Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence


Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 1954 > May 1954 Decisions > G.R. No. L-6408 May 24, 1954 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. EPIFANIO CARULASDULASAN, ET AL.

095 Phil 8:




PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

EN BANC

[G.R. No. L-6408. May 24, 1954.]

THE PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. EPIFANIO CARULASDULASAN and NICASIO BECAREL, Defendants-Appellants.

Solicitor General Juan R. Liwag and Solicitor Meliton G. Soliman for Appellee.

Francisco E. Remotigue for appellants.


SYLLABUS


1. ESTAFA,; FACTS SUFFICIENT TO MAKE UP THE CRIME. — Where the accused, with deliberate intent to defraud their landlord, sold all the abaca harvested by them from his plantation without giving the latter his share, which they are under obligation to deliver, and appropriated the proceeds thereof to their own use and benefit to the damage and prejudice of the landlord, — these facts are sufficient to make up the crime of estafa as defined in subsection 1(b) of article 315 of the Revised Penal Code.


D E C I S I O N


REYES, J.:


Epifanio Carulasdulasan and Nicasio Becarel were accused in the Court of First Instance of Cebu of the crime of estafa committed, according to the information, as follows:jgc:chanrobles.com.ph

"That during the month of December, 1950, in the municipality of Dalaguete, Province of Cebu, Philippines, and within the jurisdiction of this Court, the above-named accused, being then tenants or Crispin Almagro, and as such had the express obligation to share one-half of whatever product they could harvest from the land of the latter, conspiring together and helping each other and with deliberate intent to defraud said Crispin Almagro, the accused herein having stripped 600 kilos of abaca planted on their landlord’s land, of which he was entitled to one-half of this quantity or 300 kilos sold them all without giving said Crispin Almagro his corresponding share and appropriated the proceeds thereof for their own use and benefit and despite several demands with the aid of the police authorities of the aforesaid municipality the accused, refused and still refuse to give the offended party his share and to his damage and prejudice in the amount of P330, the value of 300 kilos as his rightful share."cralaw virtua1aw library

Upon arraignment the accused asked for the dismissal of the case on the ground that the facts alleged in the information did not constitute estafa. As the trial court granted the motion, the provincial fiscal interposed the present appeal.

We agree with the Solicitor General that the facts alleged in the information make up the crime of estafa defined in subsection 1(b) of article 315 of the Revised Penal Code, which refers to fraud committed —

"By misappropriating or converting, to the prejudice of another, money, goods, or any other personal property received by the offender in trust or on commission, or for administration, or under any other circumstance involving the duty to make delivery of or to return the same, even though such obligation be totally or partially guaranteed by a bond; or by denying having received such money, goods, or other property."cralaw virtua1aw library

From the facts alleged it is clear that the accused received from the sale of the abaca harvested by them a sum of money which did not all belong to them because one-half of it corresponds to the landlord’s share of the abaca under the tenancy agreement. This half the accused were under obligation to deliver to the landlord. They therefore held it in trust for him. But instead of turning it over to him, they appropriated it to their own use and refused to give it to him notwithstanding repeated demands. In other words, the accused are charged with having committed fraud by misappropriating or converting to the prejudice of another money received by them in trust or under circumstances which made it their duty to deliver it to its owner. Obviously, this is a form of fraud specially covered by the penal provision above cited.

The learned trial Judge held the provision inapplicable on the theory that "the abaca in question was not received by the accused from anybody but had been harvested by them, as tenants, from the plantation of the complainant." His Honor has obviously overlooked the fact that what the accused are charged with having misappropriated is the landlord’s share of the purchase price received by them for the abaca which they sold.

As authority for holding that upon the facts alleged in the information the accused could not be held guilty of estafa, the trial court cites the case of U. S. v. Reyes, 6 Phil., 441, which is clearly inapplicable to the case at bar. In that case the lessee of several parcels of land entered into an agreement with one Julian Reyes for the cultivation of said land under certain conditions, one of which was that the harvest was to be divided between them share and share alike. But when the crop was harvested Reyes sold it without giving his partner his share. Convicted of theft in the court of first instance, Reyes was, upon appeal to this Court, acquitted of that crime, this Court holding that the unlawful disposal of his partner’s share of the crop by Reyes "was undoubtedly a violation of their contract and a trespass upon the rights of another and not an act constituting the crime of theft." It should be noted, however, that while Reyes was acquitted of the charge of theft this Court did not hold that he was not guilty of estafa. On the contrary, this Court seems to have given thought to the suggestion of the Solicitor General that the crime committed by Reyes was not theft but estafa, on which reason this Court, in acquitting Reyes of theft, did so" ’without prejudice to the institution of any other action that may be proper" and remanded the case to the court below "for proper procedure."cralaw virtua1aw library

Applying the corresponding provision of the Spanish Penal Code, the Spanish Supreme Court, in its decision of December 20, 1930, sustained the conviction for estafa of a tenant (aparcero) who sold crop gathered from the land held by him as tenant without giving the landlord his share thereof.

