Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence


Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 2012 > June 2012 Decisions > [G.R. No. 180966 : June 13, 2012] COL. JESUS G. CABARRUS, JR., PAF (RES.), PETITIONER, VS. HON. SECRETARY OF NATIONAL DEFENSE, THE CHIEF OF STAFF, AND THE COMMANDING GENERAL, RESERVE COMMAND, AFP, RESPONDENTS.:




THIRD DIVISION

[G.R. No. 180966 : June 13, 2012]

COL. JESUS G. CABARRUS, JR., PAF (RES.), PETITIONER, VS. HON. SECRETARY OF NATIONAL DEFENSE, THE CHIEF OF STAFF, AND THE COMMANDING GENERAL, RESERVE COMMAND, AFP, RESPONDENTS.

D E C I S I O N


ABAD, J.:

This case is about a reserve officer called to active duty in the Armed Forces of the Philippines Reserve Command when he was already 60 years of age but refused to be relieved at 65 believing that he was still physically and mentally fit for duty.cralaw

The Facts and the Case

One of the major support commands of the Armed Forces of the Philippines (AFP) is its Reserve Command, created for the purpose of Reserve Force management, procurement, and organization.  It develops, organizes, trains, equips, and administers AFP reservists into capable, responsive, and mobilizable reserve force.  These reservists augment the regular force whenever needed.[1]

In 2000 the AFP called into active service petitioner Jesus G. Cabarrus, Jr., a reserve officer with the rank of colonel in the Philippine Air Force, and installed him as Group Commander of the Public Affairs Service of the AFP Reserve Command.  He was then 60 years old.

In February 2005 the overall Commanding Officer of the AFP Reserve Command, Col. Cabarrus’s superior, wrote the Judge Advocate General Office (JAGO), requesting its legal opinion on whether Col. Cabarrus could continue to serve as Group Commander after his 65th birthday.  The JAGO replied in the negative, citing Section 13(3) of Republic Act (R.A.) 7077.[2]

On March 1, 2005 Col. Cabarrus reached the age of 65 but apparently remained at his post for a while.  Eight months later or on November 8, 2005 the Group Commander of the Technical Service Reserve of the AFP Reserve Command issued a circular announcing the retirement of reservists in the AFP Reserve Command who had reached the age of 65.  Thus, his superior in the latter Command considered Col. Cabarrus retired and relieved him of his post beginning on December 11, 2005.

Believing that his superiors singled him out for removal, Col. Cabarrus wrote separate letters to his Commanding Officer, to the AFP Chief of Staff, and to the Secretary of National Defense protesting the same.  But they did not reply to him.  Thus, he filed a petition for declaratory relief with the Quezon City Regional Trial Court (RTC) for the proper construction of Section 13(3) of R.A. 7077 regarding the retirement of reservists who had been called to active service.  On November 27, 2007 the RTC rendered a decision, dismissing his petition for lack of merit, hence, the present action.

The Issue Presented

The case presents a legal issue that needs to be settled for the benefit of the AFP:

Whether or not Col. Cabarrus, a reservist called to serve in one of the support commands of the AFP may be regarded as retired under Section 13(3) of R.A. 7077 after he reached the age of 65.

The Ruling of the Court

The citizen soldiers of the AFP, called reservists, are of three categories.  In the first category are able-bodied reservists between the ages of 18 and 35; in the second category are able-bodied reservists between the ages of 36 and 51; and in the third category are able-bodied reservists who are above the age of 51.[3]  No doubt, Col. Cabarrus belonged to the third category when he was called into active service in 2000 since he was then already 60 years of age.  As Group Commander of the Public Affairs Service of the AFP Reserve Command, he worked in a unit of the regular armed forces that looked after the affairs of its reserve force.

What is in issue in this case is the age when third category reservists who are called into the active service can be relieved from such service.  Col. Cabarrus claims that he has the right to remain in the active service beyond the age of 65 as long as he remains mentally and physically fit.  But the AFP, invoking Section 13(3) of R.A. 7077, claims that third category reservists like him when called to active duty are automatically relieved from the service at the age of 65.

The pertinent portions of Section 13 provide:

Section 13.  Classification of Reserve Force Units. – Based on the categorization provided in Section 12 above, the Reserve Force units shall further be classified into the Ready Reserve, the Standby Reserve and the Retired Reserve based in their operational readiness for immediate deployment/utilization.

(1) Ready Reserve. - The Ready Reserve shall be composed of citizen soldiers belonging mostly to the First Category Reserve and others as provided in this Act who shall be organized, trained and maintained as mobilizable ready reserve subject to call at any time to augment the regular armed force of the AFP not only in times of war or national emergency but also to meet local emergencies arising from calamities, disasters and threats to peace, order, security and stability in any locality, including the need to provide assistance in relief and rescue work and other civil assistance activities.

Any reservist or citizen soldiers belonging to the Second Category Reserve and/or the Third Category Reserve, particularly the commissioned and non-commissioned officers, who will volunteer to serve with the Ready Reserve shall be allowed, if qualified and fit for duty, to join and actively participate as part of the Ready Reserve and shall serve with an appropriate Ready Reserve unit.

Furthermore, members of the AFP Affiliated Reserved units of various government and private utilities and services considered essential for the preservation of the economic stability of the country or particular locality, such as power and electricity, water supply, transportation and communications, among others, regardless of their categorization shall be classified as Ready Reserve.

All citizen soldiers belonging to the First Category Reserve, except those exempted under this Act, shall be required to serve with Ready Reserve units and will have assignments and promotions in accordance with existing policies of the AFP until transferred to the Standby Reserve by virtue of their age.

x x x x

(2) Standby Reserve. - The Standby Reserve shall be composed of citizen soldiers belonging mostly to the Second Category Reserve and the Third Category Reserve, except as provided in this Act. The members of the Standby Reserve shall be organized and assigned to specified reserve units and shall be maintained through annual assembly tests to update their records and their present addresses, among others. The Standby Reserve may be mobilized or ordered to active duty only in times of national emergency or war. The ranks of the members of the Standby Reserve may be upgraded if they voluntarily participate in training or serve with the Ready Reserve units in their areas or if their Standby Reserve units undergo retraining. They will however be encouraged to upgrade their military knowledge and skills by taking up non-resident or resident courses which shall be set up for the purpose.

(3) Retired Reserve. - The Retired Reserve shall be composed of citizen soldiers who have qualified for retirement through length of service, old age or disability. For this purpose, sixty-five (65) years shall be considered as the retirement age. However, if qualified and fit for duty, a member of the Retired Reserve may be ordered to active duty in times of local or national emergencies if he volunteers for active duty and when the Secretary of National Defense determines that there are not enough qualified citizen soldiers with his special skills and qualifications in the Ready Reserve or the Standby Reserve in his particular area of residence. (Emphasis supplied)

The reference to “sixty-five (65) years” as the retirement age in sub-paragraph (3) above evidently has to do with the composition of the Retired Reserve Unit.  That unit is composed of “citizen soldiers who have qualified for retirement through length of service, old age or disability.”  The retirement age for this purpose, it says, is the age of 65.  The provision in question does not prescribe the retirement age for reservists who are called into active service in the regular armed forces.

Moreover, Section 13 is not about the retirement of reservists who have been called to active duty.  Section 13 essentially creates a classification of the Reserved Force units of the country’s citizen armed force.  The three units of this Reserve Citizen Armed Force are the (a) Ready Reserve; (b) Standby Reserve; and (c) Retired Reserve. These units do not, until mobilized, perform the work of the regular armed forces.  They are essentially needed only to cope with an actual war, invasion, rebellion or any other extreme emergency.  Theirs is the limited and contingent mission described under Section 7 which reads:

Section 7. Mission. – The mission of the Citizen Armed Force, alternately referred to as the Reserve Force, is to provide the base for the expansion of the Armed Forces of the Philippines in the event of war, invasion or rebellion; to assist in relief and rescue during disaster or calamities; to assist in socioeconomic development; and to assist in the operation and maintenance of essential government or private utilities in furtherance of overall mission.

Of the three units mentioned, the Ready Reserve unit consists of reservists who are organized, trained, and maintained as mobilizable ready reserve subject to call at any time to augment the regular armed force of the AFP not only in times of war or national emergency but also in normal times.  Still, they have to be mobilized when the occasion calls for it.

The AFP did not post Col. Cabarrus to any of the three stand by reserve units subject of Section 13, the membership of which exists, except during training, largely on paper.  The AFP posted Col. Cabarrus in one of its support commands, the AFP Reserve Command, as Group Commander of its Public Affairs Service.  Consequently, Section 13 does not apply to him.

Actually, the only possible opportunity for reservists to be called to active duty and hold commands in the regular armed forces is for “training” as provided in Section 53 of R.A. 7077.

Section 53.  Active Duty Tour for Training of Reserve Officers. – In order to improve their professional competence and leadership qualities, reserve officers in the inactive status shall be called to active duty for a period not exceeding two (2) years without extension; provided, that the quota for such active duty shall as far as practicable be proportionately distributed to the provinces and cities based on their reserve units, with priority to units of Ready Reserve I: provided, further, that the reserve officers called to active duty shall as far as practicable serve in the province of their reserve unit assignment.  A reserve officer who has served his tour shall not be called again to active duty until after (5) years, except in case of mobilization.cralaw

Since Col. Cabarrus has already exceeded the two-year service allowed to reservists who are called to active duty tour, he cannot complain that he has been prematurely removed from the active or regular service.

WHEREFORE, the Court DENIES the petition for lack of merit.

SO ORDERED.

Peralta, (Acting Chairperson),* Villarama, Jr.,** Mendoza, and Perlas-Bernabe, JJ., concur.

Endnotes:


* Per Special Order 1228 dated June 6, 2012.

**  Designated Acting Member in lieu of Associate Justice Presbitero J. Velasco, Jr., per Special Order 1229 dated June 6, 2012.

[1] http://wikimapia.org/13183946/AFPRESCOM-Armed-Forces-of-the-Philippines-Reserve-Command (last accessed May 28, 2012).

[2] Entitled “An Act Providing for the Development, Administration, Organization, Training, Maintenance and Utilization of the Citizen Armed Forces of the Armed Forces of the Philippines and For Other Purposes.”

[3] Section 12.  Categorization of Citizen Soldiers. – There shall be three (3) categories of citizen soldiers of AFP reservists: the First Category Reserve, the Second Category Reserve, and the Third Category Reserve based on age.

(1) First Category Reserve. - The First Category Reserve shall be composed of able-bodied reservists whose ages are between eighteen (18) years and thirty-five (35) years, inclusive.

(2) Second Category Reserve. - The Second Category Reserve shall be composed of able-bodied reservists whose ages are between thirty-six (36) years and fifty-one (51) years, inclusive.

(3) Third Category Reserve. - The Third Category Reserve shall be composed of the all able-bodied reservists who are above fifty-one (51) years of age.



Back to Home | Back to Main


chanrobles.com



ChanRobles Professional Review, Inc.

ChanRobles Professional Review, Inc. : www.chanroblesprofessionalreview.com
ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com
ChanRobles CPA Review Online

ChanRobles CPALE Review Online : www.chanroblescpareviewonline.com
ChanRobles Special Lecture Series

ChanRobles Special Lecture Series - Memory Man : www.chanroblesbar.com/memoryman





June-2012 Jurisprudence                 

  • [G.R. No. 182316, June 13, 2012] THELMA CASULLA VELASCO AND MYRNA CASULLA VDA. DE RETUERMA, PETITIONERS, VS. FELIPE R. BUENVIAJE, ANGELINA MILAN- BUENVIAJE AND THE COURT OF APPEALS SPECIAL EIGHTH DIVISION, RESPONDENTS.

  • [G.R. No. 178046 : June 13, 2012] LAND BANK OF THE PHILIPPINES, PETITIONER, VS. MONTINOLA-ESCARILLA AND CO., INC., RESPONDENT.

  • [G.R. No. 176893 : June 13, 2012] VICENTE VILLANUEVA, JR., PETITIONER, VS. THE NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION THIRD DIVISION, MANILA ELECTRIC COMPANY, MANUEL LOPEZ, CHAIRMAN AND CEO, AND FRANCISCO COLLANTES, MANAGER, RESPONDENTS.

  • [G.R. No. 201112 : June 13, 2012] ARCHBISHOP FERNANDO R. CAPALLA, OMAR SOLITARIO ALI AND MARY ANNE L. SUSANO, PETITIONERS, VS. THE HONORABLE COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS, RESPONDENT. [G.R. NO. 201121] SOLIDARITY FOR SOVEREIGNTY (S4S), REPRESENTED BY MA. LINDA OLAGUER; RAMON PEDROSA, BENJAMIN PAULINO SR., EVELYN CORONEL, MA. LINDA OLAGUER MONTAYRE, AND NELSON T. MONTAYRE, PETITIONERS, VS. COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN, COMMISSIONER SIXTO S. BRILLANTES, JR., RESPONDENT. [G.R. NO. 201127] TEOFISTO T. GUINGONA, BISHOP BRODERICK S. PABILLO, SOLITA COLLAS MONSOD, MARIA CORAZON MENDOZA ACOL, FR. JOSE DIZON, NELSON JAVA CELIS, PABLO R. MANALASTAS, GEORGINA R. ENCANTO AND ANNA LEAH E. COLINA, PETITIONERS, VS. COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS AND SMARTMATIC TIM CORPORATION, RESPONDENTS. [G.R. NO. 201413] TANGGULANG DEMOKRASYA (TAN DEM), INC., EVELYN L. KILAYKO, TERESITA D. BALTAZAR, PILAR L. CALDERON AND ELITA T. MONTILLA, PETITIONERS, VS. COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS AND SMARTMATIC-TIM CORPORATION, RESPONDENTS.

  • [G.R. No. 192241 : June 13, 2012] ROMULO TRINIDAD @ ROMY, PETITIONER, VS. PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, RESPONDENT.

  • [G.R. No. 188978 : June 13, 2012] PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, PLAINTIFF -APPELLEE, VS. MARCIAL BAYRANTE Y BOAQUINA, ACCUSED-APPELLANT.

  • [A.M. No. MTJ-11-1796 (Formerly OCA I.P.I. No. 10-2279-MTJ) : June 13, 2012] FE D. VALDEZ, COMPLAINANT, VS. JUDGE LIZABETH G. TORRES, METC, BRANCH 60, MANDALUYONG CITY, RESPONDENT.

  • [G.R. No. 190875 : June 13, 2012] ANICETO BANGIS SUBSTITUTED BY HIS HEIRS, NAMELY: RODOLFO B. BANGIS, RONNIE B. BANGIS, ROGELIO B. BANGIS, RAQUEL B. QUILLO, ROMULO B. BANGIS, ROSALINA B. PARAN, ROSARIO B. REDDY, REYNALDO B. BANGIS, AND REMEDIOS B. LASTRE, PETITIONERS, VS. HEIRS OF SERAFIN AND SALUD ADOLFO, NAMELY: LUZ A. BANNISTER, SERAFIN ADOLFO, JR., AND ELEUTERIO ADOLFO REP. BY HIS HEIRS, NAMELY: MILAGROS, JOEL, MELCHOR, LEA, MILA, NELSON, JIMMY AND MARISSA, ALL SURNAMED ADOLFO, RESPONDENTS.

  • [G.R. No. 185335 : June 13, 2012] PRUDENTIAL GUARANTEE AND ASSURANCE EMPLOYEE LABOR UNION AND SANDY T. VALLOTA, PETITIONERS, VS. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION, PRUDENTIAL GUARANTEE AND ASSURANCE INC., AND/OR JOCELYN RETIZOS, RESPONDENTS.

  • [A.M. No. 06-9-525-RTC : June 13, 2012] RE: REPORT ON THE JUDICIAL AUDIT CONDUCTED IN THE REGIONAL TRIAL COURT, BRANCHES 72 AND 22, NARVACAN, ILOCOS SUR.

  • [A.C. No. 1900 : June 13, 2012] RODRIGO A. MOLINA, COMPLAINANT, VS. ATTY. CEFERINO R. MAGAT, RESPONDENT.

