Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence


Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 1993 > June 1993 Decisions > A.M. No. P-92-673 June 17, 1993 - LUMEN POLICARPIO, ET AL. v. GALLARDO TOLENTINO, ET AL.:




PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

FIRST DIVISION

[A.M. No. P-92-673. June 17, 1993.]

LUMEN POLICARPIO, CONCORDIA GLADYS YSMAEL, RICARDO POLICARPIO RENTAO, JOSE POLICARPIO, and LEONILA POLICARPIO, Petitioners, v. GALLARDO TOLENTINO, Deputy Sheriff and AUGUSTO CASTRO, Ex-Oficio Sheriff of the Regional Trial Court of Malabon, Respondents.


SYLLABUS


1. LEGAL AND JUDICIAL ETHICS; ABUSE OF AUTHORITY AND SERIOUS MISCONDUCT ON PART OF CLERK OF COURT-EX-OFICIO SHERIFF AND DEPUTY SHERIFF, A CASE OF. — On October 21, 1991, Attorney Lumen Policarpio, Concordia Gladys Ysmael, Ricardo Policarpio Rentao, Jose Policarpio and Leonila Policarpio filed an administrative complaint charging respondents Gallardo C. Tolentino, deputy sheriff of the Office of the Clerk of Court of the Regional Trial Court of Malabon, Metro Manila, and Attorney Augusto D. Castro, Jr., Clerk of Court and Ex-Oficio Sheriff of the same court, with grave abuse of authority, serious misconduct and conduct prejudicial to the best interest of the service, in connection with their actuations in Civil Case No. R-83-19048 (41518) entitled, "Philippine Trust Company v. Lumen Policarpio, Et Al.," of Branch 12, Regional Trial Court of Manila. . . . Complainants filed this administrative complaint against the respondents, alleging that the enforcement of the writ of possession by breaking into the Policarpio home which was not even "included in the mortgage with the Philtrust," was unlawful because the Regional Trial Court of Malabon had no jurisdiction over the case. Despite that, Tolentino filed his Return and Manifestation in the Regional Trial Court of Malabon. Complainants filed robbery charges against the respondents. There is no doubt that the implementation of the writ of possession on October 14, 1991 by the respondents was premature and irregular. It was carried out with undue haste and in an oppressive manner, without awaiting the court’s action on respondent sheriff’s motion for approval of his estimated expenses. As a matter of fact, for that misconduct, Tolentino was found guilty of indirect contempt by Judge Donato of the Regional Trial Court of Manila, Branch 12. WHEREFORE, as recommended by the Court Administrator, respondents Gallardo C. Tolentino and Attorney Augusto Castro are found guilty of abuse of authority and serious misconduct and are each ordered to pay a fine of TWO THOUSAND (P2,000.00) PESOS for having arbitrarily and oppressively disregarded procedural rules in implementing the writ of possession on the property of the herein complainants.


D E C I S I O N


GRIÑO-AQUINO, J.:


On October 21, 1991, Attorney Lumen Policarpio, Concordia Gladys Ysmael, Ricardo Policarpio Rentao, Jose Policarpio and Leonila Policarpio filed an administrative complaint charging respondents Gallardo C. Tolentino, deputy sheriff of the Office of the Clerk of Court of the Regional Trial Court of Malabon, Metro Manila, and Attorney Augusto D. Castro, Jr., Clerk of Court and Ex-Oficio Sheriff of the same court, with grave abuse of authority, serious misconduct and conduct prejudicial to the best interest of the service, in connection with their actuations in Civil Case No. R-83-19048 (41518) entitled, "Philippine Trust Company v. Lumen Policarpio, Et Al.," of Branch 12, Regional Trial Court of Manila.chanrobles virtual lawlibrary

As set out in the resolution of this Court dated September 28, 1988 in G.R. No. 81142 entitled, "Lumen Policarpio v. Justice Lorna Lombos-Dela Fuente, et. al.," the background facts of this case are:chanrob1es virtual 1aw library

Sometime in 1958, Attorney Lumen Policarpio borrowed P300,000.00 from PHILTRUST. As security for the loan, her parents mortgaged to PHILTRUST some properties in Navotas, Rizal. For failure of the debtors to pay the loan when due, the bank commenced foreclosure proceedings in 1963. Eventually, as highest bidder at the public sale, the bank consolidated its ownership over the mortgaged properties. A new title was issued in its name on March 13, 1972.

