compensable under the employees’ compensation program in P.D. No. 626.

WHEREFORE, the appealed decision of the respondent Employees’ Compensation Commission is hereby REVERSED and the claim of the petitioner, Rodolfo Yosores, for total and permanent disability benefits is approved. Let the records of this case be remanded to the Government Service Insurance System for computation and payment of the benefits due the petitioner under P.D. 626, as amended.

SO ORDERED.

Narvasa, C.J., Cruz and Medialdea, JJ., concur.

Bellosillo, J., is on leave.




Back to Home | Back to Main




















chanrobles.com





ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com






March-1992 Jurisprudence                 

  • G.R. No. 86150 March 2, 1992 - GUMAN, BOCALING & CO. v. RAOUL S.V. BONNEVIE

  • A.M. No. P-88-255 March 3, 1992 - MANUEL U. DEL ROSARlO v. JOSE T. BASCAR, JR., ET AL.

  • G.R. Nos. 46460-61 March 3, 1992 - DIWA NG PAGKAKAISA-PAFLU v. AMADO G. INCIONG, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 82511 March 3, 1992 - GLOBE-MACKAY CABLE AND RADIO CORPORATION v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 85479 March 3, 1992 - PERFECTO ESPAÑOL v. CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 93003 March 3, 1992 - CARMELITA REYES v. EMPLOYEES’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 94472 March 3, 1992 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. FERNANDO I. SANTIAGO

  • G.R. No. 95696 March 3, 1992 - ALFONSO S. TAN v. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 101753 March 3, 1992 - CIPRIANO PEÑAFLORIDA v. COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-42987 March 4, 1992 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. VICENTE REBULADO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 84363 March 4, 1992 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. MATEO B. ALILIN, ET AL.

  • G.R. Nos. 88158 & 97108-09 March 4, 1992 - DANIEL GARCIA, ET AL. v. ERNESTO DE JESUS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 91745 March 4, 1992 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. JULIO MANLIGUEZ, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 96607 March 4, 1992 - OSCAR QUILOÑA v. GENERAL COURT MARTIAL, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 97296 March 4, 1992 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. PEDRO B. CANCILLER

  • G.R. Nos. 102653, 102925, 102983 March 5, 1992 - NATIONAL PRESS CLUB v. COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS

  • G.R. No. 58879 March 6, 1992 - EXPEDITA LIBREA v. EMPLOYEES’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 62088 March 6, 1992 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. SAMSON SAMILLANO

  • G.R. No. 66641 March 6, 1992 - FILINVEST CREDIT CORPORATION v. INTERMEDIATE APPELLATE COURT, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 77744 March 6, 1992 - TEODORA CLAVERIAS v. ADORACION QUINGCO, ET AL.

  • G.R. Nos. 89983-84 March 6, 1992 - LORENZO S. MENDIOLA v. PEOPLE OF THE PHIL., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 92501 March 6, 1992 - PHILIPPINE AIR LINES v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 92878 March 6, 1992 - EDUARDO PATNA-AN v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 93851 March 6, 1992 - MARK BAYQUEN v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 94530 March 6, 1992 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. DANTE DONATO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 103102 March 6, 1992 - CLAUDIO J. TEEHANKEE, JR. v. JOB B. MADAYAG, ET AL.

  • G.R. Nos. 95370 & 101227 March 10, 1992 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL., ET AL. v. EFREN O. RAMOS, ET AL.

  • A.C. No. 2405 March 11, 1992 - PERLA COMPANIA DE SEGUROS, INC., v. OLEEGARIO SANTISTEBAN

  • G.R. No. 40243 March 11, 1992 - CELESTINO TATEL v. MUNICIPALITY OF VIRAC, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-47815 March 11, 1992 - PEOPLE’S BANK AND TRUST COMPANY v. TOMAS R. LEONIDAS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 84612 March 11, 1992 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. DIOSDADO AVILA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 86744 March 11, 1992 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. PEDRO BUENAVENTURA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 91662 March 11, 1992 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. MARIO AGUILUZ

  • G.R. No. 94129 March 11, 1992 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ANTONIO RIVERA

  • G.R. No. 95594 March 11, 1992 - ITALIAN VILLAGE RESTAURANT, ET AL. v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 57630 March 13, 1992 - CLARA BADAYOS v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 100926 March 13, 1992 - INDEPENDENT SAGAY-ESCALANTE PLANTERS, INC. v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION

  • A.M. No. 3216 March 16, 1992 - DOMINGA VELASCO ORDONIO v. JOSEPHINE PALOGAN EDUARTE

  • G.R. Nos. 74306 & 74315 March 16, 1992 - ENRIQUE RAZON v. INTERMEDIATE APPELLATE COURT, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 91122 March 16, 1992 - DIONY RAPIZ, ET AL. v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 93234 March 16, 1992 - PEDRO S. RAVELO, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 94803 March 16, 1992 - TALAGA BARANGAY WATER SERVICE COOPERATIVE v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 95692 March 16, 1992 - SUNDAY MACHINE WORKS, INC. v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 98030 March 17, 1992 - ALEJANDRO J. CUADRA, ET AL. v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 85469 March 18, 1992 - JOSE RAMIREZ, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 87148 March 18, 1992 - MARCIANA CONSIGNADO, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 94810 March 18, 1992 - EASTERN METROPOLITAN BUS CORP., ET AL. v. EDILBERTO PANGAN, ET AL.

  • G.R. Nos. 94929-30 March 18, 1992 - PORT WORKERS UNION OF THE PHILIPPINES v. BIENVENIDO E. LAGUESMA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 97357 March 18, 1992 - VIRON GARMENTS MANUFACTURING, CO., INC., ET AL. v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 100727 March 18, 1992 - COGEO-CUBAO OPERATORS AND DRIVERS ASSOCIATION v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 71238 March 19, 1992 - LUFTHANSA GERMAN AIRLINES v. INTERMEDIATE APPELLATE COURT, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 75308 March 23, 1992 - LOPE SARREAL, SR. v. JAPAN AIR LINES CO., LTD., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 75907 March 23, 1992 - FAMILY PLANNING ORGANIZATION OF THE PHIL., INC. v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. Nos. 80658-60 March 23, 1992 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. MAXIMINO TINAMPAY, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 90519 March 23, 1992 - UNION OF FILIPINO WORKERS v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 90527 March 23, 1992 - RURAL BANK OF BAAO, INC., ET AL. v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. Nos. 92442-43 March 23, 1992 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. NESTOR DELA CRUZ

  • G.R. No. 92740 March 23, 1992 - PHILIPPINE AIRLINES, INC. v. JAIME J. RAMOS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 95022 March 23, 1992 - COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 95536 March 23, 1992 - ANICETO G. SALUDO, JR., ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 97346 March 23, 1992 - RODOLFO YOSORES v. EMPLOYEES’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION

  • G.R. No. 101367 March 23, 1992 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ELMO CATUA, ET AL.

  • G.R. Nos. 83583-84 March 25, 1992 - COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. RIO TUBA NICKEL MINING CORPORATION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 84220 March 25, 1992 - BENJAMIN RODRIGUEZ v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 84240 March 25, 1992 - OLIVIA S. PASCUAL, ET AL. v. ESPERANZA C. PASCUAL-BAUTISTA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 88942 March 25, 1992 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. MANOLO S. CARPIO

  • A.M. No. RTJ-87-98 March 26, 1992 - AMELIA B. JUVIDA v. MANUEL SERAPIO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 93044 March 26, 1992 - RADIO COMMUNICATIONS OF THE PHILIPPINES, INC. v. NATIONAL WAGES COUNCIL, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 96697 March 26, 1992 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. JAIME COMPETENTE, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 45425 & 45965 March 27, 1992 - CELSA L. VDA. DE KILAYKO, ET AL. v. ERNESTO TENGCO, ET AL.

  • A.C. No. 3724 March 31, 1992 - JOAQUIN G. GARRIDO v. RAMON J. QUISUMBING, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 64220 March 31, 1992 - SEARTH COMMODITIES CORPORATION, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 68319 March 31, 1992 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. JESUS DELA CRUZ, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 76225 March 31, 1992 - ESPIRIDION TANPINGCO v. INTERMEDIATE APPELLATE COURT, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 87710 March 31, 1992 - ROBERTO S. BENEDICTO v. BOARD OF ADMINISTRATORS OF TELEVISION STATIONS RPN, BBC AND IBC

  • G.R. No. 94071 March 31, 1992 - NEW LIFE ENTERPRISES, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 96319 March 31, 1992 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. RENATO ARCEGA

  • G.R. No. 97149 March 31, 1992 - FIDENCIO Y. BEJA, SR. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 101556 March 31, 1992 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ROBERTO ESTERA

  • G.R. No. 103956 March 31, 1992 - BLO UMPAR ADIONG v. COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS