Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence


Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 1951 > October 1951 Decisions > G.R. No. L-4015 October 30, 1951 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. LUCIANO GARCIOLA

090 Phil 285:




PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

EN BANC

[G.R. No. L-4015. October 30, 1951.]

THE PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. LUCIANO GARCIOLA, Accused-Appellant.

First Assistant Solicitor General Roberto L. Gianzon and Solicitor Isidro C. Borromeo, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Fernando C. Sudario,, for Defendant-Appellant.

SYLLABUS


1. CRIMINAL LAW; HOMICIDE OR MURDER? — The defendant’s act in mentioning his public office to the victim who was hiding in his house and in stabbing the victim as soon as the latter opened up, constitutes treachery that qualifies the crime as murder.

2. ID.; AGGRAVATING CIRCUMSTANCES OF TAKING ADVANTAGE OF PUBLIC POSITION, NOT CONSIDERED. — Probably defendant’s act in mentioning his office was a part of the scheme to catch the victim unaware. It may therefore be considered as imbided in the element of treachery, and cannot be appreciated as an aggravating circumstance in computing the penalty.


D E C I S I O N


BENGZON, J.:


Convicted of homicide and sentenced to imprisonment ranging between prision mayor and reclusion temporal, Luciano Garciola appealed to the Court of Appeals from the Leyte court of first instance. After careful examination of the record, the appellate tribunal reached the conclusion that as charged in the information, the offense was murder, punishable with reclusion perpetua. Wherefore it forwarded the expendiente to this Supreme Court pursuant to pertinent provisions of the Judiciary Act of 1948.

According to the witnesses for the prosecution in the afternoon of February 22, 1946 Carlos Cale was seen running towards the house of his mother in barrio Badiang, Jaro, Leyte. He was pursued by Gaudencio Garciola and Pablo Garciola, who having found the door closed after Carlos had entered, tried vainly to force it open. A few minutes later the accused Luciano Garciola, the father of the Garciolas, arrived, bolo in hand. Being a barrio lieutenant he ordered the fugitive to open up saying "Carlos, beware I am a peace officer." Upon hearing this, and believing he would not be harmed, Carlos Cale opened and appeared at the window. In a flash Luciano stabbed him on the right chest with his bolo, inflicting a deep wound that penetrated the thoracic cavity. Brought to the hospital without unnecessary delay, Carlos Cale died five days later due to excessive internal hemorrhage.

In August, 1947 the prosecution presented its witnesses. For reasons that do not appear, the accused began introducing his evidence in February, 1949. In the meantime Pablo Garciola died. The line of defense then was that Pablo Garciola had wounded and killed Carlos Cale under the following circumstances:chanrob1es virtual 1aw library

That day Carlos Cale while plowing on the field hit the post of Simplicio Capatoy’s house. Gaudencio Garciola reprimanded him for it. Resenting the interference, Cale picked a stick and hit Gaudencio on the head. Pablo who was behind his brother, rallied to his aid and stabbed Cale.

This unlikely version was rejected by the trial judge. It was obviously an eleventh hour attempt at exculpation by "passing the buck" to a dead man. It was not shown that Capatoy’s connection with the Garciolas called for such heated denunciation and defense a to cause the loss of one man’s life. The stick was not even submitted in evidence if only to lend plausibility to the retaliation story.

On the other hand the eyewitnesses (Marcela Juliano and Benita Morfe) have no motive whatsoever falsely to attribute the death to Luciano Garciola, who, by the way, is a relative of Benita. And this defendant’s alibi turned out to be inadequate. His account was that on February 22, 1946, he proceeded to the poblacion summoned as "barrio teniente" by the municipal mayor for a meeting of barrio lieutenants, and ate his meal in the house of Vedasto Samson returning home on the next day. But Vedasto Samson did not testify to corroborate his story. And he presented Exhibit 1 supposedly the order of the mayor calling him to the meeting. Yet the exhibit is dated February 20, 1949.

True there is in the stenographic notes a statement by defendant’s counsel that the accused desisted from presenting Vedasto Samson, since his testimony "would only be corroborative." However such statement can not take the place of declarations under oath made in court by the witness himself, inasmuch as the other party is entitled to cross-examine him.

The offense is murder, qualified by treachery as set out in the amended information. The Solicitor-General points at two aggravating circumstances to wit: taking advantage of public position and dwelling. Probably defendant’s act in mentioning his office was a part of the scheme to catch the victim unaware. It may therefore be considered as imbibed in the element of treachery. Any way there are not enough votes to impose the capital punishment.

Therefore the appealed decision will be modified in the sense that appellant shall be imprisoned for life. He shall indemnify the heirs in the amount of P2,000 pesos fixed by the lower court. Furthermore he shall pay costs in both instances. So ordered.

