Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence


Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 1996 > September 1996 Decisions > G.R. No. 117641 September 16, 1996 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. MAGENCIO PADA:




PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

SECOND DIVISION

[G.R. No. 117641. September 16, 1996.]

PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. MAGENCIO PADA alias "Menciong,", JJ., Accused-Appellant.


SYLLABUS


1. CRIMINAL LAW; RAPE; ELEMENT OF FORCE AND INTIMIDATION IN THE COMMISSION THEREOF; THE USE OF A KNIFE AND THE THREAT OF DEATH AGAINST THE VICTIM’S PARENTS CONSTITUTE SUFFICIENT INTIMIDATION TO COW THE VICTIM INTO OBEDIENCE. — The fact that Siodaleyte did not resist appellant by struggling or shouting for help does not rule out force and intimidation. Neither does the fact that she failed to report the incident to her parents or the authorities make her a willing victim. Siodaleyte testified that appellant was arched with a knife and that he threatened to kill her parents if she did not accede to his lustful desires. Appellant may have released the knife during the carnal act but he placed it on a table easily within his reach and beside the victim’s head. After satisfying himself, appellant again threatened the girl not to report the incident or he would kill her parents. The use of a knife and the threat of death against her parents constitute sufficient intimidation to cow the victim into obedience. Siodaleyte was then merely twelve years old while accused-appellant was a man sixty-three years of age and armed with a knife. Siodaleyte’s silence during and after the rape is evidence of the real fear instilled in her heart and mind by the Accused-Appellant.

2. ID.; ID.; COMMISSION THEREOF; ESTABLISHED IN CASE AT BAR. — We find that the prosecution has established appellant’s guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The victim’s testimony is simple and straightforward, unshaken by a rigid cross-examination and unflawed by any material inconsistency or contradiction. Moreover, the claim of carnal knowledge has been supported by the medical finding of lacerations in the victim’s hymen and swelling in her labia and clitoris. As to any probability of improper motive, we rule that it is unthinkable for a twelve-year old girl, especially one from the rural areas, to publicly and falsely accuse an old man of a serious offense as rape and then undergo the trauma and humiliation of a public trial if her accusations were merely concoctions of a scheming and malicious mind.


D E C I S I O N


PUNO, J.:


In a complaint dated August 28, 1991, Accused-appellant Magencio Pada alias "Menciong" was charged by Angeles Mangala, the mother of Siodaleyte Mangala, with the crime of rape committed as follows:jgc:chanrobles.com.ph

"That on or about the 19th day of August 1991, at about 9:00 in the morning, more or less, at Barangay San Pedro, Municipality of Matalom, Province of Leyte, Philippines, and within the preliminary jurisdiction of this Honorable Court, the above-named accused, with deliberate intent, with the use of force and intimidation, and with deliberate intent to have carnal knowledge, did then there, wilfully, unlawfully and criminally, have succeeded in having sexual intercourse with Siodaleyte G. Mangala, a minor and of good reputation, against her will.

This case is attended by the following aggravating circumstances: 1. the offended party is a minor; 2. superior strength; and 3. with the use of a deadly weapon.

Contrary to Art. 335 of the Revised Penal Code." 1

The prosecution established that at 9:00 in the morning of August 19, 1991, at the poblacion, Matalom, Leyte, Siodaleyte Mangala, then twelve (12) years of age and a grade six students was buying some paper at the store of a certain Loloy Dampios. Accused-appellant, whose house was across the store, saw Siodaleyte and called her to buy food for him at the market. Appellant gave the girl P25.00 — P20.00 for the food and P5.00 for her tip. Siodaleyte returned with the food and gave it to appellant at the doorway of his house. Thereupon, appellant pulled her into the house and brought her to a bed. Brandishing a knife, appellant ordered Siodaleyte to undress and lie down on the bed, and threatened that if she refused, he would kill her parents. Siodaleyte did as she was ordered. Appellant then undressed himself and went on top of her while placing the knife on a table two feet away.

Appellant forcibly penetrated Siodaleyte. She felt pain but fear prevented her outcry. After satisfying his lust, appellant ordered Siodaleyte to dress up and leave. He again threatened her parents with death if she would reveal the incident to anyone. Siodaleyte went home and pursed her lips. 2

A week later, Siodaleyte’s mother heard ugly rumors about her daughter. She confronted Siodaleyte who disclosed that she was sexually abused by appellant. A medical examination was conducted on August 27, 1991 and Siodaleyte was found to sustain lacerations in her hymen and swelling in her labia and clitoris, thus:jgc:chanrobles.com.ph

"I EXTERNAL EXAMINATION

HEAD TO FOOT — No sign of trauma

II INTERNAL EXAMINATION

A. EXTERNAL GENITALIA

PUBIC HAIR: No pubic hair noted

LABIA MAJORA: Swollen

LABIA MINORA: Swollen

CLITORIS: Swollen

B. INTERNAL GENITALIA

HYMEN: Lacerations noted at 5 o’clock, 1/3 cm long, posterior fourchet with old laceration;

INTROITUS: Admit one examining finger;

ADNEXA: Tenderness on both sides.

