Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence


Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 1951 > March 1951 Decisions > G.R. No. L-2316 March 5, 1951 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. RICARDO BEATO

088 Phil 288:




PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

EN BANC

[G.R. No. L-2316. March 5, 1951.]

THE PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. RICARDO BEATO, Defendant-Appellant.

Marcelino Lontok, for Appellant.

Assistant Solicitor General Ruperto Kapunan, Jr. and Solicitor Jaime de los Angeles, for Appellee.

SYLLABUS


1. TREASON; EVIDENCE; DEFENDANT’S IMPUTATION OF INTEREST, GRUDGE, AND RESENTMENT TO WITNESSES FOR GOVERNMENT, FOUND UNBELIEVABLE. — It is unbelievable that the seventeen witnesses for the prosecution testified falsely against the accused just to testify their alleged interest, grudge, and resentment. Other than the harm done by the defendant to the victims and some of the witnesses, which substantially constitute part of the crime alleged, no possible motive was shown why these numerous witnesses should have testified falsely against the defendant.


D E C I S I O N


JUGO, J.:


Ricardo Beato was accused before the People’s Court of treason under eleven counts.

Counts 2 and 8 were dismissed on the ground that only one witness testified on the alleged overt acts of the accused. With regard to counts 9 and 10, two witnesses testified, but the court below did not believe the testimony of one of them, leaving the testimony of the other insufficient for being alone. Consequently, counts 9 and 10 were also dismissed.

The court found the defendant guilty on counts 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 11 and sentenced him to suffer reclusion perpetua, with the accessory penalties of the law, and to pay a fine of P10,000 and the costs. The defendant appealed.

Count No. 1. — At about 6 o’clock in the afternoon of August 2, 1943, the defendant, accompanied by a number of Makapilis and a Japanese soldier by the name of Mayikawa, repaired to the house of the couple Roman Malapitan and Maxima Dedicatoria in Malusak Street, Santa Rosa, Laguna. The Makapilis were armed. They entered the house and arrested Roman Malapitan. The defendant and a Makapili by the name of Jose Dizon tied the hands of Malapitan, and the group took him away. Malapitan has not been heard of since. These facts were established by the testimony of Buenaventura Dichoso, Maxima Dedicatoria, and Concha Pascual.

Count No. 3. — While the spouses Leopoldo F. Santos and Candelaria N. de Santos were sleeping at about 3 o’clock in the morning of November 16, 1944, in their house in barrio Pook, Santa Rosa, Laguna, several Makapilis, one of whom was the defendant, wearing Japanese uniforms and accompanied by several Japanese soldiers, arrived at said house and called in a loud voice for Major Santos, who was a Philippine Army officer suspected by the Japanese and Makapilis as having organized a guerrilla company in Santa Rosa, Laguna. Two Japanese soldiers entered the house through the window, while the others entered by the door. They searched the house, looking for Major Santos. The Major jumped through the window and climbed up a nearby avocado tree. The Japanese and the Makapilis, finding him on a branch of the tree, thrust their bayonets at him. The Major received several wounds and fell to the ground. The group tied him up and took him to a truck nearby. Major Santos had never been heard of nor seen again until the following year when, upon information received from Florencio Malapitan, his grave was excavated and his remains were recovered. The above facts were established by the testimony of Angel Moldes, Pablo Alumno and Candelaria M. de Santos.

Count No. 4. — At about 4 o’clock in the morning of November 16, 1944, Teofila Lasaga and Julia Alinsod were awakened by a call of the policeman Pedrong Ocho at the door of their house in barrio Balibago, Santa Rosa, Laguna. When the door was opened, the defendant, together with Arsenio Batitis and Martin Laurel, entered the house while the rest of the party stayed outside. Those who entered lifted Roque Lasaga from his sick-bed. He was suspected as a guerrilla. The defendant and his companions, all armed and wearing Japanese uniforms, tied Roque and took him away. Roque was not heard of or seen again. The above facts were established by the testimony of Teofila Lasaga and Julia Alinsod.