Paras, C.J., Feria, Pablo, Padilla, Tuason, Reyes and Jugo, JJ., concur.




Back to Home | Back to Main




















chanrobles.com





ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com






October-1951 Jurisprudence                 

  • G.R. No. L-3926 October 10, 1951 - CLARO CORTES v. CO BUN KIM

    090 Phil 167

  • G.R. No. L-4855 October 11, 1951 - JOSE M. NAVA, ET AL. v. MAGNO GATMAITAN

    090 Phil 172

  • G.R. No. L-4178 October 18, 1951 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ALFONSO PABLO

    090 Phil 222

  • G.R. No. L-4009 October 19, 1951 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. IRINEO C. IBASCO

    090 Phil 225

  • G.R. No. L-3857 October 22, 1951 - HILARION SARCEPUEDES v. PEOPLE OF THE PHIL.

    090 Phil 228

  • G.R. No. L-4201 October 22, 1951 - ALEJANDRO D. ALMENDRAS v. ROMULO V. RAMOS

    090 Phil 231

  • G.R. No. L-4059 October 23, 1951 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. TEOFILO OGBAC

    090 Phil 235

  • G.R. No. L-3095 October 25, 1951 - MATILDE GUERRA, ET AL. v. EULALIO TOLENTINO, ET AL.

    090 Phil 240

  • G.R. No. L-3465 October 25, 1951 - FORTUNATO F. HALILI v. JORGE R. FLORO

    090 Phil 245

  • G.R. No. L-3709 October 25, 1951 - ENGRACIO DE ASIS v. JOSE V. AGDAMAG, ET. AL.

    090 Phil 249

  • G.R. No. L-4120 October 25, 1951 - AMANDA DE GUZMAN v. FELINO CH. FERNANDO, ET AL.

    090 Phil 251

  • G.R. No. L-4134 October 25, 1951 - C. N. HODGES v. MANUEL R. VILLANUEVA

    090 Phil 255

  • G.R. No. L-3802 October 26, 1951 - VADIM N. CHIRSKOFF v. COMMISSIONER OF IMMIGRATION, ET AL.

    090 Phil 256

  • G.R. No. L-3369 October 26, 1951 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ALFONSO ABALOS, ET AL.

    090 Phil 261

  • G.R. No. L-4183 October 26, 1951 - NATIONAL DENTAL SUPPLY CO. v. BIBIANO MEER

    090 Phil 265

  • G.R. No. L-3458 October 29, 1951 - EL PUEBLO DE FILIPINAS v. FLORENTINO ANTONIO

    090 Phil 269

  • G.R. No. L-3619 October 29, 1951 - BERNARDO TIGLAO v. ENGRACIO BOTONES

    090 Phil 275

  • G.R. No. L-4006 October 29, 1951 - LUIS LUCIANO v. BIENVENIDO TAN, ET AL.

    090 Phil 282

  • G.R. No. L-4015 October 30, 1951 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. LUCIANO GARCIOLA

    090 Phil 285

  • G.R. No. L-4369 October 30, 1951 - LUCIA JAVIER v. J. ANTONIO ARANETA

    090 Phil 287

  • G.R. No. L-4396 October 30, 1951 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. SERGIO DAGATAN, ET AL.

    090 Phil 294

  • G.R. No. L-4408 October 30, 1951 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. FRANCISCO CASTILLO

    090 Phil 298

  • G.R. Nos. L-2875 and L-3114 to L-3208 October 31, 1951 - MANILA YELLOW TAXICAB, ET AL. v. PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, ET AL.

    090 Phil 301

  • G.R. No. L-3316 October 31, 1951 - JOSE PONCE DE LEON v. SANTIAGO SYJUCO

    090 Phil 311

  • G.R. No. L-3457 October 31, 1951 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. IGMEDIO SAMSON, ET AL.

    090 Phil 334

  • G.R. No. L-3777 October 31, 1951 - VALENTINA ZAMORA, ET AL. v. TOMAS MEDRAN, ET AL.

    090 Phil 339

  • G.R. No. L-3905 October 31, 1951 - GONZALO P. NAVA, ET AL. v. RAMON R. SAN JOSE, ET AL.

    090 Phil 341

  • G.R. No. L-4253 October 31, 1951 - CHARLES K. ANDREU v. COMMISSIONER OF IMMIGRATION, ET AL.

    090 Phil 347

  • G.R. No. L-4300 October 31, 1951 - SATURNINO DAVID v. SIMEON RAMOS, ET AL.

    090 Phil 351

  • G.R. No. 4917-R October 31, 1951 - IRENEO M. SANTOS v. MANUEL S. RUSTIA

    090 Phil 358