Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence


Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 2019 > September 2019 Decisions > G.R. No. 242213 - PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. ROGER ENERO, ACCUSED-APPELLANT:




G.R. No. 242213 - PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. ROGER ENERO, ACCUSED-APPELLANT

PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

SECOND DIVISION

G.R. No. 242213, September 18, 2019

PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. ROGER ENERO, ACCUSED-APPELLANT.

D E C I S I O N

REYES, J. JR., J.:

This is an appeal filed by Roger Enero (accused-appellant) assailing the Decision1 dated March 27, 2018 of the Court of Appeals (CA) in CA-G.R. CR HC No. 08097, which convicted him of the crime of Murder.

The Relevant Antecedents


Accused-appellant, together with Mervin Verbo (Mervin), Mario Agbayani (Mario), and John Doe, was charged with the complex crime of robbery with homicide which resulted in the unlawful asportation of personal property and the death of three individuals, namely: Mabel Ulita (Mabel), Medirose Paat (Medirose), and Clark John John Ulita (Clark) in an Information2 that reads:

That on AUGUST 10, 2010 or thereabout (sic) in the Municipality of Gattaran, province of Cagayan, and within the jurisdiction of this Honorable Court, the above-named accused, with intent to gain, armed with knives, with violence against or intimidation of persons, conspiring together and helping one another, did then and there willfully, unlawfully, and feloniously enter the house/residence of Mabel Ulita, once inside took, stole and carted away [P]20,000.00 cash; a gold ring and gold earring with pendant, and by reason or on occasion of the Robbery, the same was aggravated, the above-named accused, with intent to kill, conspiring together and helping one another, did then and there wilfully, unlawfully, and feloniously assault, attack and stab said Mabel Ulita y Bumanglang, Medirose Paat y Berbano, and Clark John Ulita y Bumanglang, a minor, eleven (11) years of age, inflicting upon them multiple stab wounds which caused their deaths, and that the same was further aggravated the act having been accompanied by the Rape of Mabel Ulita.

CONTRARY TO LAW.3
According to SPO3 Dennis Aguilor (SPO3 Aguilor), he received a phone call at about 6:30 a.m. on August 10, 2010, relaying the killing of Mabel, her son Clark, and their housemaid, Medirose. In response to said call, Police Chief Inspector Abraham Lopez (PCI Lopez), Police Inspector Mallillin, Police Inspector Rodante Albano, SPO4 Carlito Supapo, SPO1 Elmer Juan, and the witness proceeded to the crime scene and investigated the area.4

At about 9:00 a.m. of the same day, the team of the Regional PNP Crime Laboratory arrived and processed the crime scene. They collected specimens of hair, pubic hair, and latent prints on suspicion that Mabel was raped. They also found a claw hammer on top of the septic tank at the back of the house of the victims. The specimens gathered were brought to the Crime Laboratory and examined.5

Bernard Javier (Bernard), one of the witnesses, testified that he was watching television in his house when he heard screams coming from the house of Mabel, which is about 20 meters away from his place. When he peeped through the window, he saw four persons coming out of the house of Mabel and he identified them as their neighbors, accused-appellant, Mervin, Ernesto Verbo (Ernesto), and Mario, who have noticeable traces of blood on their clothes. He was certain as to their identity because of the light coming from the house of Mabel and from the street.6

The following morning, Bernard went to the house of Arnold to narrate to him what he noticed that early morning. They then both decided to go to the house of Mabel as they suspected that the occupants had bangungot. When nobody responded to their call, Arnold threw stones at the house of Mabel to get the attention of the occupants therein. Eventually, Bernard decided to peep on the flooring using the gap between the bottom portion of the door. There, he saw blood scattered on the floor. It was at this time that people started to arrive. Bernard went to the house of SPO3 William Asuncion who immediately responded to the crime scene.7

On cross examination, Bernard, however, narrated that he saw about five persons coming out of the house of Mabel. Out of the five persons, he can identify four of them as accused-appellant, Mervin, Ernesto, and Mario. After seeing them, Bernard went back to sleep.8

On the other hand, Arnold testified that on August 10, 2010, he heard loud screams which prompted him to go outside his house and walk towards the road to observe where the screams emanated. Subsequently, he heard the screams coming from Mabel's house and suddenly saw five persons coming out of the house. As the lights were surrounding said house, he was able to ascertain that said five persons were male. However, he failed to identify anyone.9

The following morning, Arnold talked to Bernard and relayed to him what he saw in the morning of August 10, 2010. Bernard then told Arnold that he saw four of the five persons coming out of Mabel's house and named them as accused-appellant, Mervin, Ernesto, and Mario. Arnold then stated that he knew accused-appellant because he is the husband of his niece, while Mervin and Ernesto were his companions in harvesting palay.10

On cross-examination, Arnold reiterated that he saw five male persons coming out of Mabel's house after he heard loud screams emanating from said house. He likewise affirmed that he was not able to identify such persons despite the light coming from the house and street lights.11

Atty. Cicero Elizaga (Atty. Elizaga) testified that he was called by the police officers to assist Mervin and Ernesto in executing their confession. After informing the latter of their rights and the consequences of a confessional statement, Mervin and Ernesto still proceeded and decided to give the same.12

The medico-legal expert who conducted the autopsy on the bodies of the victims was Dr. Cherry Anne Ayunon-Carreon (Dr. Ayunon-Carreon), who found multiple stab wounds on the upper extremities, lower and upper left arm, lower right arm. On the back side, she found wounds in the nape area, right shoulder, left and right scapular area, middle of the back, and right lower back of Medirose.13

As to Mabel, Dr. Ayunon-Carreon found multiple stab wounds on the nape area, both on the interior and anterior area, the right clavicular area, the chest, the right upper quadrant and left upper quadrant of the abdomen, all of which are at the frontal side of the victim. At the back of the ventral side, she found seven stab wounds. The fatal wounds are located at the right and lower back part where the kidneys are located. The most serious wound was found on the anterior part of the neck and on both the left and right side of the chest, where the heart and lungs are located. Dr. Ayunon-Carreon reiterated that more than one bladed weapon was used in inflicting wounds upon Mabel.14

As to Clark, Dr. Ayunon-Carreon found only one wound on the frontal side located at the right chest. At the back portion, two wounds were found at the right upper and lower back. She also found a hematoma at the left frontal area of the head and an abrasion on the left psychosomatic area.15

During cross-examination, Dr. Ayunon-Carreon said that it was possible that one weapon caused the multiple wounds. During re-cross examination, she said that based on the multiple wounds received by the victims, it was not possible that only one assailant caused the same.16

For his defense, accused-appellant denied the accusations against him and averred that when he was at the waiting shed, which was 20 meters away from the house of Mabel, he heard screams coming from the northern direction. He then went to said direction and saw Arnold and Bernard. They informed accused-appellant that Mabel was dead. He further testified that Arnold and Bernard peeped through a small opening and saw bodies lying on the ground covered with blood. Accused-appellant likewise peeped through said opening and saw the arm and feet of a person covered with blood. Upon seeing such, he ordered Arnold and Bernard to call the barangay captain and Mabel's brother, as he claimed to be a "private" barangay tanod.17

Accused-appellant, likewise, testified that earlier on that day, while he was conditioning his fighting cocks, he saw Mario holding the right side of his stomach and his clothes were torn. He likewise noticed red stains on Mario's shirt and presumed it was blood. He was afraid to inquire as to why Mario's shirt was covered with blood and so he went back to his house to sleep.18

The Regional Trial Court (RTC), in a Decision19 dated January 27, 2016, convicted accused-appellant of the crime as charged. By circumstantial evidence, the RTC found that the prosecution sufficiently proved that robbery with homicide was committed by accused-appellant.

The following circumstances were considered by the trial court in ruling for accused-appellant's conviction: (a) Bernard claimed to have seen the accused-appellant near the place of the incident at the time or near at such time; (b) Bernard's statement was corroborated in some material points by Arnold's testimony that he saw four to five male persons coming out of the fence of Mabel's house; (c) Accused-appellant did not deny that on the date and time of the incident, he was at Palagao, Norte, Gattaran, Cagayan; (d) The investigation of the police officers yielded to the fact that money and jewelry were taken from Mabel's house; and (e) Mervin and Ernesto executed their respective confessions, which implicated accused-appellant in the commission of the robbery and death of the victims.20

Notably, the RTC deemed it improper to discuss the existence of conspiracy "considering that only one accused was arraigned and tried."21 Thus:
WHEREFORE, premises considered, the court finds [accused-appellant] ROGER ENERO guilty beyond reasonable doubt of the crime of ROBBERY WITH MULTIPLE HOMICIDE and hereby imposes upon him:

1.����� The penalty of RECLUSION PERPETUA for the death of Mabel Ulita;

2.����� The penalty of RECLUSION PERPETUA for the death of John Clark Ulita;

3.����� The penalty of RECLUSION PERPETUA for the death of Medirose Paat.

The accused is further directed to pay the heirs of Mabel Ulita, Clark John Ulita and Medirose Paat the total amount of Three Hundred Thousand (PhP300,000.00) Pesos as actual damages, Seventy Five Thousand (PhP 75,000.00) each victim as death indemnity; Fifty Thousand Pesos (PhP 50,000.00) pesos each victim as Moral damages and the amount of Twenty Five Thousand (PhP 25,000.00) Pesos each victim as Exemplary Damages and to pay the costs.

Considering that accused Mervin Verbo, Mario Agbayani and John Doe are still at large, let the records of the case be sent to the archived (sic) to be reinstated upon their arrest. For this purpose, let an Alias Warrant of Arrest be issued for their immediate apprehension.

SO ORDERED.22
On appeal, the CA, in a Decision23 dated March 27, 2018, maintained that there was no evidence presented which would prove that the complex crime of robbery with homicide took place. Accused-appellant's complicity to such crime, which was entirely based on the extrajudicial confessions of Mervin and Ernesto, remained unproven.� Such confessional� statements constitute hearsay evidence.24

The CA found that no evidence was presented to prove that the elements of the crime of robbery were present nor the intent of accused-appellant and his cohorts to rob the place and the killings were only incidental so as to convict accused-appellant of such complex crime.25

However, the CA found that the crime of murder, qualified by treachery, was committed, as circumstantial evidence exists which proves that accused-appellant participated in the killing of Mabel, Clark, and Medirose. The fallo thereof reads:
WHEREFORE, the appeal is hereby DENIED. The Decision of the Regional Trial Court, Branch 8, Aparri, Cagayan in Criminal Case No. 11-10717 is AFFIRMED with MODIFICATIONS.

Accused-Appellant ROGER ENERO is hereby found guilty beyond reasonable doubt of the Murder of Mabel Ulita y Bumanglag, Clark John John Ulita y Bumanglag, and Medirose Paat y Berbano and thus he is sentenced to suffer the penalty of reclusion perpetua, without eligibility of parole, for each of the three killings.

The accused-appellant Roger Enero is also held liable for civil damages to the heirs of Mabel Ulita y Bumanglag, Clark John John Ulita y Bumanglag and Medirose Paat y Berbano, separately, in the following amounts:���
  1. [P] 100,000.00 as civil indemnity ex delicto;
  2. [P] 100,000.0 as moral damages;
  3. [P] 100,00.00 as exemplary damages; and
  4. [P]50,000.00 as temperate damages.
All amounts awarded, including the temperate damages, shall earn an interest of 6% [per annum] from date of finality of this Decision, until full payment.

SO ORDERED.26
Hence, accused-appellant filed an appeal before this Court.

The Issue

Whether or not the guilt of accused-appellant was proven beyond reasonable doubt.

The Court's Ruling

The appeal is impressed with merit.

To successfully prosecute the crime of murder, the following elements must be established; (1) that a person was killed; (2) that the accused killed him or her; (3) that the killing was attended by any of the qualifying circumstances mentioned in Article 248 of the Revised Penal Code; and (4) that the killing is not parricide or infanticide.27

The existence of the first and the fourth elements is undisputed. However, the determination as to whether the second element is present in this case deserves a re-examination by this Court.

Significantly, accused-appellant's participation in the crime of murder was based on circumstantial evidence. For the latter to be given credence as basis for conviction, it is but indispensable that: (1) there is more than one circumstance; (2) the facts from which the inferences are derived are proven; and (3) the combination of all the circumstances is such as to produce a conviction beyond a reasonable doubt.28

Circumstantial evidence presented must constitute an unbroken chain which leads one to a fair and reasonable conclusion pointing to the accused, to the exclusion of the others, as the guilty person.29�� (Emphasis supplied)

Culling the records of the case, this Court finds that the tapestry of circumstances does not merit the conviction of accused-appellant.

Mainly, the factual circumstances which were considered by the RTC and the C A in ruling that accused-appellant committed the killings of Mabel, Clark, and Medirose were as follows: (a) loud screams were heard by witnesses Arnold and Bernard; (b) the screams came from the house of Mabel; (c) Bernard and Arnold saw four to five men coming out of the house of Mabel; (d) Bernard positively identified accused-appellant as one of the men; (e) Bernard and Arnold discovered the dead bodies of Mabel, Clark, and Medirose.

The foregoing narration failed to establish that accused-appellant was the one who committed the killings. The evidence linking accused-appellant to the crime of murder, as held by the CA, was the fact that he was seen by both Bernard and Arnold coming out of Mabel's house after hearing the screams therefrom. However, it is significant to consider that Bernard likewise, testified that there were three to four persons, aside from accused-appellant, who came out from Mabel's house. Thus, the presence of other men does not exclude the possibility that they were the perpetrators. Also, a considerable amount of time had lapsed from the time that Bernard and Arnold saw accused-appellant and his alleged cohorts, to the time that they actually saw the lifeless bodies of the victims. Both Bernard and Arnold testified that they went to the house of Mabel hours after they saw accused-appellant with three or four others. It was unclear as to whether the victims were already dead when they saw accused-appellant and others coming out of Mabel's house or there were others who went inside or outside said house. The endless possibilities which may arise in this case sanction reasonable doubt on accused-appellant's guilt. The conclusion of the RTC and the CA that it was indeed accused-appellant who was the perpetrator of the crime, is a mere speculation and based on conjecture.

Neither can conspiracy be appreciated so as to consider accused-appellant as principal by direct participation. As a rule, once conspiracy is shown, the act of one is the act of all the conspirators.30 As in all crimes, the existence of conspiracy must be proven beyond reasonable doubt. While direct proof is unnecessary, the same degree of proof necessary in establishing the crime, is required to support the attendance thereof, i.e., it must be shown to exist as clearly and convincingly as the commission of the offense itself.31

In this case, however, there is want of evidence proving that all the accused executed concerted acts so as to achieve their common design of killing the victims. In fact, the prosecution seemed to dispense with the theory of conspiracy as there appears no evidence to such effect. The extrajudicial confession executed by Mervin and Ernesto does not bind the accused-appellant as it is considered as hearsay evidence under the res inter alios acta rule. Even the exception to such rule, i.e., an admission made by a conspirator, does not apply here for proof other than said admission is necessary. Here, the lone evidence of conspiracy is such confessional statement of Mervin and Ernesto.32

It is a basic principle of constitutional law that the accused shall be presumed innocent until the contrary is proved. Thus, when the prosecution failed to overturn this presumption, this Court is bound by its constitutional duty to render a judgment of acquittal.

While this Court abhors the dreadful fate which had cast upon the victims, to sustain conviction sans proof beyond reasonable doubt is to permit an innocent man's ontological demise.

WHEREFORE, premises considered, the appeal is hereby GRANTED. The Decision dated March 27, 2018 of the Court of Appeals in CA-G.R. CR HC No. 08097 is REVERSED and SET ASIDE. Accordingly, accused-appellant ROGER ENERO is hereby ACQUITTED of the crime of murder for failure of the prosecution to prove his guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

His immediate release from the National Penitentiary is hereby ORDERED unless there are other lawful causes warranting his continuing confinement thereat. The Director of the Bureau of Corrections is DIRECTED to implement the release of accused-appellant ROGER ENERO in accordance with this decision, and to report on his compliance, within ten (10) days from receipt.

SO ORDERED.

Carpio, (Chairperson), Caguioa, Lazaro-Javier, and Zalameda, JJ., concur.

Endnotes:


*Acting Chief Justice per Special Order No. 2703 dated September 10, 2019.

1 Penned by Associate Justice Maria Filomena D. Singh, with Associate Justices Sesinando E. Villon and Edwin D. Sorongon, concurring; rollo, pp. 2-30.

2 CA rollo, p. 16.

3 Id.

4 Supra note 1, at 4.

5 Id.

6 Id. at 5.

7 Id. at 5-6.

8 Id. at 6-7.

9 Id. at 7.

10 Id.

11 Id. at 8.

12 Id. at 8-9.

13 Id at 10.

14 Id.

15 Id. at 10-11.

16 Id. at 11.

17 Id. at 12.

18 Id. at 12.

19 Penned by Presiding Judge Nicanor S. Pascual, Jr.; CA rollo, pp. 18-38.

20 Id. at 32-35.

21 Id. at 36.

22 Id. at 37.

23 Supra note 1.

24Rollo, p. 20.

25 Id. at 18-19.

26 Id. at 29.

27People of the Philippines v. Racal, 817 Phil. 665, 677 ( 2017).

28 RULES OF COURT. Rule 133, Section 4.

29Zabala v. People of the Philippines, 752 Phil. 59, 68 (2015).

30People of the Philippines v. Jesalva, 811 Phil. 299, 308, citing People v. Medice, 679 Phil. 338, 349 (2012)

31See People of the Philippines v. Anabe, 644 Phil. 261, 278 ( 2010).

32 People of the Philippines v. Cachuela, 710 Phil. 728, 741 (2013)



Back to Home | Back to Main




















chanrobles.com





ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com






September-2019 Jurisprudence                 

  • A.C. No. 10439 - ANNALIZA C. CHAN, COMPLAINANT, v. ATTY. REBENE C. CARRERA, RESPONDENT.

  • G.R No. 224595 - PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. GGG, ACCUSED-APPELLANT.

  • A.C. No. 6560 - MIKE A. FERMIN, COMPLAINANT, v. ATTY. LINTANG H. BEDOL, RESPONDENT.

  • G.R No. 246328 - VICE MAYOR SHIRLYN L. BA�AS-NOGRALES, ET AL.,* PETITIONERS, v. COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS, RESPONDENT.

  • G.R. No. 230817 - VIVE EAGLE LAND, INC., PETITIONER, v. NATIONAL HOME MORTGAGE FINANCE CORPORATION, JOSEPH PETER S. SISON, AND CAVACON CORPORATION, RESPONDENTS.

  • G.R. No. 217787 - SOCORRO F. ONGKINGCO AND MARIE PAZ B. ONGKINGCO, PETITIONERS, v. KAZUHIRO SUGIYAMA AND PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, RESPONDENTS.

  • G.R. No. 235783 - PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, APPELLEE, v. ANTHONY CHAVEZ Y VILLAREAL @ ESTONG AND MICHELLE BAUTISTA Y DELA CRUZ, ACCUSED, ANTHONY CHAVEZ Y VILLAREAL @ ESTONG, ACCUSED-APPELLANT.

  • G.R. Nos. 234789-91 - FELICITAS D. NACINO, HELEN E. RAMACULA, AND THE VOLUNTEERS AGAINST CRIME AND CORRUPTION, INC., PETITIONERS, v. THE OFFICE OF THE OMBUDSMAN, REPRESENTED BY OMBUDSMAN CONCHITA CARPIO-MORALES, BENIGNO SIMEON C. AQUINO III, ALAN LM. PURISIMA, AND GETULIO P. NAPE�AS, RESPONDENTS.

  • G.R. No. 240311 - PHILIPPINE NATIONAL BANK, PETITIONER, v. FELINA GIRON-ROQUE, DR. GLORIA M. APOSTOL AND HUSBAND, DR. EDWARD APOSTOL, RESPONDENTS

  • G.R. No. 243151 - XXX, PETITIONER, v. PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, RESPONDENT

  • G.R. No. 211522 - J' MARKETING CORPORATION, ROGELIO U. SOYAO, EVP-GENERAL MANAGER, PEPITO P. ESTRELLAN, KALIBO BRANCH MANAGER, PETITIONERS, v. FERNANDO S. IGUIZ, RESPONDENT

  • G.R. No. 229212 - PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, APPELLEE, v. GERARDO LABINI Y GRAJO @ "JERRY," APPELLANT

  • G.R. No. 230356 - PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, APPELLEE, v. ERIC VARGAS Y JAGUARIN AND GINA BAGACINA, ACCUSED, ERIC VARGAS Y JAGUARIN, ACCUSED-APPELLANT

  • G.R. No. 222455 - GERRY S. MOJICA, PETITIONER, v. GENERALI PILIPINAS LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY, INC., RESPONDENT

  • G.R. No. 208480 - REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES, PETITIONER, v. NATIONAL COMMISSION ON INDIGENOUS PEOPLES, REGISTER OF DEEDS OF BAGUIO CITY, LAND REGISTRATION AUTHORITY, HEIRS OF COSEN PIRASO, REPRESENTED BY RICHARD A. ACOP, HEIRS OF JOSEPHINE MOLINTAS ABANAG, REPRESENTED BY ISAIAS M. ABANAG, MARION T. POOL, JOAN L. GORIO, AND VIRGINIA C. GAO-AN, RESPONDENTS

  • G.R. No. 238457 - PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. JOJO BACYAAN Y SABANIYA, RONNIE FERNANDEZ Y GONZALES, AND RYAN GUEVARRA Y SIPRIA, ACCUSED-APPELLANTS

  • G.R.No. 206598 - SPOUSES SALVADOR BATOLINIO AND AMOR P. BATOLINIO, REPRESENTED BY ROY B. PANTALEON AS ATTORNEY-IN-FACT, PETITIONERS, v. SHERIFF JANET YAP-ROSAS AND PHILIPPINE SAVINGS BANK, RESPONDENTS

  • G.R. No. 244274 - NORMAN CORDERO MARQUEZ, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS, RESPONDENT

  • G.R. No. 222710 - PHILIPPINE HEALTH INSURANCE CORPORATION, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSION ON AUDIT, CHAIRPERSON MICHAEL G. AGUINALDO, DIRECTOR JOSEPH B. ANACAY AND SUPERVISING AUDITOR ELENA L. AGUSTIN, RESPONDENTS

  • G.R. No. 240873 - SOLICITOR GENERAL JOSE C. CALIDA, MILAGROS O. CALIDA, JOSEF CALIDA, MICHELLE CALIDA, AND MARK JOREL CALIDA, PETITIONERS, v. SENATOR ANTONIO "SONNY" TRILLANES IV, THE COMMITTEE ON ACCOUNTABILITY OF PUBLIC OFFICERS AND INVESTIGATIONS (BLUE RIBBON COMMITTEE), AND THE COMMITTEE ON CIVIL SERVICE, GOVERNMENT REORGANIZATION, AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, RESPONDENTS

  • A.M. No. RTJ-17-2486 [Formerly A.M. No. 17-02-45-RTC - RE: INVESTIGATION REPORT ON THE ALLEGED EXTORTION ACTIVITIES OF PRESIDING JUDGE GODOFREDO B. ABUL, JR., BRANCH 4, REGIONAL TRIAL COURT, BUTUAN CITY, AGUSAN DEL NORTE

  • G.R. No. 220514 - RUBEN T. OCLARINO, ABBIE S. HILAY, CUSTODIO N. NONAILLADA, JR., HENEDIN F. TORRECAMPO, ISIDRO A. MORILLO, ROBERTO R. PANGAN, ROGELIO O. DI�O, BEBIANO S. GANDAMON, ASTERIO S. CATIBIG, DAVID G. GUJILDE, ROBERTO Y. NUGOY, EDUARDO H. SOTTO, ALLAN JEAN E. SANDAG, VICENTE P. DUYOG, ORLANDO C. PELARES, MARLON A. ALERTA and EXPEDITO A. SOLIVAR, Petitioners, vs. SILVERIO J. NAVARRO, EDUARDOCRISTOBAL, REYNALDO BERNARDO, DANILO SALAZAR, MAXIMO ESPINOSA, ROMEO DI�O, ISAGANI SAMONTE, REYWELL RUAYA, VIRGILIO SECO, RUBEN ESTOCADA, WARSON GUY-AB, ANGELITO BAYAWA, JOSE PIRIGRIN, VALERIANO CANTUNGAN, ROGELIO PAGSISIHAN and NEMENCIO AGUILAR, RESPONDENTS

  • G.R. No. 234273 - PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. EMALYN N. MORENO, ACCUSED-APPELLANT

  • G.R. No. 224511 - EXCHANGE CAPITAL CORPORATION, PETITIONER, v. BANK OF COMMERCE AND BANCAPITAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, RESPONDENTS

  • G.R. No. 227993 - PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. BENSON TULOD Y CUARTE, ACCUSED-APPELLANT

  • G.R. No. 232380 - PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, V. RONALD JAURIGUE @ "RON-RON" A.K.A. RONALDO VICENTE Y JAURIGUE, ACCUSED-APPELLANT

  • G.R. No. 205805 - SIMEONA, GLORIA AND RODOLFO (ALL SURNAMED PRESCILLA), ARMENTINA PRESCILLA-PERDES, HERMINIA PRESCILLA-CARANDANG, ZENAIDA PRESCILLA-MANUEL AND YOLANDA PRESCILLA-MARCIANO, PETITIONERS, v. CONRADO O. LASQUITE AND JUANITO L. ANDRADE, RESPONDENTS

  • G.R. No. 217755 - ELMER MONTERO, PETITIONER, v. SANTIAGO MONTERO, JR. AND CHARLIE MONTERO, RESPONDENTS

  • G.R. No. 224186 - SPOUSES EMILIO MANGARON, JR. AND ERLINDA MANGARON, PETITIONERS, v. HANNA VIA DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION, OWNED AND MANAGED BY ENGR. JAMES STEPHEN B. CARPE, RESPONDENT