  • [A.M. No. P-11-2986 [Formerly A.M. OCA IPI No. 10-3460-P] : June 13, 2012] SPOUSES RAINER TIU AND JENNIFER TIU, COMPLAINANTS, VS. VIRGILIO F. VILLAR, SHERIFF IV, REGIONAL TRIAL COURT, OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF COURT, PASAY CITY, RESPONDENT.

  • [G.R. No. 179015 : June 13, 2012] UNITED COCONUT PLANTERS BANK, PETITIONER,VS. PLANTERS PRODUCTS, INC., JANET LAYSON AND GREGORY GREY, RESPONDENTS.

  • [G.R. No. 180966 : June 13, 2012] COL. JESUS G. CABARRUS, JR., PAF (RES.), PETITIONER, VS. HON. SECRETARY OF NATIONAL DEFENSE, THE CHIEF OF STAFF, AND THE COMMANDING GENERAL, RESERVE COMMAND, AFP, RESPONDENTS.

  • [G.R. No. 172349 : June 13, 2012] POLYFOAM-RGC INTERNATIONAL, CORPORATION AND PRECILLA A. GRAMAJE, PETITIONERS, VS. EDGARDO CONCEPCION, RESPONDENT.

  • [G.R. No. 172642 : June 13, 2012] ESTATE OF NELSON R. DULAY, REPRESENTED BY HIS WIFE MERRIDY JANE P. DULAY, PETITIONER, VS. ABOITIZ JEBSEN MARITIME, INC. AND GENERAL CHARTERERS, INC., RESPONDENTS.

  • [G.R. No. 178626 : June 13, 2012] CECILIA U. LEGRAMA, PETITIONER, VS. SANDIGANBAYAN AND PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, RESPONDENTS.

  • [G.R. No. 175350 : June 13, 2012] EQUITABLE BANKING CORPORATION, PETITIONER, VS. SPECIAL STEEL PRODUCTS, INC. AND AUGUSTO L. PARDO, RESPONDENTS.

  • [G.R. No. 179059 : June 13, 2012] FIRST DIVISION VICTOR RONDINA, PETITIONER, VS. PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, RESPONDENT.

  • [G.R. No. 192716 : June 13, 2012] ELOISA MERCHANDISING, INC. AND TREBEL INTERNATIONAL, INC., PETITIONERS, VS. BANCO DE ORO UNIVERSAL BANK AND ENGRACIO M. ESCASINAS, JR., IN HIS CAPACITY AS EX-OFFICIO SHERIFF OF THE RTC OF MAKATI CITY, RESPONDENTS.

  • [G.R. No. 174214 : June 13, 2012] WATERFRONT CEBU CITY HOTEL, PETITIONER, VS. MA. MELANIE P. JIMENEZ, JACQUELINE C. BAGUIO, LOVELLA V. CARILLO, AND MAILA G. ROBLE, RESPONDENTS.

  • [G.R. No. 192334 : June 13, 2012] CONRADO CASING, PETITIONER, VS. HON. OMBUDSMAN, JAIME C. VELASCO AND ANGELES DELLOVA, RESPONDENTS.

  • [G.R. No. 192334 : June 13, 2012] CONRADO CASING, PETITIONER, VS. HON. OMBUDSMAN, JAIME C. VELASCO AND ANGELES DELLOVA, RESPONDENTS.

  • [G.R. No. 195137 : June 13, 2012] REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES, PETITIONER, VS. HEIRS OF DOROTEO MONTOYA, REPRESENTED BY BUENAVENTURA MONTOYA, RESPONDENTS.

  • [A.M. No. P-12-3035 [Formerly OCA I.P.I. No. 11- 3619-P] : June 13, 2012] JUDGE ETHELWOLDA A. JARAVATA, PETITIONER, VS. PRECIOSO T. ORENCIA, CLERK OF COURT II, MUNICIPAL TRIAL COURT, AGOO, LA UNION, RESPONDENT.

  • [G.R. No. 180974 : June 13, 2012] METROPOLITAN BANK AND TRUST COMPANY, PETITIONER, VS. CENTRO DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, CHONGKING KEHYENG, MANUEL CO KEHYENG AND QUIRINO KEHYENG, RESPONDENTS.