In any event, supposing that subsection 1(b) of article 315 of the Revised Penal Code is not applicable, still the information alleges sufficient facts to make the accused criminally liable under the first paragraph of article 318, which punishes "any person who shall defraud or damage another by any other deceit not mentioned in the preceding articles of this chapter," it being averred that the accused "with deliberate intent to defraud" their landlord sold all the abaca harvested by them from his plantation without giving the latter his share and appropriated the proceeds thereof to their own use and benefit to the damage and prejudice of the landlord in the amount of P330.

In view of the foregoing, the order of dismissal is revoked and the case remanded to the court below for further proceedings.

Paras, C.J., Pablo, Bengzon, Montemayor, Jugo, Bautista Angelo, Labrador and Concepcion, JJ., concur.




Back to Home | Back to Main




















chanrobles.com





ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com






May-1954 Jurisprudence                 

  • G.R. No. L-6669 May 3, 1954 - PEDRO DAQUIS v. MAXIMO BUSTOS

    094 Phil 913

  • G.R. No. L-6736 May 4, 1954 - ISABEL GABRIEL, ET AL. v. DEMETRIO B. ENCARNACION, ET AL.

    094 Phil 917

  • G.R. No. L-6220 May 7, 1954 - MARTINA QUIZANA v. GAUDENCIO REDUGERIO, ET AL.

    094 Phil 922

  • G.R. No. L-5773 May 10, 1954 - CASIMIRO, ET AL. v. FABIAN SOBERANO

    094 Phil 927

  • G.R. No. L-6538 May 10, 1954 - PABLO BURGUETE v. JOVENCIO Q. MAYOR, ET AL.

    094 Phil 930

  • G.R. No. L-5694 May 12, 1954 - PAMBUJAN SUR UNITED MINE WORKERS v. SAMAR MINING CO., INC.

    094 Phil 932

  • G.R. No. L-6666 May 12, 1954 - GORGONIO PANDES v. JOSE TEODORO SR., ET AL.

    094 Phil 942

  • G.R. No. L-6765 May 12, 1954 - FULGENCIO VEGA, ET AL. v. MUN. BOARD OF THE CITY OF ILOILO, ET AL.

    094 Phil 949

  • G.R. No. L-4918 May 14, 1954 - REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL. v. JOSE LEON GONZALEZ, ET AL.

    094 Phil 956

  • G.R. No. L-5689 May 14, 1954 - JUAN DE G. RODRIGUEZ, ET AL. v. AURELIO MONTINOLA, ET AL.

    094 Phil 964

  • G.R. No. L-5900 May 14, 1954 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. PAULINO FRANCISCO

    094 Phil 975

  • G.R. No. L-5942 May 14, 1954 - R.F.C. v. HONORABLE COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

    094 Phil 984

  • G.R. No. L-6313 May 14, 1954 - ROYAL SHIRT FACTORY, INC. v. CO

    094 Phil 994

  • G.R. No. L-6444 May 14, 1954 - MUN. OF CALOOCAN v. MANOTOK REALTY, INC. ET AL.

    094 Phil 1003

  • G.R. No. L-6572 May 14, 1954 - MAX CHAMORRO & CO. v. PHIL. READY-MIX CONCRETE CO., INC., ET AL.

    094 Phil 1005

  • G.R. No. L-6792 May 14, 1954 - FAUSTO D. LAQUIAN v. FILOMENA SOCCO, ET AL.

    094 Phil 1010

  • G.R. No. L-6921 May 14, 1954 - EUGENIO CATILO v. GAVINO S. ABAYA

    094 Phil 1014

  • G.R. No. L-6481 May 17, 1954 - JESUS GUIAO v. ALBINO L. FIGUEROA

    094 Phil 1018

  • G.R. No. L-7045 May 18, 1954 - BENIGNO C. GUTIERREZ v. LAUREANO JOSE RUIZ, ET AL.

    094 Phil 1024

  • G.R. No. L-5378 May 24, 1954 - CO TIONG SA v. DIRECTOR OF PATENTS

    095 Phil 1

  • G.R. No. L-6408 May 24, 1954 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. EPIFANIO CARULASDULASAN, ET AL.