  • G.R. No. 213831 - THE PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, V. ADONIS CABALES, ACCUSED-APPELLANT

  • G.R. No. 242101 - XXX, PETITIONER, v. PEOPLE OF PHILIPPINES, THE RESPONDENT

  • G.R. Nos. 229164 & 229186 - MERCEDES TOLENTINO SOLIMAN, HEIRS OF ANGELES TOLENTINO-ANGELES, NAMELY: GRACIA S. PANES, EDGAR T. SALVOSA, BENJAMIN T. SALVOSA AND SONIA I. MENDOZA, HEIRS OF RAFAEL TOLENTINO, NAMELY: LEAH T. BAENA, RENE ANGEL TOLENTINO AND ROBERT TOLENTINO, PETITIONERS, v. HEIRS OF RAMON TOLENTINO, NAMELY: MARILOU T. LOIUE, ANTONIO I. TOLENTINO, ELSA T. CALAUSTRO, DOLORES T. TOLENTINO, JOCELYN T. DURAN, TERESITA T. THOMAS, SUSAN T. CLASIO AND REMIGIO MANCHUS, RESPONDENTS

  • G.R. No. 234655 - JESSICA LIO MARTINEZ, PETITIONER, v. HEIRS OF REMBERTO F. LIM, NAMELY: FABIANA TIMBANCAYA LIM, CHINITA LIM PE, MINYANI LIM BAYLOSIS, GENARO T. LIM, EMELINE LIM ANGELES AND BELINDA LIM VILLEGAS, REPRESENTED BY THEIR ATTORNEY-IN-FACT, JIM GERALD LIM PE, RESPONDENTS

  • G.R. Nos. 233280-92 - PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, PETITIONER, v. HON. SANDIGANBAYAN (SECOND DIVISION) AND FELICIDAD B. ZURBANO, RESPONDENTS

  • G.R. No. 242817 - PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, V. MICHAEL ROXAS Y CAMARILLO, ACCUSED-APPELLANT

  • G.R. No. 239823 - ANGELICA ANZIA FAJARDO, PETITIONER, v. PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, RESPONDENT

  • G.R. No. 220904 - JEBSENS MARITIME, INC. AND HAPAG-LLOYD AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT, PETITIONERS, v. RUPERTO S. PASAMBA, RESPONDENT

  • A.C. No. 12019 - JOSE ANTONIO G. GABUCAN, COMPLAINANT, V. ATTY. FLORENCIO A. NARIDO, JR., RESPONDENT

  • G.R. No. 242213 - PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. ROGER ENERO, ACCUSED-APPELLANT

  • G.R. No. 202851 - FEATI UNIVERSITY, PETITIONER, v. ANTOLIN PANGAN, RESPONDENT

  • G.R. No. 199469 - GERTRUDES D. MEJILA, PETITIONER, v. WRIGLEY PHILIPPINES, INC., JESSELYN P. PANIS, ET AL., RESPONDENTS.; G.R. No. 199505, September 11, 2019 - WRIGLEY PHILIPPINES, INC., PETITIONER, v. GERTRUDES D. MEJILA, RESPONDENT

  • G.R. No. 242413 - THE PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. WENNIE PESPENIAN, ACCUSED-APPELLANT

  • G.R. No. 219673 - SOLID HOMES, INC., PETITIONER, v. SPOUSES ARTEMIO JURADO AND CONSUELO O. JURADO, RESPONDENTS

  • G.R. No. 206795 - FOODBEV INTERNATIONAL AND LUCILA S. DELA CRUZ, PETITIONERS, v. NOLI C. FERRER, JEVER BELARDO, FELIX GALELA, ROMEO SISCAR, MICHAEL BALDESCO, RICO ACADEMIA, EDUARDO DELA CRUZ, RYAN AQUINO, GAUDENCIO PARIO, MARK TRAPAGO, MAIR GOMEZ, NAGKAKAISANG MANGGAGAWA NG FOODBEV INTERNATIONAL, RICHARD EROLES AND BERNADETTE BELARDO, RESPONDENTS

  • G.R. No. 216029 - SHEMBERG CORPORATION, MARKETING PETITIONER, v. CITIBANK, N.A., NEMESIO SOLOMON, EX-OFFICIO SHERIFF AND SHERIFF-IN-CHARGE, RESPONDENTS

  • G.R. No. 242165 - PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. ABUBACAR ABDULWAHAB Y MAMA, ACCUSED-APPELLANT

  • G.R. No. 245391 - PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. NI�A CARAY Y EMMANUEL, ACCUSED-APPELLANT

  • G.R. No. 227934 - JERRY BERING TALAUGON, PETITIONER, v. BSM CREW SERVICE CENTRE PHILS., INC., BERNARD* SCHULTE SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD. AND DANILO MENDOZA, RESPONDENTS

  • A.C. No. 9837 - RANDY N. SEGURA, COMPLAINANT, v. PROSECUTOR MARILOU R. GARACHICO-FABILA, RESPONDENT

  • G.R. No. 234618 - PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, PETITIONER, v. MATEO A. LEE, JR., RESPONDENT

  • G.R. No. 209078 - JOSEPH VILLASANA Y CABAHUG, PETITIONER, v. PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, RESPONDENT

  • G.R. No. 242570 - PHILIPPINE NATIONAL BANK, PETITIONER, v. ELENITA V. ABELLO, MA. ELENA ELIZABETH A. FIDER, JONATHAN V. ABELLO, MANUEL V. ABELLO, JR. AND VINCENT EDWARD V. ABELLO, RESPONDENTS

  • A.M. No. RTJ-11-2281 (Formerly OCA IPI- 10-3372-RTJ) - ATTY. MARSHA B. ESTURAS, COMPLAINANT, v. JUDGE AGAPITO S. LU, REGIONAL TRIAL COURT, BRANCH 88, CAVITE CITY, RESPONDENT

  • G.R. No. 230983 - PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. EDGARDO GARCIA Y ANCHETA, ACCUSED-APPELLANT

  • G.R. No. 217448 - ELENA A. ESTALILLA, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSION ON AUDIT, RESPONDENT

  • G.R. No. 217837 - MR HOLDINGS, INC. AND MARCOPPER MINING CORPORATION, PETITIONERS, v. ROLANDO A. DE JESUS, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS THE OFFICER-IN-CHARGE (OIC)-REGIONAL DIRECTOR, MINES AND GEOSCIENCES - BUREAU (MGB), REGION IV-B (MIMAROPA) AND VICENTE S. PARAGAS, CESO III, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS THE REGIONAL EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, DENR REGION IV-B (MIMAROPA), RESPONDENTS