  • [G.R. No. 181136 : June 13, 2012] WESTERN MINDANAO POWER CORPORATION, PETITIONER, VS. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT.

  • [G.R. No. 176184 : June 13, 2012] ROMEO E. PAULINO, PETITIONER, VS. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION AND PHILIPPINE LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE COMPANY, INCORPORATED. RESPONDENTS.

  • [A.M. No. 12-6-11-SC : June 13, 2012] RE: LETTER-COMPLAINT AGAINST HON. JUSTICES ANTONIO T. CARPIO AND MARIA LOURDES P.A. SERENO DATED SEPTEMBER 16, 2011 FILED BY ATTY. MAGDALENO M. PEÑA

  • [A.M. No. 12-6-10-SC : June 13, 2012] RE: COMPLAINT AGAINST THE HON. CHIEF JUSTICE RENATO C. CORONA DATED SEPTEMBER 14, 2011 FILED BY INTER-PETAL RECREATIONAL CORPORATION

  • [G.R. No. 197371 : June 13, 2012] PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, VS. JOEL ANCHETA Y OSAN, JOHN LLORANDO Y RIGARYO, AND JUAN CARLOS GERNADA Y HORCAJO, ACCUSED-APPELLANTS.

  • [G.R. No. 174937 : June 13, 2012] JOVINA DABON VDA. DE MENDEZ, PETITIONER, VS. COURT OF APPEALS AND SPOUSES MINEO AND TRINIDAD B. DABON, RESPONDENTS.

  • [G.R. No. 194795 : June 13, 2012] EVER ELECTRICAL MANUFACTURING, INC., (EEMI) AND VICENTE GO, PETITIONERS, VS. SAMAHANG MANGGAGAWA NG EVER ELECTRICAL/ NAMAWU LOCAL 224 REPRESENTED BY FELIMON PANGANIBAN, RESPONDENTS.

  • [G.R. No. 173012 : June 13, 2012] DOLORES T. ESGUERRA, PETITIONER, VS. VALLE VERDE COUNTRY CLUB, INC. AND ERNESTO VILLALUNA, RESPONDENTS.

  • [G.R. No. 185522 : June 13, 2012] SAN MIGUEL CORPORATION, PETITIONER, VS. HELEN T. KALALO, RESPONDENT.

  • [G.R. No. 200653 : June 13, 2012] 3RD ALERT SECURITY AND DETECTIVE SERVICES, INC., PETITIONER, VS. CARPIO, (CHAIRPERSON), BRION, PEREZ, SERENO, AND REYES, JJ. ROMUALDO NAVIA, RESPONDENT.

  • [G.R. No. 199403 : June 13, 2012] PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, APPELLEE, VS. GOMER S. CLIMACO, APPELLANT.

  • [G.R. No. 192413 : June 13, 2012] RIZAL COMMERCIAL BANKING CORPORATION, PETITIONER, VS. HI-TRI DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION AND LUZ R. BAKUNAWA, RESPONDENTS.

  • [A.C. No. 6368 : June 13, 2012] FIDELA BENGCO AND TERESITA BENGCO, COMPLAINANTS, VS. ATTY. PABLO S. BERNARDO, RESPONDENT.