Count No. 5. — At about 2 o’clock in the morning of November 16, 1944, the defendant wearing a Japanese uniform and carrying a rifle, with a company of armed Makapilis and Japanese soldiers, entered the house of Inocencio Alumno in the barrio of Masiit, Santa Rosa, Laguna. Inocencio and his sons Antonio and Conrado climbed up the roof of the house, but the Filipinos and Japanese seeing them, climbed up after them and caught them. Inocencio surrendered to the group, and was brought down to the ground where he was tied. While going to the waiting truck, Inocencio in the darkness succeeded in loosening the rope with which he was tied, and ran away. Noticing that Inocencio was missing, the group of Japanese and Makapilis including the defendant returned to Inocencio’s house and took away his sons Antonio and Conrado. The latter were never heard of nor seen again until their remains were identified by Inocencio when they were exhumed after the liberation. These facts were established by the testimony of Sancho Sayao Alumno and Inocencio Alumno.

Count No. 6. — On November 24, 1944, the defendant, with the Japanese officer Mayikawa and other Filipinos dressed in Japanese uniforms, went to the house of Emiliano Concepcion in Santa Rosa, Laguna, and arrested, tied, and placed him on a truck. Concepcion was not heard of or seen afterwards. These facts were established by the testimony of Amanda Batungal and Francisco Dichoso.

Count No. 7. — In the early morning of November 24, 1944, the defendant accompanied by several persons went to the house of Aurelio Lagarte in Santa Rosa, Laguna. Three of the group arrested Aurelio and brought him down. The other members of the group tied him and placed him on a truck. Aurelio has never been heard of nor seen thereafter. The above facts were established by the testimony of Francisco Dichoso, Buenaventura Legarte, and Beatriz Cabrijas.

Count No. 11. — During the Japanese occupation, the defendant was an active member of the Makapili organization and the Scout Battalion in charge of seizing food from the civilian population for the maintenance of the Japanese army. Defendant likewise took active part in the apprehension of guerrillas in Santa Rosa, Laguna. After February 4, 1945, when the American army had landed, the defendant joined the Japanese in their retreat to Rizal Province. Canuto Velandres, Francisco Dichoso, and Ruben Caro testified to the above facts.

Counsel for appellant attacks the credibility of the witnesses for the prosecution alleging that they testified prompted by their interest, grudge, and resentment, and are "morally incompetent." It is unbelievable that the seventeen witnesses for the prosecution testified falsely against the accused just to satisfy their alleged interest, grudge, and resentment. Other than the harm done by the accused against the victims and some of the witnesses, no possible motive was shown why these numerous witnesses should testify falsely against the defendant. It is true that some of these witnesses were themselves the victims of the accused and some were relatives of the several persons who have disappeared or have been killed through the acts of the accused in cooperation with the Makapilis and the Japanese soldiers. But, why should they have testified against the accused if the latter was not instrumental in committing these evils against their relatives and friends? It cannot be imagined that all these seventeen witnesses perversely conspired and connived against the defendant if he had not committed those acts. They had no possible motive for doing so.

Counsel for appellant maintains that Commonwealth Act No. 682, which created the People’s Court is unconstitutional; that the provisions of the Revised Penal Code regarding treason were suspended during the Japanese occupation; that the allegiance to the United States or the Government of the Philippine Islands was likewise suspended during the occupation; that allegiance to a sovereignty is conditioned upon the protection given by it, and, inasmuch as it was suspended in these Islands during the occupation, the act of collaborating with the enemy did not constitute treason.

It would be a waste of time for us to take up those questions as they have already been decided adversely to the appellant in the cases of Laurel v. The Director of Prisons, (77 Phil., 856, 44 Off. Gaz. [No. 4] 1176), and People v. Apolonio Carlos (78 Phil., 535, 44 Off. Gaz. [No 11], 4281).

