Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence


Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 1929 > August 1929 Decisions > G.R. No. 31070 August 8, 1929 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. CHARLES E. T. WADE

053 Phil 292:




PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

FIRST DIVISION

[G.R. No. 31070. August 8, 1929.]

THE PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINE ISLANDS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CHARLES E. T. WADE, Defendant-Appellant.

Thos. G. Ingalls and Emigdio L. Achacoso for Appellant.

Attorney-General Jaranilla for Appellee.

SYLLABUS


1. CRIMINAL LAW; HOMICIDE; SELF-DEFENSE NOT PROVED. — Upon a review of the proof in this case a conviction for homicide was sustained and the penalty placed in the medium degree of reclusion temporal, it appearing that the homicide, admittedly perpetrated by the accused, was not done in self-defense, as claimed by him, and notwithstanding the fact that the circumstances suggested that the mind of the accused may have been in some degree fired by wine imbibed by him shortly prior to the killing.


D E C I S I O N


STREET, J.:


This appeal has been brought to reverse a judgment of the Court of First Instance of the Province of Lanao, finding the appellant, Charles E. T. Wade, guilty of the offense of homicide and sentencing him to undergo imprisonment for fourteen years and one day, cadena temporal, and requiring him to indemnify the heirs of the deceased in the amount of P1,000, and to pay the costs.

It appears that in the afternoon of April 3, 1928, several persons, residents of Momungan, Province of Lanao, were collected together in a drinking place maintained by one Ariston Tijero in the poblacion of said municipality. Most of these individuals were persons of American citizenship, consisting of white men and persons of African descent. The Accused in this case, Charles E. T. Wade, colored, came to the place in an automobile, accompanied by Peter Martisen and two Moros. Among those present in the store were Edgar C. Choate, the deceased, Jere Barbour, and C. C. Andrews, all white men.

While the persons mentioned were seated at a table, drinks were passed around upon the order of Wade, though he himself did not imbibe. Hilarity then resulted, and some of those present engaged in dancing. In the course of these activities Choate punched one of Wade’s Moros, at which Wade took offense. Choate apologized, and those present, except Wade, thought no more of the incident. After a half hour or such a matter Wade got up and went out, and a few moments later he was followed by Choate, inquiring for one Smith. As Choate passed out of the door of the tienda, he lighted a cigarette, and when outside was confronted by Wade, who turned, drew his revolver and fired at Choate, inflicting a fatal wound in the breast or abdomen. Wade again proceeded to pull the trigger of the revolver, but seeing that the first shot had sufficiently taken effect, he turned and left. Choate staggered a moment and fell over dead, or dying soon after. A lieutenant of the Constabulary, one B. J. Tumilde, who arrived upon the scene in a few moments, found Choate lying 1� meters from the door. Though already dead Choate still held between the fingers of the right hand a cigarette and in the other hand a match. The scene of the tragedy was visible to Jere Barbour, who was inside the tienda at the time of the shooting but was so placed that he could see what was going on immediately in front of the door. Teodulo Janaw, an employee in the house of Barbour, says that he happened to be on the street and saw Wade come out and stop near the door of the tienda. He also saw Choate come out of the same door; and as he lighted his cigarette Wade drew his revolver, pointed at Choate and fired.

Andrews testified that after the shot was fired he followed Wade and took his revolver. Andrews says that he suggested to Wade that he go back and ask Choate’s pardon. But Wade answered, "What is done is done; all is ended." Andrews then asked Wade why he killed Choate and replied, "He is bigger than I am; he darted at me and struck me, and I used my weapon."cralaw virtua1aw library

In a statement (Exhibit C) signed by Wade on April 4, 1928, he made this statement:jgc:chanrobles.com.ph

"That when I was going out of the door, Choate followed me and gave me a punch at the back and still followed me to the road;

"That when he did follow me I turned around, pulled my revolver from its holster, cocked and pointed it to him;

"That he made a rush at me so I fired, altho I did not think of doing it."cralaw virtua1aw library

At the trial of the case Wade introduced evidence tending to show that the shot was accidental. To establish this fact, he introduced one Taylor, who lived only a short distance from Tijero’s tienda where the shooting occurred. Taylor says that he saw the shooting and that it occurred apparently accidentally, while Wade and Choate were fumbling or struggling over the pistol between them. The testimony of Wade himself also tended to show that the shooting took place accidentally while he and Choate were scuffling over the revolver.

We entertain no doubt that the pretense that the shooting was accidental was an afterthought. No suggestion to this effect was made by the accused at the time the shooting occurred, nor in his written statement the next day. Neither did Wade make this contention clearly before Governor Heffington later. The trial judge rejected the testimony of the defense on this point as incredible, and we think he was justified in so doing.

The offense committed was homicide, punishable under article 404 of the Penal Code. It is not proved, nor does Wade contend that he was drunk, though the circumstances of the killing suggest the probability that his mind might have been fired in some degree by wine.

The penalty appropriate to the offense is that of imprisonment for fourteen years, eight months and one day, reclusion temporal, with the penalties accessory to said penalty.

