Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence


Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 1993 > June 1993 Decisions > G.R. No. 97457 June 4, 1993 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. TITO CABALLERO, ET AL.:




PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

FIRST DIVISION

[G.R. No. 97457. June 4, 1993.]

PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. TITO CABALLERO, JAIME CABALLERO, ROGELIO CABALLERO, JOSE CABALLERO, BENNY GONZALES AND WENCIL ESQUILONA, Accused, ROGELIO CABALLERO and JOSE CABALLERO, Accused-Appellants.

The Solicitor General for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Carlito M. Guimbarda for Accused-Appellant.


SYLLABUS


1. CRIMINAL LAW; ALIBI; APPELLANTS MUST PROVE THAT AT THE TIME THE CRIME WAS COMMITTED, THEY WERE AT SUCH A PLACE THAT IT WAS PHYSICALLY IMPOSSIBLE FOR THEM TO HAVE BEEN AT THE CRIME SCENE. — Both appellants put up the defense of alibi. Appellant Jose Caballero claims that on the night of July 20, 1988, he was at Barangay Bari-is, Aroroy, Masbate, attending to his store and waiting for his six boarders to return home. Appellant Rogelio Caballero, on his part, claims that on the night of the incident he was confined at his house at the poblacion of Baleno, Masbate, suffering from a serious attack of asthma. Appellants must prove that at the time the crime was committed, they were at such a place that it was physically impossible for them to have been at the crime scene (People v. Aniñon, 158 SCRA 701 [1988]; People v. Mendoza, 163 SCRA 568 [1988]; People v. Sato, 163 SCRA 602 [1988]). The Municipality of Aroroy, where appellant Jose Caballero resided, adjoins the Municipality of Baleno. The distance between the poblacion of Baleno and Barangay Lagta in Aroroy where Noe Aldao was kidnapped, is only four kilometers. The distance between the poblacion of Baleno, where Rogelio Caballero resided and Barangay Lagta of the same town, is only five kilometers. While appellant Rogelio Caballero may have suffered an asthmatic attack on the night of July 20, 1988, his own witness, Dr. Conchita Ulanday, admitted that his attacks did not immobilize him and that he could still move around.

2. ID.; ALIBI CANNOT PREVAIL OVER THE POSITIVE IDENTIFICATION MADE BY CREDIBLE WITNESSES. — Appellants were positively identified by Nida Salcedo Albao and Clemencia Albao, the wife and the mother respectively of the victim. The two eyewitnesses saw the crime committed at close range. At that time, a gas lamp was lit in the house. Nida Albao was in the bedroom when appellants’ co-accused barged inside and forcibly brought Noe Albao outside. Clemencia Albao, who was awakened when the accused destroyed the door of the house, went out of her room and saw her son being dragged away by the accused. She pleaded with them to let go of her son and not to harm him. Appellants and Nida Salcedo Albao were not only province mates but belonged to feuding families. When the father of appellants was hacked, two brothers of Nida were prosecuted for the offense but were acquitted. Since this incident, the Caballero family had been seeking vengeance on the Salcedo family. Alibi cannot prevail over the positive identification made by credible witnesses (People v. Plaza, 140 SCRA 277 [1985]; People v. Pigon, 173 SCRA 607 [1989]; People v. Serrano, 170 SCRA 663 [1989]).

3. ID.; ID.; UNDER THE REVISED PENAL CODE, THE PROPER PENALTY TO IMPOSE IS "RECLUSION PERPETUA" AND NOT LIFE IMPRISONMENT; CIVIL INDEMNITY FOR THE DEATH OF THE VICTIM HAS BEEN INCREASED TO P50,000.00. — The trial court sentenced appellants to suffer the penalty of "Reclusion Perpetua or life imprisonment." For crimes penalized under the Revised Penal Code, the proper penalty to impose is "Reclusion Perpetua" and not life imprisonment (People v. Ramos, 203 SCRA 327 [1991]). Likewise, the trial court ordered appellants to pay the heirs of Noe Albao the amount of P30,000.00. The civil indemnity for the death of the victim has been increased to P50,000.00 (People v. Sison, 189 SCRA 643 [1990]).


