Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence


Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 1929 > August 1929 Decisions > G.R. No. 30840 August 10, 1929 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. DANIEL RIVERA

053 Phil 308:




PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

FIRST DIVISION

[G.R. No. 30840. August 10, 1929.]

THE PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINE ISLANDS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. DANIEL RIVERA, Defendant-Appellant.

C. B. Jamora for Appellant.

Attorney-General Jaranilla for Appellee.

SYLLABUS


1. CRIMINAL LAW; HOMICIDE; SUFFICIENCY OF PROOF. — The dying declaration of the deceased in this case, in connection with other proof, is held sufficient to support a conviction for the crime of homicide.


D E C I S I O N


STREET, J.:


This appeal has been brought to reverse a judgment of the Court of First Instance of the Province of Camarines Sur, finding the appellant, Daniel Rivera, guilty of the offense of homicide and sentencing him to undergo imprisonment for seventeen years, four months and one day, reclusion temporal, with the accessory penalties prescribed by law, and requiring him to indemnify the heirs of the deceased, one Pedro Namoro, in the amount of P1,000, as well as to pay the costs of prosecution.

In the late afternoon of June 10, 1928, Pedro Namoro, resident of the municipality of Calabanga, Province of Camarines Sur, was riding a carabao along in that municipality, while the animal was drawing a sled laden with bananas and sweet potatoes. His wife, Juana, and a daughter were proceeding afoot along the road about 100 meters ahead. As they went along the voice of Pedro was heard in song, but when they reached the place called Binauanan, they ceased to hear the voice of Pedro and, after waiting a moment for him to catch up, without result, they retraced their steps a short distance and found Pedro lying on the ground groaning with pain. Juana asked him what had happened and he replied that Daniel, the Tagalog, had struck him on the neck. She knelt beside him and attempted to raise his head, but the injured man told her not to move him because he felt he was dying. In a few moments a stranger appeared and Juana asked his assistance in removing Pedro, but the man excused himself pretending to be in a hurry, and directed her to repair to a house nearby, belonging to Santiago Aquine. The ungenerous stranger thereupon departed, and Juana obtained help from Aquine. Upon the arrival of the latter upon the scene the injured man told him not to move him as he felt he was dying. Aquine then asked what had happened and Pedro replied that Daniel, the Tagalog, had struck him, as a result of which he had fallen from the carabao. The injured man was presently removed to the house of Aquine but was no longer able to speak and died around midnight of the following day, June 11, 1928.

The appellant in this case is identified as the person to whom Pedro referred as Daniel, the Tagalog; and that he is the individual who committed the homicide is fully established by proof additional to the dying declaration of the deceased. Thus, the witness Tomas Cuevas testified that between 6 and 7 o’clock on the evening in question he was on the road near the spot where the assault was committed, and that he there saw a man on a carabao coming towards him. At this moment Daniel Rivera struck said person on the neck, as a result of which the latter fell from the carabao. This witness stated that he was so scared that he fled from the spot immediately and saw nothing more of the incident.

The witness Martin Malate testified that while he was walking towards Calabanga between 6 and 7 o’clock on the night in question, and near the place where the homicide was committed, he met Daniel Rivera running towards him from the opposite direction. As Rivera approached he almost fell and dropped something, whereupon the witness lighted a match and recognized the individual as this defendant. After the accused left the witness picked up the object which the defendant had dropped and it proved to be a cane. The same cane is identified as one that was in the hands of the appellant at 5 o’clock in the afternoon of the day when the homicide occurred. It is also shown that at this time the appellant was looking for the deceased and appeared angry and excited. According to the testimony of the physician who examined the body of the deceased, death resulted from a dislocation of the cervical vertebrae in the neck of the deceased, caused by a blow.

The testimony, in our opinion, leaves no reason to doubt that the appellant is the guilty agent and that the crime was committed by striking the deceased on the neck with the cane mentioned. The proof for the defense suggests that the death of the deceased resulted from his fall from the carabao and that the fatal wound was caused by his neck striking the sled.

As the proof does not reveal the exact manner in which the assault was committed, nor the antecedents of the crime, it would be unsafe to assert that by aggravating circumstance, such as treachery or premeditation, was present. The case is therefore one of simple homicide; and in accordance with the recommendation of the Attorney-General, the penalty imposed by the trial judge must be reduced to fourteen years, eight months and one day, reclusion temporal, with the appropriate accessory penalties.

It being understood, therefore, that the period of imprisonment is so modified, the judgment is affirmed, with costs against the Appellant.

Avanceña, C.J., Johnson, Villamor, Johns, Romualdez and Villa-Real, JJ., concur.




