Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence


Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 1962 > April 1962 Decisions > G.R. No. L-16172 April 28, 1962 - ARSENIO SUMILANG v. GUALBERTO CASTILLO, ET AL. :




PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

EN BANC

[G.R. No. L-16172. April 28, 1962.]

ARSENIO SUMILANG, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GUALBERTO CASTILLO, ARSENIO G. CASTRO, N. BAENS DEL ROSARIO, JOSE SANCHEZ and CESAREO DE LEON, Defendants-Appellees.

Sibal & Sibal, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Andreciano F. Caballero for defendants-appellee Gualberto Castillo, Et. Al.


SYLLABUS


1. COURTS; JURISDICTION OF COURTS OF FIRST INSTANCE TO REVIEW DECISIONS OF THE WORKMEN’S COMPENSATION COMMISSION. — The Court of First Instance is not clothed with jurisdiction to review or modify, much less, annul an award or order of execution issued by the Workmen’s Compensation Commission. Under Section 46 of Republic Act No. 772, the decisions, orders or awards entered by said Commission are appealable to the Supreme Court.


D E C I S I O N


PADILLA, J.:


Appeal from an order entered on 25 May 1959 by the Court of First Instance of Tarlac dismissing a complaint that prayed for the annulment of an award granted on 7 November 1956 (Annex B) and a writ of execution issued on 20 January 1958 (Annex A) by the Workmen’s Compensation Commission.

In a vehicular accident that took place at about 5:00 o’clock in the morning of 6 September 1955 on the National Highway in Malutung Cabun, Capas, Tarlac, Gualberto Castillo suffered physical injuries. At that moment he was beneath a truck owned and operated by Arsenio Sumilang, for whom he worked as driver, examining its motor when another truck belonging to Matilde Mancha of Manila bumped it. The accident also resulted in the death of Matilde Mancha’s driver and physical injuries to Emerenciana Sibal and Cornelio Salinas.

Following an amicable settlement entered into by and between Arsenio Sumilang, Gualberto Castillo, Emerenciana Sibal and Cornelio Salinas, on one side, and Matilde Mancha, on the other, on 31 October 1955 Gualberto Castillo received P500 from Matilde Mancha as his share in the total amount of P3,000 paid by the latter as damages.

On 30 January 1956 Gualberto Castillo filed in the Workmen’s Compensation Commission a claim for compensation against his employer Arsenio Sumilang without mentioning the payment to him (Castillo) of P500 (W.C.C. case No. 41439).

On 7 November 1956 the Workmen’s Compensation Commission entered an award directing Arsenio Sumilang to pay his driver Gualberto Castillo through the Commission the sum of P2,406.29 as compensation for the physical injuries the latter suffered in the aforesaid accident and to the Commission a fee in the sum of P25 (Annex B). On 20 January 1958 the Workmen’s Compensation Commission issued a writ of execution to enforce the above award (Annex A).

On 5 March 1958 Arsenio Sumilang filed in the Workmen’s Compensation Commission a "complaint" praying that a writ of preliminary injunction be issued to enjoin the execution of the award and that the award be annulled.

On 7 March 1958 the Commission en banc heard the "complaint" and on the same day dismissed it. On 27 March 1958 Arsenio Sumilang received a copy of the resolution dismissing his "complaint."cralaw virtua1aw library

On 8 March 1958 the Acting Provincial Sheriff of Tarlac sold at public auction a parcel of land (Lot No. 2030 of the Panique Cadastre) belonging to Arsenio Sumilang situated in Paniqui, Tarlac, described in transfer certificate of title No. 10588 issued by the Register of Deeds of Tarlac.

On 22 January 1959 Arsenio Sumilang commenced an action in the Court of First Instance of Tarlac praying for a writ of preliminary injunction to enjoin the final sale of the aforesaid lot, for the annulment of the award and writ of execution issued by the Workmen’s Compensation Commission, for damages in the amount of P100 to reimburse him for the premium on the bond he had filed in connection with his "complaint" filed in the Workmen’s Compensation Commission, for damages, attorney’s fees, and for any other just and equitable relief.

