Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence


Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 1966 > May 1966 Decisions > G.R. No. L-21981 May 19, 1966 WILFREDO GO BON LEE v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.:




PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

EN BANC

[G.R. No. L-21981. May 19, 1966.]

WILFREDO GO BON LEE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES, Oppositor-Appellee.

P. B. Alvez for Petitioner-Appellant.

Solicitor General for Oppositor-Appellee.


SYLLABUS


1. NATURALIZATION; FAILURE TO ENROLL MINOR CHILDREN IN SCHOOLS RECOGNIZED BY THE GOVERNMENT. — Failure of petitioner to enroll his minor children in any public or private school recognized by the government is a ground for cancellation of his certificate for naturalization. The fact that his children are in a foreign country does not exempt him from such requirement, where it appears that no satisfactory explanation was given to justify his failure to bring his minor children to the Philippines.

2. ID.; RES JUDICATA; FINDING OF THE COURT IN A PREVIOUS NATURALIZATION CASE. — The decision of the Supreme Court revoking the previous certificate of naturalization of petitioner on the ground that he failed to enroll his minor children in any public or private school recognized by the government and that he presented no satisfactory proof to show that he exerted efforts to bring into the Philippines his minor children, constitutes res judicata in a subsequent petition for naturalization.


D E C I S I O N


BAUTISTA ANGELO, J.:


Petitioner seeks Philippine citizenship in a petition filed before the Court of First Instance of Cebu.

It appears that on August 15, 1951, the Solicitor General filed with the same court a petition for the cancellation of the certificate of naturalization previously granted petitioner on the ground that he has not enrolled his minor children in any public or private school recognized by our government. On appeal from the order denying said petition, this Court rendered decision revoking said certificate of naturalization.

After said decision had become final, Petitioner, in an obvious attempt to cure the defect found in his first petition for naturalization and go around the schooling requirement of our Naturalization Law, filed on June 23, 1961 the instant petition with the Court of First Instance of Cebu.

In due time, the City Fiscal of Cebu filed an opposition reiterating the same ground that petitioner had failed to send his minor children to any public or private school recognized by the government, and after the parties had presented their evidence, the court a quo rendered decision denying said petition. Petitioner interposed the present appeal.

Petitioner was born on June 9, 1884 in Amoy, China of Chinese parents. He came to the Philippines on December 17, 1919 where he was issued a landing certificate. In 1917, he was married in Amoy, China to Sy Hong with whom he has six children all of whom were already married and were no longer under his parental authority. His children were Go Kian Giap who was born on January 20, 1923 in Amoy, China; Go Kian Ti who was born on July 21, 1925 in Amoy, China; Pacita alias Juanita Baby Go who was born on March 13, 1929 in Cebu City; Go Kian Guan who was born on October 10, 1930 in Amoy, China; Go Kian Sing who was born on July 7, 1934 in Amoy, China; and Go Kian Tai who was born on June 6, 1938 also in Amoy, China.

Before the war petitioner tried his best to bring his children to the Philippines but his mother-in-law objected giving as reason the fact that they were sickly and could not travel without endangering their health. In 1939, his mother-in-law promised to send his children to the Philippines but it was not fulfilled because of the outbreak of the war between China and Japan. In 1948 or 1949, he applied for the admission of his children to the Philippines but the Department of Foreign Affairs found defect in his petition and did not allow their admission. With the exception of his daughter Pacita Go who is living with him in Cebu City, his other children are still in Amoy, China. His daughter Pacita graduated from the University of San Carlos with a commerce degree. She finished her high school course in the same university where Philippine history, civics and government are taught. Pacita is married to Manuel Yap, a Filipino citizen.

Petitioner claims that his petition for naturalization should have been granted by the court a quo because he is exempt from the requirement of sending his children to a public or private school recognized by our government because of the difficulty he was confronted with in bringing them to the Philippines. He argues that he had exerted utmost efforts to bring his children to the Philippines but due to circumstances beyond his control he was not able to do so which accounted for his failure to enroll them in a school recognized in this country.