GYNECOLOGIC HISTORY: Menarche and LMP not applicable.

REMARKS: Consummated rape is highly entertained." 3

Accused-appellant denied having raped Siodaleyte. He alleged that on August 19, 1990 at 5:00 A.M., he left his house for the public market where he worked as a laborer. He was at the market the whole day and returned home late in the afternoon. He claimed that his left hand had been paralyzed since 1986 and he could not hold a knife or any other object in his left hand. 4

The trial court convicted the Accused-Appellant. In a decision dated July 19, 1994, the court sentenced appellant as follows:jgc:chanrobles.com.ph

"WHEREFORE, this court pronounced accused MAGENCIO PADA GUILTY of rape beyond reasonable doubt and is hereby sentenced to suffer the penalty of reclusion perpetua and to indemnify the offended party the amount of Thirty Thousand Pesos (P30,000.00) with costs.

In the service of his sentence, Accused is hereby credited with the full time of his preventive imprisonment if he agreed to abide by the same disciplinary rules imposed upon convicted prisoners, otherwise, he will only be entitled to 4/5 of the same.

SO ORDERED." 5

In this appeal, appellant contends that:jgc:chanrobles.com.ph

"THE LOWER COURT MANIFESTLY ERRED IN CONVICTING APPELLANT OF THE CRIME CHARGED DESPITE THE FACT THAT THE PROSECUTION FAILED TO ESTABLISH HIS GUILT BEYOND REASONABLE DOUBT." 6

The crime of rape is committed:jgc:chanrobles.com.ph

"Art. 335. When and how rape is committed. — Rape is committed by having carnal knowledge of a woman under any of the following circumstances:chanrob1es virtual 1aw library

1. By using force or intimidation;

2. When the woman is deprived of reason or otherwise unconscious; and

3. When the woman is under the twelve years of age, even though neither of the circumstances mentioned in the two next preceding paragraphs shall be present. . . ." 7

Appellant claims that the prosecution has failed to establish the crime of rape. He admits he had carnal knowledge of Siodaleyte but contends that he did not force himself on her. Allegedly, the victim did not struggle nor shout for help at the time the offense was committed. 8

We do not agree. The fact that Siodaleyte did not resist appellant by struggling or shouting for help does not rule out force and intimidation. Neither does the fact that she failed to report the incident to her parents or the authorities make her a willing victim. Siodaleyte testified that appellant was armed with a knife and that he threatened to kill her parents if she did not accede to his lustful desires. Appellant may have released the knife during the carnal act but he placed it on a table easily within his reach and beside the victim’s head. 9 After satisfying himself, appellant again threatened the girl not to report the incident or he would kill her parents.

The use of a knife and the threat of death against her parents constitute sufficient intimidation to cow the victim into obedience. 10 Siodaleyte was then merely twelve years old while accused-appellant was a man sixty-three years of age 11 and armed with a knife. Siodaleyte’s silence during and after the rape is evidence of the real fear instilled in her heart and mind by the Accused-Appellant.

We find that the prosecution has established appellant’s guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The victim’s testimony is simple and straightforward, unshaken by a rigid cross-examination and unflawed by any material inconsistency or contradiction. Moreover, the claim of carnal knowledge has been supported by the medical finding of lacerations in the victim’s hymen and swelling in her labia and clitoris. As to any probability of improper motive, we rule that it is unthinkable for a twelve-year old girl, especially one from the rural areas, to publicly and falsely accuse an old man of a serious offense as rape and then undergo the trauma and humiliation of a public trial if her accusations were merely concoctions of a scheming and malicious mind. 12

We note that the use of a knife, a deadly weapon, increases the penalty from reclusion perpetua to death. 13 This case however took place before the enactment of Republic Act No. 7659, hence, the death penalty cannot be imposed on appellant. 14 Nonetheless, the civil liability for the crime should be increased from P30,000.00 to P50,000.00 as the victim was twelve years old at the time of its commission. 15

IN VIEW WHEREOF, the decision of the Regional Trial Court, Branch 18, Hilongos, Leyte in Criminal Case No. H-428 is affirmed with the modification that the civil indemnity is increased from P30,000.00 to P50,000.00.

SO ORDERED.

Regalado, Romero and Torres, Jr., JJ., concur.

Mendoza, J., is on leave.