Sometime in 1974, the Policarpio residence which stood on the foreclosed property was destroyed by a typhoon. Apparently, Lumen Policarpio had not vacated it, for she rebuilt it in January 1975. In 1980, the bank sold the property to Alto Industrial Enterprises, Inc. On August 28, 1989, a writ of possession was issued by Judge Castañeda of the Regional Trial Court of Manila, Branch 17, whom Lumen Policarpio sought to disqualify. The case was raffled to Branch 12 presided over by Judge Procoro J. Donato, who issued a second alias writ of possession on October 15, 1990. It was given to respondent deputy sheriff Gallardo Tolentino for implementation. Attorney Policarpio, Et. Al. challenged Judge Donato’s order in the Court of Appeals but without success. Her petition was dismissed by the Court of Appeals on March 21, 1991. Her petition for review of the Appellate Court’s decision was likewise dismissed by the Supreme Court.chanrobles.com:cralaw:red

On November 12, 1990, Deputy Sheriff Tolentino filed in court a motion for approval of his estimate of expenses for the implementation of the writ of possession and prayed that the plaintiff be ordered to deposit the amount with the sheriff. The court, however, deferred action on Tolentino’s motion until after the hearing on December 6, 1990 of Policarpio’s motion for reconsideration. Without waiting for the court’s action on his motion, Tolentino proceeded to implement the alias writ of possession on November 14, 1990.chanrobles law library

On November 29, 1990, Judge Donato found Tolentino guilty of indirect contempt for his undue haste in implementing the alias writ of possession without waiting for the court’s approval of his estimate of expenses for the implementation of said writ.

On October 4, 1991, Tolentino filed with the Executive Judge of the Regional Trial Court of Malabon, Metro Manila, a sheriff’s Return and Manifestation seeking authority to place certain personal property of the complainants in a bonded warehouse. He also asked the court to approve his bill of expenses for moving the complainants’ property from the premises. On October 7, 1991, Executive Judge Cabigao issued the order prayed for.

On October 14, 1991, acting by virtue of the resolution of the Supreme Court dated August 28, 1991 in the case of "Simeon Policarpio, Et. Al. v. CA, G.R. No. 97963, as well as the October 7, 1991 order of Judge Cabigao, deputy sheriff Gallardo Tolentino, with the knowledge and approval of clerk of court Attorney Augusto D. Castro, and aided by PHILTRUST’s lawyer and a support force of thirty (30) bank employees, forcibly opened the house of the complainants, ransacked the same, removed all the personal property therein, and transferred them to an undisclosed bonded warehouse in Pandacan, Metro Manila.

The next day, October 15, 1991, Judge Cabigao recalled and set aside his October 7, 1991 order for fear that it might be misinterpreted as an assumption of jurisdiction over the case by the Regional Trial Court of Malabon.

Complainants filed this administrative complaint against the respondents, alleging that the enforcement of the writ of possession by breaking into the Policarpio home which was not even "included in the mortgage with the Philtrust" (p. 2, Rollo), was unlawful because the Regional Trial Court of Malabon had no jurisdiction over the case. Despite that, Tolentino filed his Return and Manifestation in the Regional Trial Court of Malabon. Complainants filed robbery charges against the respondents.chanrobles.com.ph : virtual law library

There is no doubt that the implementation of the writ of possession on October 14, 1991 by the respondents was premature and irregular. It was carried out with undue haste and in an oppressive manner, without awaiting the court’s action on respondent sheriff’s motion for approval of his estimated expenses. As a matter of fact, for that misconduct, Tolentino was found guilty of indirect contempt by Judge Donato of the Regional Trial Court of Manila, Branch 12.

WHEREFORE, as recommended by the Court Administrator, respondents Gallardo C. Tolentino and Attorney Augusto Castro are found guilty of abuse of authority and serious misconduct and are each ordered to pay a fine of TWO THOUSAND (P2,000.00) PESOS for having arbitrarily and oppressively disregarded procedural rules in implementing the writ of possession on the property of the herein complainants. They are warned that a repetition of the same or similar act in the future will be dealt with more severely and they are admonished to henceforth exercise utmost care and prudence in the performance of their duties.

SO ORDERED.

Cruz and Quiason, JJ., concur.




Back to Home | Back to Main




















chanrobles.com





ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com






June-1993 Jurisprudence                 

  • G.R. Nos. 70310-11 June 1, 1993 - MASSIVE CONSTRUCTION, INC., ET AL. v. INTERMEDIATE APPELLATE COURT, ET AL.