On 9 February 1959 the Provincial Sheriff of Tarlac, assisted by the Provincial Fiscal, filed a motion to dismiss the complaint on the ground that the Court of First Instance of Tarlac lacked jurisdiction to try the case and that, even assuming it has jurisdiction, there was no cause of action against the Provincial Sheriff.

On 12 February 1959 the defendant Gualberto Castillo objected to the issuance of a writ of preliminary injunction and on 17 February 1959 moved for the dismissal of the complaint on the ground that the cause of action was barred by a prior judgment and the complaint stated no cause of action.

On the last mentioned date, the Workmen’s Compensation Commission filed a motion to dismiss, on the ground that the Court of First Instance of Tarlac had no jurisdiction over the subject matter and the action was barred by a prior judgment. The Commission also pointed out that Arsenio Sumilang had appealed to the Supreme Court from the resolution adopted by the Workmen’s Compensation Commission dismissing his complaint for the annulment of the award and writ of execution (Annex 1) and that the appeal was dismissed by the Supreme Court for lack of merit (Annex 2).

On 21 February 1959 the plaintiff replied to the motion to dismiss filed by the Provincial Sheriff and to that filed by the defendant Gualberto Castillo and on 25 February, to that filed by the Workmen’s Compensation Commissioners.

On 25 May 1959, the trial court dismissed the complaint and denied the prayer for a writ of preliminary injunction.

On 29 June 1959 the plaintiff filed a motion for reconsideration which was denied.

From the order of dismissal, the plaintiff Arsenio Sumilang has appealed.

The three errors assigned by the appellant narrow down to whether the Court of First Instance has jurisdiction or power to annul or set aside an award or writ of execution issued by the Workmen’s Compensation Commission.

The appellant contends that it has, whereas the appellees maintain that it does not have.

Section 46 of Republic Act No. 772 amending Act No. 3428 as amended by Act No. 3812 and Commonwealth Act No. 210 provides that —

The Workmen’s Compensation Commission shall have exclusive jurisdiction to hear and decide claims for compensation under the Workmen’s Compensation Act, subject to appeal to the Supreme Court, in the same manner and in the same period as provided by law and by Rules of Court for appeal from the Court of Industrial Relations to the Supreme Court.

Clearly, under the above quoted provision the Workmen’s Compensation Commission has exclusive jurisdiction over workmen’s compensation cases. The Reorganization Plan No. 20-A approved pursuant to Republic Act No. 997 as amended by Republic Act No. 1241 provides that the Workmen’s Compensation Commission be composed of three members "who shall have the qualifications required of Judge of the Court of First Instance." Under Republic Act No. 772, the decisions, orders or awards entered by the Workmen’s Compensation Commission are appealable to the Supreme Court. Such being the case, the Court of First Instance is not empowered or clothed with jurisdiction to review or modify, much less, annul an award or order of execution issued by the Workmen’s Compensation Commission.

The order appealed from is affirmed, with costs against the Appellant.

Bengzon, C.J. Bautista Angelo, Concepcion, Reyes, J.B.L. and Paredes, JJ., concur.

Labrador, Barrera and Dizon, JJ., took no part.




Back to Home | Back to Main




















chanrobles.com





ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com






April-1962 Jurisprudence                 

  • G.R. No. L-18462 April 13, 1962 - MENELEO B. BERNARDEZ v. FRANCISCO T. VALERA

  • G.R. No. L-13704 April 18, 1962 - BENJAMIN T. ASUNCION v. LUZ DE ASIS DE AQUINO, ETC. ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-15162 April 18, 1962 - PHILIPPINE AMERICAN DRUG CO. v. COURT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-16642 April 18, 1962 - ANTONIO RAGUDO, ET AL. v. EMELITA R. PASNO

  • G.R. No. L-16864 April 18, 1962 - VALDERRAMA LUMBER MANUFACTURERS’ CO. INC. v. VICENTE N. CUSI, JR., ET AL.