Endnotes:



1. Records, p. 1.

2. TSN of August 6, 1992, pp. 3-8.

3. Exhibit "A," Records, p. 2.

4. TSN of September 10, 1992, pp. 4-5.

5. Decision, p. 3, Rollo, p. 139.

6. Appellant’s Brief, p. 1, Rollo, p. 28.

7. Revised Penal Code, Article 335.

8. Appellant’s Brief, pp. 4-6, Rollo, pp. 31-33.

9. TSN of August 6, 1992, pp. 18-19.

10. People v. Adlawan, Jr., 217 SCRA 489, 498 [1993]; People v. Tayag, 227 SCRA 169, 177 [1993]; People v. Olivar, 215 SCRA 759, 764 [1992].

11. TSN of September 10, 1992, p. 2.

12. People v. Bautista, 236 SCRA 102, 107 [1994]; People v. Buyok, 235 SCRA 622, 628 [1994].

13. Revised Penal Code, Article 335.

14. Republic Act No. 7659, sec. 11.

15. People v. Joya, supra, at 27-28.




Back to Home | Back to Main




















chanrobles.com





ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com






September-1996 Jurisprudence                 

  • Adm. Matter No. MTJ-93-773 September 3, 1996 - JOSE A. BERSALES v. DIOSDADO C. ARRIESGADO

  • G.R. Nos. 96259 & 96274 September 3, 1996 - LUIS J. GONZAGA, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 106962 September 3, 1996 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ERNESTO ATUEL

  • G.R. No. 109767 September 3, 1996 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ROLANDO Q. MONTEREY

  • G.R. No. 118696 September 3, 1996 - RAMON S. OROSA, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • Adm. Matter No. P-96-1218 September 4, 1996 - ERLINDA C. ABERGAS v. MERLITA V. BAGOLBAGOL

  • G.R. No. 105006 September 4, 1996 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. RODRIGO VILLARUEL, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 110187 September 4, 1996 - JOSE G. EBRO III v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 111173 September 4, 1996 - PHILIPPINE SAVINGS BANK v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION, ET. AL.

  • G.R. No. 123026 September 4, 1996 - JAIME R. RODRIGUEZ v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • Adm. Matter No. MTJ-92-720 September 5, 1996 - SIMEON BENJAMIN, SR. v. EUGENIO C. ALABA

  • G.R. No. 115005 September 5, 1996 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. CATALINO FABRIGAS, JR., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 117488 September 5, 1996 - SANTIAGO IBASCO v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 118509 September 5, 1996 - LIMKETKAI SONS MILLING, INC. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • Adm. Matter Nos. P-95-1171 & 8733-Ret September 6, 1996 - CLARA BEEGAN v. TEOTIMO BORJA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 108179 September 6, 1996 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. MANOLITO MALAZARTE

  • G.R. No. 116122 September 6, 1996 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ARNOLD M. CASTILLO

  • G.R. No. 117983 September 6, 1996 - RIZALINO P. UY v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 118633 September 6, 1996 - LAPULAPU DEV’T. & HOUSING CORP. v. TEODORO K. RISOS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 63528 September 9, 1996 - ATOK BIG-WEDGE MINING CO. v. INTERMEDIATE APPELLATE COURT, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 91619 September 9, 1996 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. GAVINO L. PASAYAN

  • G.R. No. 107545 September 9, 1996 - UNICANE WORKERS UNION-CLUP, ET AL. v. NLRC, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 114290 September 9, 1996 - RAYCOR AIRCONTROL SYSTEM, INC. v. NLRC, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 116222 September 9, 1996 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. LINDES PAYNOR

  • Adm. Matter No. MTJ-96-1096 September 10, 1996 - ELEAZAR JOSEP v. JOVITO C. ABARQUEZ

  • G.R. No. 113224 September 11, 1996 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ABDUL HADI S. ALSHAIKA

  • G.R. Nos. 118168-70 September 11, 1996 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. REYNALDO D. PAULE

  • G.R. No. 120082 September 11, 1996 - MACTAN CEBU INT’L. AIRPORT AUTHORITY v. FERDINAND J. MARCOS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 120654 September 11, 1996 - MARIA LOURDES PAREDES-GARCIA v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. Nos. 106345-46 September 16, 1996 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ROMEO J. TUSON

  • G.R. No. 108733 September 16, 1996 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. RENANTE T. PAREL

  • G.R. No. 113204-05 September 16, 1996 - BARBIZON PHIL., INC. v. NAGKAKAISANG SUPERVISOR NG BARBIZON PHIL., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 115497 September 16, 1996 - INTERORIENT MARITIME ENTERPRISES, ET AL. v. NLRC, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 117641 September 16, 1996 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. MAGENCIO PADA