  • G.R. Nos. 71998-99 June 2, 1991

    EMILIANO R. DE LOS SANTOS, ET AL. v. INTERMEDIATE APPELLATE COURT, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 99866 June 2, 1993 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. SIDRO D. DORO

  • G.R. No. 105005 June 2, 1993 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. JUANITA A. MARCELO

  • A.M. No. MTJ-90-460 June 3, 1993 - COURT ADMINISTRATOR v. OSMUNDO M. VILLANUEVA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 93511 June 3, 1993 - CORAZON L. CABAGNOT v. CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. Nos. 97309-10 June 3, 1993 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ERNESTO QUEJADA

  • G.R. No. 97426 June 3, 1993 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ROMEO APOLINARIO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 97931 June 3, 1993 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ERNESTO MENDOZA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 105285 June 3, 1993 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. RENATO D. FIDER

  • G.R. No. 105884 June 3, 1993 - SOCIAL SECURITY SYSTEM v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 74298 June 4, 1993 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ROLANDO PATELLAR SACRISTAN, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 88246 June 4, 1993 - LA CAMPANA FOOD PRODUCTS, INC. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 97457 June 4, 1993 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. TITO CABALLERO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 100290 June 4, 1993 - NORBERTO TIBAJIA, JR., ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 100606 June 4, 1993 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. JOEMI BALACIO, ET AL.

  • G.R. Nos. 101216-18 June 4, 1993 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. REDENTOR D. DICHOSO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 83902 June 8, 1993 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ARCADIO MANRIQUE, JR., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 84921 June 8, 1993 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ROLANDO DURAL, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 88291 June 8, 1993 - ERNESTO M. MACEDA v. CATALINO MACARAIG, JR.

  • G.R. No. 96354 June 8, 1993 - LAPERAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 98177 June 8, 1993 - BARFEL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 101292 June 8, 1993 - RICARDO ENCARNACION v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. Nos. 102773-77 June 8, 1993 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. GODOFREDO SAYAT

  • G.R. No. 103631 June 8, 1993 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. FELIPE C. RAMOS

  • G.R. No. 106621 June 8, 1993 - PSBA MANILA v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 95357 June 9, 1993 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. EDUARDO GELAVER

  • G.R. No. 57828 June 14, 1993 - SEA-LAND SERVICE, INC. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 94630 June 14, 1993 - SALOME ROSENDO RIVAS v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 95539 June 14, 1993 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. MELCHOR B. DATINGGINOO

  • G.R. No. 97835 June 14, 1993 - FIRST GENERAL MARKETING CORPORATION, ET AL. v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION

  • G.R. No. 100641 June 14, 1993 - FARLE P. ALMODIEL v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 108957 June 14, 1993 - PRUDENTIAL BANK v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • A.M. No. P-92-709 June 14, 1993 - ROGER A. DOMAGAS v. DELIA MALANA

  • G.R. Nos. 94709-10 June 15, 1993 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. RUBEN CABARRUBIAS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 106037 June 15, 1993 - RICARDO C. ROA, ET AL. v. PH CREDIT CORPORATION, ET AL.

  • B.M. No. 553 June 17, 1993 - MAURICIO C. ULEP v. LEGAL CLINIC, INC.

  • A.M. No. MTJ-88-142 June 17, 1993 - ERLINDA A. MENDOZA v. RODOLFO A. MABUTAS

  • A.M. No. P-92-673 June 17, 1993 - LUMEN POLICARPIO, ET AL. v. GALLARDO TOLENTINO, ET AL.

  • A.M. No. 3694 June 17, 1993 - ALBERTO FERNANDEZ, ET AL. v. BENJAMIN M. GRECIA

  • G.R. No. 88445 June 17, 1993 - JESUS KHO v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 92492 June 17, 1993 - THELMA VDA. DE CANILANG v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 101730 June 17, 1993 - PHILIPPINE TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION v. BIENVENIDO E. LAGUESMA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 106011 June 17, 1993 - TOWN SAVINGS AND LOAN BANK, INC. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 106374 June 17, 1993 - PHILIPPINE AIRLINES, INC. v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 106973 June 17, 1993 - MARIA L. LOPEZ v. NORTHWEST AIRLINES, INC., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 108000 June 17, 1993 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • A.M. No. RTJ-91-657 June 21, 1993 - LOURDES PRESADO v. MANUEL C. GENOVA