  • G.R. Nos. L-19440 and L-19447 April 18, 1962 - CESAR CLIMACO, ET AL. v. HIGINIO B. MACADAEG, ET AL.

  • A.C. No. 518 April 23, 1962 - DOMINADOR CARLOS v. BENIGNO PALAGANAS

  • G.R. No. L-11816 April 23, 1962 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. OSCAR CASTELO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-14716 April 23, 1962 - TERESA REALTY, INC. v. JOSE SISON

  • G.R. No. L-15499 April 23, 1962 - ANGELA M. BUTTE v. MANUEL UY & SONS, INC.

  • G.R. No. L-15634 April 23, 1962 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. JUANITO LLANTO

  • G.R. No. L-15714 April 23, 1962 - LORENZA FABIAN, ET AL. v. EULOGIO MENCIAS, ETC., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-15778 April 23, 1962 - TAN TIONG BIO, ET AL. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE

  • G.R. No. L-15892 April 23, 1962 - FERNANDO LACSON, ET AL. v. BACOLOD CITY, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-16665 April 23, 1962 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. IRINEO SANTELLA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-17344 April 23, 1962 - TALISAY-SILAY MILLING CO., INC. v. COURT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-17349 April 23, 1962 - NATIONAL SHIPYARDS AND STEEL CORPORATION v. MARTIN ARTOZ, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-12219 April 25, 1962 - FRANCISCO PASCUAL v. COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS

  • G.R. No. L-13918 April 25, 1962 - CALTEX (PHILIPPINES) INC. v. KATIPUNAN LABOR UNION

  • G.R. No. L-14530 April 25, 1962 - LEONA AGLIBOT, ET AL. v. ANDREA ACAY MAÑALAC, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-14591 April 25, 1962 - PINDAÑGAN AGRICULTURAL COMPANY, INC. v. JOSE P. DANS, ETC., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-15080 April 25, 1962 - IN RE: RICARDO R. CARABALLO v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. L-15404 April 25, 1962 - ILDEFONSO SUZARA v. HERMONES CALUAG, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-16066 April 25, 1962 - ENCARNACION BACANI, ET AL. v. FELICISIMA PAZ SAMIA GALAURAN, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-16856 April 25, 1962 - OLIVO G. RUIZ v. CEDAR V. PASTOR

  • G.R. No. L-16954 April 25, 1962 - ARMINIO RIVERA v. LITAM & COMPANY, INC., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-16997 April 25, 1962 - RAMCAR INCORPORATED v. DOMINGO GARCIA

  • G.R. No. L-17016 April 25, 1962 - WORLDWIDE PAPER MILLS, INC. v. LABOR STANDARDS COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-12174 April 26, 1962 - MARIA B. CASTRO v. COLLECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE

  • G.R. No. L-14455 April 26, 1962 - LINO GUTIERREZ v. LUCIANO L. MEDEL, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-15369 April 26, 1962 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. TIMOTEO CRUZ, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-15427 April 26, 1962 - SAN MIGUEL BREWERY, INC. v. ELPIDIO FLORESCA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-15638 April 26, 1962 - HERMOGENES CONCEPCION, JR. v. FRANCISCO F. GONZALES IV

  • G.R. No. L-16384 April 26, 1962 - IN RE: JAYME S. TAN v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

  • Nos. L-17325 and L-16594 April 26, 1962


  • SYLLABUS


    1. TAXATION; PERCENTAGE TAXES; FORFEITURE OF BOND WITHIN TEN YEARS. — Upon the execution of a bond to guarantee the payment of an internal revenue tax, the tax-payer, as principal, and the bondsman, as surety, assumed an obligation entirely distinct from the tax and became subject to an entirely different kind of liability. A bond being a written contract imposing rights and liabilities, the government, pursuant to article 1144 of the new Civil Code, has the right to take court action for its forfeiture within 10 years from the accrual of the right of action.