  • G.R. No. 238892 - SPOUSES AURORA TOJONG SU AND AMADOR SU, PETITIONERS, v. EDA BONTILAO, PABLITA BONTILAO, AND MARICEL DAYANDAYAN, RESPONDENTS

  • G.R. No. 242827 - PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. ROSEMARIE* GABUNADA Y TALISIC, ACCUSED-APPELLANT

  • G.R. No. 233556 - CITY TREASURER OF MANILA, PETITIONER, v. PHILIPPINE BEVERAGE PARTNERS, INC., SUBSTITUTED BY COCA-COLA BOTTLERS PHILIPPINES, RESPONDENT

  • G.R. No. 201396 - YUSHI KONDO, PETITIONER, v. TOYOTA BOSHOKU (PHILS.) CORPORATION, MAMORU MATSUNAGA, KAZUKI MIURA, AND JOSELITO LEDESMA, RESPONDENTS

  • G.R. No. 224039 - DANILO DE VILLA Y GUINTO, PETITIONER, v. PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, RESPONDENT

  • G.R. No. 223562 - PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPINES, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. LEAN NOEL DIZON @ "JINGLE", ACCUSED-APPELLANT

  • G.R. No. 208892 - SPOUSES ANTHONY ROGELIO BERNARDO AND MA. MARTHA BERNARDO, PETITIONERS, v. UNION BANK OF THE PHILIPPINES AND THE HON. COURT OF APPEALS, RESPONDENTS

  • G.R. No. 224936 - PNOC ALTERNATIVE FUELS CORPORATION, PETITIONER, v. NATIONAL GRID CORPORATION OF THE PHILIPPINES, RESPONDENT

  • G.R. No. 243589 - PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. ANDIDATO MAMARINTA AND JACK BATUAN ACCUSED-APPELLANTS

  • G.R. No. 241324 - PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. MARIVIC COHAYCO Y REVIL @ "KAKANG," ACCUSED-APPELLANT

  • G.R. No. 239903 - PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. RONALDO SALENGA Y GONZALES A.K.A. "BAROK," ACCUSED-APPELLANT

  • G.R. No. 243936 - PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. VERNIE ANTONIO Y MABUTI, ACCUSED-APPELLANT

  • G.R. No. 224584 - THE PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. ZZZ, ACCUSED-APPELLANT

  • G.R. No. 242132 - NOR JELAMIN MUSA, IVAN USOP BITO, AND MONSOUR ABDULRAKMAN ABDILLA, PETITIONERS, v. PEOPLE THE OF PHILIPPINES, RESPONDENT

  • G.R. No. 231305 - PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. ALVIN GALISIM Y GARCIA, ACCUSED-APPELLANT

  • G.R. No. 239866 - PAULO JACKSON POLANGCOS Y FRANCISCO, PETITIONER, v. PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, RESPONDENT

  • G.R. No. 206767 - PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. ORLANDO RAMOS ORDIZ, ACCUSED-APPELLANT

  • G.R. No. 203382 - PEDRO S. CUERPO, SALVADOR SIMBULAN AND FERNANDO H. RO�O, PETITIONERS, v. PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES RESPONDENT

  • G.R. No. 237172 - MARIO JOEL T. REYES, PETITIONER, v. PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, RESPONDENT

  • G.R. No. 243386 - PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. HILARIO DE CASTRO Y SANTOS ALIAS "DACOY," ACCUSED-APPELLANT

  • G.R. No 210105 - LAND BANK OF THE PHILIPPINES, PETITIONER, v. MA. AURORA [RITA] DEL ROSARIO AND IRENE DEL ROSARIO, RESPONDENTS

  • G.R. No. 217910 - JESUS NICARDO M. FALCIS, III, PETITIONER, v. CIVIL REGISTRAR GENERAL, RESPONDENT.; LGBTS CHRISTIAN CHURCH, INC., REVEREND CRESENCIO "CEEJAY" AGBAYANI, JR., MARLON FELIPE, AND MARIA ARLYN "SUGAR" IBA�EZ, PETITIONERS-IN-INTERVENTION.; ATTY. FERNANDO P. PERITO, ATTY. RONALDO T. REYES, ATTY. JEREMY I. GATDULA, ATTY. CRISTINA A. MONTES, AND ATTY. RUFINO POLICARPIO III, INTERVENORS-OPPOSITORS

  • G.R. No. 244806 - AMANDO M. TETANGCO, JR., ARMANDO L. SURATOS, JUAN D. ZUNIGA, JR., ANTONIO A. BERNARDO, JR., VICTORIA C. BERCILES, TERESA T. MANGILA, AND MA. CECILIA N. MARTIN, PETITIONERS, v. COMMISSION ON AUDIT, RESPONDENTS

  • A.M. No. MTJ-17-1889 [Formerly OCA IPI No. 16-2822-MTJ] - RE: ANONYMOUS COMPLAINT AGAINST PRESIDING JUDGE ANALIE C. ALDEA-AROCENA, MUNICIPAL TRIAL COURT IN CITIES, BRANCH 1, SAN JOSE CITY, NUEVA ECIJA

  • G.R. No. 230642 - OSCAR B. PIMENTEL, ERROL B. COMAFAY, JR., RENE B. GOROSPE, EDWIN R. SANDOVAL, VICTORIA B. LOANZON, ELGIN MICHAEL C. PEREZ, ARNOLD E. CACHO, AL CONRAD B. ESPALDON, ED VINCENT S. ALBANO, LEIGHTON R. SIAZON, ARIANNE C. ARTUGUE, CLARABEL ANNE R. LACSINA, KRISTINE JANE R. LIU, ALYANNA MARL C. BUENVIAJE, LANA PATRICIA DULA T. NICOLAS, IRENE A. TOLENTINO AND ALTREA I. GRUYAL, PETITIONERS, v. LEGAL EDUCATION BOARD, AS REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRPERSON, HON. EMERSON B. AQUENDE, AND LEB MEMBER HON. ZENAIDA N. ELEPA�O, RESPONDENTS; ATTYS. ANTHONY D. BENGZON, FERDINAND M. NEGRE, MICHAEL Z. UNTALAN; JONATHAN Q. PEREZ, SAMANTHA WESLEY K. ROSALES, ERIKA M. ALFONSO, KRYS VALEN O. MARTINEZ, RYAN CEAZAR P. ROMANO, AND KENNETH C. VARONA, RESPONDENTS-IN-INTERVENTION;APRIL D. CABALLERO, JEREY C. CASTARDO, MC WELLROE P. BRINGAS, RHUFFY D. FEDERE, CONRAD THEODORE A. MATUTINO AND NUMEROUS OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, ST. THOMAS MORE SCHOOL OF LAW AND BUSINESS, INC., REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT RODOLFO C. RAPISTA, FOR HIMSELF AND AS FOUNDER, DEAN AND PROFESSOR, OF THE COLLEGE OF LAW, JUDY MARIE RAPISTA-TAN, LYNNART WALFORD A. TAN, IAN M. ENTERINA, NEIL JOHN VILLARICO AS LAW PROFESSORS AND AS CONCERNED CITIZENS, PETITIONERS-INTERVENORS; G.R. No. 242954 - FRANCIS JOSE LEAN L. ABAYATA,GRETCHENM. VASQUEZ, SHEENAH S. ILUSTRISMO, RALPH LOUIE SALA�O, AIREEN MONICA B. GUZMAN, DELFINO ODIAS, DARYL DELA CRUZ, CLAIRE SUICO, AIVIE S. PESCADERO, NI�A CHRISTINE DELA PAZ, SHEMARK K. QUENIAHAN, AL JAY T. MEJOS, ROCELLYN L. DA�O, MICHAEL ADOLFO, RONALD A. ATIG, LYNNETTE C. LUMAYAG, MARY CHRIS LAGERA, TIMOTHY B. FRANCISCO, SHEILA MARIE C. DANDAN, MADELINE C. DELA PE�A, DARLIN R. VILLAMOR, LORENZANA L. LLORICO, AND JAN IVAN M. SANTAMARIA, PETITIONERS, v. HON. SALVADOR MEDIALDEA, EXECUTIVE SECRETARY, AND LEGAL EDUCATION BOARD, HEREIN REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRPERSON, EMERSON B. AQUENDE, RESPONDENTS

  • G.R. No. 221771 - TERP CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION, PETITIONER, v. BANCO FILIPINO SAVINGS AND MORTGAGE BANK, RESPONDENT

  • G.R. No. 194469 - HUBERT JEFFREY P. WEBB, PETITIONER, v. NBI DIRECTOR MAGTANGGOL B. GATDULA, FORMER NBI DIRECTOR CARLOS S. CAABAY, FORMER NBI DIRECTOR NESTOR M. MANTARING, DR. RENATO C. BAUTISTA, DR. PROSPERO CABANAYAN, ATTY. FLORESTO P. ARIZALA, JR., ATTY. REYNALDO O. ESMERALDA, ATTY. ARTURO FIGUERAS, ATTY. PEDRO RIVERA AND JOHN HERRA, RESPONDENTS

  • G.R. No. 152797 - FIL-ESTATE PROPERTIES, INC., PETITIONER, v. PAULINO REYES, DANILO BAON, PACITA D. VADURIA, JULIE MONTOYA, MERCEDES RAMOS, GERONIMO DERAIN, FELICIANO D. BAON, PACIFICO DERAIN, EUTERIO SEVILLA, MAMERTO B. ESPINELI, CARMELITA GRAVADOS, AVELINO E. PASTOR, ANTONIO BUHAY, TIRZO GULFAN, JR., FELIX SOBREMONTE, ERNESTO SOBREMONTE, BEN PILIIN, PASCUAL V. DISTREZA, JACINTO P. BACALAG, ADELAIDA BAYANI, ELMERT BAYANI, EGLESIA SOBREMONTE, NICASIO TINAUGISAN, VICENTE VILLALUNA, MEYNARDO VILLALUNA, LEOPOLDO DE JOYA, LENIE DE JOYA, LIBERATO DE JOYA, CRESENCIANA DE JOYA, FRESCO CATAPANG, ROSITA CATAPANG, DOMINGO P. LIMBOC, VIRGILIO A. LIMBOC, VICENTE LIMBOC, MARIO H. PERNO, LAZARITO CABRAL, CARLITO CAPACIA, RESPONDENTS. [G.R. No. 189315] PAULINO REYES, DANILO BAON, PACITA D. VADURIA, JULIE MONTOYA, BENIGNO BAON, BEATRIZ DERAIN, MARILOU SEVILLA, MAMERTO B. ESPINELLI, CARMELITA GRANADOS, ANTONIO BUHAY, FELIX SOBREMONTE, NICASIO TINAMISAN, CRESCENCIANA DE JOYA, FRESCO CATAPANG, SONNY CATAPANG, MARIO H. PERNO, CARLITO CAPACIA, AQUILINA BAUTISTA, FELECITO BARCELON, LUIS MANGI, BAYANI ORIONDO, BASILISA DERAIN, GUILLERMO BAUTISTA, BEATRIZ SEVILLA, NICOLAS ASAHAN, ROSITA MERCADO, LAMBERTO BAUTISTA, REXIE DINGLES, JOSE QUIROZ, PETITIONERS, v. FIL-ESTATE PROPERTIES, INC., RESPONDENT. [G.R. No. 200684] NOLITO G. DEL MUNDO, GABRIEL A. MAULLON, MARIA L. TENORIO, NOEL G. DEL MUNDO, RACQUEL DEL MUNDO-REDUCA, TEODORICO D. AGUSTIN, REPRESENTED BY THEIR ATTORNEY-IN-FACT, NOMER G. DEL MUNDO, PETITIONERS, v. THE MANILA SOUTHCOAST DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, INC., RESPONDENT

  • G.R. No. 246679 - GOVERNOR EDGARDO A. TALLADO, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS, NORBERTO B. VILLAMIN, AND SENANDRO M. JALGALADO, RESPONDENTS

  • G.R. No. 246209 - MONICO A. ABOGADO, ROBERTO M. ASIADO, LARRY HUGO, ANGELO SADANG, NONELON BALBONTIN, SALITO LAGROSA, ARZEL BELIDAN, RONALD GRANDIA, TROY LAGROSA, RONEL BADILLA, ARCHIE GARCIANO, REGIDOR ASIADO, ELY LOPEZ, EXPEDITO MAGDAYAO, RENY MAGBANUA, ROMULO CANA, JR., ROGELIO HINGPIT, JONEL HUGO, ROBERT VALDEZ, RIZEN GALVAN, RICARDO NATURAL, SANNY BELIDAN, ROWEL P. EJONA, FELIX ULZON, RAFFY M. ASIADO, PRIMO M. ASIADO, ADRIAN P. ABAYAN, RANDY DACUMOS, DANILO BELONO, ROMEO MALAGUIT, DENNIS BANIA, JASON VILLAMOR, GARY CASTILLOS, ALBERTO SONIO, DOLIE DUSONG, BJ PIRING AND JING MALINAO (COLLECTIVELY KNOWN AS THE "KALAYAAN PALAWAN FARMERS AND FISHERFOLK ASSOCIATION"), NILO LABRADOR, W1LFREDO LABANDELO AND ROLANDO LABANDELO, AND INTEGRATED BAR OF THE PHILIPPINES, PETITIONERS, v. DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY HON. ROY A. CIMATU, DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY HON. EMMANUEL PI�OL, BUREAU OF FISHERIES AND AQUATIC RESOURCES, REPRESENTED BY NATIONAL DIRECTOR HON. EDUARDO B. GONGONA, PHILIPPINE NAVY, REPRESENTED BY FLAG OFFICER IN COMMAND HON. VADM ROBERT EMPEDRAD, PN, PHILIPPINE COAST GUARD, REPRESENTED BY COMMANDANT HON. ADMIRAL ELSON E. HERMOGINO, PCG, PHILIPPINE NATIONAL POLICE, REPRESENTED BY CHIEF HON. PDG. OSCAR ALBAYALDE, PNP MARITIME GROUP, REPRESENTED BY DIRECTOR HON. PCSUPT RODELIO B. JOCSON, AND DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY HON. MENARDO I. GUEVARRA, RESPONDENTS