In view of the foregoing, the decision appealed from is affirmed in all its parts, with costs against appellant. So ordered.

Moran, C.J., Paras, Feria, Pablo, Bengzon, Padilla, Tuason, Montemayor and Reyes, JJ., concur.




Back to Home | Back to Main




















chanrobles.com





ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com






March-1951 Jurisprudence                 

  • G.R. No. L-3362 March 1, 1951 - ISABEL HERREROS VDA. DE GIL v. PILAR GIL VDA. DE MURCIANO

    088 Phil 260

  • G.R. No. L-2316 March 5, 1951 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. RICARDO BEATO

    088 Phil 288

  • G.R. No. L-3097 March 5, 1951 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. CASIMIRO BERSAMIN, ET AL.

    088 Phil 292

  • G.R. No. L-4069 March 5, 1951 - RODOBALDO GANDICELA v. DEOGRACIAS LUTERO

    088 Phil 299

  • G.R. No. 4108 March 5, 1951 - MELENCIO ANDRES v. EL DIRECTOR DE PRISIONES

    088 Phil 308

  • G.R. No. L-3440 March 6, 1951 - ANATOLIO HENSON v. J. K. PICKERING & CO., LTD.

    088 Phil 313

  • G.R. No. L-3410 March 7, 1951 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. SIMEON DE VILLA

    088 Phil 319

  • G.R. No. L-3244 March 8, 1951 - VALERIANA GUANTIA, ET AL. v. ELENA TATOY, ET AL.

    088 Phil 329

  • G.R. No. L-3031 March 15, 1951 - AMANDA MADAMBA VDA. DE ADIARTE v. EMILIANA TUMANENG

    088 Phil 333

  • G.R. No. L-3830 March 15, 1951 - URBAN ESTATES, INC. v. AGUSTIN P. MONTESA, ET AL.

    088 Phil 348

  • G.R. No. L-2958 March 16, 1951 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. PATRICIO ROSAS

    088 Phil 355

  • G.R. No. L-3399 March 16, 1951 - FELIPE AGUASIN v. ANANIAS VELASQUEZ, ET AL.

    088 Phil 357

  • G.R. No. L-2543 March 19, 1951 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. MAGONDACAN BURANSING

    088 Phil 363

  • G.R. No. L-3008 March 19, 1951 - FEDERICO SORIANO v. PEOPLE OF THE PHIL.

    088 Phil 368

  • G.R. No. L-3477 March 19, 1951 - PHILIPPINE NATIONAL BANK v. JOSE R. JACINTO

    088 Phil 376

  • G.R. No. L-3498 March 19, 1951 - PHILIPPINE NATIONAL BANK v. SERGIO M. SILO

    088 Phil 379

  • G.R. No. L-3629 March 19, 1951 - ELISEO SILVA v. BELEN CABRERA

    088 Phil 381

  • G.R. No. L-3781 March 19, 1951 - TOPANDAS VERHOMAL v. BIENVENIDO A. TAN

    088 Phil 389

  • G.R. No. L-4150 March 20, 1951 - MANILA TERMINAL RELIEF AND MUTUAL AID ASSOCIATION v. MANILA TERMINAL CO., INC., ET AL.

    088 Phil 395

  • G.R. No. L-4313 March 20, 1951 - PEDRO P. VILLA v. FIDEL IBAÑEZ, ET AL.

    088 Phil 402

  • G.R. No. L-1621 March 29, 1951 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ANDRES BUCOY

    088 Phil 406

  • G.R. No. L-3563 March 29, 1951 - ABLAZA TRANSPORTATION CO., INC. v. FELICIANO OCAMPO, ET AL.

    088 Phil 412

  • G.R. No. L-3762 March 29, 1951 - ANGELES RODRIGUEZ, ET AL. v. COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE OF RIZAL, ET AL.

    088 Phil 417

  • G.R. No. L-2059 March 30, 1951 - EL PUEBLO DE FILIPINAS v. JESUS ASTROLOGO

    088 Phil 423