  • [G.R. No. 168208 : June 13, 2012] VIVIAN T. RAMIREZ, ALBERTO B. DIGNO, DANILO M. CASQUITE, JUMADIYA A. KADIL, FAUJIA SALIH, ANTONIO FABIAN, ROMEL DANAG, GINA PANTASAN, ARTHUR MATUGAS, VIRGILIA OSARIO, ORLANDO EBRADA, ROSANA CABATO, WILFREDO LUNA, LILIA BARREDO, ISABEL ALBERTO, NORA BONIAO, PILAR OSARIO, LYDIA ESLIT, AMMAN SALI, AKMAD AKIL, ROGELIO LAZARO, ISABEL CONCILLADO, MARLON ABIAL, HERMOCILLO NAPALCRUZ, WALTER BUHIAN, ELISEO AMATORIO, JOSE CASTRO, JAMIL LAGBAY, MA. EVELYN SANTOS, LEDENIA T. BARON, ELSA AMATORIO, SARAH F. BUCOY, EXPEDITO L. RELUYA, ARNULFO ALFARO, EDGARDO F. BORGONIA, DANILO R. MANINGO, ABDUSAID H. DAMBONG, LORINDA M. MUTIA, DOMINADOR DEL ROSARIO, JOEL E. TRONO, HUSSIN A. JAWAJI, JUL-ASNAM JAKARIA, LUZVIMINDA A. NOLASCO, VILMA G. GASCO, MORITA S. MARMETO, PROCESA JUANICO, ANTONIO A. MONDRAGON, JR., JESSICA F. QUIACHON, PACITA G. MEDINA, ARNEL S. SANTOS, ANECITA T. TARAS, TOMINDAO T. TARAS, NULCA C. SABDANI, AKMAD A. SABDANI, ROWENA J. GARCIA, LINA P. CASAS, MARLYN G. FRANCISCO, MERCEDITA MAQUINANO, NICOLAS T. RIO, TERESITA A. CASINAS, VIRGILIO F. IB-IB, PANTALEON S. ROJAS, JR., EVELYN V. BEATINGO, MATILDE G. HUSSIN, ESPERANZA I. LLEDO, ADOLFINA DELA MERCED, LAURA E. SANTOS, ROGACIANA MAQUILING, ALELIE D. SAMSON, SHIRLEY L. ALVAREZ, MAGDALENA A. MARCOS, VIRGINIA S. ESPINOSA, ANTONIO C. GUEVARA, AUGUSTA S. DE JESUS, SERVILLA A. BANCALE, PROSERFINA GATINAO, RASMA A. FABRIGA, ROLANDO D. GATINAO, ANALISA G. MEÑA, SARAH A. SALCEDO, ALICIA M. JAYAG, FERNANDO G. CABEROY, ROMEO R. PONCE, EDNA S. PONCE, TEODORA T. LUY, WALDERICO F. ARIÑO, MELCHOR S. BUCOY, EDITA H. CINCO, RUDY I. LIMBAROC, PETER MONTOJO, MARLYN S. ATILANO, REGIDOR MEDALLO, EDWIN O. DEMASUAY, DENNIS M. SUICANO, ROSALINA Q. ATILANO, ESTRELLA FELICIANO, IMELDA T. DAGALEA, MARILYN RUFINO, JOSE AGUSTIN, EFREN RIVERA, CRISALDO VALERO, SAFIA HANDANG, LUCENA R. MEDINA, DANNY BOY B. PANGASIAN, ABDURASA HASIL, ROEL ALTA, JOBERT BELTRAN, EDNA FAUSTO, TAJMAHAR HADJULA, ELENA MAGHANOY, ERIC B. QUITIOL, JESSE D. FLORES, GEMMA CANILLAS, ERNITO CANILLAS, MARILOU JAVIER, MARGANI MADDIN, RICHARD SENA, FE D. CANOY, GEORGE SALUD, EDGARDO BORGONIA, JR., ANTONIO ATILANO, JOSE CASTRO, AND LIBERATO BAGALANON, PETITIONERS, VS. MAR FISHING CO., INC., MIRAMAR FISHING CO., INC., ROBERT BUEHS AND JEROME SPITZ. RESPONDENTS.

  • [G.R. No. 152662 : June 13, 2012] PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, PETITIONER, VS. MA. THERESA PANGILINAN, RESPONDENT.

  • [G.R. No. 194255 : June 13, 2012] THE PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, VS. NURFRASIR HASHIM Y SARABAN A.K.A “FRANZ/FRANS,” MAKDUL JAMAD Y BUKIN (AL) A.K.A. “MACKY,” A CERTAIN “TAS,” AND A CERTAIN “JUN,” ACCUSED, BERNADETTE PANSACALA A.K.A. “NENENG AWID,” ACCUSED-APPELLANT.