  • G.R. No. 223140 - PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. ROSEMARIE GARDON-MENTOY, ACCUSED-APPELLANT

  • G.R. No. 243639 - PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. JOSE RASOS, JR. Y PADOLLO @ "JOSE", ACCUSED-APPELLANT

  • G.R. No. 224562 - EXCEL GURRO Y MAGA, PETITIONER, v. PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, RESPONDENT.; G.R. NO. 237216 PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, PLAINTIFF-APPELLE, v. EXCEL GURRO Y MAGA, WENNIE INTING, JJ. IDIAN Y JAMINDANG AND JOEL JAMINDANG Y ZOSA, ACCUSED, WENNIE IDIAN Y JAMINDANG AND EXCEL GURRO Y MAGA. ACCUSED-APPELLANTS

  • A.C. No. 8249 (Formerly CBD Case No. 05-129) - MARCIANO A. SAMBILE AND LERMA M. SAMBILE, COMPLAINANTS, v. ATTY. RENATO A. IGNACIO, RESPONDENT

  • G.R. No. 229046 - PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. NOEL CARDENAS Y HALILI, ACCUSED-APPELLANT

  • G.R. No. 205007 - THE MERCANTILE INSURANCE CO., INC., PETITIONER, v. DMCI-LAING CONSTRUCTION, INC.,� RESPONDENT

  • G.R. No. 204782 - GENUINO AGRO-INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, PETITIONER, v. ARMANDO G. ROMANO, JAY A. CABRERA AND MOISES V. SARMIENTO, RESPONDENTS

  • A.C. No. 12154 - ATTY. ROGELIO N. VELARDE, PETITIONER, v. ATTY. RUBEN M. ILAGAN, RESPONDENT

  • G.R. No. 237871 - MARGARITA FERNANDO, FELIX FERNANDO AND MANUEL FERNANDO, SUBSTITUTED BY HIS LEGAL HEIRS, NAMELY: JOSEFINA FERNANDO ANDAYA AND MARIA CONSOLACION FERNANDO PARASO, PETITIONERS, v. ROSALINDA RAMOS PAGUYO; HEIRS OF LEONARDO RAMOS, NAMELY: EDNA RAMOS DIMLA, ANDREA RAMOS MIRASOL, AND ERMINIA RAMOS SAUL; VIRGILIO RAMOS REPRESENTED BY CHARLIE RAMOS ALZATE; TEODORICO RAMOS; AURORA RAMOS DELA CRUZ; VIRGINIA RAMOS PADILLA; RODOLFO RAMOS; AND ROSITA RAMOS FLORES, RESPONDENTS

  • G.R. No. 241774 - FRANCISCO C. DELGADO,REPRESENTED BY JOSE MARI DELGADO, PETITIONER, v. GQ REALTY DEVELOPMENT CORP., MA. ROSARIO G. MEYER, KARL KURT EDWARD MEYER, AND THE REGISTRY OF DEEDS OF MAKATI CITY, RESPONDENTS

  • G.R. No. 184535 - SISTER PILAR VERSOZA, PETITIONER, v. PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, MICHELINA S. AGUIRRE-OLONDRIZ, PEDRO AGUIRRE, AND DR. MARISSA PASCUAL, RESPONDENTS

  • G.R. No. 205618 - ELFLEDA, ALBERT, NAPOLEON, EDEN, SEVERIANO, CELIA AND LEO, ALL SURNAMED MARCELO, REPRESENTED BY SPOUSES SEVERINO [DECEASED] AND CELIA C. MARCELO, PETITIONERS, v. SAMAHANG MAGSASAKA NG BARANGAY SAN MARIANO, REPRESENTED BY GODOFREDO ERMITA, RESPONDENT

  • G.R. No. 216024 - SPS. ERNESTO V. YU AND ELSIE YU, PETITIONERS, v. EULOGIO A. TOPACIO, JR., RESPONDENT

  • G.R. No. 218107 - PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. JOSE JAMILLO QUILATAN Y DELA CRUZ, ACCUSED-APPELLANT

  • G.R. No. 213893 - NATIONAL POWER CORPORATION AND NATIONAL POWER BOARD, PETITIONERS, v. EMMA Y. BAYSIC AND NARCISA G. SANTIAGO, RESPONDENTS

  • G.R. No. 200102 - THE REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES, PETITIONER, v. ARTHUR TAN MANDA, RESPONDENT

  • G.R. No. 184389 - ALLAN MADRILEJOS, ALLAN HERNANDEZ, GLENDA GIL, AND LISA GOKONGWEI-CHENG, PETITIONERS, v. LOURDES GATDULA, AGNES LOPEZ, HILARION BUBAN, AND THE OFFICE OF THE CITY PROSECUTOR OF MANILA, RESPONDENTS

  • G.R. No. 233200 - PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. CARMELO CARPIO Y TARROZA, ACCUSED-APPELLANT

  • G.R. No. 182842 - PCI LEASING & FINANCE, INC., PETITIONER, v. SPOUSES JAMES D. GUTIERREZ AND CATHERINE R. GUTIERREZ, RESPONDENTS. - G.R. No. 199393, September 4, 2019 - SPOUSES DANTE R. GUTIERREZ AND LOURDES D. GUTIERREZ, DOING BUSINESS UNDER THE NAME AND STYLE OF CAPITOL ALLIED TRADING & TRANSPORT, PETITIONERS, v. PCI LEASING & FINANCE, INC., RESPONDENT.

  • G.R. No. 223712 - PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. VICTOR SUMILIP Y TILLO, ACCUSED-APPELLANT.