Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence


Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 2009 > November 2009 Decisions > A.M. No. 06-3-07-SC - Re: Request for approval of the revised qualification standard for the Chief of MISO:




A.M. No. 06-3-07-SC - Re: Request for approval of the revised qualification standard for the Chief of MISO

PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

EN BANC

[A.M. NO. 06-3-07-SC : November 25, 2009]

RE: REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF THE REVISED QUALIFICATION STANDARD FOR THE CHIEF OF MISO.

R E S O L U T I O N

NACHURA, J.:

On September 10, 2009, this Court promulgated a Resolution in the above-captioned case, approving the Qualification Standards (QS) for Chief of Office, Management Information Systems Office (MISO); and Judicial Reform Program Administrator, Program Management Office (PMO), as follows:

MISO

Chief of Office

PMO

Judicial Reform Program Administrator

Education

Bachelor of Laws with at least 18 units in computer science, information technology or any similar computer academic course

or

Bachelor's Degree in computer science or information technology and post-graduate degree, preferably in computer science or information technology

Bachelor of Laws with at least 18 units in public administration, business administration, finance, economics, social sciences or any related field

or

Bachelor's degree and post-graduate degree in public administration, finance, economics, social sciences or any related field

Experience

10 years or more of relevant supervisory work experience either in the government (acquired under career service) or private sector, with at least 5 years relevant experience in the field of computer science or information and communication technology

10 years or more of relevant supervisory work experience either in the government (acquired under career service) or private sector, with at least 5 years relevant experience in the field of economics, social sciences, or any related field, as well as in donor coordination and project management.

Training

32 hours of relevant experience in management and supervision

32 hours relevant training in project management and supervision

Eligibility

RA 1080 (Bar), CSC Professional or IT eligibility

RA 1080 (Bar) or CSC Professional

and the Qualification Standards for Assistant Chief of Office, MISO and Deputy Judicial Reform Program Administrator, PMO:

MISO

Assistant Chief of Office

PMO

Deputy Judicial Reform Program Administrator

Education

Bachelor of Laws with units and/or studies in computer science or information technology

or

post-graduate units in computer science or information technology

Bachelor of Laws with units and/or studies in public administration, finance, economics, social sciences or any related field

or

post-graduate units in public administration, business administration, finance, economics, social sciences or any related field

Experience

10 years or more of relevant supervisory work experience either in the government (acquired under career service) or private sector with at least 3 years experience in the field of computer science or information and communication technology

10 years or more relevant supervisory work experience either in the government (acquired under career service) or private sector with at least 3 years relevant experience in the field of economics, social sciences or any related field, as well as in donor coordination and project management

Training

At least 32 hours of relevant trainings in computer operation, information and communication technology

At least 32 hours of relevant trainings in project management and supervision

Eligibility

RA 1080 (Bar) or any appropriate CSC 2nd level eligibility

RA 1080 (Bar) or any appropriate CSC 2nd level eligibility

In a letter dated October 30, 2009, Deputy Clerk of Court and Chief Administrative Officer Atty. Eden T. Candelaria called this Court's attention to what might be an inadvertent minor error in the dispositive portion of our Resolution, specifically on the Training requirement for the Chief of Office, MISO. In particular, the Resolution stated: "32 hours of relevant experience in management and supervision." Atty. Candelaria points out that the word "experience" may have been inadvertently typed instead of "training," which would have been more compatible with the category "Training." If, indeed, such an error was committed, Atty. Candelaria requests the Court to make the necessary correction.

The request is noted and granted.

