Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence


Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 1954 > January 1954 Decisions > G.R. No. L-6137 January 22, 1954 - GAUDENCIO MANIGRAS v. ESTEBAN DE GUZMAN and RAFAEL MACATANGAS

094 Phil 245:




PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

EN BANC

[G.R. No. L-6137. January 22, 1954.]

GAUDENCIO MANIGRAS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. ESTEBAN DE GUZMAN and RAFAEL MACATANGAS, Respondents-Appellees.

Federico Blay for Appellant.

Pablo Aguila for Appellees.


SYLLABUS


1. ADMINISTRATIVE LAW; CIVIL SERVICE LAW; POSITIONS IN THE CLASSIFIED SERVICE; POSITION OF CHIEF OF POLICE OF A MUNICIPALITY. — The position of municipal chief of police is in the classified service, and appointment thereto may be authorized by the Commissioner of Civil Service as "temporary" for the period fixed in section 628 of the Revised Administrative Code.

2. ID.; ID.; REPLACEMENT OF NON-ELIGIBLE BY NON-ELIGIBLE. — A non-eligible may be replaced by another non-eligible, but the latter’s appointment "shall continue only for such period not exceeding three months as may be necessary to make appointment through certification of eligibles, and in no case shall extend beyond thirty days from receipt by the chief of the bureau or office of the Commissioner’s certificate of eligibles."


D E C I S I O N


REYES, J.:


Appointed Chief of Police of Rosario, Batangas, on September 21, 1951, by the mayor of that municipality, but replaced by another more than three months thereafter, the petitioner Gaudencio Manigbas brought quo warranto proceedings in the Court of First Instance of the province to contest the legality of his removal from office and the appointment of the respondent Esteban de Guzman in his place, and upon receiving an adverse decision took an appeal to this Court, contending that the lower court erred in holding that a municipal mayor had discretionary power summarily to remove without cause a chief of police holding a temporary appointment as a civil service non-eligible and replace him with another non-eligible under an appointment likewise temporary.

It appears that petitioner and respondent were civil service non- eligibles and their appointments were authorized by the Commission on Civil Service as "temporary" under section 682 of the Revised Administrative Code, which provides that when a position in the classified service - and the post of municipal chief of police is of that nature - is temporarily filled by the appointment of one who is not a qualified civil service eligible, such appointment "shall continue only for such period not exceeding three months as may be necessary to make appointment through certification of eligibles, and in no case shall extend beyond thirty days from receipt by the chief of the bureau of office of the Commissioner’s certificate of eligibles." Interpreting this provision in the case of Orais Et. Al. v. Ribo Et. Al., G. R. No. L-4945, decided on October 28, 1953, we held that "the holding of a position by a temporary appointee until replaced by an eligible in disregard of the time limitation of three months is unauthorized and illegal," and that "the replacement of non- eligibles by non-eligibles is lawful under and pursuant to section 682 of the Revised Administrative Code." Conformably to those pronouncements, we ruled in the case of Paña Et. Al. v. City Mayor Et. Al. * G. R. No. L-5700, decided December 18, 1953, that, as the positions of members of the police department of a city are embraced within the classified service, non-eligibles appointed to those positions can not continue in office for more than three-months and can, therefore, be thereafter replaced by other non-eligibles. The present case being on all fours with the one last cited, the decision appealed from must be, as it is hereby, affirmed, with costs against the Appellant.

Paras, C.J., Pablo, Bengzon, Padilla, Montemayor, Jugo, Bautista Angelo and Labrador, JJ., concur.

Endnotes:



*. Supra, p. 103.




Back to Home | Back to Main




















chanrobles.com





ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com






January-1954 Jurisprudence                 

  • G.R. No. L-6404 January 12, 1954 - PEDRO CALANO v. PEDRO CRUZ

    094 Phil 230

  • G.R. No. L-5064 January 14, 1954 - CONSUELO G. GUANZON ET AL. v. ROBERTO LLANTADA

    094 Phil 234

  • G.R. No. L-5810 January 18, 1954 - FRANCISCO MARASIGAN v. FELICISIMO RONQUILLO

    094 Phil 237

  • G.R. No. L-5684 January 22, 1954 - THE PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES v. PELAGIO MOSTASESA and PAULINO DUMAGAT

    094 Phil 243

  • G.R. No. L-6137 January 22, 1954 - GAUDENCIO MANIGRAS v. ESTEBAN DE GUZMAN and RAFAEL MACATANGAS

    094 Phil 245

  • G.R. No. L-6314 January 22, 1954 - PEDRO TEODORO v. AGAPITO BALATBAT ET AL.

    094 Phil 247

  • G.R. No. L-5561 January 26, 1954 - LAZARO MONDOÑIDO v. PRESCA ALAURA VDA. DE RODA

    094 Phil 251

  • G.R. No. L-6342 January 26, 1954 - PHILIPPINE NATIONAL BANK v. LAUREANO ATENDIDO

    094 Phil 254

  • G.R. No. L-6415 January 26, 1954 - CO TE HUE v. DEMETRIO B. ENCARNACION

    094 Phil 258

  • G.R. No. L-4916 January 27, 1954 - 4ABLAZA TRANS. CO., INC. v. PROVINCIAL GOV’T. OF BULACAN

    094 Phil 261

  • G.R. No. L-6496 January 27, 1954 - LEOPOLDO R. JALANDONI v. DEMETRIO N. SARCON

    094 Phil 266

  • Adm. No. 104 January 28, 1954 - BENITA S. BALINON v. CELESTINO M. DE LEON ET AL.

    094 Phil 277

  • G.R. No. L-5412 January 28, 1954 - NATIONAL COCONUT CORPORATION v. MAXIMO M. KALAW ET AL.

    094 Phil 282

  • G.R. No. L-5552 January 28, 1954 - ANTONIO DELUMEN ET AL v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES

    094 Phil 287

  • G.R. No. L-5623 January 28, 1954 - MANILA TRADING & SUPPLY CO. v. REG. OF DEEDS OF MANILA

    094 Phil 290

  • G.R. No. L-5775 January 28, 1954 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. AGUSTIN PIAMONTE

    094 Phil 293

  • G.R. Nos. L-5984 & L-5985 January 28, 1954 - FRANCISCO SEGOVIA v. PRISCILA GARCIA, ET AL.

    094 Phil 300

  • G.R. Nos. L-5841 & L-5842 January 29, 1954 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. JUAN CUARESMA

    094 Phil 305

  • G.R. No. L-6589 January 29, 1954 - ELIGIO CARAECLE v. THE COURT OF APPEALS and FELIX DEL CASTILLO

    094 Phil 308

  • G.R. No. L-5736 January 30, 1954 - VALENTIN ALIGARBES v. JUAN AGUILAR

    094 Phil 313

  • G.R. No. L-5937 January 30, 1954 - PEDRO MENDOZA v. JUSTINA CAPARROS Y OTROS

    094 Phil 317