  • G.R. No. 104408 June 21, 1993 - METRO MANILA TRANSIT CORPORATION v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 105607 June 21, 1993 - HECTOR C. VILLANUEVA v. SANDIGANBAYAN, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 99843 June 22, 1993 - Sps. BRAULIO ABALOS, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. Nos. 104304-05 June 22, 1993 - LUNINGNING LANDRITO v. CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION

  • G.R. No. 104732 June 22, 1993 - ROBERTO A. FLORES, ET AL. v. FRANKLIN M. DRILON, ET AL.

  • A.M. No. RTJ-91-752 June 23, 1993 - JOVENCITO R. ZUÑO, SR. v. BALTAZAR DIZON

  • G.R. No. 90643 June 25, 1993 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. AGUSTIN G. FORTES

  • G.R. No. 93109 June 25, 1993 - MILAGROS LLAMANZARES v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 101728 June 25, 1993 - RAMON V. ROXAS v. SPS. ANDRES DY, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 102206 June 25, 1993 - NATIONAL POWER CORPORATION, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 102958 June 25, 1993 - RADIO COMMUNICATIONS OF THE PHILIPPINES, INC. v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 104175 June 25, 1993 - YOUNG AUTO SUPPLY CO., ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 105361 June 25, 1993 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. BONIFACIO ENCISO

  • G.R. No. 105883 June 25, 1993 - LETICIA A. ALIMARIO v. COMMISSION ON AUDIT

  • A.M. No. RTJ-86-50 June 28, 1993 - ADELAIDA P. FELONGCO v. JUDGE LUIS D. DICTADO

  • G.R. No. 79760 June 28, 1993 - PERPETUAL SAVINGS BANK, ET AL. v. JOSE ORO B. FAJARDO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 99333 June 28, 1993 - SPS. ANTONIO PAILANO, JR., ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 102980 June 28, 1993 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. SALVADOR OSIGAN, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 106498 June 28, 1993 - LOLITA DADUBO v. CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • A.M. No. R-711-P June 29, 1993 - SPS. ALFONSO AQUINO LIM, ET AL. v. OSCAR GUASCH, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 78631 June 29, 1993 - COLUMBIA PICTURES, INC., ET AL. v. ALFREDO C. FLORES, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 97564 June 29, 1993 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. RODOLFO CAYETANO

  • G.R. No. 99395 June 29, 1993 - ST. LUKE’S MEDICAL CENTER, INC. v. RUBEN O. TORRES, ET AL.

  • A.M. No. MTJ-91-554 June 30, 1993 - WARLITO ALISANGCO v. JOSE C. TABILIRAN, JR.

  • G.R. No. 58057 June 30, 1993 - HEIRS OF MARIANO LAGUTAN, ET AL. v. SEVERINA ICAO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 72319 June 30, 1993 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. MARTIN ALVERO, JR., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 72608 June 30, 1993 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. JULITO U. ARNAN

  • G.R. No. 86390 June 30, 1993 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. JAIME A. ROSALES

  • G.R. No. 86994 June 30, 1993 - JAIME LOOT v. GOVERNMENT SERVICE INSURANCE SYSTEM

  • G.R. No. 94310 June 30, 1993 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. VIRGILIO ALAY-AY

  • G.R. No. 97212 June 30, 1993 - BENJAMIN YU v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. Nos. 98000-02 June 30, 1993 - INOCENCIO PEÑANUEVA, JR. v. SANDIGANBAYAN, ET AL.

  • G.R. Nos. 98321-24 June 30, 1993 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. RICARDO S. DE GUZMAN, ET AL.

  • G.R. Nos. 100720-23 June 30, 1993 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ROLANDO CODILLA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 102748 June 30, 1993 - GOULDS PUMPS (PHILS.), INC. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 102984 June 30, 1993 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. RUBEN TAKBOBO

  • G.R. No. 104609 June 30, 1993 - PHILIP LEE GO, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 105671 June 30, 1993 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. MANUEL M. MAGTULOY

  • G.R. No. 105751 June 30, 1993 - BA FINANCE CORPORATION v. RUFINO CO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 106646 June 30, 1993 - JAIME LEDESMA v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 108284 June 30, 1993 - PERSONNEL SERVICES v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION, ET AL.