    2. ID.; ID.; ID.; SECTION 332 (c) OF REVENUE CODE NOT APPLICABLE. — Section 332 (c) of the Revenue Code, is not applicable to actions for forfeiture of bonds. The period of limitation provided in this section is evidently confined to actions for the collection of taxes.

    3. ID.; ID.; ID.; PRESCRIPTIVE PERIOD FOR PAYMENT OF TAX INTERRUPTED BY EXECUTION OF BOND. — Obligations contracted in a bond by a tax-payer constitute written acknowledgments of the debt and interrupt the 5-year period of prescription for the payment of tax.

    G.R. No. L-15265 April 27, 1962 - BAGUIO GOLD MINING COMPANY v. BENJAMIN TABISOLA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-16467 April 27, 1962 - FLORENTINA MATA DE STUART v. NICASIO YATCO

  • G.R. No. L-11964 April 28, 1962 - REGISTER OF DEEDS OF MANILA v. CHINA BANKING CORPORATION

  • G.R. No. L-12116 April 28, 1962 - MACARIA TINIO DE DOMINGO v. COURT OF AGRARIAN RELATIONS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-12570 April 28, 1962 - VICENTE PAZ, ETC., ET AL. v. COURT OF AGRARIAN RELATIONS, ET AL.

  • G.R. Nos. L-14166 & L-14320 April 28, 1962 - FINLEY J. GIBBS, ET AL. v. COLLECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-14231 April 28, 1962 - CATALINO BALBECINO, ET AL. v. WENCESLAO M. ORTEGA, ETC., ET AL.

  • G.R. Nos. L-14546-47 April 28, 1962 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. BASILIO PADUA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-14833 April 28, 1962 - OROMECA LUMBER CO., INC. v. SOCIAL SECURITY COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-15089 April 28, 1962 - TEODULO DOMINGUEZ, ET AL. v. ROMAN B. DE JESUS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-15338 April 28, 1962 - CALTEX REFINERY EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION-PAFLU v. ANTONIO LUCERO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-16005 April 28, 1962 - MANILA ELECTRIC COMPANY v. PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION

  • G.R. No. L-16172 April 28, 1962 - ARSENIO SUMILANG v. GUALBERTO CASTILLO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-16219 April 28, 1962 - NATIVIDAD VERNUS-SANGCIANGCO v. DIOSDADO SANGCIANGCO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-16716 April 28, 1962 - PEDRO R. JAO, ET AL. v. ROYAL FINANCING CORPORATION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-16804 April 28, 1962 - FRANCO J. ALTOMONTE v. PHILIPPINE AMERICAN DRUG COMPANY

  • G.R. No. L-17044 April 28, 1962 - EUSTAQUIO JUAN, ET AL. v. VICENTE ZUÑIGA ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-17047 April 28, 1962 - ATLANTIC MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. MANILA PORT TERMINAL, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-17247 April 28, 1962 - C. N. HODGES v. ELPIDIO JAVELLANA, ET AL.

  • G.R. Nos. L-17481 & L-17537-59 April 28, 1962 - LIBERATA ANTONIO ESTRADA, ET AL. v. COURT OF AGRARIAN RELATIONS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-17887 April 28, 1962 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. RODOLFO SANTOS

  • G.R. No. L-18751 April 28, 1962 - A. C. ESGUERRA & SONS v. DOMINADOR R. AYTONA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-10909 April 30, 1962 - ADELAIDA TABOTABO, ET AL. v. AGUEDO TABOTABO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-16843 April 30, 1962 - GONZALO PUYAT & SONS INC. v. PHILIPPINE NATIONAL BANK

  • G.R. No. L-17082 April 30, 1962 - MERCEDES RAFFIÑAN v. FELIPE L. ABEL

  • G.R. No. L-17378 April 30, 1962 - NORTHWEST AIRLINES, INC. v. NORTHWEST AIRLINES PHILIPPINES EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION, ET AL.