We find no merit in this contention. In the first place, the mere fact that his mother-in-law allegedly objected to the sending of his children to the Philippines on the dubious ground that they were sickly and the travel might endanger their health does not constitute an insurmountable barrier to bring them to the Philippines. It should be observed that petitioner, by his own admission, went to China on five different occasions. He made the trips successively in 1924, 1933, 1937, 1938 and 1947 and in any of these trips particularly before the outbreak of the Sino-Japanese war there could certainly have been an occasion where his children were not sickly and therefore, could have been taken to the Philippines had he wished them to come and live in this country. This he failed to do, and no satisfactory explanation was given to justify his failure. In fact, he did not give any for which reason this Court, in revoking his previous certificate of naturalization, made the following comment:jgc:chanrobles.com.ph

". . . Moreover, according to appellee’s own testimony, in 1930 he took his daughter Juanita — who was born in Cebu to China where she remained until she was brought back to the Philippines in 1938. No satisfactory proof has been presented to show that Go had exerted efforts at that time to bring into the Philippines his other four minor children." (Republic of the Philippines, v. Go Bon Lee, L- 11499, April 29, 1961.)

Indeed, if petitioner were able to bring his daughter Juanita to stay with his mother-in-law in Amoy, China in the early 1930 and thereafter to come here in the Philippines in 1938 he could have also brought to this country his other minor children if he only wanted them to come and be educated in the Philippines. This matter, therefore, can now be considered as res judicata in view of the finding above adverted to.

WHEREFORE, the decision appealed from is affirmed. Petition is denied, with costs against petitioner.

Bengzon, Concepcion, Reyes, J.B.L., Barrera, Dizon, Regala, Makalintal, Bengzon, J.P., Zaldivar and Sanchez, JJ., concur.




Back to Home | Back to Main




















chanrobles.com





ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com






May-1966 Jurisprudence                 

  • G.R. No. L-20341 May 14, 1966 SIMEON S. CLARIDADES v. VICENTE C. MERCADER, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-20372 May 14, 1966 IN RE: BENJAMIN YAP v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. L-22989 May 14, 1966 BIENVENIDO CAPULONG v. TIMOTEO Y. ASERON

  • G.R. No. L-20992 May 14, 1966 IN RE: KOCK TEE YAP v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. L-21486 May 14, 1966 LA MALLORCA and PAMPANGA BUS COMPANY v. VALENTIN DE JESUS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-20344 May 16, 1966 POTENCIANO ILUSORIO, ET AL. v. COURT OF AGRARIAN RELATIONS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-21673 May 16, 1966 FRANCISO MACATANGAY v. SECRETARY OF PUBLIC WORKS AND COMMUNICATIONS, ET AL.

  • G.R. Nos. L-22511 and L-22343 May 16, 196

    ANDRES E. LAZARO v. THE COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS

  • G.R. Nos. L-22383 and L-22386 May 16, 1966 EXTENSIVE ENTERPRISES CORPORATION v. SARBRO & CO., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-22058 May 17, 1966 EMILIANO D. MANUEL, ET AL. v. PEDRO JIMENEZ, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-22059 May 17, 1966 MARIO T. LIZARES v. RUFINO G. HECHANOVA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-22990 May 19, 1966 BIENVENIDO CAPULONG v. THE ACTING COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS

  • G.R. No. L-17696 May 19, 1966 DIRECTOR OF LANDS v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-18138 May 19, 1966 HONORIO J. HERNANDO v. J. FRANCISCO, ET AL.

  • G.R. Nos. L-19815-16 May 19, 1966 FILEMON YEPES, ET AL. v. SAMAR EXPRESS TRANSIT

  • G.R. No. L-20209 May 19, 1966 TAN TIONG ENG v. CITY MAYOR, PASAY, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-20366 May 19, 1966 LEONORA S. PALMA, ET AL. v. Q. & S. INC., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-20682 May 19, 1966 GREGORIO VILLARTA, ET AL. v. FAUSTA CUTAMORA VDA. DE CUYNO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-21032 May 19, 1966 FRANCISCA GALEOS-VALDEHUEZA, ET AL. v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-21489 and L-21628 May 19, 1966 MIGUEL MAPALO, ET AL. v. MAXIMO MAPALO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-21568 May 19, 1966 SERVANDA ENECILLA v. LUZ MAGSAYSAY

  • G.R. No. L-21587 May 19, 1966 BRISTOL MYERS COMPANY v. DIRECTOR OF PATENTS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-21598 May 19, 1966 ENCARNACION VDA. DE VALENCIA, ET AL. v. PEDRO DEUDOR, ET AL.

