ChanRobles™ Virtual Law Library | chanrobles.com™  
Main Index Law Library Philippine Laws, Statutes & Codes Latest Legal Updates Philippine Legal Resources Significant Philippine Legal Resources Worldwide Legal Resources Philippine Supreme Court Decisions United States Jurisprudence
Prof. Joselito Guianan Chan's The Labor Code of the Philippines, Annotated Labor Standards & Social Legislation Volume I of a 3-Volume Series 2019 Edition (3rd Revised Edition)
 

 
Chan Robles Virtual Law Library
 









 

 
UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT JURISPRUDENCE
 

 
PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT JURISPRUDENCE
 

   
January-1949 Jurisprudence                 

  • G.R. No. L-406 January 7, 1949 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. BIENVENIDO GARCIA

    082 Phil 496

  • G.R. No. L-1449 January 7, 1949 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. JOSE DOSAL, ET AL.

    082 Phil 501

  • G.R. No. L-1656 January 7, 1949 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ROMAN VILO

    082 Phil 524

  • G.R. No. L-1838 January 7, 1949 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. EXEQUIEL LACANLALE

    082 Phil 536

  • G.R. No. L-1874 January 7, 1949 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. MELECIO MEJIAS

    082 Phil 541

  • G.R. No. L-2327 January 11, 1949 - CANUTO F. PIMENTEL v. PEDRO FESTEJO

    082 Phil 545

  • G.R. No. L-1607 January 12, 1949 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ATANACIO FIGUIEROA

    082 Phil 559

  • G.R. Nos. L-1846-48 January 18, 1949 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. PEDRO REYES, ET AL.

    082 Phil 563

  • G.R. No. L-1591 January 20, 1949 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. CONRADO REFUERZO

    082 Phil 576

  • In re VICENTE SOTTO, for contempt of court : January 21, 1949 - 082 Phil 595

  • G.R. No. L-365 January 21, 1949 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ANTONIO RACAZA

    082 Phil 623

  • G.R. No. L-1278 January 21, 1949 - LORETO BARRIOQUINTO, ET AL. v. ENRIQUE A. FERNANDEZ, ET AL

    082 Phil 642

  • G.R. No. L-1369 January 21, 1949 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. MANUEL VALENCIA

    082 Phil 657

  • G.R. No. L-1187 January 25, 1949 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. EUFRACIO LANSANG

    082 Phil 662

  • G.R. No. L-1288 January 25, 1949 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. JACINTO PINEDA

    082 Phil 668

  • G.R. No. L-1561 January 25, 1949 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. JOSE CADA

    082 Phil 671

  • G.R. No. L-2456 January 25, 1949 - NICOLAS B. POTOT v. JUAN L. BAGANO, ET AL.

    082 Phil 679

  • G.R. No. L-986 January 26, 1949 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. FELIX ALCOVER

    082 Phil 681

  • G.R. No. L-1620 January 26, 1949 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. RUPERTO ARANGUREN, ET AL.

    082 Phil 696

  • G.R. No. L-300 January 28, 1949 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. FILOMENO CASTRO

    082 Phil 706

  • G.R. No. L-1481 January 28, 1949 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. EUGENIO ABENDAN, ET AL.

    082 Phil 711

  • G.R. No. L-1547 January 28, 1949 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. MAXIMO BATE

    082 Phil 716

  • G.R. No. L-1653 January 28, 1949 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. VICENTE TUMANDAO

    082 Phil 723

  • G.R. No. L-1677 January 28, 1949 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. CIRILO HUMARANG

    082 Phil 737

  • G.R. Nos. L-1642-44 January 29, 1949 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ALEJANDRO MENDIOLA, ET AL.

    082 Phil 740

  • G.R. No. L-2186 January 29, 1949 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. JUAN BULATAO

    082 Phil 753

  • G.R. No. L-2417 January 29, 1949 - DALMACIO CELINO v. ALEJANDRO BAUTISTA

    082 Phil 756

  • G.R. No. L-1805 January 31, 1949 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. BENJAMIN ALBANO

    082 Phil 767

  • G.R. No. L-2007 January 31, 1949 - WILLIAM CHIONGBIAN v. ALFREDO DE LEON, ET AL.

    082 Phil 771

  • G.R. No. L-2676 January 31, 1949 - LI KIM THO v. GO SIU KAO, ET AL.

    082 Phil 776

  • R-CA-No. 9871 January 31, 1949 - ANTONIO AUSTRIA v. JOSE E. LAUREL, ET AL.

    082 Phil 780

  •  





     
     

    G.R. No. L-1288   January 25, 1949 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. JACINTO PINEDA<br /><br />082 Phil 668

     
    PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

    EN BANC

    [G.R. No. L-1288. January 25, 1949.]

    THE PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. JACINTO PINEDA (alias ISING PINEDA), Defendant-Appellant.

    Ambrosio Padilla for Appellant.

    Assistant Solicitor General Manuel P. Barcelona and Solicitor Manuel Tomacruz for Appellee.