  • G.R. No. 118101 September 16, 1996 - EDDIE DOMASIG v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 103875 September 18, 1996 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. JOSE NARSICO

  • G.R. No. 105084 September 18, 1996 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. RONNIE A. VILLAVIRAY, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 112989 September 18, 1996 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. PEDRITO B. AÑONUEVO

  • G.R. No. 113191 September 18, 1996 - DEPARTMENT OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS v. NLRC, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 119769 September 18, 1996 - BERNARD RAYMOND T. SAULOG, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 99867 September 19, 1996 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. NARCISO BARERA

  • G.R. No. 111262 September 19, 1996 - SAN MIGUEL CORP. EMPLOYEES UNION-PTGWO v. MA. NIEVES D. CONFESOR, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 117250 September 19, 1996 - PATRICIA SANDEL v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 99859 September 20, 1996 - PHIL. SCOUT VETERANS SECURITY & INVESTIGATION AGENCY v. NLRC, ET AL.

  • G.R. Nos. 105938 & 108113 September 20, 1996 - TEODORO R. REGALA, ET AL. v. SANDIGANBAYAN, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 106536 September 20, 1996 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. EDGAR LAYAGUIN, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 111267 September 20, 1996 - COLUMBIA PICTURES ENTERTAINMENT, INC., ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 116624 September 20, 1996 - BALIWAG TRANSIT, INC. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 116989 September 20, 1996 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. GUILLERMO CRUZ

  • G.R. No. 118180 September 20, 1996 - DEVELOPMENT BANK OF THE PHIL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 119220 September 20, 1996 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. NILO SOLAYAO

  • G.R. Nos. 119964-69 September 20, 1996 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. VICTORINO DEL MUNDO

  • Adm. Matter No. MTJ-94-999 September 23, 1996 - TERESITA DYSICO v. EUGENIO A. DACUMOS

  • Adm. Matter No. MTJ-96-1099 September 23, 1996 - SURIGAO CITIZENS’ MOVEMENT FOR GOOD GOVERNMENT v. FLORDELIZA D. CORO

  • Adm. Matter No. P-96-1225 September 23, 1996 - ANATOLIA A. JUNTILLA v. TERESITA J. CALLEJA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 102692 September 23, 1996 - JOHNSON & JOHNSON (PHILS.) v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 118653 September 23, 1996 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. MARCOS VILLEGAS

  • G.R. No. 119957 September 23, 1996 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. RODOLFO L. BAWAR

  • G.R. No. 120097 September 23, 1996 - FOOD TERMINAL, INC. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 121433 September 23, 1996 - RAUL H. SESBREÑO v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 97425 September 24, 1996 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ROMUALDO G. MIRANDA

  • G.R. No. 106875 September 24, 1996 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. NESTOR BABOR, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 111914 September 24, 1996 - JORGE M. RANISES v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 114007 September 24, 1996 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. GONZALO GALAS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 97067 September 26, 1996 - HOMEOWNERS SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSO. v. NLRC, ET AL.

  • G.R. Nos. 115314-23 September 26, 1996 - RODRIGO BORDEOS, ET AL. v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 116232 September 26, 1996 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ERNESTO G. DE LEON

  • G.R. No. 118882 September 26, 1996 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 119325 September 26, 1996 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. SULPICIO R. CAPINIG

  • G.R. No. 119580 September 26, 1996 - PHILIPPINE NATIONAL BANK v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 121200 September 26, 1996 - GLORIA A. SAMEDRA LACANILAO, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 125416 September 26, 1996 - SUBIC BAY METROPOLITAN AUTHORITY v. COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 111399 September 27, 1996 - ODON PECHO v. PEOPLE OF THE PHIL., ET AL.

  • G.R. Nos. 115150-55 September 27, 1996 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. REYDANTE A. CALONZO

  • G.R. No. 118918 September 27, 1996 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ANGELITO TALLEDO

  • G.R. No. 125672 September 27, 1996 - JESUSA CRUZ v. CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION FOR WOMEN IN MANDALUYONG

  • Adm. Matter No. 96-3-88-RTC September 30, 1996 - IN RE: REPORT ON AUDIT AND INVENTORY OF CASES IN RTC-ALAMINOS, PANGASINAN

  • Adm. Matter No. RTJ-96-1346 September 30, 1996 - LEO C. TABAO v. WALERICO B. BUTALID

  • G.R. No. 97933 September 30, 1996 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL v. ANTONIO T. APAWAN

  • G.R. Nos. 115350 & 117819-21 September 30, 1996 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL . v. RESTITUTO C. PABALAN

  • G.R. Nos. 116716-18 September 30, 1996 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ANTONIO F. GABAN

  • G.R. No. 119219 September 30, 1996 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. EDUARDO F. LIGOTAN