Back to Home | Back to Main




















chanrobles.com





ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com






August-1929 Jurisprudence                 

  • G.R. No. 31342 August 3, 1929 - VICENTE ONG CHIONGCHI v. COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE OF ORIENTAL NEGROS

    053 Phil 264

  • G.R. No. 30532 August 5, 1929 - GODOFREDO MENDOZA v. TEODORO MENDIOLA ET AL.

    053 Phil 267

  • G.R. No. 31251 August 6, 1929 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. MAGUIA DE TAGA

    053 Phil 273

  • G.R. No. 31255 August 7, 1929 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ISAIAS GEYROSAGA

    053 Phil 278

  • G.R. No. 30724 August 8, 1929 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. MARIANO DUCUSIN

    053 Phil 280

  • G.R. No. 31070 August 8, 1929 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. CHARLES E. T. WADE

    053 Phil 292

  • G.R. Nos. 30486 & 30487 August 9, 1929 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. LUIS MAALIHAN

    053 Phil 295

  • G.R. No. 31814 August 9, 1929 - FELIX ARAMBULO v. THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE OF LAGUNA ET AL.,

    053 Phil 302

  • G.R. No. 29412 August 10, 1929 - VICTORIANO OMBALINO v. FELIPA SALDARIAGA ET AL.

    053 Phil 306

  • G.R. No. 30840 August 10, 1929 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. DANIEL RIVERA

    053 Phil 308

  • G.R. No. 30427 August 12, 1929 - HARRY MARTIN v. AGUSAN COCONUT CO.

    053 Phil 311

  • G.R. No. 30686 August 12, 1929 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. JUAN MONTES ET AL.

    053 Phil 323

  • G.R. No. 31075 August 12, 1929 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. TELESFORO APIADO

    053 Phil 325

  • G.R. No. 31680 August 14, 1929 - DIONISIO SAN PABLO v. FRANCISCO ENAGE

    053 Phil 328

  • G.R. No. 30366 August 15, 1929 - SOCORRO SANCHEZ DE STRONG v. WILLIAM BEISHIR

    053 Phil 331

  • G.R. No. 31025 August 15, 1929 - FRANCISCO GUTIERREZ ET AL. v. JUAN CARPIO

    053 Phil 334

  • G.R. No. 30745 August 20, 1929 - J. V. HOUSE v. JUAN POSADAS

    053 Phil 338

  • G.R. No. 31024 August 22, 1929 - RICARDO DE MESA v. COLLECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE

    053 Phil 342

  • G.R. No. 29780 August 23, 1929 - GOV’T. OF THE PHIL. v. ASIA LUMBER CO.

    053 Phil 346

  • G.R. No. 30234 August 23, 1929 - CLARO VILLAROSA ET AL. v. ULDARICO VILLAMOR

    053 Phil 350

  • G.R. No. 30240 August 23, 1929 - AQUILINA TACAS ET AL. v. EVARISTO TOBON

    053 Phil 356

  • G.R. No. 31101 August 23, 1929 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. PEDRO DURANTE

    053 Phil 363

  • G.R. No. 30495 August 24, 1929 - ERLANGER & GALINGER v. JUAN POSADAS

    053 Phil 372

  • G.R. No. 30279 August 26, 1929 - MAXIMO GUILLENA v. CANDELARIO BORJA

    053 Phil 379

  • G.R. No. 31273 August 26, 1929 - CORNELIO ALBA v. FORTUNATO ACUÑA ET AL.,

    053 Phil 380

  • G.R. No. 31636 August 26, 1929 - SATURNINO GALLARDO v. ELIAS ALDANA

    053 Phil 388

  • G.R. No. 30783 August 27, 1929 - JUAN B. ALEGRE v. INSULAR COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS

    053 Phil 394

  • G.R. No. 31123 August 27, 1929 - PHIL. GUARANTY CO. v. CARMEN BELANDO

    053 Phil 410

  • G.R. No. 30421 August 28, 1929 - GOV’T. OF THE PHIL. v. AGUSTIN JAVIER

    053 Phil 415

  • G.R. No. 30668 August 28, 1929 - SABAS BUSTAMANTE ET AL. v. JOSE M. RATO Y TUASON ET AL.

    053 Phil 418

  • G.R. No. 30829 August 28, 1929 - GOV’T. OF THE PHIL. v. COLEGIO DE SAN JOSE ET AL.

    053 Phil 423

  • G.R. No. 31120 August 28, 1929 - JESUSA LACSON DE ARROYO v. VISAYAN GENERAL SUPPLY CO.

    053 Phil 432

  • G.R. No. 31137 August 30, 1929 - CING HONG SO v. TAN BOON KONG ET AL.

    053 Phil 437

  • G.R. No. 30246 August 31, 1929 - AGRIPINO DE OCAMPO ET AL. v. JUAN ZAPORTEZA ET AL.

    053 Phil 442