It is being understood, therefore, that the period of imprisonment imposed by the trial judge is raised from fourteen years and one day to fourteen years, eight months and one day, reclusion temporal, with appropriate accessories, the judgment is affirmed, with costs against the appellant. So ordered.

Avanceña, C.J., Johnson, Villamor, Johns, Romualdez and Villa-Real, JJ., concur.




Back to Home | Back to Main




















chanrobles.com





ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com






August-1929 Jurisprudence                 

  • G.R. No. 31342 August 3, 1929 - VICENTE ONG CHIONGCHI v. COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE OF ORIENTAL NEGROS

    053 Phil 264

  • G.R. No. 30532 August 5, 1929 - GODOFREDO MENDOZA v. TEODORO MENDIOLA ET AL.

    053 Phil 267

  • G.R. No. 31251 August 6, 1929 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. MAGUIA DE TAGA

    053 Phil 273

  • G.R. No. 31255 August 7, 1929 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ISAIAS GEYROSAGA

    053 Phil 278

  • G.R. No. 30724 August 8, 1929 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. MARIANO DUCUSIN

    053 Phil 280

  • G.R. No. 31070 August 8, 1929 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. CHARLES E. T. WADE

    053 Phil 292

  • G.R. Nos. 30486 & 30487 August 9, 1929 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. LUIS MAALIHAN

    053 Phil 295

  • G.R. No. 31814 August 9, 1929 - FELIX ARAMBULO v. THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE OF LAGUNA ET AL.,

    053 Phil 302

  • G.R. No. 29412 August 10, 1929 - VICTORIANO OMBALINO v. FELIPA SALDARIAGA ET AL.

    053 Phil 306

  • G.R. No. 30840 August 10, 1929 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. DANIEL RIVERA

    053 Phil 308

  • G.R. No. 30427 August 12, 1929 - HARRY MARTIN v. AGUSAN COCONUT CO.

    053 Phil 311

  • G.R. No. 30686 August 12, 1929 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. JUAN MONTES ET AL.

    053 Phil 323

  • G.R. No. 31075 August 12, 1929 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. TELESFORO APIADO

    053 Phil 325

  • G.R. No. 31680 August 14, 1929 - DIONISIO SAN PABLO v. FRANCISCO ENAGE

    053 Phil 328

  • G.R. No. 30366 August 15, 1929 - SOCORRO SANCHEZ DE STRONG v. WILLIAM BEISHIR

    053 Phil 331

  • G.R. No. 31025 August 15, 1929 - FRANCISCO GUTIERREZ ET AL. v. JUAN CARPIO

    053 Phil 334

  • G.R. No. 30745 August 20, 1929 - J. V. HOUSE v. JUAN POSADAS

    053 Phil 338

  • G.R. No. 31024 August 22, 1929 - RICARDO DE MESA v. COLLECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE

    053 Phil 342

  • G.R. No. 29780 August 23, 1929 - GOV’T. OF THE PHIL. v. ASIA LUMBER CO.

    053 Phil 346

  • G.R. No. 30234 August 23, 1929 - CLARO VILLAROSA ET AL. v. ULDARICO VILLAMOR

    053 Phil 350

  • G.R. No. 30240 August 23, 1929 - AQUILINA TACAS ET AL. v. EVARISTO TOBON

    053 Phil 356

  • G.R. No. 31101 August 23, 1929 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. PEDRO DURANTE

    053 Phil 363

  • G.R. No. 30495 August 24, 1929 - ERLANGER & GALINGER v. JUAN POSADAS

    053 Phil 372

  • G.R. No. 30279 August 26, 1929 - MAXIMO GUILLENA v. CANDELARIO BORJA

    053 Phil 379

  • G.R. No. 31273 August 26, 1929 - CORNELIO ALBA v. FORTUNATO ACUÑA ET AL.,

    053 Phil 380

  • G.R. No. 31636 August 26, 1929 - SATURNINO GALLARDO v. ELIAS ALDANA

    053 Phil 388

  • G.R. No. 30783 August 27, 1929 - JUAN B. ALEGRE v. INSULAR COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS

    053 Phil 394

  • G.R. No. 31123 August 27, 1929 - PHIL. GUARANTY CO. v. CARMEN BELANDO

    053 Phil 410

  • G.R. No. 30421 August 28, 1929 - GOV’T. OF THE PHIL. v. AGUSTIN JAVIER

    053 Phil 415

  • G.R. No. 30668 August 28, 1929 - SABAS BUSTAMANTE ET AL. v. JOSE M. RATO Y TUASON ET AL.

    053 Phil 418

  • G.R. No. 30829 August 28, 1929 - GOV’T. OF THE PHIL. v. COLEGIO DE SAN JOSE ET AL.

    053 Phil 423

  • G.R. No. 31120 August 28, 1929 - JESUSA LACSON DE ARROYO v. VISAYAN GENERAL SUPPLY CO.

    053 Phil 432

  • G.R. No. 31137 August 30, 1929 - CING HONG SO v. TAN BOON KONG ET AL.

    053 Phil 437

  • G.R. No. 30246 August 31, 1929 - AGRIPINO DE OCAMPO ET AL. v. JUAN ZAPORTEZA ET AL.

    053 Phil 442