D E C I S I O N


QUIASON, J.:


This is an appeal from the decision of the Regional Trial Court, Masbate, Masbate, in Criminal Case No. 5560, finding Rogelio Caballero and Jose Caballero, guilty beyond reasonable doubt of kidnapping and sentencing them "to suffer the penalty of Reclusion Perpetua or life imprisonment, to pay the family of Noe Albao the amount of Thirty Thousand (P30,000.00) Pesos, without subsidiary imprisonment in case of insolvency and to pay the cost" (Decision, p. 6; Rollo, p. 18).chanroblesvirtualawlibrary

In the information filed in Criminal Case No. 5560, Tito Caballero, Jaime Caballero, Rogelio Caballero and Jose Caballero were charged with kidnapping committed as follows:jgc:chanrobles.com.ph

"That on or about July 20, 1988, in the evening thereof, at Barangay Lagta, Municipality of Baleno, Province of Masbate, Philippines, within the jurisdiction of this Honorable Court, the said accused armed with guns, confederating, conspiring and helping one another, by means of violence and intimidation, did then and there, wilfully, unlawfully and feloniously kidnap one Noe Albao by forcibly taking him away from his house after mauling the latter and detain (sic) him to an unknown place up to the present, thereby depriving said Noe Albao of his liberty" (Rollo, p. 60).

Only Rogelio Caballero and Jose Caballero were arrested, arraigned and tried. Tito Caballero has not been arrested and remains at-large. Jaime Caballero died on February 9, 1990 and the case against him was dismissed. Accused Benny Gonzales, a policeman, and Wencil Esquilona, a PC soldier, were tried separately by the National Police Commission in Legaspi City.

This Court has reviewed the findings of fact of the trial court and has found them substantiated by the evidence. The trial court found:jgc:chanrobles.com.ph

"That on July 20, 1988 at about 10:00 at night at Barangay Lagta, Baleno, Masbate, while the family of Noe Albao was sleeping, they heard the pounding and banging of the bamboo door of their house. The door was struck about seven times until it was destroyed and the four (4) Caballero brothers and Benny Gonzales and Wencil Esquilona entered the house. Tito and Jaime Caballero went inside the room where Nida and her husband Noe Albao were sleeping and they forced Noe Albao out while the others were watching. Tito Caballero was dragging Noe Albao by the arm while Jaime was pushing the back of Noe, and when they went out, they mauled and maltreated Noe. His wife Nida pleaded with them not to harm her husband but they did not listen. When they were able to drag and push Noe, they ordered the victim to lay flat on the ground face downward. Then Noe cried and pleaded but he was tied and was brought away. The victim was dragged and loaded in a red Ford Fierra. At first, the Fierra would not start and it was pushed by the four accused in civilian clothes while the victim who was moaning and asking for help, the driver, and the two in military uniform were inside the Fierra. The following morning Nida, the wife, and her mother Clemencia one after the other went to the police station at poblacion Baleno and reported to Pat. Decina that her husband Noe Albao was kidnapped by the four Caballero brothers, PC soldier Wencil Esquilona and Pat. Benny Gonzales. From the Baleno Police Station, they went to the PC Detachment at Bari-is, Aroroy, Masbate to inquire about her husband, Noe, but they did not find him there." (Rollo, pp. 13-14).

Both appellants put up the defense of alibi. Appellant Jose Caballero claims that on the night of July 20, 1988, he was at Barangay Bari-is, Aroroy, Masbate, attending to his store and waiting for his six boarders to return home. Appellant Rogelio Caballero, on his part, claims that on the night of the incident he was confined at his house at the poblacion of Baleno, Masbate, suffering from a serious attack of asthma.chanrobles virtual lawlibrary

Appellants must prove that at the time the crime was committed, they were at such a place that it was physically impossible for them to have been at the crime scene (People v. Aniñon, 158 SCRA 701 [1988]; People v. Mendoza, 163 SCRA 568 [1988]; People v. Sato, 163 SCRA 602 [1988]).