It has also come to our attention that, in our efforts at maintaining uniformity in the QS, we may have overlooked an important component of the MISO Re-engineering Development Plan (MRDP). As discussed in our September 10, 2009 Resolution, the MISO has an ongoing ICT consultancy project with Indra Sistemas S.A. (INDRA), part of which specifically deals with the creation of the MRDP. Among the concerns studied by INDRA is the staffing pattern of MISO and the QS for each position in the office's plantilla. INDRA recognizes that both lawyers and non-lawyers may apply for the position, and recommends the following QS:

FOR LAWYERS

FOR NON-LAWYERS

Education

Bachelor of Laws and 18 MA units in a relevant ICT course or 3 years of relevant ICT experience or 160 hours of ICT training or relevant ICT certification

Bachelor's Degree in a relevant ICT course and an MBA or Post Graduate Degree in a Management related course

or

Bachelor's Degree in a Management-related course and an MBA or Post Graduate Degree in a Management-related course and 18 MA units in a relevant ICT course or 3 years of relevant ICT experience or 160 hours of ICT training or relevant ICT certification

Experience

10 years of supervisory experience (within or outside the Supreme Court)

10 years of supervisory experience (within or outside the Supreme Court)

Training

40 hours of relevant training in management and supervision

40 hours of relevant ICT training

Eligibility

RA 1080 (Attorney)

CSC Professional or IT eligibility

An additional project management certification is proposed for all managerial/supervisory positions to enable them to effectively manage ICT projects.

The MRDP was approved by this Court in a Resolution dated August 11, 2009. Thus, in order to fully implement the MISO's MRDP, we resolve to adopt INDRA's recommendation for the QS of the MISO Chief of Office position.

WHEREFORE, the foregoing premises considered, the Court's Resolution dated September 10, 2009 in A.M. No. 06-3-07-SC is hereby AMENDED as follows:

"IN VIEW OF THE FOREGOING, the Court APPROVES, with modification, the recommendations of the OAS on the Qualification Standards for Chief of Office, Management Information Systems Office and Judicial Reform Program Administrator, Program Management Office, as follows:

MISO

Chief of Office

PMO

Judicial Reform Program Administrator

ςηαñrοblεš �νιr†υαl �lαω �lιbrαrÿ

Education

Bachelor of Laws and at least 18 units in computer science, information technology or any similar computer academic course, or 3 years of relevant ICT experience, or 160 hours of ICT training, or relevant ICT certification

or

Bachelor's Degree in computer science or information technology and post-graduate degree, preferably in computer science or information technology

Bachelor of Laws and at least 18 units in public administration, business administration, finance, economics, social sciences or any related field

or

Bachelor's degree and post-graduate degree in public administration, finance, economics, social sciences or any related field

Experience

10 years or more of relevant supervisory work experience either in the government (acquired under career service) or private sector

10 years or more of relevant supervisory work experience either in the government (acquired under career service) or private sector, with at least 5 years relevant experience in the field of economics, social sciences, or any related field, as well as in donor coordination and project management

Training

40 hours of relevant training in management and supervision

32 hours of relevant training in project management and supervision

Eligibility

RA 1080 (Bar), CSC Professional or IT eligibility

RA 1080 (Bar) or CSC Professional

and the Qualification Standards for Assistant Chief of Office, MISO and Deputy Judicial Reform Program Administrator, PMO:

MISO

Assistant Chief of Office

PMO

Deputy Judicial Reform Program Administrator

Education

Bachelor of Laws and units and/or studies in computer science or information technology

or

post-graduate units in computer science or information technology

Bachelor of Laws with units and/or studies in public administration, finance, economics, social sciences or any related field

or

post-graduate units in public administration, business administration, finance, economics, social sciences or any related field

Experience

10 years or more of relevant supervisory work experience either in the government (acquired under career service) or private sector with at least 3 years experience in the field of computer science or information and communication technology

10 years or more of relevant supervisory work experience either in the government (acquired under career service) or private sector with at least 3 years of relevant experience in the field of economics, social sciences or any related field, as well as in donor coordination and project management

Training

At least 32 hours of relevant trainings in computer operation, information and communication technology

At least 32 hours of relevant trainings in project management and supervision

Eligibility

RA 1080 (Bar) or any appropriate CSC 2nd level eligibility

RA 1080 (Bar) or any appropriate CSC 2nd level eligibility

SO ORDERED."

SO ORDERED.