    SYLLABUS


    1. CRIMINAL LAW; TREASON; ATROCITIES COMMITTED ON GUERRILLA SUSPECTS AS CONSTITUTING ADHERENCE TO THE ENEMY. — The facts which were established and proven beyond reasonable doubt consisted of the arrest, inhuman killing of or atrocities committed upon guerrilla suspects by the enemies in which the herein accused had participated. Such deeds were overt acts of treason, affording the Japanese aid and comfort. By inference they constituted evidence of adherence to the enemy.


    D E C I S I O N


    TUASON, J.:


    The appellant, Jacinto Pineda alias Ising Pineda, was prosecuted in the People’s Court, charged with treason on six counts. The Third Division of that Court found the defendant guilty of the charges in counts 1, 3, 4 and 5, and acquitted him on counts 2 and 6.

    At least two eye-witnesses testified to each set of the following facts:chanrob1es virtual 1aw library

    Count 3. Benjamin Rayola, a resident of Lucena, Quezon, who had joined the Panay guerrillas, visited his home town with two other guerrillas, De Leon and Aguile, on December 22, 1944. As they were counting guerrilla notes at the home of Benjamin’s folks, on December 23, three Japanese and three Filipinos, one of whom was the appellant, arrested them with Benjamin’s mother and brother Amado, and marched them to the Japanese garrison. The raiding party slapped Benjamin, De Leon and Aguile, asked them why they had so much money, and thoroughly searched the house for arms. In the garrison, the prisoners were lined up, their names and ages were taken down and they were maltreated. Mrs. Rayola and Amado were released after a few days but Benjamin, Aguile and De Leon were not seen or heard of after the release of the first two.

    Count 4. On December 21, 1944, in Lucena, after mass, several Filipinos, including the accused, and two Japanese came to Jose Unson’s house and searched it thoroughly for firearms and radio. All of them were armed with pistols or revolvers. Not finding what they were looking for, they left. Later they came back and took Jose Unson to the garrison, releasing him on the night of that day. However, the next day, that is on the 22nd at noon, two Japanese came back and arrested Jose Unson again. After that arrest Jose Unson was not seen alive anymore. His remains were exhumed on all Saints’ Day in 1945 in Lukban, Quezon. The cause of Jose Unson’s arrest and execution was that he had a radio and had been tuning in on foreign broadcasts for war news which he used to pass on to his acquaintances and friends.

    Count 5. Federico Unson, Jr. and his family resided in barrio Bocoban, Lucena, Quezon. On October 6, 1944, at about ten o’clock in the morning, Japanese soldiers and four Filipinos came, picked up Federico Unson, questioned him and maltreated him. One of the Filipinos was Jacinto Pineda. All of them, Japanese and Filipinos, were carrying arms. Pineda did most of the questioning and slapped Unson during the examination. The subject of the investigation was the location of the guerrillas and the bodies of two makapilis who had been kidnapped and killed two days previously by the resistance forces. Other people in the barrio were questioned, too. While the investigation was going on, guerrillas swooped down on the Japanese and their allies and the latter fled, Jacinto Pineda having been wounded above the eye. About two o’clock in the afternoon the Japanese and their Filipino cohorts including the accused came back. There were about eight in the party. This time, the accused had a bandage around his head. Federico Unson and two of his laborers were tied together "back to back" and beaten up. The laborers’ names were Ruben Godoy and Isaias Perez. After Unson and his two laborers were punished, the whole barrio was razed to the ground. Then Godoy was marched by Japanese in one direction and Perez and Unson were marched by Japanese and Filipinos, including Pineda, in another direction. That was between three and four o’clock in the afternoon. The next day Unson and Perez were found dead. Unson was blindfolded and his body was almost suspended in midair from a coconut tree littered with wounds one of which was a gunshot wound in the chest. Perez’s body was in a more dreadful condition, lying flat on the ground and covered with flies.

    The appellant denied participation in any of the above arrests, beatings and executions. He denied having been a spy for the Japanese.

    We are convinced beyond reasonable doubt of the truth of the evidence for the prosecution, and find no error in the trial judges’ findings. If any error was committed, it was perhaps an error on the side of the accused — his exoneration from counts Nos. 2 and 6.

    The deeds committed by the appellant were overt acts of treason, affording the Japanese aid and comfort. By inference they constituted evidence of adherence to the enemy charged in count 1.

    The defendant has been properly sentenced to reclusion perpetua with the accessories of law and to pay a fine of P20,000 and costs. This judgment is affirmed with costs of this appeal against the Appellant.

    Moran, C.J., Paras, Feria, Pablo, Perfecto, Bengzon, Briones and Montemayor, JJ., concur.

    G.R. No. L-1288   January 25, 1949 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. JACINTO PINEDA<br /><br />082 Phil 668


    Back to Home | Back to Main

     

    QUICK SEARCH

    cralaw

       

    cralaw



     
      Copyright © ChanRobles Publishing Company Disclaimer | E-mail Restrictions
    ChanRobles™ Virtual Law Library | chanrobles.com™
     
    RED