The Municipality of Aroroy, where appellant Jose Caballero resided, adjoins the Municipality of Baleno. The distance between the poblacion of Baleno and Barangay Lagta in Aroroy where Noe Aldao was kidnapped, is only four kilometers. The distance between the poblacion of Baleno, where Rogelio Caballero resided and Barangay Lagta of the same town, is only five kilometers. While appellant Rogelio Caballero may have suffered as asthmatic attack on the night of July 20, 1988, his own witness, Dr. Conchita Ulanday, admitted that his attacks did not immobilize him and that he could still move around.

Appellants were positively identified by Nida Salcedo Albao and Clemencia Albao, the wife and the mother respectively of the victim. The two eyewitnesses saw the crime committed at close range. At that time, a gas lamp was lit in the house. Nida Albao was in the bedroom when appellants’ co-accused barged inside and forcibly brought Noe Albao outside. Clemencia Albao, who was awakened when the accused destroyed the door of the house, went out of her room and saw her son being dragged away by the accused. She pleaded with them to let go of her son and not to harm him.chanrobles.com.ph : virtual law library

Appellants and Nida Salcedo Albao were not only province mates but belonged to feuding families. When the father of appellants was hacked, two brothers of Nida were prosecuted for the offense but were acquitted. Since this incident, the Caballero family had been seeking vengeance on the Salcedo family.

Alibi cannot prevail over the positive identification made by credible witnesses (People v. Plaza, 140 SCRA 277 [1985]; People v. Pigon, 173 SCRA 607 [1989]; People v. Serrano, 170 SCRA 663 [1989]).

The trial court sentenced appellants to suffer the penalty of "Reclusion Perpetua or life imprisonment." For crimes penalized under the Revised Penal Code, the proper penalty to impose is "Reclusion Perpetua" and not life imprisonment (People v. Ramos, 203 SCRA 327 [1991]).

Likewise, the trial court ordered appellants to pay the heirs of Noe Albao the amount of P30,000.00. The civil indemnity for the death of the victim has been increased to P50,000.00 (People v. Sison, 189 SCRA 643 [1990]).

WHEREFORE, in view of all the foregoing, the decision appealed from is AFFIRMED with the modification that the penalty to be imposed on appellants is Reclusion Perpetua and the civil indemnity is increased to P50,000.00.

SO ORDERED.

Cruz, Griño-Aquino and Bellosillo, JJ., concur.




Back to Home | Back to Main




















chanrobles.com





ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com






June-1993 Jurisprudence                 

  • G.R. Nos. 70310-11 June 1, 1993 - MASSIVE CONSTRUCTION, INC., ET AL. v. INTERMEDIATE APPELLATE COURT, ET AL.

  • G.R. Nos. 71998-99 June 2, 1991

    EMILIANO R. DE LOS SANTOS, ET AL. v. INTERMEDIATE APPELLATE COURT, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 99866 June 2, 1993 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. SIDRO D. DORO

  • G.R. No. 105005 June 2, 1993 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. JUANITA A. MARCELO

  • A.M. No. MTJ-90-460 June 3, 1993 - COURT ADMINISTRATOR v. OSMUNDO M. VILLANUEVA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 93511 June 3, 1993 - CORAZON L. CABAGNOT v. CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. Nos. 97309-10 June 3, 1993 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ERNESTO QUEJADA

  • G.R. No. 97426 June 3, 1993 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ROMEO APOLINARIO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 97931 June 3, 1993 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ERNESTO MENDOZA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 105285 June 3, 1993 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. RENATO D. FIDER

  • G.R. No. 105884 June 3, 1993 - SOCIAL SECURITY SYSTEM v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 74298 June 4, 1993 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ROLANDO PATELLAR SACRISTAN, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 88246 June 4, 1993 - LA CAMPANA FOOD PRODUCTS, INC. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 97457 June 4, 1993 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. TITO CABALLERO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 100290 June 4, 1993 - NORBERTO TIBAJIA, JR., ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 100606 June 4, 1993 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. JOEMI BALACIO, ET AL.