Back to Home | Back to Main




















chanrobles.com





ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com






November-2009 Jurisprudence                 

  • A.C. No. 8380 - Arellano University, Inc. v. Atty. Leovigildo H. Mijares III

  • A.M. No. 06-3-07-SC - Re: Request for approval of the revised qualification standard for the Chief of MISO

  • G.R. No. 136466 - Heirs of Aurelio Reyes v. Hon. Ernesto D. Garilao, et al.

  • G.R. No. 151800 - Office of the Ombudsman, represented by Hon. Aniano A. Desierto v. Heirs of Margarita vda. De Ventura represented by Pacita V. Pascual, et al.

  • G.R. No. 152613 and G.R. No. 152628, G.R. No. G.R. NOS. 152619-20 and G.R. NOS. 152870-71 - Apex Mining Co. Inc. v. Southest Mindanao Gold Mining Corp., et al.

  • G.R. No. 153788 - Roger V. Navarro v. Hon. Jose L. Escobido, et al.

  • G.R. No. 154048 - Stanfilco Employees Agrarian Reform Beneficiaries Multi-Purpose Cooperative v. DOLE Philippines, Inc. (Stanfilco Division), Oribanex Services, Inc., Spouses Elly and Myrna Abujos

  • G.R. No. 160046 - Bank fo the Philippines Islands, etc. v. Evangeline L. Puzon

  • G.R. No. 160239 - Angelina S. Soriente, et al. v. The Estate of the late Arsenio E. Concepcion, etc.

  • G.R. No. 160394 - Land Bank of the Philippines v. Agustin C. Dizon

  • G.R. No. 161318 - Julie Nabus, Michelle Nabus and Betty Tolero v. Joaquin and Julia Pacson

  • G.R. No. 161925 - Spouses Exequiel Lopez and Eusebia Lopez v. Spouses Eduardo Lopez, et al.

  • G.R. No. 162523 - Norton Resources and Development Corporation v. All Asia Bank Corporation

  • G.R. No. 163053 - Agripina Panganiban v. Sps. Romeo Roldan, et al.

  • G.R. No. 163078 - Sthepen Cang and George Nardo y Josol v. Herminia Cullen

  • G.R. No. 163406 - Power Sites and Signs, Inc. v. United Neon (A Division of Ever Corporation)

  • G.R. No. 164886 - Jose Feliciano Loy, et al. v. San Miguel Corporation Employees Union-Philippine Transport and General Workers Organization (SMCEU-PTGWO), et al.

  • G.R. No. 165199 - Philippine Long Distance Telephone Company v. Inocencio B. Berbano, Jr.

  • G.R. No. 165276 - Judge Adoracion G. Angeles v. Hon. Manuel B. Gaite, et al.

  • G.R. No. 165428 - Land Bank of the Philippines v. Teresita Panlilio Luciano

  • G.R. No. 165938 - Rogelio Dizon v. Philippine Veterans Bank

  • G.R. No. 166682 - Noel B. Bagtas v. Hon. Ruth C. Santos, etc. et al.

  • G.R. No. 166759 - Sofia Torres, et al. v. Nicanor Satsatin, et al.

  • G.R. No. 167706 - Reynaldo G. Cabigting v. San Miguel Foods, Inc.

  • G.R. No. 168746 - Equitable PCI Bank, Inc. v. Hon. Salvador y Apurillo, et al.

  • G.R. No. 168940 - Sps. Isagani & Diosdada Castro v. Angelina de Leon Tan

  • G.R. No. 169606 - Bernando B. Jose, Jr. v. Michael Phils., Inc. et al.

  • G.R. No. 169681 - The Estate of Pedro C. Gonzales and Heirs of Pedro C. Gonzales v. The Heirs of Marcos Perez

  • G.R. No. 170023 - Kings Properties Corporation, Inc. v. Canuto A. Galido

  • G.R. No. 170891 - Jose Feliciano Loy, et al. v. San Miguel Corporation Employees Union-Philippine Transport and General Workers Organization (SMCEU-PTGWO), et al.