    095 Phil 8

  • G.R. No. L-6522 May 24, 1954 - LUIS B. UVERO, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

    095 Phil 11

  • G.R. No. L-6807 May 24, 1954 - JESUS SACRED HEART COLLEGE v. COLLECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE

    095 Phil 16

  • G.R. No. L-6870 May 24, 1954 - ELENA AMEDO v. RIO Y OLABARRIETA, INC.

    095 Phil 33

  • G.R. No. L-6988 May 24, 1954 - U.S.T. HOSPITAL EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION v. STO. TOMAS UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL

    095 Phil 40

  • G.R. No. L-4817 May 26, 1954 - SILVESTRE M. PUNSALAN v. MUNICIPAL BOARD OF THE CITY OF MANILA, ET AL.

    095 Phil 46

  • G.R. No. L-5682 May 26, 1954 - ANASTACIO N. ABAD v. CANDIDA CARGANILLO VDA. DE YANCE

    095 Phil 51

  • G.R. No. L-5807 May 26, 1954 - BASILIA CABRERA, ET AL. v. FLORENCIA BELEN, ET AL.

    095 Phil 54

  • G.R. No. L-5906 May 26, 1954 - ANGAT-MANILA TRANSPORTATION CO., INC. v. VICTORIA VDA. DE TENGCO

    095 Phil 58

  • G.R. No. L-5953 May 26, 1954 - EX-MERALCO EMPLOYEES TRANSPORTATION CO., INC. v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

    095 Phil 61

  • G.R. No. L-6246 May 26, 1954 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. FELIX RIPAS

    095 Phil 63

  • G.R. No. L-6260 May 26, 1954 - HERMOGENES TARUC v. BACHRACH MOTOR CO.

    095 Phil 73

  • G.R. No. L-6306 May 26, 1954 - FORTUNATO HALILI v. MARIA LLORET, ET AL.

    095 Phil 78

  • G.R. No. L-6353 May 26, 1954 - DANIEL CABANGANGAN v. ROBERTO CONCEPCION, ET AL.

    095 Phil 87

  • G.R. No. L-6463 May 26, 1954 - RIZAL SURETY & INSURANCE CO. v. MARCIANO DE LA PAZ

    095 Phil 90

  • G.R. Nos. L-6675-81 May 26, 1954 - BIENVENIDO E. DOLLENTE v. EL PUEBLO DE FILIPINAS

    095 Phil 97

  • G.R. No. L-7024 May 26, 1954 - ROMAN TOLSA v. ALEJANDRO J. PANLILIO, ET AL.

    095 Phil 104

  • G.R. No. L-4935 May 28, 1954 - J.M. TUASON & CO., INC. v. QUIRINO BOLAÑOS

    095 Phil 106

  • G.R. No. L-6462 May 28, 1954 - BELEN JOVE LAGRIMAS v. TITO LAGRIMAS

    095 Phil 113

  • G.R. No. L-6967 May 28, 1954 - JOSE PONCE DE LEON v. FIDEL IBAÑEZ, ET AL.

    095 Phil 119

  • G.R. No. L-7042 May 28, 1954 - CLOTILDE MEJIA VDA. DE ALFAFARA v. PLACIDO MAPA, ET AL.

    095 Phil 125

  • G.R. No. L-3663 May 31, 1954 - EL PUEBLO DE FILIPINAS v. MARIA VELASCO RODRIGUEZ, ET AL.

    095 Phil 135

  • G.R. No. L-4510 May 31, 1954 - MARC DONNELLY & ASSOCIATES, INC. v. MANUEL AGREGADO, ET AL.

    095 Phil 142

  • G.R. No. L-4633 May 31, 1954 - GREGORIO ARANETA, INC. v. PHILIPPINE NATIONAL BANK

    095 Phil 160

  • G.R. No. L-5824 May 31, 1954 - PAZ PAREJA v. JULIO PAREJA

    095 Phil 167

  • G.R. No. L-5837 May 31, 1954 - CRISTOBAL BONNEVIE, ET AL. v. JAIME HERNANDEZ

    095 Phil 175

  • G.R. No. L-6018 May 31, 1954 - EMILIANO MORABE v. WILLIAM BROWN

    095 Phil 181

  • G.R. No. L-6122 May 31, 1954 - AURELIA DE LARA, ET AL. v. JACINTO AYROSO

    095 Phil 185

  • G.R. No. L-6461 May 31, 1954 - PILAR ARAULLO MACOY v. CARMEN VASQUEZ TRINIDAD, ET AL.

    095 Phil 192

  • G.R. Nos. L-7403 & L-7426 May 31, 1954 - COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS v. GAVINO S. ABAYA, ET AL.

    095 Phil 205