  • G.R. Nos. 101216-18 June 4, 1993 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. REDENTOR D. DICHOSO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 83902 June 8, 1993 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ARCADIO MANRIQUE, JR., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 84921 June 8, 1993 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ROLANDO DURAL, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 88291 June 8, 1993 - ERNESTO M. MACEDA v. CATALINO MACARAIG, JR.

  • G.R. No. 96354 June 8, 1993 - LAPERAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 98177 June 8, 1993 - BARFEL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 101292 June 8, 1993 - RICARDO ENCARNACION v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. Nos. 102773-77 June 8, 1993 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. GODOFREDO SAYAT

  • G.R. No. 103631 June 8, 1993 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. FELIPE C. RAMOS

  • G.R. No. 106621 June 8, 1993 - PSBA MANILA v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 95357 June 9, 1993 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. EDUARDO GELAVER

  • G.R. No. 57828 June 14, 1993 - SEA-LAND SERVICE, INC. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 94630 June 14, 1993 - SALOME ROSENDO RIVAS v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 95539 June 14, 1993 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. MELCHOR B. DATINGGINOO

  • G.R. No. 97835 June 14, 1993 - FIRST GENERAL MARKETING CORPORATION, ET AL. v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION

  • G.R. No. 100641 June 14, 1993 - FARLE P. ALMODIEL v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 108957 June 14, 1993 - PRUDENTIAL BANK v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • A.M. No. P-92-709 June 14, 1993 - ROGER A. DOMAGAS v. DELIA MALANA

  • G.R. Nos. 94709-10 June 15, 1993 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. RUBEN CABARRUBIAS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 106037 June 15, 1993 - RICARDO C. ROA, ET AL. v. PH CREDIT CORPORATION, ET AL.

  • B.M. No. 553 June 17, 1993 - MAURICIO C. ULEP v. LEGAL CLINIC, INC.

  • A.M. No. MTJ-88-142 June 17, 1993 - ERLINDA A. MENDOZA v. RODOLFO A. MABUTAS

  • A.M. No. P-92-673 June 17, 1993 - LUMEN POLICARPIO, ET AL. v. GALLARDO TOLENTINO, ET AL.

  • A.M. No. 3694 June 17, 1993 - ALBERTO FERNANDEZ, ET AL. v. BENJAMIN M. GRECIA

  • G.R. No. 88445 June 17, 1993 - JESUS KHO v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 92492 June 17, 1993 - THELMA VDA. DE CANILANG v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 101730 June 17, 1993 - PHILIPPINE TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION v. BIENVENIDO E. LAGUESMA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 106011 June 17, 1993 - TOWN SAVINGS AND LOAN BANK, INC. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 106374 June 17, 1993 - PHILIPPINE AIRLINES, INC. v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 106973 June 17, 1993 - MARIA L. LOPEZ v. NORTHWEST AIRLINES, INC., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 108000 June 17, 1993 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • A.M. No. RTJ-91-657 June 21, 1993 - LOURDES PRESADO v. MANUEL C. GENOVA

  • G.R. No. 104408 June 21, 1993 - METRO MANILA TRANSIT CORPORATION v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 105607 June 21, 1993 - HECTOR C. VILLANUEVA v. SANDIGANBAYAN, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 99843 June 22, 1993 - Sps. BRAULIO ABALOS, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. Nos. 104304-05 June 22, 1993 - LUNINGNING LANDRITO v. CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION

  • G.R. No. 104732 June 22, 1993 - ROBERTO A. FLORES, ET AL. v. FRANKLIN M. DRILON, ET AL.