  • G.R. Nos. L-21919-20 May 19, 1966 ANGEL S. OLAES v. TEODORO TANDA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-21952 May 19, 1966 IN RE: LIM CHIAO CUN v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. L-22041 May 19, 1966 MELECIO CLARINIO UJANO v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. L-22044 May 19, 1966 ZOILO C. PARAGAS v. ESTANISLAO R. BERNAL, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-22137 May 19, 1966 MANILA RAILROAD COMPANY, ET AL. v. CARMELINO ALVENDIA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-22277 May 19, 1966 ALBERTO AÑONUEVO, ET AL. v. ROBERTO ZURBANO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-17773 May 19, 1966 PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. EMETERIO ORZAME, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-22549 May 19, 1966 RENATO D. TAYAG, ET AL. v. ANGELES ELECTRIC CORPORATION

  • G.R. No. L-22550 May 19, 1966 REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL. v. ANDRES REYES, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-22811 May 19, 1966 MALAYAN INSURANCE CO., INC. v. DELGADO SHIPPING AGENCIES, INC., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-21981 May 19, 1966 WILFREDO GO BON LEE v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. L-20318 May 19, 1966 JOSEPH SOGLOU v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. L-21197 May 19, 1966 IN RE: ONG HOCK LIAN v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. L-22823 May 19, 1966 GODOFREDO N. FAVIS v. NICOMEDES T. RUPISAN, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-18452 May 20, 1966 AUGUSTO COSIO, ET AL. v. CHERIE PALILEO

  • G.R. No. L-20552 May 20, 1966 FILIPINAS LIFE ASSURANCE CO., ET AL. v. GONZALO P. NAVA

  • G.R. No. L-21219 May 20, 1966 UY CHIN HONG v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. Nos. L-21353 and L-21354 May 20, 1966 GREGORIO ANURAN, ET AL. v. PEPITO BUÑO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-21380 May 20, 1966 MISAMIS LUMBER CORPORATION v. CAPITAL INSURANCE & SURETY CO., INC.

  • G.R. No. L-25835 May 20, 1966 CITY OF MANILA, ET AL. v. ABELARDO SUBIDO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-19660 May 24, 1966 PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. AMBROCIO P. CANO

  • G.R. No. L-20921 May 24, 1966 MARCELO SOTTO v. FILEMON SOTTO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-20112 May 25, 1966 ROBERTO TOMADO v. JOAQUlN BILBAO

  • G.R. No. L-20874 May 25, 1966 IN RE: JOSELITO YU v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. L-20818 May 25, 1966 CESAR GUILLERGAN, ET AL. v. RODOLFO GANZON, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-15631 May 27, 1966 PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. HERMOSO SINAON

  • G.R. No. L-20962 May 27, 1966 PACENCIA O. ITCHON v. JUAN M. BALIGOD, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-18769 May 27, 1966 PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. DIEGO VILLANUEVA

  • G.R. No. L-19894 May 27, 1966 PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. CESAR E. REYES, ET AL.

  • G.R. Nos. L-21028-29 May 27, 1966 SANTIAGO LABOR UNION v. EMILIANO TABIGNE, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-22079 May 27, 1966 ASIAN SURETY & INSURANCE COMPANY, INC. v. ONG TING, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-22370 May 27, 1966 LILIA HERNAEZ v. YAN KAO

  • G.R. No. L-21021 May 27, 1966 INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA v. UNITED STATES LINES CO., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-18383 May 30, 1966 CELESTINO C. JUAN v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-18892 May 30, 1966 PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. MAKALAHI REYES, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-20051 May 30, 1966 ANTIQUE SAWMILLS, INC. v. AQUILES R. ZAYCO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-20417 May 30, 1966 REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL. v. GREGORIO A. VENTURANZA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-21060 May 30, 1966 CESARIO V. INDUCIL v. VICTOR DE LOS SANTOS

  • G.R. No. L-20313 May 30, 1966 LAURO G. MARQUEZ, v. GABRIEL V. VALERO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-22207 May 30, 1966 IN RE: NERIO TAN v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHILI.

  • G.R. No. L-23510 May 30, 1966 LUCIDO GARCON v. REDEMPTORIST FATHERS

  • G.R. No. L-21195 May 31, 1966 NANCY Q. SISON v. PEDRO M. GIMENEZ, ET AL.

  • G.R. Nos. L-24267-8 May 31, 1966 PERFECTO FERRER, ET AL. v. COURT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-19066 May 31, 1966 JUANITO YARCIA, ET AL. v. ZOILO CASTRILLO, ET AL.

  • G.R. Nos. L-21821-22, L-211824-27 May 31, 1966 DIOSDADO C. TY v. FILIPINAS COMPAÑA DE SEGUROS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-20299 May 31, 1966 ANITA BUENSUCESO DE LAMERA v. COURT OF AGRARIAN RELATIONS, ETC., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-21400 May 31, 1966 IN RE: WILLIAM CHUA SIONG HUA v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.