  • [A.M. No. 09-8-6-SC : June 13, 2012] RE: REQUEST FOR COPY OF 2008 STATEMENT OF ASSETS, LIABILITIES AND NETWORTH [SALN] AND PERSONAL DATA SHEET OR CURRICULUM VITAE OF THE JUSTICES OF THE SUPREME COURT AND OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES OF THE JUDICIARY. [A.M. NO. 09-8-07-CA] RE: REQUEST OF PHILIPPINE CENTER FOR INVESTIGATIVE JOURNALISM [PCIJ] FOR THE 2008 STATEMENT OF ASSETS, LIABILITIES AND NET WORTH [SALN] AND PERSONAL DATA SHEETS OF THE COURT OF APPEALS JUSTICES.

  • [A.M. No. MTJ-12-1811 [Formerly A.M. OCA IPI No. 10-2313-MTJ] : June 13, 2012] LETICIA G. JACINTO COMPLAINANT, VS. JUDGE JOSEPHUS JOANNES H. ASIS, METROPOLITAN TRIAL COURT, BRANCH 40, QUEZON CITY, RESPONDENT.

  • [G.R. No. 166884 : June 13, 2012] LAND BANK OF THE PHILIPPINES, PETITIONER, VS. LAMBERTO C. PEREZ, NESTOR C. KUN, MA. ESTELITA P. ANGELES-PANLILIO, AND NAPOLEON O. GARCIA, RESPONDENTS.

  • [G.R. No. 195534 : June 13, 2012] PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, APPELLEE, VS. EDUARDO GONZALES, APPELLANT.

  • [G.R. No. 198402 : June 13, 2012] HEIRS OF PACENCIA RACAZA, NAMELY, VIRGINIA RACAZA COSCOS, ANGELES RACAZA MIEL, RODRIGO RACAZA, QUIRINO RACAZA, ROGELIO RACAZA, ERNESTA RACAZA AND ROLAND RACAZA, PETITIONERS, VS. SPOUSES FLORENCIO ABAY-ABAY, AND ELEUTERIA ABAY-ABAY,[1] RESPONDENTS.

  • [G.R. No. 187512 : June 13, 2012] REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES, PETITIONER, VS. YOLANDA CADACIO GRANADA, RESPONDENT.

  • [G.R. No. 186730 : June 13, 2012] JESSE YAP, PETITIONER, VS. COURT OF APPEALS (SPECIAL ELEVENTH [11TH] DIVISION), AND ELIZA CHUA AND EVELYN TE, RESPONDENTS.

  • [A.M. No. SB-12-18-P : June 13, 2012] SHIRLEY C. DIOMAMPO, RECORDS OFFICER II, SANDIGANBAYAN, COMPLAINANT, VS. FELIPE C. LARIBO, JR., PROMULGATED: SHUTTLE BUS DRIVER, SANDIGANBAYAN, RESPONDENT.

  • [G.R. No. 182920 : June 18, 2012] PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, APPELLEE, VS. MICHAEL BIGLETE Y CAMACHO, APPELLANT.

  • [G.R. No. 186722 : June 18, 2012] THE UNITED ABANGAN CLAN, INC., REPRESENTED BY CRISTITUTO F. ABANGAN, PETITIONER, VS. YOLANDA C. SABELLANO-SUMAGANG, ERNESTO TIRO, BASILISA CABELLON-MORENO, MARTIN C. TABURA, JR., ROMUALDO C. TABURA, ROLANDO CABELLON, REPRESENTED BY ROLANDO CABELLON, AND THE HONORABLE CITY CIVIL REGISTRAR OF CEBU CITY, RESPONDENTS.

  • [G.R. No. 186469 : June 18, 2012] THE PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, VS. JOVER MATIAS Y DELA FUENTE, ACCUSED-APPELLANT.

  • [G.R. No. 166044 : June 18, 2012] COUNTRY BANKERS INSURANCE CORPORATION, PETITIONER, VS. KEPPEL CEBU SHIPYARD, UNIMARINE SHIPPING LINES, INC., PAUL RODRIGUEZ, PETER RODRIGUEZ, ALBERT HONTANOSAS, AND BETHOVEN QUINAIN, RESPONDENTS.

  • [G.R. No. 158755 : June 18, 2012] SPOUSES FRANCISCO AND MERCED RABAT, PETITIONERS, VS. PHILIPPINE NATIONAL BANK, RESPONDENT.