  • A.M. No. RTJ-91-752 June 23, 1993 - JOVENCITO R. ZUÑO, SR. v. BALTAZAR DIZON

  • G.R. No. 90643 June 25, 1993 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. AGUSTIN G. FORTES

  • G.R. No. 93109 June 25, 1993 - MILAGROS LLAMANZARES v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 101728 June 25, 1993 - RAMON V. ROXAS v. SPS. ANDRES DY, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 102206 June 25, 1993 - NATIONAL POWER CORPORATION, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 102958 June 25, 1993 - RADIO COMMUNICATIONS OF THE PHILIPPINES, INC. v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 104175 June 25, 1993 - YOUNG AUTO SUPPLY CO., ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 105361 June 25, 1993 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. BONIFACIO ENCISO

  • G.R. No. 105883 June 25, 1993 - LETICIA A. ALIMARIO v. COMMISSION ON AUDIT

  • A.M. No. RTJ-86-50 June 28, 1993 - ADELAIDA P. FELONGCO v. JUDGE LUIS D. DICTADO

  • G.R. No. 79760 June 28, 1993 - PERPETUAL SAVINGS BANK, ET AL. v. JOSE ORO B. FAJARDO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 99333 June 28, 1993 - SPS. ANTONIO PAILANO, JR., ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 102980 June 28, 1993 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. SALVADOR OSIGAN, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 106498 June 28, 1993 - LOLITA DADUBO v. CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • A.M. No. R-711-P June 29, 1993 - SPS. ALFONSO AQUINO LIM, ET AL. v. OSCAR GUASCH, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 78631 June 29, 1993 - COLUMBIA PICTURES, INC., ET AL. v. ALFREDO C. FLORES, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 97564 June 29, 1993 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. RODOLFO CAYETANO

  • G.R. No. 99395 June 29, 1993 - ST. LUKE’S MEDICAL CENTER, INC. v. RUBEN O. TORRES, ET AL.

  • A.M. No. MTJ-91-554 June 30, 1993 - WARLITO ALISANGCO v. JOSE C. TABILIRAN, JR.

  • G.R. No. 58057 June 30, 1993 - HEIRS OF MARIANO LAGUTAN, ET AL. v. SEVERINA ICAO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 72319 June 30, 1993 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. MARTIN ALVERO, JR., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 72608 June 30, 1993 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. JULITO U. ARNAN

  • G.R. No. 86390 June 30, 1993 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. JAIME A. ROSALES

  • G.R. No. 86994 June 30, 1993 - JAIME LOOT v. GOVERNMENT SERVICE INSURANCE SYSTEM

  • G.R. No. 94310 June 30, 1993 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. VIRGILIO ALAY-AY

  • G.R. No. 97212 June 30, 1993 - BENJAMIN YU v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. Nos. 98000-02 June 30, 1993 - INOCENCIO PEÑANUEVA, JR. v. SANDIGANBAYAN, ET AL.

  • G.R. Nos. 98321-24 June 30, 1993 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. RICARDO S. DE GUZMAN, ET AL.

  • G.R. Nos. 100720-23 June 30, 1993 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ROLANDO CODILLA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 102748 June 30, 1993 - GOULDS PUMPS (PHILS.), INC. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 102984 June 30, 1993 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. RUBEN TAKBOBO

  • G.R. No. 104609 June 30, 1993 - PHILIP LEE GO, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 105671 June 30, 1993 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. MANUEL M. MAGTULOY

  • G.R. No. 105751 June 30, 1993 - BA FINANCE CORPORATION v. RUFINO CO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 106646 June 30, 1993 - JAIME LEDESMA v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 108284 June 30, 1993 - PERSONNEL SERVICES v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION, ET AL.