  • G.R. No. 170906 - Metropolitan Bank & Trust Co., v. Lamb Construction Consortium Corporation, represented by Victor T. Nubla and Edgardo C. Santos

  • G.R. No. 171741 - Metro, Inc. adn Spouses Frederick and LIza Juan v. Lara's Gifts and Decors, Inc. et al.

  • G.R. No. 173146 - Agusan Del Norte Electric Cooperative, Inc. (ANECO), etc. v. Angelina Balen, et al.

  • G.R. No. 174044 - Gloria V. Gomez v. PNOC Development and Management Corporation (PDMC)

  • G.R. No. 176249 - FVC Labor Union-Philippine Transport and General Workers Organization (FVCLU-PTGWO) v. Sama-samang Nagkakaisang Manggagawa sa FVC-Solidarity of Independet and General Labor Organization (SANAMA-FVC-SIGLO)

  • G.R. No. 176413 - Spouses Danilo T. Samonte and Rosalinda N. Samonte v. Century Savings Bank

  • G.R. No. 176506 - Merch Sharp and Dohme (Philippines), et al. v. Jonar P. Robles, et al.

  • G.R. No. 177429 - Anicia Valdez-Tallorin v. Heirs of Juanito Tarona, et al.

  • G.R. No. 178255 - Ricardo C. Siverio v. Eufemia Almeda and Ponciano Almeda, et al.

  • G.R. No. 178527 - Joven Yuki, Jr. v. Wellington Co

  • G.R. No. 178768 and G.R. NO. 180893 - Pacific Wide Realty and Development Corporation v. Puerto Azul Land, Inc./Pacific Wide Realty and Development Corporation v. Puerto Azul Land, Inc.

  • G.R. No. 179370 - Eugenio S. Capablanca v. Civil Service Commission

  • G.R. No. 180073 - Prosource International, Inc. v. Horphag Research Management SA

  • G.R. No. 181020 - Jazmin L. Espiritu and Porfirio Lazaro, Jr. v. Vladimir G. Lazaro, et al.

  • G.R. No. 180345 - San Roque Power Corporation v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

  • G.R. No. 181613 - ROSALINDA A. PENERA v. COMELEC & EDGAR T. ANDANAR

  • G.R. No. 182156 - Jazmin L. Espiritu and Porfirio Lazaro, Jr. v. Vladimir G. Lazaro, et al.

  • G.R. No. 182165 - P/Supt. Felixberto Castillo, Police Officers Romeo Bagtas, et al. v. Dr. Amanda T. Cruz, Nixon T. Cruz and Ferdinand T. Cruz

  • G.R. No. 182585 - Josephine Marmo, et al. v. Moises O. Anacay

  • G.R. No. 183198 - Luz Palanca Tan v. Jam Transit, Inc.

  • G.R. No. 183834 - Jimmy R. Napoles v. Office of the Ombudsman (Visayas), et al.

  • G.R. No. 184315 - Alfonso T. Yuchenco v. The Manila Chronicle Publishing corporation, et al.

  • G.R. No. 185094 - Masonic Contractor, Inc., et al. v. Magdalena Madjos, et al.

  • G.R. No. 185379 - People of the Philippines v. Zenaida Quebral y Mateo, et al.

  • G.R. No. 185396 - Rufina Fajardo, et al. v. Alberto Comandante, et al.

  • G.R. No. 185933 - St. Luke's Medical Center, Incorporated v. Jennifer Lynne C. Fadrigo

  • G.R. No. 186493 - The People of the Philippines v. Reynaldo Hernando y Aquino

  • G.R. No. 186538 - People of the Philippines v. Ausencio Comillo, Jr., et al.

  • G.R. No. 186616 - Commission on Elections v. Conrado Cruz, et al.

  • G.R. No. 187682 - People of the Philippines v. Roman Lacaden y Parinas

  • G.R. No. 187956 - Ramon P. Torres v. Commission on Elections and Josephine "Joy" H. Gaviola

  • G.R. No. 188106 - The People of the Philippines v. Antonio Dalisay y Destresa